“She is well-versed in the functions of our organization and possesses a deep understanding of campus partnerships,” Gerstein said. “Stepping into the role as CSG vice president in the closing months of any administration’s term is no easy task. But given Evie’s experience, my personal friendship with her, my understanding and knowledge that she has the passion, drive and will to do this work, I am fully confident she is going to be able to execute this position to the best of her ability.” Rackham student Hayden Jackson, chair of the Executives Nomination Committee, read excerpts from the Executives Nomination Committee’s report on Winter’s eligibility for the position as vice president. Jackson said the committee felt she would be a good fit for the role. However, they had concerns about Winter’s comments in the report about the administration’s lack of accomplishments during the first semester and her lack of attendance at the University Council, a core function of the vice presidency. “It remains a concern for us that there was more room for events and initiatives for completion in the first semester, but that Ms. Winter was largely unable to articulate a long list of accomplishments,” Jackson said. “That said, overall, we believe Ms. Winter would do a good job serving in the role for the remainder of the year, as she would carry out former Vice President Blanchard’s projects to completion, and she already understands the Gerstein administration and how it works.” According to the report, Winter had previously attended one Assembly meeting in the Fall 2019 semester and no UC meetings. Responding to concerns about attendance at University Council and Assembly, Winter acknowledged she has never been to a UC meeting, but also argued the UC has had issues determining what “that space and time should be used for.” She said she will be attending the first meeting to understand the body’s priorities and work from there to support UC in passing legislation or planning events. “To clarify, this part of the report is mostly referring to my specific accomplishments. I spent most of the first semester working and developing a coffee chat program,” Winter responded. “I didn’t do a lot of the large-scale events, but that’s not to say that our administration hasn’t been productive and that we haven’t been working on things and planning events throughout the year.” Gerstein also announced plans to launch a Campus Climate Advisory Council ahead of the 2020 presidential debate that will be hosted on campus. The council aims to build a united campus community and foster a welcoming space for all students in a divisive environment. To ensure this work continues beyond the presidential election year, it is slated to be a standing body composed of students, staff and faculty from a variety of student organizations. Additionally, Gerstein reported that the Student Fee Advisory Committee, a body which contributes to the Office of Student Life’s budget request to the provost, advocated primarily to increase the allocation of funds for resources to support student mental health. The Student Fee Advisory Committee proposal integrated insights from CSG’s mental health survey and requested that additional funds go to limit wait times at CAPS. LSA sophomore and representative Sam Braden addressed the progress of the plans for an LSAT prep course and highlighted its popularity amongst students. “We have over 130 students who want to take it and 140 who want to teach it,” Braden said. “I will be interviewing all the students next week and choosing six of them to teach the students.” LSA junior Hershy Jalluri, chair of the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Commission, spoke about the force’s plans to create a platform to increase accessibility to DEI-focused resources. Jalluri also shared plans to create DEI focus groups at student organization mass meetings. LSA senior Eva Kluting, chair of Transfer Student Resource Commission, spoke on future plans to strengthen ties among transfer students and increase their access to resources. “The transfer community is a little bit smaller, but we are trying to get people in, and our biggest project right now is the transfer students’ symposium,” Kluting said. “We are going to be a space for students to speak with administrators, talk about transfer issues like housing transportation and orientation. It’ll be a better place to facilitate discussion between students and the administration.” Engineering senior Zeke Majeske was approved as the Bystander Intervention Training Liaison. Majeske, who nominated himself, shared plans to increase transparency and efficiency in the role by eliminating it. Members also participated in a hand-ballot election to settle the tiebreaker between the two Rackham Graduate Student Representative candidates, Gerson Ramirez, Public Policy graduate student, and Rackham student Siddharth Singh. Singh was elected. The Assembly also elected the vice-chair of Executive Nominations, choosing between two nominees, Rackham student Matthew Lesko and LSA senior Annabel Weinbach. Lesko was selected through a secret ballot. Sevig acknowledges the system can backlog with long wait times in the fall as it processes a huge influx of students who are new to campus and struggling to adjust to college. CAPS saw 