100%

Scanned image of the page. Keyboard directions: use + to zoom in, - to zoom out, arrow keys to pan inside the viewer.

Page Options

Download this Issue

Share

Something wrong?

Something wrong with this page? Report problem.

Rights / Permissions

This collection, digitized in collaboration with the Michigan Daily and the Board for Student Publications, contains materials that are protected by copyright law. Access to these materials is provided for non-profit educational and research purposes. If you use an item from this collection, it is your responsibility to consider the work's copyright status and obtain any required permission.

March 26, 2020 - Image 3

Resource type:
Text
Publication:
The Michigan Daily

Disclaimer: Computer generated plain text may have errors. Read more about this.

El-Sayed also viewed the current

pandemic and its implications for

Medicare for All through a political

lens, discussing the implications the

COVID-19 virus may have on the

passing of favorable legislation in the

future.

“We’re talking about a mass

trauma that we are all experiencing

right now, and that’s terrible,”

El-Sayed said. “But every time

someone has to go bankrupt for their

cancer care, every time someone

who gets really sick can’t see a

doctor — that’s a mini tragedy on

its own. And even though it’s not

collectively experienced, let’s not

undersell the cost that that has on

those individuals and the fact that

it’s happening to 10 percent of our

population or 42 percent of people

who have cancer.”

El-Sayed
emphasized
the

importance of preventative care

over reactive care, stating the ways

in which it would cut costs overall.

“One of the most important

aspects of Medicare for All is that

it streamlines the incentive set to

prevent disease, which reduces

health care costs over the long-

term,” El-Sayed said. “And because

it’s the government, the only real

intended outcome is, rather than

making money off the system,

to promote the well-being of the

population.”

El-Sayed explained the way in

which American insurance and

medical systems currently work.

“One of these things we’ve seen in

this system is this crazy amount of

consolidation on either side,” he said.

“The biggest hospital groups or the

biggest payers are able to negotiate

to consolidate the market around

themselves, in effect creating local

oligopolies or even monopolies.”

El-Sayed further critiqued the

American
health
care
system’s

current
market
structure.
He

explained the ways in which it does

not display the traits of the free

market championed by members of

the American public and critics of a

single-payer healthcare system.

“The problem with American

health care, and health care in

general, is that you don’t actually

know what you want,” El-Sayed

said. “You have a deep information

asymmetry. I walk in, and I know

I’m sick and I know I want the

sickness to go away, but I don’t know

what I need to make the sickness go

away.”

During this discussion, Rackham

student Rebecca Copeland asked

El-Sayed about the implementation

of a sweeping policy like Medicare

for All.

“Something that I think a lot

about when I think about Medicare

for All is how a lot of the services

and general operation of a program

like this would be contracted out to

private contractors because that’s

how most of the (Affordable Care

Act) implementation is happening,”

Copeland said. “I was wondering

what your thoughts were on that

and how you see something like this

being implemented.”

Gov.
Gretchen
Whitmer

declared a state of emergency

on March 10 after the first cases

were detected in Michigan.

Whitmer
has
since
banned

gatherings of more than 50

people, closed all schools and

public spaces and restricted

hospital visits. Whitmer also

put a shelter-in-place order into

effect beginning March 24.

Other
states,
including

California,
New
York
and

Illinois,
have
also
issued

similar orders. With Americans

unable to leave their homes —

unless in cases of emergency

— campaigns have been forced

to shut down campaign rallies,

face-to-face town halls and

canvassing events.

“This
was
in
nobody’s

playbook,” Hughes said. “It kind

of took everyone by surprise. It

required
some
maneuvering,

and I’m really proud of our team

in being able to pick up where

we left off.”

Both Sanders’s and former

Vice
President
Joe
Biden’s

presidential
campaigns
have

mandated that staffers work

remotely.
Field-organizers

will continue campaigning via

digital platforms such as phone

banking and mobile updates.

Both
candidates
have
also

shifted to conducting “virtual”

town halls and broadcasting

their speeches remotely.

