The Michigan Daily — michigandaily.com Arts Thursday, February 6, 2020 — 5 P O L I C Y T A L K S @ T H E F O R D S C H O O L CHRISTOPHER A. HART Former Chairman of the National Transportation Safety Board Photo: Philadelphia International Airport CL O SUP LEC T URE SERIE S Opportunities and challenges of autonomous vehicles: Role of governments? CO-SPONSORED BY THE SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, AND PUBLIC POLICY PROGRAM (STPP) Free and open to the public. Reception to follow. Information: 734-647-4091 or closup@umich.edu @fordschool #policytalks Monday, February 10, 2020 4:00 - 5:20 pm Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy Annenberg Auditorium, 1120 Weill Hall 735 S. State Street Frances Quinlan tackles the unpleasant on ‘Likewise’ MUSIC NOTEBOOK I don’t usually listen to indie rock, but when I do, it’s for a good reason. This time around, the reason is Frances Quinlan. The Hop Along frontwoman has decided to grace the world with her debut solo album Likewise. I don’t know much about indie rock, I admit. However, I do know what makes an outstanding album, and this is an outstanding album. Sonically, Likewise is a gorgeous nine-song romp through a glistening and glittering indie rock wonderland. Album opener “Pilitdown Man” takes a stroll down a piano-driven lane as Quinlan sings softly in a pleasingly off-kilter manner. “Rare Thing” is a hypnotic spiral staircase up to synth-pop heaven. “Went to LA” is a twinkling acoustic gaze up toward the stars marked by Quinlan’s ever-present ruminations on anything and everything. As a whole, Likewise is a sonic tour of Quinlan’s world, a world for everyone, filled with pleasant little quirks and easter eggs. Lyrically, however, Likewise is something of an oasis. Quinlan is floating by herself, accompanied only by her own thoughts and musings. She covers themes ranging from climate change, human compassion, solitude and even cannibalism. Despite this range, Quinlan is always laser- focused, dissecting each topic with the precision and ease of a surgeon. This description makes it seem like Likewise is a sterile operating room, but it certainly is not. Rather, it is a messy, scattered album similar to the natural world, which Quinlan wrangles with grace and poise, deftly handling everything that crosses her mind. “Detroit Lake” finds Quinlan striking the perfect balance between sonic beauty and lyrical dismay. She takes listeners to a conversation between the narrator and another person, far away from the namesake lake. In the song’s chorus, she sings, “Miles from all that’s between us at stake / Algae blooms up in Detroit Lake / Listening for my turn to come next / Leave, the same as I came in, more or less.” Quinlan describes a conversation running dry, perhaps the sign of a dying relationship, which, at the time, seems more important than the algal bloom in the distant Detroit Lake. “Detroit Lake” serves as a reminder that our actions can have grave consequences, yet we still are more concerned about ourselves, a message that rings true across the album. Likewise is a thoughtful album that is chock-full of compelling lyrics and ideas, but for some reason, Quinlan decides to end it with words that are not her own. Album closer “Carry the Zero” is a cover of the Built to Spill song of the same name, and despite its status as a cover, it’s so much more. In a personal album filled with her thoughts and feelings, it makes sense that Quinlan chose to include a cover of one of her favorite songs. She stays true to the essence of the song, but she makes it wholly her own. She makes it more subdued than the original, driven by an echoing synth line that, in true Quinlan fashion, eventually explodes into a full band, including blazing guitar licks and a pulsating bass line. All the focus is on her as she perfectly and thoughtfully delivers each line, closing her album beautifully. Likewise finds Frances Quinlan tackling some pretty complex themes, but she delivers them in a relatable, down-to-earth manner, thanks to her charming persona and gorgeous instrumentals. Quinlan is sure to make a fan out of anyone with Likewise. She certainly just made one out of me. JIM WILSON Daily Arts Writer Convos at Color Caberet ZOE PHILLIPS Senior Arts Editor COMMUNITY CULTURE PREVIEW Musical theatre tends to be dominated by whiteness. White characters breed white casting and white schooling in a positive feedback loop that has excluded artists of color for as long as the industry is old. The University’s School of Music, Theatre & Dance students know this — they live it. On a recent rainy evening, SMTD Junior Erica Ito put it this way: “[it’s] a predominantly white department in a predominantly white institution in a predominantly white field that we are entering that has a complicated history with people of color.” “The Color Cabaret” deals with all of this. Divided into two parts over roughly 90 minutes, the student-run show gives artists of color opportunities to sing and perform in roles rarely offered to them. In the first half, students take on famous color-consciously casted songs that make a difference to them as