Opinion The Michigan Daily — michigandaily.com 4 — Friday, January 31, 2020 Alanna Berger Brittany Bowman Zack Blumberg Emily Considine Cheryn Hong Krystal Hur Ethan Kessler Mary Rolfes Michael Russo Timothy Spurlin Miles Stephenson Joel Weiner Erin White Lola Yang ERIN WHITE Managing Editor Stanford Lipsey Student Publications Building 420 Maynard St. Ann Arbor, MI 48109 tothedaily@michigandaily.com Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan since 1890. ELIZABETH LAWRENCE Editor in Chief EMILY CONSIDINE AND MILES STEPHENSON Editorial Page Editors Unsigned editorials reflect the official position of The Daily’s Editorial Board. All other signed articles and illustrations represent solely the views of their authors. EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS RILEY DEHR | COLUMN Your Canada Goose is uglier than it looks I love Nicholas Cage. From his melodramatic performance alongside Cher in “Moonstruck” to his laughable screaming of “not the bees!” in “The Wicker Man,” his movies are iconic. While I am excited to see his new film, based on H.P. Lovecraft’s “Colours Out of Space,” at the State Theatre, I highly doubt it will surpass the brilliance of 2004’s “National Treasure.” Like “The Da Vinci Code” for fifth graders, it’s two hours of dumb fun that begin with Sean Bean and Cage, in all his mouthbreathing glory, riding across a sea of snow. As I watched the movie over Martin Luther King Jr. Day weekend for the first time in a decade, I was surprised to see Cage and Bean (who somehow survives the movie) wearing bright red Canada Goose parkas. Founded in 1957 as a jacket for Northern Canadians, Canada Goose’s parkas are designed to keep a person alive in temperatures as low as -30 degrees Celsius. In the 1980s, it became the iconic jacket of Antarctic researchers and the first Canadian to reach the summit of Mount Everest. Now, it’s the jacket of the rich and famous. The blue and red logo has been seen on dozens of celebrities, ranging from Kevin Bacon and Aubrey Plaza to a topless Kate Upton, who donned one of their parkas on a cover of Sports Illustrated magazine to the delight of teenage boys everywhere. Their parkas not only look like sleeping bags, but are described as “like wearing a sleeping bag” on elite fashion blogs. Even so, the lack of style hasn’t hindered them from becoming the new status symbol among America’s upper class. Most versions are priced at over $1,000 if you get it from a certified seller, the only way to ensure it isn’t a fake stuffed with German Shepard hair. Their increasing popularity has been to the financial gain of past presidential candidate Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Ut., whose former private equity firm, Bain Capital, owns a majority of stock in the company. While I could go on endlessly about these implications alone, the jackets are most infamous for their coyote fur hoods. Predictably, people unabashedly wearing fur has brought the ire of PETA, who released a video of distressed coyotes in traps, protesting the company’s fur use. Canada Goose has fired back by saying their trapping of coyotes is in accordance with Canada’s misleadingly named Agreement on International Humane Trapping Standards (AIHTS). This agreement allows coyotes to be captured using Duke No. 3 Rubber Jaws, which are banned in the EU for clamping down on the legs of animals, usually breaking them in the process. In the western United States, coyotes are then either shot in the head or bludgeoned to death, usually with a hammer, in accordance with state laws that vary greatly in what they consider humane. Most require a coyote to be trapped and killed within 24 hours, but states like Wyoming only require traps to be checked once every three days. “It’s horrible, to put it mildly,” says wildlife expert Stanley Gehrt in a Newsweek article regarding the controversy around the jackets. The coyotes often experience a mix of muscle damage and dehydration until their eventual death due to exposure to the elements or blood loss. Coyotes, which may form monogamous mating pairs like people, are also not subject to a hunting season in most western states, where Canada Goose gets their fur. This is done in most other fur-bearing species to reduce pup deaths, but this courtesy hasn’t been extended to these highly intelligent and social animals. Mother coyotes have even been known to chew their legs off in desperation to get back to their pups. With no way of knowing where the fur comes from, it can only be left to speculation how each jacket hood met its final moments. Some environmentalists have thrown their weight behind Canada Goose, citing the Western Coyote’s status as an overpopulated, native invader, thriving in new ranges where humans have extirpated wolves. This is posing an ecological threat to many North American biomes, as coyotes inhabit every single contiguous state in America. Even so, studies have found that areas with two-year coyote removal programs are back at pre-removal numbers within only eight months, indicating that hunting may be nothing more than a nonsense solution with unknown ecological implications. This isn’t the only thing that puts the company’s claims of “ethical sourcing” in question. The reason their jackets can sustain such low temperatures is due to the fine Canadian Hutterite goose down in the jackets. According to Canada Goose, “Each ounce of down has approximately two million fluffy filaments that interlock and overlap to create insulating pockets of air, which is what keeps you warm.” PETA released another video, showing one of their supplier farms crushing and suffocating its geese as they sent them to a slaughterhouse. Canada Goose says there is no other way to make a jacket that endures arctic temperatures without making synthetic furs and feathers. While cruel, animal fur and feathers are relatively carbon- neutral compared to manufacturing synthetic alternatives. In order to keep people warm in the coldest places on Earth, the company’s use of animal