875 new clients in September 2018, more than double the number of an average month. While the wait time is back down to four days as of publication, Sevig said the recent surges have overwhelmed CAPS. “The first five weeks last fall, we had about 300 students per week asking for help,” Sevig said. “So those 300 students who come in the first week need to be seen the second week, and you have another 300 who are new that second week, and then it just goes on every week. So, we’re doing a lot of work this year to think about how we can navigate next fall.” Sevig did not specify his plans for reducing wait times but said he is looking at adding more counselors and is open to student input on how they’d like the process to change. CAPS currently houses 39 licensed permanent clinical staff and 16 professionals-in- training. Sevig acknowledged there are trade-offs in the current staffing model, which consists of initial, crisis and ongoing consultation. “We could have the wait time for a scheduled appointment be two days,” Sevig said. “But if we were to do that, we would be sacrificing either the crisis work or the ongoing work. In any clinical agency, you’re balancing initial, ongoing and crisis work, so I want to increase initial and ongoing and maybe all three.” In the 2019-20 fiscal year, Counseling Services was allotted almost $3 million. When asked what an increase in funding would mean for CAPS, Sevig said he would defer to students. “We ask our Student Advisory Board, ‘If we were to grow, how could we best use new staff? Do we want to do online interventions? How long should that initial appointment be?’” Sevig said. “If we get new staffing and new funding, what we will do with it will be driven by students.” A need for diversity Students of color voiced concern about being able to find a counselor who can relate to their experiences on campus. LSA freshman Alia Cummings said it’s difficult to connect with counselors who do not innately understand the perspectives of students of color. “One thing that I’ve noticed is that there aren’t that many people of color who are therapists on campus,” Cummings said. “Hearing from my peers, one of the things that we notice is when we go into these areas and we have different struggles and things like that … although it’s good to talk to a therapist, if the person does not look like us, then it’s very difficult for the person to be able to relate to us about what we’re talking about or to be able to even express those feelings because we know that the ability to relate will be very limited.” Sevig said that CAPS is dedicated to diversity in their office and they put the photos of all their staff on the website to show their efforts. “We acknowledge the diversity, and we work with it,” Sevig said. “Our staffing reflects the diversity. About half of us are people of color.” Connecting to North Campus One of the biggest challenges campus mental health resources face is connecting with students on North Campus, which is up to a thirty-minute commute from the main CAPS and UHS offices. In the CSG Mental Health Taskforce report, 50 percent of students who take classes or live on North Campus said the physical distance from Central Campus CAPS has deterred them from using CAPS. In response, CAPS is reaching out to students on North Campus through the embedded model, which places a dedicated staff counselor in 13 schools and colleges across both North and Central Campuses. Sevig said he envisions a further expansion of embedded counselors to include currently uncovered colleges, including the Schools of Education, Environment and Sustainability, Information, Kinesiology and Public Policy. Since the CAPS office is located on Central Campus, it can be difficult for students in other colleges to seek out their services. Embedded counselors learn about the culture of the college they are assigned and meet with students from those schools. They also give referrals for students when they need additional assistance. Rath reached out to Emily Hyssong, the embedded counselor at the School of Music, Theatre & Dance, when she was going through a hard time, and through Hyssong, was able to make an appointment with CAPS. “I only found out about it through a counselor in the music school, she told me about it,” Rath said. “She didn’t have enough room to see me herself. She had enough patients, so she recommended me to CAPS.” Even though embedded counselors in the Schools of Music, Theatre & Dance, Engineering, Art and Architecture and Urban Planning are accessible to the majority of North Campus students, students at schools on Central Campus who end up living on North still face the barrier of a commute to seek professional help. “It is very far. I had one appointment that I waited a long time for, but due to the bus system, I was late and had to wait another four weeks for the next appointment,” said a student quoted in the CSG Mental Health Taskforce report. “I was discouraged and did not return to CAPS until I moved to Central Campus the next year. That was when I received the help I needed.” When asked about outreach efforts to North Campus, Sevig said CAPS experimented briefly with counselors in Pierpont Commons in the early 2000s, but he said he sees that abandoned project as a failure. “Students would come in and interrupt the