artists. Disney princesses and “Hadestown” are both set to make an appearance. The second half takes on iconic roles in musical theatre that have not been traditionally performed by people of color — “Don’t Rain on My Parade” from “Funny Girl” and “Music in the Mirror” from “A Chorus Line” topped Ito’s list of what to look forward to. The last few numbers will also tackle issues of intersectionality. Ito, who is co-producing the show alongside SMTD junior Thani Brant, started work on the cabaret with a few other MT upperclassmen back in November. The show has been an on-and- off biennial tradition for the past decade, but Ito and her team have revamped it into something extra special for 2020. The concept started in conversation — specifically, intergroup dialogues facilitated by director and SMTD senior Maya Imani. There, everyone involved had the chance to voice their experiences as performers of color. “These are conversations that we have with our roommates at 2 a.m. or coming home from rehearsal,” Imani said. She added that bringing such topics into a formalized space made people feel “like their thoughts and opinions about these things actually do have worth.” Imani and Ito both noted how special these dialogues quickly became, especially in their accentuation of every individual’s experience. Both women were pleasantly surprised by how much they could still learn from each other. Therein lies the theme of the show, too. It’s “sharing our experiences with each other,” Ito said, “and then pushing that into the audience.” Later that evening, Imani echoed this exact sentiment. “The cabaret is not about making a political statement,” she said. The performers are there to listen, support, validate and celebrate one another — the audience just gets to watch. And while the show has been an undertaking for its upperclassmen leadership, the impact is not lost on MT underclassmen of color, either. In fact, these dialogues were the first time the freshmen had ever been in a room with only people of color. “That sheer fact,” Imani said, reminded her of “how much the space, and who’s present in the space, can dictate what you allow yourself to bring out … How does being in a predominantly white space affect your artistry?” The show might not offer an answer, but it celebrates the opportunity to ask the question. The weight of such an opportunity doesn’t go unnoticed by Ito or Imani. While they both spoke highly of their supportive department that works alongside “The Color Cabaret” rehearsals and schedule requirements, they made an important distinction: the faculty prepares their students for the musical theatre industry as it exists today. Ito and Imani are creating a show for the industry they’d like to remake for tomorrow. “The Color Cabaret” plays this weekend on Friday and Saturday at 7 p.m. in The Newman Studio of the Walgreen Drama Center. Admission is free. Following the show, the actors will facilitate a round-table discussion to continue the conversations on being an artist of color in musical theatre. BOOKS NOTEBOOK On love triangles in fiction Last week I was reminded of the horrific love-triangle trope in young-adult novels when my friend brought up the “Shatter Me” series in our book club. She was a touch too excited (morbidly so) to share the gory details: “...and here’s the kicker, Adam and Warner are the only people that are able to touch her. Like, of course, it’s the love interests that are the kryptonite to her ‘super-power.’” Tahereh Mafi’s “Shatter Me” follows Juliette, a teenage girl who has a “fatal touch.” That is, after Juliette touches someone, they die. At the start of the novel, she’s locked up in a cell and hasn’t experienced human touch in years… until Adam. “Shatter Me” screams “young- adult dystopia” with the two male leads following the love- triangle trope to a T. Adam, the nice one and Warner, the bad boy/villain/anti-hero. After six sequels, guess which one Juliette ends up with (cue the eye-roll and yawn). Even though I’ve never read “Shatter Me,” it feels like I have. The thought of love triangles triggers the sensation of cockroaches crawling under my skin. With a physical revolution, I’m yanked back in time to 5th grade, where I read about my first love triangle ever: “Twilight.” It’s true. I ate up the “Twilight” series like a vampire after a weekend-long fast from blood. I was unabashedly Team Edward, and I felt betrayed when Bella swayed to Jacob in “New Moon.” I wanted to wallow in a ball and shake Bella out of her werewolf induced spell, “Edward is the love of your life!” Take my aforementioned turbulent emotions and apply them to any of the following series: “The Mortal Instruments,” “The Infernal Devices” (Side note — this series has unequivocally deterred me from love triangles forever. Tessa, you can’t have your cake and eat it too!), “The Hunger Games,” “Vampire Academy,” “The Selection.” It’s always the mean playboy with the traumatic past versus the nice, bland guy, typically best friends with our protagonist. With few exceptions (cough, “The Hunger Games”), the nice guys finish last. Now we return to the age- old question: If love triangles