products may be acceptable. This argument, however, merely justifies the use of animal products in the jackets for Arctic explorers and researchers, not Hollywood celebrities. Sure, researchers and Nicholas Cage need them on their Antarctic expeditions, but do the students that populate the streets outside South University Avenue’s luxury condos? While Michigan winters are known for their harshness, they don’t compare to the places where the jackets are necessary. At the University of Michigan, they are status symbols that happen to keep you warm. With ample ethical ways to stay warm in Michigan, there is no excuse to have a fur hood dangling over your face in 2020. At best, wearing Canada Goose supports Mitt Romney and the needless killing of coyotes and geese, and at worst, it supports unspeakable and inexcusable cruelty, making you look less like Kate Upton and more like Cruella De Vil. Riley Dehr can be reached at rdehr@umich.edu. VARNA KODOTH | COLUMN Serving the underserved “ No matter where you’re from, you belong here.” This is the powerful message with which University of Michigan students are welcomed upon arrival to the Center for the Education of Women (CEW+) website, or the respective building. The first time I heard of CEW+ was at the end of the winter semester of my junior year, and while unknown to many, CEW+ is an incredible resource available to provide the space and support for advocacy initiatives to grow at the University. After learning more about the program, I took steps to involve myself with other strong and progressive women. This led me to conduct a focus group on women and marginalized communities in STEM departments at U-M with the support and guidance of CEW+. The results of this study will ultimately be incorporated into the COUNTS Toolkit for student success. COUNTS, the Council for Nontraditional Students, is responsible for addressing the importance of a strong community for nontraditional and underserved students at the University which includes, and is not limited to, student parents and caregivers. COUNTS is an online Canvas module dedicated to increasing awareness about social identities in the classroom and educating University students about the nontraditional student population. CEW+’s upcoming initiative is a Toolkit meant to teach members of the U-M community how to navigate different student identities. By engaging with this Toolkit, University staff are eligible to receive funding in support of any new endeavors or attempts to better support and include nontraditional students in their courses and programs. CEW+ passionately supports student-led efforts with the goal of improving the campus climate for all identities. The center even offers students the opportunity to apply for funding to implement programs or events geared toward increasing equity for nontraditional student populations. An example of this is the opportunity for U-M undergraduate student organizations to apply for $5,000 in funding through the Frances and Sydney Lewis Visiting Leaders Fund. Through the Frances and Sydney Lewis Fund, CEW+ partners with student organizations to bring women leaders to campus. From my work as a research assistant to Dr. Tiffany Marra, the director of CEW+, it is clear that CEW+ is committed to creating inclusive, accessible and safe educational spaces for undergraduate women and marginalized community members. Engaging in the classroom and attaining a productive learning experience is crucial to degree completion and student success. CEW+ is a resource that undergraduate students should be well-acquainted with, and the work that is accomplished here is of high impact in the U-M campus community. CEW+ works to empower women and underserved students at U-M by serving as an advocate and providing resources to help them reach their academic, financial and professional potential. During my junior year, a close friend of mine informed me that she had received emergency financial assistance from CEW+. Through the CEW+ counseling program, we are able to award Emergency Funds to assist with “unexpected financial emergencies that threaten to derail degree progress.” The intent here is to enable individuals to act independently and take control of their path. By way of workshops and events oriented around promoting leadership, career and personal development, CEW+ generates a safe and uplifting atmosphere for accomplishing goals and solving problems. Dr. Marra recommends that students attend a Midweek Mindfulness sit if they don’t feel comfortable pausing and reflecting on their experiences. Mindfulness meditations are 30 minute events designed to help people practice recentering themselves in the present. CEW+ also leads events and workshops to address the needs of students, including a workshop coming up on Feb. 5 titled, “‘Am I Good Enough?’ Yes, You Are!”, which will focus on self-doubt and impostor syndrome. These are the types of workshops that exist to uplift and motivate students to chase after their ambitions. CEW+ is committed to ensuring that student identities are a positive influence in the path to success at U-M rather than a hindrance or burden. Dr. Marra has discussed her passion for working and learning from the U-M community of women and nontraditional students. “Whether it be a student working full-time while taking 15 credits or a student caring for a loved one or a student fighting for the rights of DACA students knowing it may not lead to better results for himself, I am continually amazed by the grit and determination of students as they trail blaze their path through U-M,” said Marra. CEW+ redefines what it is that professional development means to U-M students. Professional development events at CEW+ involve stepping outside of your comfort zone as a component of growth. Taking a risk to be slightly uncomfortable can lead to a greater understanding of something that students may have felt to be unknown or intimidating initially. CEW+ is a resource that exists to serve U-M