counselors, they would open the door, they weren’t available. It just didn’t work.” Sevig said. “But there are a lot of students on North Campus who aren’t in embedded schools, so it’s on my list to think about accessibility for them.” Defining a ‘Crisis’ CAPS offers crisis services but several students interviewed for this story said they were unaware of what is considered a crisis in order for them to see CAPS. LSA sophomore Noelle Seward suffered a concussion in October of 2019 and had to ask for accommodations in her classes. When she was struggling with keeping up with her classes and getting accommodations, she sought out CAPS to help her with the anxiety, but she did not think her situation was a crisis. “There was such a long waiting period, and I don’t feel like this is something I can wait for,” Seward said. “They say, ‘If you’re in an absolute emergency, then you can come in.’ I don’t want to take that spot away from someone who is having suicidal thoughts or something, because they may need it more than I do, but that doesn’t mean I can wait two months to have my issue addressed.” According to the 2018-2019 CAPS Annual Report, only about 4 percent of appointments were classified as urgent or crises. Due to the ambiguity, many students feel hesitant to prioritize their own situation and underutilize the crisis services. At CAPS, Sevig told The Daily that “crisis” is based on what students think and does not have one solid meaning. “Some centers define (crisis) by the professional staff. We intentionally do not do that,” The Michigan Daily — michigandaily.com News Wednesday, January 15, 2020 — 3A CAPS From Page 2A CSG From Page 1A It is available to students who applied early action and received a postponed decision or who applied regular decision, Sanders said. “For some, the Early Action application deadline approaches much sooner than anticipated and an opportunity to submit additional information now that the rush of the fall season has quieted would be welcomed,” Sanders wrote. “This short answer response offers the opportunity to provide an update to the initial application submission.” According to the webpage, the decision to not consider other information from applicants is due to the high volume of applications. Nationally, the University ranked 10th for the number of freshman applicants, with 64,917 applications for this year’s freshman class. Approximately 23 percent of applicants were admitted. A second deferred student, also speaking on condition of anonymity, said the practice of sending a letter of continued interest, which was largely an unspoken method for showing commitment, was a way to distinguish themselves from the rest of the applicant pool. Because it is now a form available to all applicants, the student feels they may have lost an edge they previously would have had with sending the letter. “I know some people are annoyed because this is another essay and it’s extra work when they’ve already put so much into the application, but to me, for someone who sees this as their top school, it’s more of another opportunity for me to show them I’m committed,” the applicant said. “It’s an opportunity that I’m grateful for, but I do think it’s interesting that it’s not this under-the-radar thing that it was in the past.” The student said the change from a letter to an essay removed some of the individuality. She also noted the possibility for overlap with the 500-word application essay, which asks students to “describe the unique qualities that attract you to the specific undergraduate College or School (including preferred admission and dual degree programs) to which you are applying at the University of Michigan” and how the curriculum supports the applicant’s interests. The student was also frustrated with the language of the form, which says additional communication will not be considered. However, after talking with teachers, the student said she is still considering sending in additional information, such as an extra letter of recommendation. Sanders wrote that the change levels the playing field for applicants because it provides guidance for what the University would like to see. Previously, there would be a large variation in what the admissions staff received from applicants, so this change provides more information about what they will and will not consider. “Historically, our Early Action applicants who are not admitted in Early Action, as well as some Regular Decision applicants, have attempted to provide further information about themselves after their application is submitted, and we did not provide standard guidance regarding how to do so,” Sanders wrote. “The quantity and quality of the information submitted varied greatly and follow-up with students was inefficient and cumbersome. This additional short answer response allows for an equitable experience for all applicants who desire to send additional information after their application is completed, and provides guidance for the submission of that information.” Christopher Kasper, a school counselor at Ann Arbor Pioneer High School, is grateful for this clarity. He said students in previous years were unsure of what to do after receiving a postponed decision from the University. He said this form gives applicants more information on the next steps they can