100%

Scanned image of the page. Keyboard directions: use + to zoom in, - to zoom out, arrow keys to pan inside the viewer.

Page Options

Download this Issue

Share

Something wrong?

Something wrong with this page? Report problem.

Rights / Permissions

This collection, digitized in collaboration with the Michigan Daily and the Board for Student Publications, contains materials that are protected by copyright law. Access to these materials is provided for non-profit educational and research purposes. If you use an item from this collection, it is your responsibility to consider the work's copyright status and obtain any required permission.

March 31, 2021 - Image 14

Resource type:
Text
Publication:
The Michigan Daily

Disclaimer: Computer generated plain text may have errors. Read more about this.

In an extraordinary year, the

Michigan hockey team looked like it

might make it to the end.

Everything

the
world

could
have

thrown at the

Wolverines,
it

did. An insanely

long
offseason.

An
athletic

department-

wide shutdown.

A season-ending injury. At each turn,

they’ve proven time and again that

they’re capable of playing through

unprecedented
circumstances.

Sitting as a two seed and the No. 8

team in the country, they had a real

shot to make some noise in the NCAA

Tournament.

But on Friday, just hours before

the puck dropped on its first game,

Michigan was forced to withdraw

from the NCAA Tournament due to

COVID-19 protocols.

Before anything else, let’s put this

into perspective.

The
Wolverines
have
been

practicing since July. According

to coach Mel Pearson, the team

hadn’t had a single case of COVID-

19 between then and the Big Ten

Tournament. In that span, Michigan

went through some rough patches

performance-wise, but ultimately

entered the postseason with a

respectable 15-10-1 record and playing

some of its best hockey.

Then, in an instant, it was over.

For the senior class especially, it’s

downright tragic. For the second

straight season, they’ve had a

promising
postseason
campaign

suddenly
and
unceremoniously

wiped out by the pandemic.

“The first time was really tough

last year, because it was so sudden, and

everybody’s healthy, and there’s no

issues,” Michigan coach Mel Pearson

said. “Once we found out there was an

issue within our program (this week),

you know, all bets are off. I think there

was some real concern amongst our

team.”

Last season, nothing could’ve kept

the season from ending the way it

did. It was the very beginning of the

COVID-19 pandemic in the United

States. A shutdown of college sports

was, at the time, inevitable. But this

year? It was entirely avoidable.

As with virtually everything else

the NCAA has done in 2020 and

2021, the plan for how to approach

the college hockey postseason fell

woefully short. According to the

NCAA’s Return to Championship

Guidelines, players were expected to

test negative prior to departing for the

tournament, then test negative again

upon arrival. Any player who tested

positive would be sent to a designated

quarantine location for 14 days, along

with any close contacts.

But
disease
detection
is

not
disease
prevention.
The

expectation, apparently, was that

the 16 teams would all arrive at their

respective regional sites and simply

have no positive tests. Or, if there

were positive tests, they would

just be limited to a few players and

not cause problems with contact

tracing. That worked for 14 teams,

but for three others, there was no

backup plan.

Sure, there’s no way to completely

eliminate the risks involved with

playing a tournament during a

pandemic, but there are definitely

ways to mitigate them.

One such way is a mandatory

quarantine period, a protocol that

the NCAA has bafflingly refused to

implement for any of its tournaments.

It’s really not that complicated: Have

everyone arrive one to two weeks

before games are scheduled to start to

prevent outside contact, test everyone

each day and isolate anyone who tests

positive.

Sure, there would be logistical

hurdles, and there’s no guarantee

a quarantine period would have

prevented Michigan’s removal from

the tournament. But it’s hard to argue

that it wouldn’t have helped at this

stage. It should have happened for

the men’s and women’s basketball

tournaments, and it should have

happened for hockey.

“Absolutely. (A quarantine period)

would
have
absolutely
helped,”

Pearson said. “Now, do I think we

should do that across all sports? That’s

above my paygrade, but it absolutely

would have helped. Or similar to

basketball, they go into a bubble. But I

know with expenses, and everything

else that’s going on — again, that’s way

above my paygrade.”

In response to a request for

comment,
NCAA
associate

director of communications Greg

Johnson referred to the Return

to Championship Guidelines, the

NCAA COVID-19 Advisory Group

and the Resocialization to College

Sports page.

