electric, and improving energy efficiency in homes, businesses, schools, places of worship, recreational sites and government facilities. Ann Arbor Mayor Christopher Taylor said the plan will be disruptive, but will create a community that better incorporates its values of sustainability and equity. “Ann Arbor 2030 will be materially different than Ann Arbor 2020,” Taylor said. “It’ll be a denser community, a more electrified community, a community that emphasizes renewable energy.” The plan will dedicate $900 million to reduce miles traveled in vehicles by at least 50 percent, which will eliminate 8 percent of community- wide emissions. Missy Stults, Ann Arbor’s sustainability and innovations manager, said some of the costs can be offset by outside sources of funding, but A2Zero’s billion-dollar price tag is necessary. “It is expensive, but inaction is far more expensive, as we’re coming to find out,” Stults said. “Whether or not we do this, the climate is still changing. This is just an imperative to help mitigate the impacts of what’s coming.” Though City Council passed Resolution 19-2103: “A Resolution in Support of Creating a Plan to Achieve Ann Arbor Community-Wide Climate Neutrality by 2030” long before COVID-19’s disruption, leaders designed A2Zero as a “living plan” prepared to adjust to obstacles. Taylor said the COVID-19 crisis will hurt and hinder the community’s ability to achieve carbon neutrality, but the scope of the crisis can be viewed as an opportunity. “All lines of work, all manners of doing things, are open to interrogation,” Taylor said. “The old way of running an economy, the old way of doing business, the old way of operating civil society is subject to change, subject to reexamination, subject to improvement. As we figure out where we go next, reconstituting as a functioning society with the goal of carbon neutrality will be a part of our recovery.” Stults said the current COVID-19 pandemic is an opportunity to double down on the plan’s resilience efforts intended to strengthen community responses to a changing climate. She said while most of our lives have paused because of the pandemic, natural and manmade disasters will continue. “From a resilience standpoint, I’m terrified thinking about what’s going to happen during a pandemic when we’re socially isolated and the storm takes power out,” Stults said. “What do we do then? What does it look like when our food supply chain gets disrupted? The pandemic isn’t related to climate change, but the pandemic is laying bare the vulnerabilities that we have regardless.” Stults said the community needs to accept a degree of failure as part of the process to achieve the ultimate goal of carbon neutrality. “This idea of being okay with failure, or failure positive as we call it, is a total paradigm shift in most situations, but so is climate change,” Stults said. “So, we have to be comfortable with trying something and being okay coming back and saying, ‘You know, that was not as successful as we thought it was going to be.’ The ultimate objective is a safe climate, it’s a high quality of life. Basically, a bunch of things can fail for different reasons, and we have to be okay with that.” Rackham student Matthew Sehrsweeney, an organizer in Michigan’s Climate Action Movement, said environmental activists on campus have been grappling with how to continue their work amid social distancing measures. He said activists have worked to understand how to maintain low-carbon lifestyles after social distancing measures are lifted, demonstrate solidarity with movements fighting for racial, economic and carceral justice and highlight the danger posed by environmental injustices such as poor air quality. Sehrsweeney pointed to ways the University could reduce its carbon emissions. “Universities are always flying people in and hosting big conferences where people are flying across the country,” said Sehrsweeney. “Now we’re demonstrating all these online tools that we can use to bring people in virtually and you don’t have to be flying them across the country.” Sehrsweeney said there are significant barriers to achieving carbon neutrality, pointing to state laws and COVID-19, but that the community’s plan is essential. “It’s absolutely necessary,” Sehrsweeney said. “Especially for a city like Ann Arbor that has pretty concentrated wealth. If Ann Arbor can’t do it, then how are any poor cities going to do it?” Taylor said the community will accomplish carbon neutrality by 2030. “The bottom line is, we have a carbon neutrality goal,” Taylor said. “That is a commitment from the city government, and we’re going to do everything we can to achieve that goal.” Daily Staff Reporter Julia Rubin can be reached at julrubin@umich. edu. Durham said the University sent the mass email cautioning students receiving financial aid about the risk of dropping below full time prior to President Trump signing the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act into law on March 27. The act outlines a monetary relief package which in part provides the University with funds to support students reliant on financial aid. “We did intentionally send that email to help students plan in case federal relief was not made available to colleges and universities,” Durham said. “Thankfully, since that email, the CARES Act has provided flexibility for those students impacted by Covid 19.” During any particular school year, students receiving need and merit based scholarships are required to meet federal as well as University set guidelines specific to their scholarship, known as Satisfactory Academic Requirements. These guidelines can include volunteer hours, academic grade point average and minimum credit hours. The CARES Act now ensures that throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, students receiving financial aid will not be penalized for not fulfilling these requirements. In Section 3509, the act states that in determining whether a student maintains satisfactory academic progress, “an institution of higher education may, as a result of a qualifying emergency, exclude from the quantitative component of the calculation any attempted credits that were not completed by such student without requiring an appeal by such student.” Angela Morabito, U.S. Department of Education press secretary, reiterated the purpose of this act in an email to The Daily. “We know that this national public health emergency has created challenges for students and we are continually working to provide institutions and students with the flexibility they need as they make the transition to distance education,” Morabito wrote. Students who assumed they could not drop below full-time credit status due to the initial email sent on March 24 can still withdraw from a class due to the University-wide add/drop policy extension. Macleod said the University’s lack of clarity