100%

Scanned image of the page. Keyboard directions: use + to zoom in, - to zoom out, arrow keys to pan inside the viewer.

Page Options

Download this Issue

Share

Something wrong?

Something wrong with this page? Report problem.

Rights / Permissions

This collection, digitized in collaboration with the Michigan Daily and the Board for Student Publications, contains materials that are protected by copyright law. Access to these materials is provided for non-profit educational and research purposes. If you use an item from this collection, it is your responsibility to consider the work's copyright status and obtain any required permission.

October 26, 2022 - Image 3

Resource type:
Text
Publication:
The Michigan Daily

Disclaimer: Computer generated plain text may have errors. Read more about this.

SO (cont.): Now that I’m on the
ground here, there’ll be more face-
to-face interactions. On Wednesday,
I’ll be on both Central and North
Campuses meeting with students.
I hope to also drop in on classes and
other venues so I can interact with
people spontaneously.
TMD: Over the past few years,
the Board of Regents has taken
steps to facilitate the process of
ratifying new unions. Despite these
steps to improve labor relations on
campus, the University has still seen
numerous stalled negotiations and a
strike since 2020. What do you view
as your role in working with the
unions and how do you envision the
University’s relationship with labor
on campus?
SO: I’ve come from two other
universities that have many unions.
One thing that’s really important
is that I don’t interfere with the
processes and policies around the
negotiating table. I won’t do that. But
I think it’s very meaningful for me to
meet and listen to leaders and unions,
and I’ve started to do that and I hope
to continue to do that. It’s got to be
something where it is really clear
that the agreed-upon procedures
of negotiating and bargaining are
adhered to.
TMD: At the University of
Cincinnati, you were active in
promoting the school’s athletics. How
do you view your role in approaching
issues like name, image and likeness
(NIL) in college sports, especially
when some critics have claimed that
Michigan Athletics has fallen behind
other schools in NIL?
SO: Yeah, it’s pretty early days in
terms of NIL. The great thing is that
all the great universities that are
part of the Big Ten are having these
conversations, so I don’t think it
makes sense for one university to go
off on their own.
There are issues of parity, issues
of values that are embedded in those
decisions, and there are legal issues

as well that are jurisdictional from
state to state. So a president has to
be involved because these are major
decisions. One of my roles as president
is to understand the landscape and to
understand the specific jurisdictional
policies and laws, and also to be a
team player in all NCAA sports.
TMD: Can you speak on what
values specifically you want to see
inform these NIL decisions?
SO: We have a broad spectrum
of sports here at the University with
different positions and different
teams, which brings certain ethical
considerations in the recruitment
of athletes. What Michigan values
is that we can do things in a way
that we can be proud of, so being in
compliance with the NCAA is one
thing that is really important to me.
With NIL, certain players are
more prominent than others, but
the success of a team isn’t just the
quarterback or the wide receiver or
the running back who might have
more popularity in the NIL space
— the whole team is important. J.J.
McCarthy has done something,
which I think is indicative of
Michigan values, to donate his NIL
earnings to his offensive line and
that’s something I applaud.
TMD: You are coming to not only
the University but also the state of
Michigan as a representative of a
public university, in the middle of
a particularly contentious election
cycle. What race or issue do you view
as the most important going into
November?
SO: I think it is really important
for me as a president of a university
with a diversity of views to not
insert my own particular personal
views into any kind of election, or
anytime, actually, as president. I
think it is really important for me
to facilitate and support active
debate and to encourage people to
vote. Unfortunately, I have only just
arrived and there appears to be a
30-day residency requirement for
me to vote, so I just miss being able
to vote. But, I am going to encourage
people to vote and to be involved in
the democratic process of opining