Biden has switched all of his

efforts to online campaigning,

recently holding a virtual town

hall in Illinois that was stopped

fifteen minutes into questions

due to technical difficulties. He

has also held a virtual fundraiser

and plans to continue virtually

campaigning amid the COVID-

19 outbreak.

Andrew
Schaeffler,
LSA

freshman
and
co-founder

of Students for Biden at the

University, said the campus

organization plans to readjust

its efforts to support Biden by

working remotely and focusing

on virtual campaigning.

“We can’t have a presence on

campus, but that doesn’t mean

that we’re not doing everything

we
can,”
Schaeffler
said.

“There’s still virtual campaign

events that are happening, that

our members are participating

in. And (this crisis) just goes

to
show
that
when
you’re

dealing with these problems

as president, you don’t want

someone that needs on-the-job

training. And I think that for

many voters, that will be the

deciding factor.”

President Donald Trump has

also had to adjust his campaign

due
to
the
outbreaks.
He

recently postponed or canceled

events in Colorado, Nevada and

Wisconsin. Trump has also

called for all of his campaign

staffers to begin working from

home and has canceled all

in-person rallies and events

until further notice.

Students for Trump did not

respond to The Daily’s request

for comment.

Down-ballot campaigns have

also had to scramble to find

alternative ways of engaging

voters that do not jeopardize

an individual’s health or safety.

Some have halted campaigning

entirely for the time being

while some have switched to

more
virtual
outreach
and

campaigning.

U.S. Rep. Debbie Dingell,

D-Mich.,
who
is
up
for

re-election
in
November
in

Michigan’s 12th Congressional

District, spoke to The Daily

about
halting
her
current

campaign efforts for the time

being to focus on serving her

constituents to the best of her

ability.

“I don’t think (campaigning)

is a priority,” Dingell said.

“I’ll have to figure it out down

the road. But now, I’m not up

there saying, ‘vote for me.’ I

don’t think it’s appropriate to

ask people to vote for you right

now. I’ve been very focused on

making sure everyone’s okay.

What are we going to do to

make sure that people are safe?

My campaign will come back

up again in a few weeks. My

job is to represent the people of

my district, to make sure I can

do everything I can to fight for

them.”

Solomon
Rajput,
Dingell’s

opponent in the Democratic

primary, has moved all of his

campaign operations online and

ordered his staff and volunteers

to work remotely from home.

Rajput spoke to The Daily about

the
importance
of
keeping

voters engaged by helping to

put to the forefront what issues

voters care about most.

“You know, this isn’t just a

regular campaign,” Rajput said.

“We do need to make sure that

we are doing what we can to

improve people’s lives during

this crisis. (We are) able to

really focus in and rally around

(the issues) people will be facing

during this crisis and are trying

to help people through that and

let people know that we’re here

to champion their issues … I

think it’s important for people to

demonstrate their commitment

to materially improving the

lives of Americans.”

Marianne
Drysdale,
LSA

senior, is working to re-elect

Sen.
Gary
Peters,
D-Mich.,

who is up for re-election in the

fall She serves as co-president

for Students for Gary Peters,

a student group that is not

directly affiliated with Peter’s

campaign but has still focused

its energy on supporting his

candidacy.

She
said
in-person

interactions play an important

role in campaigning.

“Things have really, really,

really
changed,
because
in

organizing the most effective

way to transition a conversation

into a vote is through in-person

interaction,”
Drysdale
said.

“And for us, campaigning now

is probably going to be mostly

using
our
personal
digital

networks and reaching out to

other people that we know to

use their digital networks. So

it’s a completely different kind

of strategy.”

As campaigns have struggled

to adjust to life amid the

coronavirus,
the
general

election itself could also be

affected.
States
across
the

country have already begun

to
postpone
their
primary

elections set to take place in

March or April to later in the

summer.

“No one really can predict

what the world will look like

in November,” Drysdale said.

