T he latest meeting of the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) last month revealed that Republicans around the country continue to enthusiastically support former President Donald Trump. In a straw poll of hypothetical Republican candidates, nearly 60% signaled they would back Trump in the rapidly- approaching 2024 presidential election. Coming far behind in second place was Gov. Ron DeSantis, R-Fla., who secured just over a quarter of the tally. With the Republican presidential primaries less than two years out, and campaigning likely to begin around a year before that, many signs point to Trump launching a bid for a second term in the White House. If strong levels of support for Trump among Republicans hold, it’s highly likely we’ll be witnessing another face- off between Donald Trump and Joe Biden. Americans won’t cast their next presidential ballots for more than 30 months, but with a number of polls now putting Trump ahead of Biden in a hypothetical matchup, there’s a reasonable chance Trump could end up back in the Oval Office come January 2025. When Trump departed the White House only two weeks after a group of his rioting supporters stormed the Capitol, the idea of Trump returning and mounting another run for president seemed wild and ridiculous. According to Quinnipiac polls taken in the final days of the Trump presidency, almost 60% of voters said Trump should be barred from holding any kind of elected office ever again, while 53% said Trump should resign from office before his term ended. Seven Republican senators voted to convict the former president in his second impeachment trial over the January 6 insurrection. Republican leaders like then- Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., were widely and publicly critical of Trump. Multiple loyal officials in the Trump administration, including Attorney General William Barr and the Secretaries of Education and Transportation, resigned. But the picture is entirely different only a short year later. Too many Republicans seem to have turned a blind eye to the ugly final days of the Trump administration, threatening to destroy any conservative who stands against Trump. After Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., and Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., joined a Congressional committee probing the events of January 6, Republicans censured both representatives and declared the Capitol violence was “legitimate political discourse.” The GOP also removed Cheney from House Republican leadership last spring over her opposition to Trump. These recent trends within the GOP illuminate Trump’s extreme popularity within the party and the headwinds most mainstream Republicans face in opposing him. Republicans must change course quickly. It’s time for the GOP to reset, turn away from Trump and support candidates who reflect the values of not only the Republican Party but of America at large. Not too long ago, Republicans threw their support behind presidential candidates like former Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., a Vietnam War veteran who exemplified America’s democratic values and promoted conservative principles like smaller government and lower spending. Republicans like McCain had reasonable policy disagreements with Democrats, but they were always firm advocates of the American people, and were respected on both sides of the aisle. President Trump surely had positive accomplishments during his term, like signing the First Step Act, a bipartisan initiative focusing on much- needed criminal justice reform. But by and large, it’s become readily apparent that Trump lacks the qualities Americans need in their president. After he lost the election in 2020 to Biden, Trump launched an unprecedented effort to discredit the election results and overturn the will of the people so he could stay in power. Those efforts thankfully failed, but if not for the loyal Americans who stood in Trump’s way, we could have experienced a serious constitutional crisis. Nevertheless, Trump’s election lies continue to persist to this day. A poll from last November found only a third of Republicans believe American elections are fair. Over 70% of Republicans said in a shocking December poll that they doubted the legitimacy of the 2020 presidential election. Trump’s election rhetoric is completely false as well as dangerous. In the end, it’s astonishing that one of America’s two major political parties is so supportive of a figure who tried to subvert the Constitution and overturn fair, democratic processes. This country is built on democratic values that have guided it for hundreds of years. Russia’s blatant assault on freedom and democracy in Ukraine exhibits just how fragile democracy truly is, even in 2022. Trump’s attack on democracy here at home should drive every American — Republican, Democrat or independent — to support people up and down the ticket who believe in democracy and support it wholeheartedly, even when it’s not in their own political interest to do so. With time running out before 2024, it’s imperative the GOP does a hard reset, and fast. Republicans must return to promoting American values and firmly reject misinformation and propaganda. Rather than vote for a candidate who has done much to undermine American democracy, it’s time Republicans throw their support behind people with proven track records of defending and celebrating our precious democracy. A merican intervention”: two words that represent a very loaded topic. Revisiting any part of our history shows that debate over intervention is present at every turn. From the beginning of our country’s history, President George Washington famously believed that the US should avoid any foreign entanglements. Then, during the 1800s into the 1900s, as the U.S. was strengthening its economic influence, it involved itself aggressively in other countries. After World War I, America adopted an isolationist policy for a time, but by World War II it had switched gears again to join the fight against the Axis powers. Throughout the 1900s, U.S. involvement in foreign affairs turned controversial with its fight against communism during the Cold War. Though the Korean War is considered a success as it stopped communism from taking root in the country, the Vietnam War is mostly viewed as a mistake. Such a complicated past in foreign policy has proven that when addressing this question, there is no easy answer. Now, as Russia continues its invasion of Ukraine, we are entering a new period of history that has raised the question once more. Yet, for me, the answer seems quite clear. Throughout the centuries America has taken extreme steps to protect their economic exploits across the globe. Though it is clear that the U.S. is an economic powerhouse in our current global stage, its journey to get to the top wasn’t the most ethical. From overthrowing Hawaii’s Queen Liliuokalani when she wouldn’t succumb to U.S. economic desires, to leading several military coups against leaders — such as Guatemala’s