about and advocating for things that
they believe in.
TMD: The University of Michigan
has been plagued recently with
sexual misconduct scandals, from
the decades-long allegations against
former
athletic
doctor
Robert
Anderson to more recent allegations
against former American Culture
Professor Bruce Conforth. What
are the biggest problems you see in
terms of sexual misconduct at the
University? And, how do you plan to
begin to rectify them?
SO: Having been president to other
universities, I can tell you that sexual
misconduct is pervasive. It is not just
in this sector, but it is in every sector of
society. It is not just at the University
of Michigan. Nevertheless, it is a very
important thing to address, and I plan
to be actively involved in addressing
the situation here. We have been
hard at work over the past three
months and intensively over the past
several days. You should stay tuned
for the actions that I will take and
statements that I will make regarding
this issue, but it is a little bit early for
me to say. But I have, during the three
months, listened and talked to many
people who have made it clear that
this is something important for me to
address, and I will do so.
TMD: In August, Students Allied
for Freedom and Equality (SAFE)
released a statement criticizing a
May 2014 trip to Israel you went
on as president of the University of
Cincinnati. SAFE also criticized an
April 2022 decision of yours to decline
to have the University of British
Columbia divest from companies
located in the West Bank. What do
you have to say to these criticisms
and how do you plan on engaging
students on both sides of this very
contentious issue?
SO: The trip that we went on to
Israel when I was president of the
University of Cincinnati was really
focused on technology, innovation
and academic linkages. There are
great universities in Israel, and I’ve
visited universities across the world.

Since 2017, Michigan legislators

have been debating whether or not

to prohibit local governments from

imposing more controls on short-

term rentals. The push for restricting

local control gained new momentum

in the past year following the

passage of bills banning short-term

rentals in residential neighborhoods,

such as the banning of Airbnb

houses in Ann Arbor. House Bill

4722, introduced by state Rep. Sarah

Lightner, R-Springport, would limit

the local governments’ ability to

enact zoning restrictions on short-

term rentals. The bill, which passed

in the house last year in a late-night

session, was advanced by a Senate

panel this September and referred to

the Committee of the Whole.

State Sen. Jeff Irwin, D-Ann

Arbor, said in an interview with The

Michigan Daily that he opposed the

intention of the bill.

“I think the communities should

have some limited authority to

make rules about these things,”

Irwin said. “(They should have)

limited authority to make sure that

(short-term rentals) don’t present

a
persistent
problem
to
their

neighbors, that they are positioned

in a way where it’s more fair to the

hotels.”

For Ann Arbor, a college town

and popular tourist destination,

short-term
rentals
have
long

symbolized its tourism paradox.

The
thriving
tourism
industry,

buoyed by weekend football games,

has benefited property owners

who convert their properties into

short-term rentals to host visitors.

However, city officials have said

short-term rentals contribute to

the city’s affordability challenges

by taking housing stock away from

prospective buyers and long-term

renters.

In 2020, City Council passed

an ordinance banning dedicated

short-term rentals in residential

neighborhoods.
In
2021,
amid

possible
legal
challenges
from

affected short-term rental owners,

City Council updated the previous

ordinance
to
allow
existing

dedicated short-term rentals to

continue operating. However, the

continued to prohibit the creation

of new dedicated short-term rentals

in residential neighborhoods. The

city also introduced a new licensing

system requiring annual renewal by

all short-term rental owners.

The
House
bill
bans
local

governments
from
restricting

short-term rentals to lower than

30% of total residential units. In

2020, 1400 out of 47,214 housing

units in Ann Arbor were short-term

rentals. While Michigan Realtors,

a
statewide
organization,
has

advocated for the bill, in interviews

with The Daily, the Ann Arbor Board

of Realtors said they didn’t take a

stance on this legislative initiative.

Prentice 4M is a local real estate

company that operates dozens of

short-term rental units. Founder

Heidi Poscher said the current city

regulations reflect a reasonable

compromise.

“(The cost of operating short-

term rentals) is more expensive

(than in the past) because there are

licensing fees to pay,” Poscher said.