Pearson
may
have
also

inadvertently hit on a major issue

at play: money. Namely, men’s

basketball draws national attention

and, thus, brings in more money.

Of course, the March Madness

bubble in Indianapolis has its own

problems, but at least they have a

bubble.

For more context, the men’s

basketball tournament had one

team out of 68 drop out because

of
COVID-19.
For
the
men’s

hockey tournament? Three of 17

involved teams have withdrawn.

If the approach for basketball was

imperfect, the plan for hockey was

unacceptable.

Part of that comes from a lack

of central guidance. For most of

the college hockey season, each

conference has had its own health

and safety guidelines and protocols,

and that didn’t change leading up to

the tournament. Lacking consistent

standards across conferences for

testing and dealing with positives

can cause confusion for coaches and

players trying to navigate playing

hockey during a pandemic.

“I sure wish we could’ve used the

Big Ten protocols,” Pearson said. “…

I can’t even tell you what they are in

the NCAA.”

But at the end of the day, there’s

no incentive for the NCAA to fix

its problems. It’s college hockey

— there’s no massive TV audience

missing the games, no national

media calling the league out for

its failure. If the players spoke out

about the protocols, they might

make a few rounds on Twitter, or

have some student papers or college

hockey blogs write on it, but that’s

about it.

And that’s a damn shame, because

the players are affected all the same,

regardless of the popularity of the

sport. Just ask Michigan’s seniors.

Roose can be reached at rooseb@

umich.edu
or
on
Twitter
@

brendanroose.

How Michigan’s season ended

Leigha Brown comes up just short for Michigan

About
four
hours
before

the
Michigan
hockey
team’s

scheduled
NCAA
Tournament

game against Minnesota-Duluth,

Michigan coach Mel Pearson

got a call from assistant sports

administrator Josh Richelew. He

knew the news wouldn’t be good.

Richelew
informed
Pearson

that the game would be canceled

due to a positive COVID-19 test

and contact tracing within the

Wolverines’
travelling
party.

While Pearson was disappointed,

it didn’t come as much of a surprise

given the events that transpired in

the days leading up to Michigan’s

departure for Fargo.

The Wolverines hadn’t had a

positive COVID-19 test since the

beginning of July, but prior to

leaving for Fargo on Tuesday, a

Michigan player was left behind

due to COVID concerns.

“At that point, we knew we

could have some issues,” Pearson

said.

But
when
the
Wolverines

arrived, every member of their

travelling party tested negative,

and Michigan athletic trainer

Brian Brewster took measures to

ensure that the team would have

no further issues.

Brewster
determined
which

players were cleared to practice in

North Dakota and made additional

hotel arrangements to limit close

contacts between players. But even

though everyone with the program

attempted to keep the Wolverines

safe in order to allow them to play,

Pearson clearly had some doubts.

“We’re here,” Pearson said

following Michigan’s practice on

Thursday. “Between our athletic

training department and our

sports medicine department, they

just tell me … if we’re good to go. …

I hope they get to play.”

Later that day, another cloud

was cast over the game’s status

when another player experienced

COVID-19
symptoms,
and
a

subsequent test came back positive,

putting the status of Friday’s game

in question. But even at that point,

Pearson believed that Michigan

had enough healthy players to

field a team.

“At that point we thought we

were still in good shape,” Pearson

said. “We had 24-25 healthy

guys who were testing regularly

and had no issues. But obviously

that wasn’t good enough for the

NCAA.”

Despite the positive test, the

Wolverines went to sleep on

Thursday believing that they would

take the ice against the bulldogs

on Friday. Prior to Pearson’s

conversation with Richelew, the

players were in their hotel rooms,

preparing for the game like they

would on any other game day,

preparing to leave Scheels Arena

at 12:45.

But at 11:30, Pearson called a

team meeting to inform his players

of the cancellation. According to

him, the team already suspected the

bad news to come. While the team

was disheartened, Pearson said

they handled it well — especially

the seniors, whose college careers

may have just come to an end

following two consecutive seasons

with abrupt finishes.

“I think initially just shock,”

Pearson said. “Then comes the

disappointment obviously about

the future, what the future holds.

The first time was really tough last

year, because it was so sudden. I

think once we found out there was

an issue within our program, our

team, then … there was some real

concern amongst our team. But I

think they’ll move forward quickly.

They’re young, and they have to.

