100%

Scanned image of the page. Keyboard directions: use + to zoom in, - to zoom out, arrow keys to pan inside the viewer.

Page Options

Download this Issue

Share

Something wrong?

Something wrong with this page? Report problem.

Rights / Permissions

This collection, digitized in collaboration with the Michigan Daily and the Board for Student Publications, contains materials that are protected by copyright law. Access to these materials is provided for non-profit educational and research purposes. If you use an item from this collection, it is your responsibility to consider the work's copyright status and obtain any required permission.

April 15, 2020 - Image 4

Resource type:
Text
Publication:
The Michigan Daily

Disclaimer: Computer generated plain text may have errors. Read more about this.

N

obody should have to choose

between their vote and

their health, but Wisconsin

voters faced this decision due to

reckless and politically-motivated

actions taken by the Republican

Party and a complicit United States

Supreme Court.

As
COVID-19
forces
stay-at-

home orders and social distancing,

numerous states have postponed

their primary elections in the name

of public health. This is the right

decision. Having people leave their

homes in the middle of a pandemic

and gather en masse at polling places,

interacting with others and touching

shared surfaces, is clearly a recipe

for disaster.

In order to protect his constituents,

Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers tried to

postpone the state’s primary election

until June. However, the GOP had

other plans.

The GOP sued to keep the April

7 election date, taking the case all

the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

In a five to four ideological split,

the conservative justices voted to

allow the election to be held on the

original date. Justice Ruth Bader

Ginsberg, joined by the other three

liberal justices, dissented, saying

that continuing to hold the election

“will result in massive

disenfranchisement.”

This

disenfranchisement

of voters was clear

during Election Day.

Fears over COVID-

19 led to a shortage

of poll workers and

widespread
poll

closures. Milwaukee,

a diverse city with

about
600,000

residents, had their

usual
180
polling

places reduced to just five. This

led to hours-long lines with people

having to wait outside during bouts

of rain and hail. Overall turnout was

down significantly from 49 percent

in the 2016 primary to 31 percent.

This lower turnout can in part be

attributed to only one party having

a
competitive
primary,
but
the

influence of COVID-19 can also not

be overlooked.

Though Wisconsin has no-excuse

absentee voting, which allows people

to vote via mail instead of in-person

and is one of the most promising

ways to vote during a pandemic,

Wisconsin’s system has many issues.

Some voters did not receive their

absentee ballots despite requesting

them. Another major issue was

that the appeals court upheld a

requirement that every person who

submits an absentee ballot must have

a witness sign their ballot before it

can be returned. For people who are

self-isolating or live alone, this can

be a major barrier to voting.

The inability for some people

to vote was not a coincidence,

it was a coordinated strategy to

disenfranchise
certain
voters.

COVID-19 is mostly concentrated in

the urban areas in Wisconsin, such

as Milwaukee. Therefore, many of

the less diverse suburban and rural

areas did not experience the same

poll closures and fears compared to

the larger, more diverse cities. It is

evident that holding the in-person

election was a thinly veiled action

on the part of the state GOP to

disenfranchise diverse voters who

overwhelmingly support Democrats.

The
most
important
race
on

the ballot was not the Democratic

primary, instead, it was a Wisconsin

state Supreme Court race. There is

currently a lawsuit pending before

the court about a move by the state

legislature
to
purge
more
than

200,000 voters from the voter rolls.

The decision will have repercussions

for the 2020 election, given that

President
Donald
Trump
won

Wisconsin by exactly one percent in

2016. The purging of the voter rolls

is a move by the GOP to help Trump

and once again disenfranchise young

people and minorities. Wisconsin

voters
clearly
understood
the

importance of this race, as they

elected the Democratic

judicial candidate in a

shocking upset.

As
infuriating
and

saddening as it was to

witness this blatant act

of
voter
suppression,

it was still inspiring to

see
voters
determined

to exercise their basic

rights. These were people

who
were
willing
to

struggle for their vote.

They were willing to

stand for hours in the

rain and the hail. They were willing

to put their own safety at risk all to

exercise their right to vote.

However, there is something that

we all can learn from this. So often

when I talk to people on campus about

voting, they say it is too hard or too

complicated. We don’t know “hard.”

“Hard” is knowing that you can either

put your life at risk and go to the polls

or stay home but allow the fraudulent

election of a judge who may take away

your right to vote. Going to the polls

took courage. So many people in this

country and around the world cannot

vote, but they would — and often do —

risk it all for that right.

So the next time there is an election

and you aren’t sure if you want to

take the time to vote, think about

the people who went to the polls in

Wisconsin. Let their courage inspire

you to participate in our democracy in

a way that many people cannot.

4A — Wednesday, April 15, 2020
Opinion
The Michigan Daily — michigandaily.com

Alanna Berger
Zack Blumberg

Brittany Bowman
Emily Considine
Jess D’Agostino

Jenny Gurung
Cheryn Hong
Krystal Hur
Ethan Kessler
Zoe Phillips
Mary Rolfes

Michael Russo
Timothy Spurlin
Miles Stephenson

Joel Weiner
Erin White

ERIN WHITE
Managing Editor

Stanford Lipsey Student Publications Building

420 Maynard St.

Ann Arbor, MI 48109

tothedaily@michigandaily.com

ELIZABETH LAWRENCE

Editor in Chief

EMILY CONSIDINE AND

MILES STEPHENSON

Editorial Page Editors

Unsigned editorials reflect the official position of The Daily’s Editorial Board.

