100%

Scanned image of the page. Keyboard directions: use + to zoom in, - to zoom out, arrow keys to pan inside the viewer.

Page Options

Download this Issue

Share

Something wrong?

Something wrong with this page? Report problem.

Rights / Permissions

This collection, digitized in collaboration with the Michigan Daily and the Board for Student Publications, contains materials that are protected by copyright law. Access to these materials is provided for non-profit educational and research purposes. If you use an item from this collection, it is your responsibility to consider the work's copyright status and obtain any required permission.

March 17, 2020 - Image 5

Resource type:
Text
Publication:
The Michigan Daily

Disclaimer: Computer generated plain text may have errors. Read more about this.

Tuesday, March 17, 2020 — 5
Arts
The Michigan Daily — michigandaily.com

New Orleans rapper Jay Electronica is one

of the greatest enigmas in the history of hip

hop. He first came up in the mid-2000s with

hits on MySpace. He then started dating singer

Erykah Badu; the eccentricity of her partners

after dating her has been the subject of memes

in the hip-hop community. In 2009, he dropped

“Exhibit C,” a not-so-cult classic of sorts that

is — over a decade later — still way ahead of

our time. Suddenly, everybody wanted a piece

of Jay Electronica: Labels entered a bidding

war for him, Jay-Z’s Roc Nation won out and

then Electronica spent the next decade as a

nutty Twitter grumbler with only leaked songs

and loose singles to his name. Billboard asked,

“What would it take for you to finally put the

project out?” Electronica responded, “An album

is something that was created by corporations as

a product to make

money.” The man’s

been in the public

consciousness for

nearly
13
years,

probably
rapping

in some form for

almost twice that

time, and — lo and

behold — a debut

album has arrived.

I never thought

I’d see the day.

HotNewHipHop

actually wrote a

timeline leading up

to the release of A Written Testimony that spans

over a decade. It’s been a long time coming. To

the surprise of many, Jay-Z’s steadfast cosign

materialized into a close musical collaboration.

Though his vocals are uncredited, Jay-Z is on

almost every track. Before listening, I had no

idea which rapper would be struggling to keep

up with the other. As it turns out, neither Jay

struggles to keep up. Here, both rappers are

neck-and-neck.

Jay Electronica’s bars are as tight on this

record as they’ve been since the era of “Exhibit

C,” deftly finishing English rhymes with Arabic,

Spanish, Jamaican patois, even West African

pidgin. Electronica raps, “But all praise due

to Allah Subhanahu wa ta’ala / I put on for my

nation like I’m King T’Challa / Crushing the

oyibo that try to bring wahala.” It’s easy to get

lost between the lines when each bar needs

its own Google search to be broken down, but

“wa ta’ala / King T’Challa / bring wahala” is as

gratifying a rhyme scheme as they come.

Electronica’s lyrical-miracle-spiritual ecstasy

can get hazy and convoluted. His infamous

wordplay on his stage name from “Exhibit C”

spawned a hilarious parody Twitter account

that exposed how anything could sound like an

Electronica line with complex enough rhymes.

There are moments of clarity on this record

when the song concept is straightforward and

empathetic. They usually come from Jay-Z, like

when he pours his heart out through the lines “I

got numbers in my phone that’ll never ring again

/ ‘Cause Allah done called ‘em home, so until

we sing again.” But these moments are too few

and far between to ground the album, and their

purpose remain airy and muddled. That being

said, if I had to throw a party for linguistics

majors, A Written Testimony would make it on

the playlist.

Even if the album’s concept is in the air, it has

a handful of truly unique tracks, among them

“The Blinding” with Travis Scott. It’s the only

track where Jay-Z and Jay Electronica go bar-

for-bar, a dynamic so killer that it’s a shame the

two aren’t trading bars all over the album. In a

landscape of hip hop where it’s growing more

and more difficult to have production that

stands out from the

rest — everyone has

a killer producer in

their pocket — “The

Blinding”
stands

out for its haunting

vocal
samples

and
unforgiving,

blaring
bassline.

Fortunately,

Electronica

had
four
killer

producers in his

pocket for this beat.

Jay-Z
may

be
featured
on

almost every track, but it’s clear why his vocals

are uncredited. This is a Jay Electronica album

through and through. It’s an album rooted

in Islam and the Five Percenters movement.

It’s rooted in Electronica’s infatuation with

the spiritual and the intangible, with culture,

philosophy and history. In this realm, Jay-Z is a

guest. He may be one of the hip-hop greats, but

his bars remain sharp out of necessity to keep up

with a meticulous writer like Electronica.