“But I understand that because the

licensing fees are necessary to police

the program … there hasn’t been any

real change. We have continued to

adhere to the regulations and try to

be good neighbors to the people that

surround us.”

Jennifer
Rigterink,
assistant

director of state and federal affairs

at Ann Arbor-based policy advocacy

group Michigan Municipal League

(MML), said the bill has gone

further than in the past.

Ann Arbor Mayor Christopher

Taylor told The Daily in an interview

that
the
city
would
leverage

communication channels with state

officials to prevent the bill from

passing.

“Certainly we are communicating

to our delegation,” Taylor said.

“Also, in the event that (the bill)

passes in the Senate and gets onto

Governor Whitmer’s desk, we would

encourage her to veto it.”

Rigterink
also
said
MML

encourages representatives from

college towns to look into adding

exemption language to the bill

grandfathering in their policies.

The bill allows cities that have

restrictions before 2019 that don’t

explicitly
discriminate
against

short-term
rentals
to
continue

to enforce them. Ritgerink said

East Lansing might have already

been exempted since the city has

restrictions on rentals in general

before 2019.

“The bill doesn’t name a specific

municipality, ” Rigterink said. “But

the only one that we have found

that fits that kind of language is

the city of East Lansing … In other

communities that host universities

or are college towns, I would be

asking my legislator, ‘Why is that

community carved out and not going

to have to deal with this, but we’re

preempted in our regulations?’”

State Senate 14th District

Tim Golding (R) and Washtenaw

County Commissioner Sue Shink

(D) will face off for Michigan’s 14th

District State Senate seat. The seat

is currently held by state Sen. Ruth

Johnson, R-Holly, who is running

for the Senate seat in the 24th

District. The 14th District has been

held by a Republican since 2014,

but Shink is looking to flip the seat.

She has centered her campaign on

climate policy, supporting small

businesses and improving access

to healthcare. Shink won the

Democratic primary with 75% of

the vote. Golding’s campaign has

focused on pandemic recovery,

defending
Second
Amendment

rights and restricting access to

abortion. He ran unopposed in the

Republican primary.

State Senate 15th District

Scott Price (R) will challenge

incumbent state Sen. Jeff Irwin,

D-Ann Arbor, for the 15th District

state Senate seat. Price won the

Republican primary with 72% of

the vote. Price did not respond

to a Michigan Daily request for

comment during the primaries and

has not spoken to other outlets.

Price does not have a website and

has not shared his platform on

social media. Irwin was elected

to the state Senate in 2018 after

serving as a state representative

from 2011 to 2017. Throughout his

time in office, he has focused on

public education, climate action

and
infrastructure.
Irwin
has

campaigned on accomplishments

in these areas, including passing

legislation to increase support for

students with dyslexia. Irwin also

touted legislation he supported to

increase corporate accountability

for environmental damage and

provide
support
to
Michigan

residents
harmed
by
disasters

resulting from climate change.

6th Congressional District

U.S.
Rep.
Debbie
Dingell,

D-Mich.,
will
face
Whittney

Williams
(R)
for
the
6th

Congressional
District
seat.

Dingell has been the representative

of the 12th District since 2015,

winning the seat after her husband,

at the time the longest-serving

congressperson, died. Dingell ran

unopposed for the Democratic

Party. Williams won 53.7% of the

vote in the Republican primary.

Dingell is focused on the auto

industry for jobs, protecting the

environment and increasing access

to health care. Williams has a focus

on lowering taxes, securing the

border and restricting abortion.

Attorney General

Matthew
DePerno
(R),

incumbent Dana Nessel (D), Joe

McHugh (L) and Gerald T. Van

Sickle (Tax) are running for the

position
of
Michigan
attorney

general.

Trump-backed
candidate

DePerno is an attorney currently

under criminal investigation an

alleged plot to tamper with voting

machines . He believes the 2020

presidential election result was

fraudulent, abortion and Plan B

should be banned and critical race

theory should be outlawed.