All other signed articles and illustrations represent solely the views of their authors.

EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS

ISABELLE SCHINDLER | COLUMN

The sacred vote

Isabelle Schindler can be reached at

ischind@umich.edu.

T

he coronavirus pandemic

began as a murmur of

distant
contagion.

Like many other newsworthy

tragedies, it seems unreal and

somehow unthreatening until

it happens to you. The world

has been shocked by a wave

of uncertainty. People were

ripped from their comfortable

nooks of life and normalcy

with no warning, no time to

process. As a student on the

big, bustling University of

Michigan campus, my daily

routine has shifted largely.

However,
I’ve
chosen
to

develop a positive perspective

on my new reality — a decision

I know is a privilege not

everyone has the opportunity

to make in this unprecedented

time. My routine can continue,

and
there
are
even
new

possibilities that were not

available to me in Ann Arbor

(beyond that of quality New

Jersey bagels and access to

Wawa coffee). I’ve found peace

in a new perspective and the

prospect of technology.

With stay-at-home orders

restricting many from leaving

their
homes,
it
becomes

increasingly challenging to

make days feel anything but

mundane. It was not until a

week ago that I realized the

importance of something I had

completely
underestimated

the
role
of
throughout

quarantine:
technology.
I

would like to recognize that

this is not a luxury enjoyed

by all. This, however, made

my realization even stronger:

We need technology not only

for ourselves but especially

for individuals without the

opportunities and resources

we so often take for granted.

Zoom, BlueJeans, Google

Hangouts and more video

platforms have become the

new classrooms for countries

across the globe. Without

technology, this would not

be possible. While there is

undeniably a difference in

learning through my computer

screen in my pajamas, I still

have the opportunity to learn

from professors I’ve grown

comfortable listening to over

a semester’s worth of work. I

am grateful for the chance to

continue my education even

if the circumstances are a bit

unorthodox. I unexpectedly

find myself longing for lecture

halls yet remain grateful for

the familiar vibrato of my

professors’ voices through a

time where nearly everything

else is uncharted territory. Not

only school but work, too, has

been transitioned to remote

operations — an unthinkable

feat without solid WiFi and

access to internet software.

Despite being isolated to

a house with only my mom,

my dad and my dog, I have

the ability to regularly talk

to my sister in Nashville,

Tennessee, and my brother

in a house around the corner.

Technology
has
presented

us with the possibility to

continue
conversing
with

friends, family and colleagues.

My four-year-old niece has

learned to ask us to “Zoom

her” and my family regularly

conducts games over different

video chat rooms. Moving out

of a constantly occupied dorm

building to a home occupied

by three people has felt much

livelier than anticipated. With

everyone
experiencing
this

pandemic
simultaneously,

it seems communication is

actually more common now

than before our lives were

essentially
paused
until

further
notice.
The
sheer

possibility of communicating

with the outside world —

family, friends and beyond

— helps to keep potential

loneliness and the inevitable

stir-craziness at bay.

The routine I had grown

so
comfortable
replicating

day after day may have been

taken away from me. My trips

to the University of Michigan

Museum of Art cafe may now

be trips down the stairs to my

Keurig, but I am grateful to be

able to adapt my perspective to

the new circumstances around

me. It is this adaptation that

I encourage you to focus on.

The space around us can

be refocused to provide the

different sectors of our lives

a temporary substitute for

the musty tables in Hatcher

Graduate Library and a Friday

night trip to Frita Batidos.

While I yearn for my daily

walks
to
CityRow,
I
am

thankful for the unbelievable

camaraderie
demonstrated

by
fitness
apps
and

instructors everywhere. Free

memberships and Instagram/

Facebook Live have provided

people the opportunity to

continue to exercise, dance,

sing and even act from the

comfort (and safety) of their

homes.
In
lieu
of
movie

theater
releases,
movies

have been streamed online

and
uploaded
to
different

streaming
networks.
The

world has adapted and molded

to fit this new technological

way of life.

While all of these uses

of
technology
and
social

media platforms are arguably

incredible adaptations to a

social-distancing
lifestyle,

it is the access to news and

applications
that
augment

safety measures that stand

out
amid
the
coronavirus

pandemic. Being informed on

the latest news is imperative

to navigate this crisis in the

safest
and
most
effective

way to “flatten the curve.”

Additionally,
apps
like

Instacart
allow
people
to

avoid grocery stores and thus

avoid
potentially
infecting

others or themselves.

Though I encourage people

to continue to go outside safely

and avoid an overwhelming

amount of screen time, it

has been reassuring to find

something positive amid a

very negative time in history.

Without technology, life truly

would be paused for everyone,

but instead, we have found a

way to adapt to this new, much

smaller world available to

each of us, albeit much more

virtually than ever before. In

the absence of The Michigan

Daily paper to hold, we have

continued to write and publish

to our virtual platform. With

my regular morning coffee,

my phone acts as a substitute

for the paper I know I will

someday hold again. For now,

I’m happy to report that my

phone will suffice.

The transition to life online

JESS D’AGOSTINO | COLUMN

Jess D’Agostino can be reached at

jessdag@umich.edu.

Fears over
COVID-
19 led to a

shortage of poll

workers and
widespread
poll closures.

CONTRIBUTE TO THE CONVERSATION

Readers are encouraged to submit letters to the

editor and op-eds. Letters should be fewer than 300
words while op-eds should be 550 to 850 words.

Send the writer’s full name and University affiliation to

tothedaily@michigandaily.com.

Back to Top

© 2024 Regents of the University of Michigan