We can’t change what’s happened,

but we have a say in what’s going to

happen in the future and how we

react to it.”

Put simply, Michigan’s season

came to a devastating end on

Friday following a hectic week. In a

season full of uncertainty due to the

ongoing pandemic, the Wolverines

largely avoided any COVID-19

related issues. But at the worst

possible time, it all came crashing

down.

“I just wish we could have

completed the journey,” Pearson

said. “Or at least had the opportunity

to compete on the ice.

“It just is a real shallow feeling

to be beaten by COVID.”

Leigha Brown dribbled down

the lane after catching the ball off

the inbounds pass. Forgoing her

signature mid-range jumper, the

junior wing brought the ball all the

way down to the block for a layup.

The ball rolled out of her hands

and into the hoop with just 19

seconds left in overtime. Down

by three, the Michigan women’s

basketball team needed someone to

step up and make a big play. Brown,

like she’d done all second half, was

the one to do so.

Though the No. 6 seed Wolverines

would end up losing 78-75 to No. 2

seed Baylor, Brown’s second half

nearly powered them to another

upset.

In
the
Sweet
16
matchup,

Michigan needed its offense firing

on all cylinders. Early on, the offense

fell flat, relying solely on junior

forward Naz Hillmon.

Facing an aggressive Baylor

defense,
Brown
had
struggled

throughout the first half to play a

big offensive role. Typically the one-

two punch with Hillmon, Michigan

needed Brown to step up in the

second half to help turn the tide.

Coming out of halftime, Brown

did just that. As the Bears continued

to
double
down
on
Hillmon,

Michigan needed someone else to

produce on offense, as has been the

case so many times this season.

Brown started the second half

with just four points. She ended

the game with 23. Flaunting her

signature mid-range jumper, Brown

created space for herself on offense.

“Obviously all of you guys see the

offense that she brings to the floor,”

Hillmon said. “When I’m drawing

a lot of attention, her eyes light up …

she takes over any chance that she

has the opportunity to.”

Pushing the ball in transition,

Brown racked up some transition

points, alongside a clutch 3-pointer

late in the second half. She also

went 4-for-4 from the free-throw

line, most of which came on driving

layups in the lane.

Up until the end of the game,

Baylor led the Wolverines, gaining

a 12 point lead early in the first half.

Throughout the second half, the

Bears struggled to hold onto their

lead as Brown continued to light up

their defense.

“You guys see how special she is,”

Michigan coach Kim Barnes Arico

said. “Such a dynamic 1-2 punch

with her and Naz and so many

teams just focus on Naz that it really

opened things up for Leigha. She’s an

incredible, incredible player. She’s a

competitor.”

At the end of overtime, after a

Baylor player stepped out of bounds

with the ball, Michigan had one last

chance to salvage the game.

Cutting toward the inbounder,

Brown received the pass a couple

feet behind the 3-point arc. With 0.9

seconds left on the clock, Brown only

had time to turn and shoot over her

defender. Chucking up a shot that

narrowly missed the rim, Brown

could only stand and watch as the ball

landed on the court and time ran out.

Brown might have carried the

Wolverines through the second half,

but when push came to shove, Brown

just wasn’t enough.

JACK KINGSLEY
Daily Sports Editor

ABBIE TELGENHOF

Daily Sports Writer

EMMA MATI/Daily

COVID-related issues within Michigan’s program prevented the Wolverines from facing Minnesota-Duluth on
Friday, putting a premature end to their season.

JULIA SCHACHINGER/Daily

After over seven months without a positive COVID-19 test, the Wolverines left Fargo without playing a single
postseason game.

The NCAA messed up. Michigan’s players are paying the price.

BRENDAN
ROOSE

The Michigan Daily — michigandaily.com
Sports
14 — Wednesday, March 31, 2021

Online Event: Wednesday, March 31st, 2021 | 4:00 p.m.

An online lecture. For more information, visit
events.umich.edu/event/81873 or call 734.615.6667

IF THEY
ONL
Y KNEW

VINCENT
HUTCHINGS

Hanes Walton Jr. Collegiate Professor of
Political Science and Afroamerican and
African Studies

Informing Blacks and
Whites about the
Racial Wealth Gap

Photo by C. Morgan Engel/NCAA Photos via Getty Images

Back to Top

© 2024 Regents of the University of Michigan