100%

Scanned image of the page. Keyboard directions: use + to zoom in, - to zoom out, arrow keys to pan inside the viewer.

Page Options

Download this Issue

Share

Something wrong?

Something wrong with this page? Report problem.

Rights / Permissions

This collection, digitized in collaboration with the Michigan Daily and the Board for Student Publications, contains materials that are protected by copyright law. Access to these materials is provided for non-profit educational and research purposes. If you use an item from this collection, it is your responsibility to consider the work's copyright status and obtain any required permission.

September 05, 2007 - Image 26

Resource type:
Text
Publication:
The Michigan Daily, 2007-09-05

Disclaimer: Computer generated plain text may have errors. Read more about this.


V V

heWih iga . il -.e - - .- S. 6

_W

-w

--

_W

w -W

Wedesda, eptmbr , 007 TeMihgnDal 4- p i

Dealing with your andlord
Whether it's leaky faucets, clogged drains, cockroaches or a collapsing roof, everyone who has
lived off campus has had trouble with his or her apartment. That doesn't mean you have to buy
a monkey wrench yourself. Stephanie Chang, an attorney for Student
Legal Services, offers these tips on how to deal with intrusive landlords,
avoid losing your security deposit and stave off predatory insects.

The science of cheating
Unknown unknowns

t'snot silent in the lecture hall,
but it might as well be. More
than 200 students, sitting one
seat apart from each other, can-
not fail to generate noise in this
steeply sloped lecture hall. Papers
rustle, chairs squeak and shift.
Listen hard enough and you can
hear the scrape of your neighbor's
pencil on a Bluebook.
A muffled cough. And again.
Wherefore this rude interrupt?
She clears her throat, louder. A
pained expression, a display of
great discomfort. She makes eye
contact with the proctor and
points towards the door. He nods.
She scampers to the ladies' room,
where an organic chemistry text-
book is artfully stowed in the
wastebasket beneath a mound of
paper towels.
What better way for this col-
umn to kick off the academic year
than with a rousing revue of the
data on student misconduct? Stu-
dents have always come up with
ingenious methods to get optimal
grades with minimal effort, but
psychologists, sociologists, econ-

omists a
sity have
arms rac
Based
Engineer
Decision
ing grout
behind s
College
I
reps
ho
Y01
ing to,
undergr
the most
This f
interpre
more, o
because
guilty pE

nd others at the Univer- want them building my bridges.
been keeping up in the The experienced, suave cheat -
e. a psychology major, say - comes
out of the College- of up with various psychological
ring, Exploring Ethical techniques to justify his behav-
-Making in Engineer- ior.
p studies the motivations one, called "neutralizing" by
tudent cheating. Why the the cheating study group, is the
of Engineering? Accord- offloading of responsibility to
external factors. The exams are
too hard or the professor doesn't
f you don't care or the material is uninterest-
ing.
ort a cheater "Students believe it is the
inmstructors' responsibility to
1w long until limit cheating," wrote the group
in a 2006 paper.
W're a cheat? This belief is part of the shift in
the role of college education from a
once-distinct privilege to a mass-
produced commodity. These years
are just another stop in the assem-
the group, engineering bly line up to the real world. The
ads historically report cheaters are paying 30 grand a year
cheating of all students. to be entertained, not tobe stressed
inding has two possible out.
tations. Engineers cheat Innocuous, spur-of-the-
r engineers admit to it moment decisions can become
they are fundamentally habits and eventually swell to fill
eople. Either way, I don't See CHEATING, Page10B

Find the Lowest
Textbook Prices
with I click!

Feel lost inthe big blue?

Back to Top

© 2024 Regents of the University of Michigan