take. “What it does is it helps guide and direct students to know what their next step is and to know that they have this opportunity,” Kasper said. “I think students appreciate the opportunity and the clarity and are more than willing and enthusiastic about the additional short essay.” ESSAY From Page 1A The talk proceeded to cover recent events in Iran, such as the assassination of Iranian Major General Qasem Soleimani by the United States. The presenters mentioned that the “liberal media” was not commenting on Iran’s initial attack against the U.S. “A lot of liberal media, they don’t tell you that they attacked us first before we attacked them and assassinated their top general,” Zhu said “But basically what happened is that they attacked a military base, killing a lot of U.S. citizens and Iraqis, and then we retaliated and assassinated a top general, and then so, that was when tensions began.” Zhu also assessed the reaction of Republicans to the assassination. “Republicans largely agree with what’s happening, because they attacked us first and we need to retaliate,” Zhu said. Student activists on campus have advocated against military involvement in Iran. At a rally on Monday, hundreds gathered to voice their opposition to starting another war in the Middle East. Public Policy senior Arwa Gayar, president of the Arab Student Association, spoke at the demonstration. She said she was concerned for the safety of members of her community. “I already see members of my community questioning if they can return back to their home and see their families in the coming months,” Gayar said. “Many of us … are already forced to leave our own home countries, due to the U.S. history of imperialism, American wars in the Middle East and legacies of colonialism. We now find the security of our families unknown once more.” Resnick ended the talk with a comment on U.S. intervention in Iran. “I’ll talk about why people think Iraq failed. Here’s why: democratization,” Resnick said. “Democratization is not the best way to go about regime change… Unlike Iraq, Iran still had lineage, descendants of Mohammed Shah where we can actually put in place of the Ayatollah.” LSA freshman Vince Tedrick attended the meeting. He said he thinks that these College Republicans meetings help him stay informed about current events. “We want to look at both sides of the issue, we try to look at where everybody’s coming from,” Tedrick said. “And I think it helps us be more knowledgeable about the world around us and what’s happening.” IRAN From Page 1A SECURITY From Page 2A In an interview with The Daily last week, Gordon- Hagerty said her time at the University is the source of her expertise, more so than any of her professional roles. “Obviously, the foundation of my career in math and science and in national security and in the technical expertise that I hold is a function directly of my time at the University of Michigan and my college education,” Gordon-Hagerty said. “There’s no doubt in my mind the expertise ... that I’ve obtained over the last 30 years or so in my career is a direct result of my schooling and education at Michigan.” Gordon-Hagerty spoke during the event about the recruiting push for the NNSA, as 40 percent of the NNSA’s workforce is on a path for retirement. She said the administration is looking to develop a diverse and robust future workforce. “I want to do whatever I can do to continue to engage with, and call from, the wonderful, brilliant brainpower that is obtained by attending the University of Michigan and these other colleges and universities across the United States,” Gordon-Hagerty said. After Gordon-Hagerty spoke, a six-person panel shared their roles in various laboratories and companies under the NNSA, including Los Alamos National Laboratory, Sandia National Laboratories and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Erik Timpson, an engineer at Kansas City National Security Campus, emphasized working for the public sector means serving the country while having the resources to turn “some of the things in your imagination into reality.” “It sounds super fancy to be working with doctors on cutting-edge national research that’s changing the way that we look at security and how secure we are,” Timpson said. “You guys are like, ‘Man, I’m just fresh out of calculus and physics. I don’t know if I’m ready for that yet.’ The simple answer is: You are. You’re totally ready. You can do this.” Gordon-Hagerty advised current undergraduates to recognize the importance of national security, to be flexible with career plans as opportunities arise and to not rule out any possibilities early on. “The advice I would give to current and future applicants to our nuclear security enterprises is keeping an open mind and to know their career will grow in the future,” Gordon-Hagerty said. Rackham student Jeff Woolstrum, who is currently pursuing a Ph.D. in nuclear engineering, said he was fascinated by the University’s relevance in national security. “It was great that (U-M) has the kind of pull to bring in these high-level people,” Woolstrum said. “There were a lot of good questions and a lot of good answers that were asked and a lot of good resources that are just so conveniently available to everybody here at Michigan.” Claire Hao contributed reporting to this article.