100%

Scanned image of the page. Keyboard directions: use + to zoom in, - to zoom out, arrow keys to pan inside the viewer.

Page Options

Share

Something wrong?

Something wrong with this page? Report problem.

Rights / Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials may be under copyright. If you decide to use any of these materials, you are responsible for making your own legal assessment and securing any necessary permission. If you have questions about the collection, please contact the Bentley Historical Library at bentley.ref@umich.edu

December 16, 1981 - Image 1

Resource type:
Text
Publication:
Michigan Citizen, 1981-12-16

Disclaimer: Computer generated plain text may have errors. Read more about this.

The emptor s ere
. g for puni . e damage
to' 15 miD.ioB and
aDUages of S 15 mil-
ceo to Dudley,
the group' ttorney Harold
Curry, , tifi
. September of .
t still
�1iI' la, but the Court had
ordered all attorneys co -
nected with the to
t on or before Octobe
1 to diJcu the ata 0
ted, but
group could not come up
the my, Dudley
ULES lAS
"aood"
pool, Dudley
IWUP" f or •
by Equal Emp1lovrlnent
Opportunity COIDIlDD
. !pool
• auilty of
counts of, dilcrimiDation.
The EEOC aid that
'WbllrIDool practice of
I
mu go to MESC, and
· ce the majority of guards
d p t employee are
white, it amoun 0 a fail­
ure to '�tain hiring
free of the taint
iority.
offered to
only on B ck employee.
"B employees ere
co . ntly discharged dur-
ed ing probation; no bites
re diJcharged
tionary employee .
"From th el
th EEOC ruled,' e con-
de that • disparity
be n B d
'Indianola elec ion
o lac s' -. Jac 0
s
appr e -
try requirements dilcrimin-
ted; the unio '. impo'
of unfi· grievance
• en na discrim-
· ted, the EEOC found. ... .t.en.
The federal cy
abo ruled that Dudley,
"an ootlpoken defender
of th cmI rights of
employ ," received retal- .
· tory tment from
o E

Back to Top

© 2025 Regents of the University of Michigan