100%

Scanned image of the page. Keyboard directions: use + to zoom in, - to zoom out, arrow keys to pan inside the viewer.

Page Options

Download this Issue

Share

Something wrong?

Something wrong with this page? Report problem.

Rights / Permissions

This collection, digitized in collaboration with the Michigan Daily and the Board for Student Publications, contains materials that are protected by copyright law. Access to these materials is provided for non-profit educational and research purposes. If you use an item from this collection, it is your responsibility to consider the work's copyright status and obtain any required permission.

February 01, 2017 - Image 13

Resource type:
Text
Publication:
The Michigan Daily

Disclaimer: Computer generated plain text may have errors. Read more about this.

Wednesday, February 1, 2017 // The Statement
6B

PHOTO BY CAROLYN GEARIG

DETROIT
From Page 5B

portly gentleman with white pants, smooth

black leather shoes, some kind of political

T-shirt, black square-framed sunglasses, and a

charcoal grey fedora with a yellow-red feather.

“How’s it going, brother?” The words sound

like those of a honeyed baritone jazz singer. Each

vowel is a deep bellow that vibrates my ear lobes.

“Well, man. Just in town checking stuff out.”

I have no idea what to talk about but I want to

hear more.

“Nice. Nice. You ever hear about our stuff

before?”

I admit I hadn’t. It’s all handmade leather

goods, that much is apparent, but virtually

everything in the store is also for sale, including

the teepee.

“We were actually way underselling these

chairs,” he said, pointing to what I thought were

just for customers to rest on. “They’re actually

worth about $10,000.”

It turns out that nothing in the store is actu-

ally from Detroit, but instead shipped from the

parent company in Oregon. Not even the uphol-

stery, teepee or random mining equipment are

native to Detroit. Every last object in the store

is scavenged in Oregon, stored in a warehouse

and then distributed to outlet stores. It’s a very

determined system. Does selling out-of-town

wares — as opposed to local crafts — make Will’s

any less legitimate as a business in Detroit or

its conscience less an authentic part of the city?

Why should this place force-fit an image of soli-

darity with the community if it’s just trying to

be a business? Maybe it’s more honest just to

sell what they want and not a façade to comfort

people like me.

“I knew Detroit as a kid when it had the best

retail store in the state: Hudson’s,” my dad said.

“When it had the best hobby shop for model

trains. When the Tigers won the American

League pennant in 1968, and I rode the bus down

Michigan Avenue with my grandfather to Tiger

Stadium.”

He continued: “But I didn’t know Black peo-

ple. My mother taught Black students in Dear-

born Heights, and my father worked with Black

workers in the Ford Rouge Assembly plant.

There was tension at my dinner table about race

because my father would make racist comments

about his Black co-workers. My mother would

stop him. It was hard for me to make sense of it.

I grew up in a white town whose trash cans said,

‘Keep Dearborn Clean,’ and people often inter-

preted that as ‘keep Black people out.’

It’s uncomfortable, the feeling you get in your

gut when you hear about family bigotry. How can

I judge the character of my grandfather, whom

I’ve never met? My grandmother described him

as “the kindest man that ever lived,” but how do I

reconcile these two polarizing narratives?

Needless to say that task was not as hard as

that of my dad’s, who had to reconcile bigotry

in a parent. It came as no surprise to me when I

heard that he hosted a classical music program

on the Wayne State University radio station

WDET in 1974 during his undergraduate career

at the University of Michigan. On Saturdays he

would drive from campus to Detroit for the 8

p.m. broadcast.

“After the one-hour show ended at 9 p.m., I

drove down Woodward Avenue to Eight Mile,

then west to Livernois where Baker’s Keyboard

Lounge is located,” he said. “I sat at the bar so

that I didn’t have to pay the cover charge, and

forced myself to learn to drink beer so I could sit

there and listen to Art Blakey, Elvin Jones, Sonny

Stitt and more. There were regulars at the bar,

particularly two middle-aged Black guys named

Skeets and Walter. Those two knew all the

musicians. … Black and white people got along,

listening to the beauty of jazz played by master

musicians. It’s an ancillary aspect of the music

that always impressed me deeply.”

His volunteering and forced appreciation

for beer was of course willful, pedagogical and

enjoyable, but was also threaded with a sense of

duty. If each generation should attempt to cor-

rect the transgressions of its predecessors in the

name of progress, this was a noble example. I am

half the product of someone who was the prod-

uct of Dearborn, which is a product of Detroit,

who moved to Ann Arbor — itself the product

of Detroit — and created the foundations for my

life. I am the latest iteration of this series of rela-

tionships. My bigoted, loving grandfather’s job in

the auto industry, the college education he pro-

vided his son and trashcans that signaled racial

exclusion are, for better or worse, what I stand

upon. Should my actions therefore not contain a

similar thread of duty to continue the mindful-

ness my father set as a precedent? Is it not my job

to continue to understand my own narrative as

it relates to this city, particularly if I’m trying to

say that I love it?

I made a mistake in trying to capture the

essence of this city in two days. The narratives

of Detroit are as numerous as the streets that

extend from Campus Martius Park. Woodward

Avenue tells a story of the power of gentrification

and its complicated benefits; Grand River Ave-

nue portends the future of a Black community as

it sits poised on the brink of destruction; Michi-

gan Avenue reminisces for the glory days of old

school baseball, trains and Irish heritage; and if

I had traveled down Gratiot Avenue, Lafayette

Street and Fort Street, their stories would have

made themselves equally known.

But my trip down these thoroughfares has

also further opened my own story. My father’s

upbringing in such a tumultuous city has nec-

essarily informed his politics, principles and

outlook on racial tension, all of which have been

resources from which I draw my own disposi-

tions. We have never had a catalyst for these con-

versations, and maybe never would, were it not

for Detroit. I owe it a great deal of thanks, a senti-

ment that one often doesn’t hear about the city.

No narrative is truer than the other, not my

own nor any of the others. Each trades off the

myths and facts that surround the city, and

serve the self-interests of those who adopt them.

But as my father frequently states: “I’ll say it till

I die — if someone wants to know what’s hap-

pening in the United States, call me, let’s meet

at my house at 9:00, go to Detroit by 9:40, drive

around and have a discussion about what we

saw at lunchtime.” True affection for Detroit is

to have a complex relationship, to listen to mul-

tiple narratives for honesty about what’s hap-

pening to the city. It means you need to take that

drive with my dad. While it may not work for

everyone, I, whose youth was passed in the tran-

quilities of a college town, one day hope to feel

sincerity in saying the words: “I love Detroit.”

Back to Top

© 2024 Regents of the University of Michigan