Nessel is a former prosecutor

and civil rights attorney. She is

focused on protecting consumers,

defending
civil
rights
and

protecting the environment and

health care.

McHugh is a Marine Corps

veteran. Based on his campaign

website, he supports the legalization

of all drugs, protection of the

environment and free speech. He

believes in a debunked conspiracy

theory that there is a “Shadow

Government”
manipulating

elections and the Supreme Court.

He also thinks the September 11

terrorist attacks were orchestrated

by the U.S. government and planned

to use COVID-19 “to collapse the

economy and move the world onto

Bitcoin.” These theories have been

disproven.

Van Sickle is also vying for

the position of attorney general,

representing the U.S. Taxpayers

Party. The party’s priorities are

limiting government control and

intervention, including opposing

education
regulations
such
as

compulsory
attendance
laws

and standardized curricula and

protecting
Second
Amendment

rights.

Secretary of State

Jocelyn Benson (D), Kristina

Karamo (R), Larry Hutchinson Jr.

(Green), Christine Schwartz (Tax)

and Grego Stempfle (L) are running

for Secretary of State.

Benson was elected Secretary

of State in 2018. She is a graduate

of Harvard Law School and was

the dean of Wayne State University

Law school from 2012 to 2016. She

was the youngest woman to lead a

top-100 accredited law school. She

is a supporter of voting rights and

has transformed customer service

by
creating
a
ballot-tracking

website for voters to monitor the

status of their absentee ballots.

Karamo is a former community

college instructor. According to her

campaign website, she currently

leads a research team focused on

identifying election inefficiencies.

Karamo gained public attention

after claiming she witnessed voter

fraud in 2020 in Detroit while

working as a poll watcher.She

supports fair auto shop inspections,

eliminating election fraud and

preventing identity theft.

Hutchinson ran for Lansing

mayor in 2021 and lost. He believes

in publicly funded elections. In

his 2021 campaign, Hutchinson

supported
campaign
finance

reform and said he was passionate

about gun control, school safety,

education and taxes. Hutchinson

did not elaborate on these issues

and did not share a secretary of

state platform on social media.

On the U.S. Taxpayer Party’s

website,
Schwartz
included
a

statement outlining her platform,

which
focuses
on
limited

government
and
building
safe

communities. “I am 100% Pro-

Life, a traditional family supporter

and a 2nd Amendment defender,”

Schwartz said in the statement.

Stempfle
was
a
clinical

laboratory scientist at the Henry

Ford Hospital organ transplant lab.

He has 25 years of experience as a

political activist. Stempfle believes

in election security. His initiatives

include
introducing
ranked-

choice voting for state elections,

nonpartisan
county
and
local

elections and stopping subsidies for

Democrats and Republicans.

Michigan
Supreme
Court

Justice

Five candidates are running to

fill two open seats on the Michigan

Supreme
Court,
including

incumbent
Richard
Bernstein,

Michigan state Rep. Kyra Harris

Bolden, attorney Paul Hudson,

attorney Kerry Lee Morgan and

incumbent Brian Zahra. The race

is nonpartisan, though candidates

can be nominated by political

parties.

Bernstein,
a
University
of

Michigan alum, was elected to the

Supreme Court in 2014, becoming

the first blind justice to serve in

the state of Michigan. Bernstein

has also previously served on

Wayne State University’s Board of

Governors. Bernstein and Harris

Bolden have been endorsed by The

Michigan League of Conservation

Voters,
Michigan
Association

for Justice and the Michigan

Democratic Party. Harris Bolden

is currently serving in her second

term as a representative for the

35th House District. If elected,

Harris Bolden will be Michigan’s

first Black woman justice on the

state Supreme Court.

Former Michigan Gov. Rick

Snyder appointed Zahra to the

Michigan
Supreme
Court
in

2011 following the retirement of

former Justice Maura Corrigan.