I’m a sucker for complex rhymes, I’m a sucker

for unconventional beats and I’m a sucker for Jay

Electronica’s whole schtick, I’ll admit it. Still, A

Written Testimony doesn’t sit well with me. “The

Neverending Story” is interesting enough only

for an interlude, but it’s over four minutes long.

On “Flux Capacitor,” Both rappers (especially

Jay-Z) sound totally off, like their verses are

on top of the wrong track. One of best songs,

“Shiny Suit Theory,” is a decade-old relic from

the era of peak Electronica hype. Aside from

the standouts, most songs just sort of meander.

But that’s natural. “Meandering” sums up Jay

Electronica’s whole career, and somewhere

on that long walk toward this debut album,

he strayed too far from the creative focus that

founded his fame.

Electronica finally drops LP

DYLAN YONO
Daily Arts Writer

FLICKR

You know those television shows that

begin by stating they were filmed in front

of a live studio audience? Until recently, I

never understood the significance of it —

not just what it meant for that particular

show, but also for television as a whole.

I missed out on the time period when my

generation rediscovered and resurrected

shows like “Friends” and “Seinfeld” for

whatever reason. Of course, I eventually

fell in love with them, but long after

the rest of the world. With absolutely

no justification for missing out on the

cultural
craze

that surrounded

these
shows,

I
regretted

dismissing

them.
This

feeling
of

cultural

isolation led me

to
drastically

rethink
how

I decide what

to
watch.

Even
then,
I

still made the

mistake
of

dismissing any

show
with
a

laugh track.

Erasing the laugh track or “canned

laughter” from multi-camera situation

comedies is not an option, nor should

it ever be one. It has been a staple of the

genre since its inception. In the 1940s

and ’50s, most radio shows were taped

in front of a live audience, meaning that

actors had to leave pauses in dialogue for

laughs to allow for a natural transition

for both the actors and the viewers. With

the emergence of television, the multi-

camera format was created to evoke a

sense of liveness, so viewers at home could

feel like they were with the audience

when they laughed. Today, the general

consensus toward laugh tracks is that

they’re outdated and distracting. I used

to hold this same belief — I told myself

if something was funny enough, I didn’t

need someone else to point it out for me.

On my spring break trip to Los Angeles,

I attended a live taping for ABC’s “The

Conners,” and it was quite the experience.

Regardless of how you feel about a laugh

track, attending a live taping is something

everyone should do at least once if given

the chance. At the same time, it was

extremely inconvenient for pretty much

everyone involved. The experience of

being part of the laugh track can feel more

exhausting than being one of the actors,

from what I can tell.

Given that this process has been going

on for over half a century, it’s funny to

see how inefficient parts of the process

can be. The taping officially began at 6

p.m., but the producers recommended

that we arrive at least 90 minutes before

— I arrived around 2:30 p.m. just to be

safe — and wait in a garage with benches

until given further directions. There were

already people in line, including some who

attend the live taping every week. Others,

like myself, were out-of-towners who

wanted a taste of being in a live audience.

At 4:30 p.m.,

I was brought to

the soundstage

and
asked
to

turn
in
my

phone.
Inside

the soundstage,

the
audience

sat
on
a
set

of
bleachers

that faced the

main
sets
of

the living room

and
kitchen.

There was even

a “hype man”

who riled up the

audience before

the
taping

began and kept the crowd entertained

between takes by giving away props from

the show or throwing out t-shirts.

The most interesting part of the whole

process was seeing all of its intricacies.

Around 7:30 p.m., they fed us sandwiches,

but we could only eat between takes. I

never knew how fast someone could eat

a sandwich until I saw the guy in front

of me. The “hype man” reminded us that

whether it’s the first take of a scene or the

fourth, we should always be laughing at

the same level. There was even one scene

where the audience genuinely gasped out

of surprise, but when they re-did the take,

we had to recreate our gasps.

Hearing others laugh, even if it’s

prerecorded, can make us enjoy the show

more. Even though television has changed

dramatically over the last decade, the “live

audience” aspect is something that will

always be important to the foundation

of television. No matter your opinion on

shows with laugh tracks, attending a live

taping is certainly worth adding to your

bucket list. If not for the actual show, do it

for the sake of seeing a form of television

that is becoming increasingly obsolete —

we owe Lucille Ball that much.

Why don’t you just leave
the laugh track well alone?

JUSTIN POLLACK

Daily Arts Writer

SONY PICTURES TELEVISION

TV NOTEBOOK
TV NOTEBOOK

ALBUM REVIEW

A Written Testimony

Jay Electronica

Roc Nation

Erasing the laugh track

or canned laughter
from multi-camera
situation comedies
is not an option, nor
should it ever be one.

Back to Top

© 2024 Regents of the University of Michigan