100%

Scanned image of the page. Keyboard directions: use + to zoom in, - to zoom out, arrow keys to pan inside the viewer.

Page Options

Share

Something wrong?

Something wrong with this page? Report problem.

Rights / Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials may be under copyright. If you decide to use any of these materials, you are responsible for making your own legal assessment and securing any necessary permission. If you have questions about the collection, please contact the Bentley Historical Library at bentley.ref@umich.edu

July 02, 2020 - Image 25

Resource type:
Text
Publication:
The Detroit Jewish News, 2020-07-02

Disclaimer: Computer generated plain text may have errors. Read more about this.

JULY 2 • 2020 | 25

WHAT DOES THIS MEAN
FOR DACA RECIPIENTS?
Local immigration attorney
Ellie Mosko of Mosko Law PC
put it this way: “DACA recipi-
ents … can now feel a little less
anxiety. DACA was always a
stopgap measure, a Band-Aid,
imperfect at best. It gives peo-
ple the chance to live here, to
work, to travel and return, to
help family members. It does
not lead to citizenship (for
people who know no other
country).

Mosko continued, “
Applying
for DACA status is always
a difficult choice. To apply,
a person comes out of the
shadows
and exposes
himself or
herself to
the govern-
ment. This
gives rise to
legitimate
concerns in
which a government could
end such a program and turn
around and target those pre-
viously protected and their
families.

Furthermore, “Homeland
Security has not yet issued
guidelines for accepting new
DACA applications.

Sedler agreed the decision
does not protect DACA recip-
ients from future deportation.
“There is no security for

dreamers,


he said.
However, “for
the foresee-
able future
at least, they
need not
worry about
losing that
status. And public opinion is
strongly in favor of their being
able to remain in the U.S.


Questions about how the
Trump administration will
implement this ruling remain.
According to Mosko, “the ini-
tial response from Homeland
Security indicates that they
consider DACA illegal.

Chad Wolf, acting
Homeland Security chief,
simply said of DACA, “The
program’
s unlawful.
” U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration
Services Deputy Director for
Policy Joseph Edlow similarly
rejects the Supreme Court
decision: “Today’
s court opin-
ion has no basis in law and
merely delays the President’
s
lawful ability to end the
illegal Deferred Action for
Childhood Arrivals amnesty
program.

Legal historian Paul
Finkelman, president of
Gratz College in greater
Philadelphia, finds Edlow’
s
statement
“disturbing.


Almost
all American
Jews are the
children,
grandchil-
dren and
great-grand-
children of refugees,

Finkelman said. “Thus, we
should be applauding this rul-
ing on DACA, which reinvig-
orates our nation as a refuge
of ‘
the tired, the poor, the hud-
dled masses, yearning to be
free’
as the Jewish poet Emma
Lazarus wrote in the poem
that is on the Statue of Liberty.

According to Mosko, the
court did not address the
legality of the original DACA
program. “In effect,
” she said,
“the court creates a roadmap
for the Trump administration
to try again following the
appropriate legal process.


Robert Sedler

Paul Finkelman

Ellie Mosko

LET US DESIGN YOUR DREAM KITCHEN

FREE In-Home Estimates

Back to Top

© 2025 Regents of the University of Michigan