In November 2012, Zahra was

elected to serve a partial term

and was reelected for a full

term in 2014. Zahra dissented in

September decisions to place two

constitutional amendments on the

Nov. 8 ballot. Zahra and Hudson

have been endorsed by the Michigan

Chamber of Commerce, Michigan

Farm Bureau and the Michigan

GOP. On his website, Hudson says

his platform is “grounded in his

commitment to the Constitution,

the rule of law, and respect for the

separation of powers.”

Morgan has been endorsed by

Michigan’s
Libertarian
Party.

Morgan ran for the Michigan

Supreme Court in 2020, 2018,

2016, 2014, 2012 and 2006. Morgan

also filed a brief on behalf of the

LONANG
Institute
opposing

affirmative action before the U.S.

Supreme Court. In it, Morgan states

he supports petitioners’ challenge

to Harvard’s use of racial factors in

college admissions.

Gubernatorial

The Nov. 8 midterm election

marks a historic gubernatorial race

for Michigan, as two women from

major political parties are facing

off for the first time in Michigan’s

history.

Incumbent
Gov.
Gretchen

Whitmer was first elected as

the 48th governor of Michigan

in 2018 when she ran against

Republican
candidate
Bill

Schuette, attorney general under

the
Snyder
administration.

Whitmer’s platform has largely

focused on reforming Michigan’s

abortion policy and highlights

her May lawsuit, which resulted

in the ruling currently blocking

the enforcement of a 1931 abortion

ban. Whitmer has also said she

supports policies to prevent school

shootings, including red flag laws

and safe storage requirements.

Whitmer
gained
national

attention in 2020 due to her

pandemic response, which is a

large talking point of opponent

Tudor Dixon’s (R) platform. Dixon

was endorsed by former U.S.

President Donald Trump on July

27, days before the primary, and

joined Trump at his “Save America”

rally on Oct. 1 to garner more

support for her candidacy. Dixon

has emphasized her anti-abortion

views as a part of her platform, in

addition to vowing to make parents

more involved in their child’s

education. Specifically, Dixon has

promised to limit education on

gender and sexuality in schools

and to outlaw critical race theory,

an academic theory not generally

taught in K-12 schools.

Whitmer and Dixon faced off in a

televised debate hosted by WOOD-

TV on Oct. 13. They are scheduled

for a second debate at Oakland

University on Oct. 25.

Donna Brandenburg of the U.S.

Taxpayers Party, Mary Buzuma,

the Libertarian candidate, Kevin

Hogan of the Green Party and Daryl

Simpson of the Natural Law Party

are also on the ballot for governor

this year.

Brandenberg,
a
business

owner, has built her platform

on maintaining the integrity of

elections,
limiting
government

overreach, and rebuilding mental

health
services.
Buzuma’s

campaign includes promises to

cut taxes and allow individuals

the freedom to choose their own

health care, including revoking

vaccine
and
mask
mandates,

lifting restrictions on abortion

and
decriminalizing
marijuana.

Simpson said the three main points

of his campaign include economic

growth,
improving
public

education and having a “common

sense approach to every issue.”

Hogan has not shared his platform

on social media.

Wednesday, October 26, 2022 — 3
News
The Michigan Daily — michigandaily.com

What’s on your midterms ballot?

CAMPUS LIFE

Ann Arbor restrictions threatened by
short-term rental proposal in State House

The Daily’s government beat outlines the races and proposals Michiganders are voting non Nov. 8

House Bill 4722 looks to limit cities’ ability to regulate services like
Airbnb, VRBO

Design by Sophie Grand

CHEN LYU
Daily Staff Reporter

ANN ARBOR

Read more at MichiganDaily.com

ANNA FIFELSKI,
SAMANTHA RICH &
CAROLINE WANG
Daily News Editor & Daily Staff
Reporters

Read more at MichiganDaily.com

ONO INTERVIEW
From PAGE 1

Back to Top

© 2024 Regents of the University of Michigan