democratically elected president — that were simply uncontrollable, the U.S. was everywhere. Considering the variety of ways America has influenced other countries’ affairs, often in a negative manner and for its own benefit, I have started to doubt the wisdom of intervention. I mean, why should one country be allowed to have that much power over the rest of the world? So for a very long time, I thought America should keep to itself instead of back-handedly controlling the world. But recently, with the conflict between Russia and Ukraine steadily worsening, I have been forced to rethink. Specifically, I find myself thinking a lot about bullies. In school, if there is a child being bullied, I would consider it wrong for any bystanders who have the power to help the child in need to just stand idly by; some would even go as far to say that those bystanders are just as bad as the bully. And I can’t help but think of bullying when I think about our current global crisis. For those who may be unaware, though Russia recently invaded Ukraine, the tension between the two countries is one that has been building up since the fall of the Soviet Union. After the USSR fell, Ukraine became its own country, but Russian President Vladimir Putin never let go of his desire to rebuild the old Soviet Union empire; in his words, Ukrainians and Russians “were one people — a single whole.” That is why he has already invaded Ukraine once before, back in 2014, and annexed Crimea in the process. Experts think the reason he has chosen to continue his mission now is because of the strengthening relations between Ukraine and NATO. Though Ukraine will not be joining NATO anytime soon, it is working to gain admission into the European Union and is the fourth-largest recipient of U.S. military funding; in some ways it has become an informal member of NATO, which threatens Russia. As a result of his fears, Putin decided to invade Ukraine to take back what he believes is Russia’s rightful territory, and make sure NATO doesn’t inch closer. There is no doubt that this is an extremely complicated situation. But breaking it down to its core, the way I see it is that Russia is using its power to bully Ukraine and as a result, we are witnessing hundreds of innocent and unnecessary deaths. There are many debates going on pertaining to what the U.S. should do. The Biden administration has remained firm on keeping U.S. soldiers out of Ukraine, which is something the majority of Americans agree with. However, 83% of Americans have also said they favor increased economic sanctions against Russia. So people do think America should intervene, but are afraid of getting involved in yet another overseas war; and honestly, who can blame them? However, though I do understand people’s hesitation to escalate involvement in Ukraine, I believe that if all else fails, we might not have any other choice. The Michigan Daily — michigandaily.com Opinion 10 — Wednesday, March 16, 2022 Intervention or isolation PALAK SRIVISTAVA Opinion Columnist EVAN STERN Opinion Columnist Building a more diverse, equitable, and inclusive U-M community takes the will and work of all of us. Learn about our transition from DEI 1.0 to DEI 2.0. 2021-22 Evaluation 2022-23 Planning 2023-24 2.0 Launch LEARN MORE: diversity.umich.edu/dei-2 It’s time for a Republican reset Read more at MichiganDaily.com E ach of the roughly 50,000 students at the University of Michigan has their own story of how they became a Wolverine. Some of us were dressed in maize and blue practically from the moment we were born. Others discovered our love for Michigan on a campus visit led by a Michigan student tour guide. Some of us were the first in our families to receive higher education, beginning a brand new legacy. No matter what our pathway to becoming a Wolverine was, the moment we accepted our offers we accepted a list of various stereotypes. In general, university students are perceived as lazy, reckless and wealthy. In addition to this general stereotype, every university seems to come with even more specific versions of these traits. In a study performed by researchers Andrea Abel and Amy Binder, 56 Harvard University and Stanford University students were surveyed regarding their perceptions of other highly respected campuses such as The University of Chicago and Princeton University. They criticized the other universities as being too social, not social enough or overly career-minded and uptight. Abel and Binder reported that these micro-comparisons students draw between different universities are a result of the universities’ highly competitive nature. They report that this is largely due to working your whole life to be admitted to a selective university and then, once admitted, doing all you can to elevate your university’s status in order to bolster your own self-confidence. My two cents? Competition is ingrained in the system. To get to these top universities, students not only need an exceptional application, but also one that is better than that of their peers. This rigorous college admissions process has primed students to carry their overly competitive sentiments into their higher education endeavors. In Abel and Binder’s study, the University of Michigan was not mentioned by any of the surveyed students. However, it is fair to say that we have spun our own web of reputations, some ugly ones and some not so ugly ones. Many of these perceptions are fairly earned. Our competitive mentalities translate into the process of applying to the University’s selective clubs and rushing its professional fraternities. These actions could be considered feats of bravery, as they sometimes feel even more difficult than getting into the University itself. Many of these clubs hold networking events where students who are already in the club can meet with those who are looking to join the club. Unfortunately, this can become a demeaning experience — existing members could flout their accomplishments in the club or speak down to nonmembers. Semester after semester, club after club, rejection after rejection, we begin to feel beaten down by the process. Despite our hopelessness, we continue to put ourselves through the endless stacks of applications. Sometimes, this draining process is less about the desire to join the organization and more about the idea that extracurriculars are necessary for success in the future. Additionally, seeing our peers doing more than us — posting about their new internships, exclusive clubs or special programs — ultimately leads to constant comparison. Comparing ourselves to others, and feeling behind because of it, is very damaging to our mental health and self- confidence. To cope with these damages, students ramp up their competition, creating an even more cutthroat environment. As you can see, this is a self-perpetuating cycle. ANNA TRUPIANO Opinion Columnist It’s time to break down the stereotype of a University of Michigan student Design by Tamara Turner, Opinion Cartoonist Slava Ukraini! (Glory to Ukraine!) Read more at MichiganDaily.com