undergraduate students in the form of events, professional development and guidance — and it’s right at the disposal of your fingertips! To the U-M student population identifying with marginalized communities: CEW+ is here to foster that sense of belonging at Michigan and to support you in your educational endeavors. To student allies: take the challenge to diversify your perspectives and better your understanding of social identities on campus during Winter 2020 through CEW+ events and opportunities. Embody what CEW+ represents and ask yourself, what can I do better to support, include and celebrate the diversity of my peers? Varna Kodoth can be reached at vkodoth@umich.edu. P O L I C Y T A L K S @ T H E F O R D S C H O O L MICHAEL COPPS Former FCC Commissioner Photo by Steve Rhodes S T PP LEC T URE SERIE S Media, big tech, and democracy: What happened? Free and open to the public. Reception to follow. Information: 734-615-7545 or fspp-events@umich.edu @fordschool #policytalks Wednesday, February 5, 2020 4:00 - 5:20 pm Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy Annenberg Auditorium, 1120 Weill Hall 735 S. State Street FROM THE DAILY Our Provost and sexual misconduct I n a sudden and surprising email sent to University of Michigan students on Jan. 22, President Mark Schlissel announced that Provost Martin Philbert had been placed on administrative leave after multiple allegations of sexual misconduct surfaced against him. This news came just a day after state Sen. Mallory McMorrow, D-Royal Oak, filed a sexual misconduct complaint against state Sen. Peter Lucido, R-Shelby Twp., for an encounter in November 2018 where Lucido inappropriately touched her very low on her back and made suggestive remarks. T hat filing came in the wake of Lucido’s inappropriate comments toward a young reporter, 22-year-old Allison Donahue, on Jan. 14. In this interaction Lucidio said a group of high school boys “could have a lot of fun” with Donahue. These stories serve as a glaring reminder of the pervasive issue of sexual harassment by men in positions of power against the women around them. The Michigan Daily Editorial Board stands in solidarity with those who have come forward over the past two weeks, and continue to encourage others to speak out when necessary. Coming from a newsroom comprised mostly of young, female, aspiring journalists, we support Donahue for her bravery in deciding to speak up about the incident. Too often, young women remain silent for fear of backlash or professional repercussions. Even McMorrow, an elected state official, felt at risk of losing her constituents’ support by coming forward, but was moved to speak out after hearing Donahue’s story. Unfortunately, we at the University are not immune to this systemic problem. In 2018, ABC 7 disclosed that reported cases of sexual assault and sexual harassment were up 61 and 37 percent respectively on the U-M campus. The details of the claims against Philbert have not been made public, but from Schlissel’s email, we know that an investigation was immediately opened after the allegations were made, bringing in outside legal counsel. Three days later, Philbert was placed on paid leave. The Editorial Board commends Schlissel for the swift response and hopes this sets a new precedent, while also reiterating the importance of transparency in the proceedings. Since activist Tarana Burke began the #MeToo movement in 2006 and it later saturated the mainstream with Alyssa Milano and the Harvey Weinstein scandal, more women have been empowered to speak out. Equally as important is the need for unbiased tribunals to evaluate evidence in these cases, weighing this against personal claims. But beyond judicial bodies, this is an issue of culture. How do we instill the treatment of women into the minds of our young men? How does this treatment undermine our universal values or prop up our definitions of masculinity? Where is the line between friendly socialization and workplace harassment? It is our job as a community to continuously ask ourselves these questions. To change our culture, we will need empathetic thinkers who set their sights on communal well-being, even at the cost of social convenience. We will need courageous men and women who are ready to self-analyze the social constructions they have built around themselves. We will need leaders and the best. Though instances of sexual harassment predominantly impact women, these behaviors and institutions exist at men’s expense as well. According to a 2018 report from the Institute of Women’s Policy Research, men were the victims in 20 percent of all sexual harassment charges. To change the culture we must encourage those who face sexual misconduct to speak up and reassure them that they will be heard and given the opportunity to support their case. Another imperative step is promoting female representation in positions of power to disrupt traditionally male dominated hierarchies. If a woman — instead of Harvey Weinstein — chaired one of the largest film studios in America, it’s likely many of these industry workers would have not fallen prey to Weinstein’s persecution. We’d like to highlight the resources available to our readers in the event they are needed. The Sexual Assault Prevention and Awareness Center (SAPAC) provides free and confidential crisis intervention, advocacy and support for University students, faculty and staff survivors of sexual assault, intimate partner violence, stalking and sexual harassment. SAPAC can be found on the fourth floor of the newly renovated Michigan Union. In addition, Counseling and Psychological Services (CAPS) offers free counseling services to all University of Michigan-Ann Arbor students. Finally, we’d like to remind our readers that the The Daily has a tip line for these types of stories: tipline@michigandaily. com. This is a private tip line viewable by a small team of reporters committed to responsible reporting on sexual misconduct and its allegations. The Michigan Daily is listening. VARNA KODOTH