are so annoying, then why are they so popular? Certainly, my relationship with literature would be so much more stress- free if not for the dreaded love-triangle. It’s an idea I’ve ruminated on quite extensively in my brief foray back into the young-adult literature world. Why introduce a new potential love interest when it’s (mostly) clear who the protagonist will end up with? Then it hit me — I wouldn’t be reading these stories in the first place if it weren’t for their love triangles (my masochist tendencies notwithstanding of course). Hear me out, these books can’t stand on their own without the love-triangle. The love-triangle serves to hide the nonexistent plot and one- dimensional characters by upping the tension. If young- adult novels were mysteries, the love triangles would be the equivalent of whodunit plot- lines. The thing that’s driving the readers to finish X amount of sequels to these novels is the love-triangle. Imagine novels like “Shatter Me,” “The Selection” or “Twilight” without the love-triangle. It’s a stagnant, mushy book — the literary version of a pint of Ben & Jerry’s for breakfast, lunch and dinner. Where’s the flavor? It’s that elusive uncertainty of “will they or won’t they?” that motivates me to pick up the 1000 page hardcover of “Breaking Dawn,” fully aware that I’m not cracking that mammoth of a book to resolve the conflict with the Volturi. Despite the irritation, I sometimes need the spice of a love triangle in my life. With my (let’s be honest) absent love life, the drama of two men and one girl is alluring. Even without a plot, I’m flooded with a whirlwind of emotions: anger, angst, butterflies and relief. Let’s face it, love triangles sell for a reason. SARAH SALMAN Daily Arts Writer TV REVIEW Ted Bundy doc empowers Have you heard the name Karen Sparks? Nancy Wilcox? Kimberly Leach? You probably haven’t. But I can guarantee you’ve heard the name Ted Bundy. You know who he is and who he pretended to be. Chances are, you know as much about what he did as you can stomach but very little about who he did it to. You may know it’s a much, much longer list of names than the ones aforementioned, but you don’t know all the names. Amazon Prime’s new documentary series “Ted Bundy: Falling for a Killer” wants to change that. Anchored by interviews with Bundy’s longtime girlfriend Elizabeth Kendall, “Falling for a Killer” emphasizes the importance of a woman’s perspective on his crimes. The series begins with Kendall describing the blissful years leading up to Bundy’s infamous murder spree. Soon, the domestic tranquility of her family’s life is juxtaposed with the savage violence that came to define her seemingly perfect partner. Joined by feminist scholars, relatives of Bundy’s victims, female law enforcement officers and a few survivors of his crimes, Kendall attempts to explain how Bundy was able to attack potentially over 100 women within the span of four years. The series details how cultural and political movements influenced Bundy’s crimes and how the public understood them at the time. In the mid-1970s, the women’s liberation movement was in full swing, Roe v. Wade had recently secured women’s right to choose, and Republicans were scrambling to maintain control amidst Nixon’s disintegrating administration. Bundy, who previously aspired to study law and become a conservative politician, committed his murders at the height of the university protests and demonstrations calling for radical social change. While the connection between cultural movements and a psychopathic murderer’s motives may be tenuous, the link between a systemically oppressive society and male violence against women is undeniable. Kendall and her daughter, whom Bundy helped raise, recount anecdotes of his constant need to control their wardrobe and social lives. His reputation in the media as a criminal mastermind leading a perfect double life falls apart when his colleagues and relatives are able to tell their own stories. Capitalizing on tragedy and victims’ pain has become a characteristic of the true- crime genre, particularly regarding the crimes of Ted Bundy. After countless documentaries and 2019’s controversial film “Extremely Wicked, Shockingly Evil and Vile” starring Zac Efron (“Baywatch”) as the infamous killer, the story of Bundy’s crimes has been repeatedly rehashed with little new interpretation. “Ted Bundy: Falling for a Killer” provides a response to his version of events. One woman interviewed in “Falling for a Killer” has never spoken out before. Known to the public by the pseudonym Joni Letz, Karen Sparks is Bundy’s first known victim and one of his few survivors. In showing her face and telling her story, this series seeks to show its audience what the point is in revisiting these events. Rather than immortalize a manipulative rapist and murderer, “Falling for a Killer” opts to shift the public’s perspective on the topic and refocus the true-crime genre’s values. The show presents a group of women too often discounted as a list of names, rather than victims and survivors. You know his story. It’s time to learn theirs. ANYA SOLLER Daily Arts Writer Saddle Creek