regarding required credit hours is placing a further burden on students with financial aid. “I think it’s incredibly misleading,” Macleod said. “I think they are concealing some opportunities for people, that they don’t have to stay full time necessarily to keep their scholarships. But by sending a mass email to everyone saying that you have to stay full time, that just kind of closes some doors for people.” LSA junior Amytess Girgis is another student who misinterpreted the email by the University. Girgis is a recipient of the Penelope W. and E. Roe Stamps Scholarship merit-based scholarship. Under federal guidelines during a typical school year, students receiving this scholarship are required to maintain full-time status. Girgis felt this message was particularly damaging due to the uncertainty many students with financial aid feel due to job losses, moving and a quick transition to online classes. “The impression to me was just that a lot of students, including myself, who are thrown into this confusing COVID situation, who are suddenly spending a lot more time than they normally would taking care of family members, taking care of themselves, moving, working, are scared because they read this email and think that there is absolutely no way they can cut back on their course load,” Girgis said. Girgis attributed the misunderstanding to poor communication by the University. “This is a communications issue,” Girgis said. “I wish that the University had been smarter about how they relate these messages and had done it with a bit more caution in how they word their emails.” Reporter Callie Teitelbaum can be reached at cteitelb@umich. edu. Reporter Jenna Siteman can be reached at jsiteman@umich. edu. Martin said he should not have to pay full tuition with the loss of on-campus resources and facilities. “I’m not able to utilize things like the buildings for my classes,” Martin said. “I’m not sure exactly how much building maintenance and upkeep costs each student, but whatever it is I’d like to keep my portion of that since I literally cannot use the buildings… Obviously the (University) could not have foreseen this and they can’t just not clean buildings, but they can reduce the services they apply to buildings.” For Martin, tuition is not just about credits, but the opportunities available on campus. “I’m not just paying for the credits,” Martin said. “I’m paying for the ability to network with other students, have research opportunities, engage in the student clubs and experience college life in Ann Arbor. The actual exchange of goods from the University to me is, yes, a degree, but that’s not the only reason I and many others attend college. Some things simply can’t be replaced online.” Though Martin is in favor of tuition reduction, he recognizes that faculty and staff must be paid to continue teaching classes and provide some services remotely. Martin said this only further complicates the issue of tuition costs and financial resources available to the University. A FAQ page from the Office of the Registrar addresses winter term tuition and fees and this approach also will apply to spring/summer term as well, according to Fitzgerald. The page explains that tuition will continue to pay faculty and staff as well as additional expenses. “Tuition and fees will continue to pay for our faculty teaching courses as well as all the associated costs of delivering our educational experience in this COVID-related remote environment,” the page reads. “Instructors will be available and delivering content, albeit in an alternative format, and students will be completing their classes, receiving credit and grades, and continuing to work toward their degree requirements at a world-class institution.” Unlike Martin, Engineering freshman Kashaf Usman said she has canceled her previous plans to take summer courses. With a difficult transition to remote learning, Usman said in an email to The Daily that being charged full tuition for online classes was not ideal for her. “I had planned on taking a few courses before everything started bandwagoning, but staying home and taking classes via Zoom has hindered my learning greatly,” Usman wrote. “I have always had trouble focusing in general, and this situation isn’t helping. Since this was my first semester at Michigan and I experienced this semester with such hardship, I decided not to take courses over the summer.” Usman also noted the types of classes taken online might affect how they occur online. “Many people don’t have the option to take summer off and paying full tuition for online classes is a little absurd,” Usman wrote. “People who have interactive labs are at a greater disadvantage than students like me that are mostly taking EECS courses, which are I guess doable online.” Biology lecturer Cindee Giffen teaches Biology 173 lab over the spring/summer term and said though students may feel they are getting less out of interactive labs, courses like these are needed in order for students to graduate on time. “Nobody that’s teaching in spring and summer is doing it because we get a lot of money or because we’re enjoying this,” Giffen said. “The reason why I’m doing it in spring and summer is because I teach a course that’s a prerequisite for a lot of other courses and if we didn’t offer it this spring then a lot of students would be behind in their education. From a lecturer’s perspective, we’re just trying to offer the courses so that students can progress in their degree requirements. Our concern primarily is to make sure that students can actually finish.” She said if tuition were to be lowered, as a lecturer she would make even less money during the spring/ summer term. “For lecturers, the vast majority of our appointments are dedicated to teaching,” Giffen said. “The people that are doing a lot of the teaching and in spring and summer are lecturers. When you look at the faculty salaries for people who are teaching in spring and summer, we’re not the people who make the big money. If I don’t teach in spring and summer, I make no money — zero dollars — for four months. For my spring class that I’m teaching, by the time benefits and everything are covered, I’ll probably make around $7,500 for the whole summer.” Giffen said the faculty and staff would be most affected by tuition lowering compared to administrators, who make significantly more money. “Not that I would tell students who they should be complaining to, but I don’t think that it’s the faculty that have the really deep pockets here, especially given that most of us are lecturers and do make less money,” Giffen said. “I think the place where there is extra money would be among our administrators.” Daily Staff Reporter Angelina Brede can be reached at angbrede@umich. edu. Friday, April 10, 2020 — 3 News The Michigan Daily — michigandaily.com AID From Page 1 CARBON From Page 1 SUMMER From Page 1