Wednesday, December 7, 2022 // The Statement — 4 Let’s talk date parties, pseudo-consent and transactional sex “He tried to kiss me like eight times,” my friend said as she casually took a sip from her iced coffee — her mascara from the night before smudged un- der her eyes. “He did what?” I asked. “I kept telling him it wouldn’t be a good idea, but he was so drunk he just kept lean- ing in. It was crazy,” she chuck- led uncomfortably, as if remem- bering an off-color joke. Our group of friends sat around the living room, dishev- eled and numbingly hungover. When we each took our turn in the sacred “morning debrief,” I was appalled at the stories com- ing from each one of my girl friends after the fraternity date party we attended the night before. A lot of my friends’ testimonies seemed to carry a similar theme: One of pseudo-con- sent, with many of their male dates be- having under the im- pression that a date party invite meant implicit consent, con- sent that lasted all night and expired at sunrise. That all their nights would end in an inevitable, albeit not explicitly-consensual hookup. “You know that’s not okay, right?” I inquired wearily. Intrinsically, we all knew this behavior was not okay, but that didn’t stop the stories from the night before to be told with a casual lightness — with us all too afraid to address the underlying level of discomfort. With each story of one of my friends being groped or continually hit on by her date, I became increasingly disgusted. I began to wonder why this was coming up now. My friends and I go out to bars and parties on a regular ba- sis without having to withstand such blatant lack of respect for our bodies. There was some- thing about this outing — The Date Party — that made the no- tion of consent feel different. Date parties are a common occurrence on college cam- puses in many student organiza- tions. While they have origins in college Greek Life communi- ties, they also occur frequently in professional fraternities and other organizations, like pre- law frats, pre-health frats and other university clubs. LSA Sophomore Jenna Al-Nouri has experience with date parties as a member of both a social sorority and a profes- sional pre-health fraternity. Thankfully, Al-Nouri hasn’t had a date party experience in which a date has pressured her into feeling like hooking up was the only way to end the night. But, she is still aware that this culture exists. She reminisced on a time when a male friend of hers stated that he “wanted to bring a date that he could hook up with.” Al-Nouri recognizes the disrespect toward a woman’s boundaries that is often height- ened around date party season and has come up with ways to combat this negativity while still preserving the fun of the event. “I made a rule that I will only bring a best friend that’s a girl because I know she will be chill,” Al-Nouri shared. “I have a lot more fun when I bring a friend.” Read more at MichiganDaily.com 2012 2022 Sex or scripture? The Madonna-Whore complex Sex, in a sense, has become one of the most commercialized phenomena of our evolution- ary biology. Evolving for over 2 billion years, the first archaeo- logical record of penetrative intercourse dates to 385 million years ago between prehistoric fish named Microbrachius dicki (giggle now if you need to). Since the time of Mycenae Greece, however, sex has been streamlined into embodying the more sociocultural aspects of our societies, with the biological effects of pregnancy and disease being redefined as a simple and banal prologue to the complex and emotionally-enriching pro- cesses of sexual intimacy. Often the source of drama and action in art as much as in real life, sex has come to define humanity and its transience, influencing political beliefs and policy, cultural and structural development of societies and our self-identity and relation- ships. The psychology of sex, in a way, supersedes its physicality because the meaning behind the act distorts our cultural values more so than physical penetra- tion ever could. The most notable contribu- tions to our contemporary val- ues of sex stem from the works of psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud, who rose to prominence for his outlandish (and often correct) hypotheses about sex. Of the most striking — and trust me, there’s a lot — notions is the foundation and defini- tion of the Madonna-Whore complex. The term came about when the shifty, yet often spot- on, psychoanalyst had observed a strange dichotomy in his male patients, who came to him com- plaining that they didn’t feel any sexual desires for their wives as they did for prostitutes. Mostly applicable to het- eronormative ideals of sex, this complex, as defined by Freud, is the black-and-white splitting of female partners into two groups: the chaste and virtuous Madon- na, and the immoral and promis- cuous Whore. Freud illustrated the paradoxical nature of this phenomenon by explaining that “where men love, they have no desire and where they desire, they cannot love.” This theory turns respect and attraction into mutually exclusive traits, with tumultuous implications in the scope of sexual dynamics. What drew me in about this complex was the absurdity of this subconscious rationale, how the male-centered fallacy views a woman’s modesty as a determinant of the respect she is owed, and the implication that a woman who has liberated herself from the anxiety of social scrutiny ought to be ousted from the societal hierarchy. Design by Serena Shen Design by Serena Shen A DECADE OF SEX VALERIJA MALASHEVICH Statement Correspondent ELLA KOPELMAN Statement Columnist Read more at MichiganDaily.com Design by Serena Shen