“Because there’s scenario A,

which is people aren’t worried

about (the election). People

are more worried about their

dire economic circumstances

or about exiting the house. Or

scenario B is that people are

really frustrated with the status

quo of our federal leadership or

people are feeling all the more

empowered to be keeping up

with the news … I don’t think

that anybody really has the

capacity to be able to predict

exactly what’s going to happen.”

Rajput
also
noted
the

uncertainty.

“We can’t even see two weeks

out right now,” Rajput said.

“Everyone’s just taking this

day by day … I think what is

paramount to our country and

also thousands of individuals

is to ensure that everyone is as

healthy as possible.”

Reporter Julia Forrest can be

reached at juforres@umich.edu.

“I believe that students should

have the option to either have

them refunded or carry over

into the next year,” Richardson

said. “Because then you’ll have

seniors who aren’t going to use

them anytime soon and already

paid for this. If you don’t get it

back, that’s just the University

taking money.”

Richardson
also
said
her

primary concern with MDining

was about her leftover Blue

Bucks and Dining Dollars.

“My main problem when it

was time to leave was that I had

a bunch of Dining Dollars and

Blue Bucks leftover,” Richardson

said.

While
Blue
Bucks
are

refundable and automatically

transfer from year to year,

MDining is still evaluating its

options in regard to Dining

Dollars.

Students who had optional

meal plans should expect to

hear from MDining about their

individual
circumstances,
as

each case will be evaluated for a

refund.

LSA sophomore Alec Bayoneto

lives off-campus but has the 55

Block optional meal plan. This

plan costs $1,432 for the fall

and winter semesters, and when

Bayoneto left campus, he said

he had 17 unused meal swipes

left. As of Wednesday, Bayoneto

said he has not received any

emails from MDining regarding

a refund for his optional meal

plan.

“I
know
that
we’re
all

struggling right now to handle

everything,” Bayoneto said. “If

they reimburse us, that would

be one less thing to worry about

right now with readjusting to the

way things are with everything

that’s going on. For plans like

mine, you can see how many

swipes you would’ve had left.

It’s about $12 a meal, so they can

just easily total that up and give

you back an exact amount.”

LSA
freshman
Dominic

Colletti
also
lived
in
East

Quad. Colletti said he was

glad University Housing was

reimbursing
students
but

questioned the logic behind the

amount they were offering. He

speculated the prorate for the

room alone would be close to

$1,200 at the cheapest rate and

said many students are not on

the cheapest rate for room and

board.

“I think there’s absolutely no

reason not to prorate. It’s a little

trickier because, with housing,

everyone’s already signed their

contract and already paid with

dining,” Colletti said. “It gets

a little trickier with students

who
have
off-campus
meal

plans because a lot of them

have used a lot of their meals

… I can foresee that being more

complicated, but unlimited meal

plans should be just prorated

plain and simple. Divide the rate

by however much time is left in

the contract.”

Students who are staying in

the dorms should not expect any

change in the price of their meal

plans. According to Mangan,

changing the meals from dine-

in service to take-out boxes does

not interfere with their ability

to provide meals during the

week and on the weekends.

“Michigan Dining continues

to provide breakfast, lunch and

dinner every day with brunch

and dinner being provided on

Saturday and Sunday so there

will be no change in meal

prices,” Mangan wrote.

Richardson said even though

everyone is working to adjust to

extreme new changes, she thinks

University services still need to

be accountable to students.

“I understand that a lot of

departments in the University

are
scrambling
to
figure

out what to do and we’re all

struggling,
but
that
doesn’t

take away from that fact that

there’s still a program that has

a responsibility to provide for

the students,” Richardson said.

“So when they can’t provide

meals anymore, we should be

compensated in some way.”

Reporter Jasmin Lee can be

reached at itsshlee@umich.edu.

Thursday, March 26, 2020 — 3
News
The Michigan Daily — michigandaily.com

CAMPAIGNS
From Page 1

MDINING
From Page 1

Read more at
MichiganDaily.com

POLICY
From Page 2

Back to Top

© 2024 Regents of the University of Michigan