2B — Thursday, September 19, 2019 b-side The Michigan Daily — michigandaily.com There isn’t much to remember about 2006. It was a year of Razor scooters and Dum Dums and multiplication tables. I was in second grade, where our hottest topics were who was seen holding hands on the playground, or what treats we were bringing in for our birthdays. We certainly weren’t talking about scientific discoveries, intergalactic developments or the terrifying depths of the universe. That is, of course, until it was announced that Pluto would no longer be considered a planet. This plunged our narrow halls into despair. I don’t know why I took this news so hard. My teacher told me I was at a fifth grade reading level and I had just gotten a life-sized stuffed dog for Christmas, so things were going pretty well. But this news about Pluto — it rocked me. It shook me to my Lisa Frank-clad core. I remember little about that year, but I do remember the day Pluto was demoted. For those who don’t, some background: Pluto was discovered on Feb. 18, 1930 at the Lowell Observatory in Flagstaff, Ariz. by astronomer Clyde W. Tombaugh. According to a website for the Library of Congress that looks straight out of the year 1993, the era during which Pluto was discovered was one of “intense planet hunting.” Hardcore. The name “Pluto,” later the name of a beloved Disney pet, was actually proposed by an 11-year-old girl from Oxford named Venetia Burney who was interested in mythology. To thank her for a name that would literally be used for the rest of time, Burney was awarded five pounds. Such a great story, right? Well, astronomers don’t care about the story, they care about the facts. And, in 2006, the fact was that Pluto could no longer be considered a planet. Instead, the International Astronomy Union (IAU) downgraded it to a dwarf planet. To be a full-blown planet a mass needs to: 1) Orbit around the Sun 2) Have sufficient mass to assume hydrostatic equilibrium (a nearly round shape) and 3) Have a “cleared neighborhood” around its orbit. Apparently, Pluto also has annoying neighbors that hover around it, because the third criteria is where it lost out. That’s a lot of science for me to understand now, so I certainly didn’t understand it during the year “A Bad Case of Stripes” caused me to become a juvenile hypochondriac. What I understood was suddenly my time spent memorizing the nine planets was wasted — all the acronyms, the solar system dioramas, the crudely colored- in circles. Why had we even spent so much time learning about planets? Was it all a waste? A facade of happiness to be ripped apart when some old men decide a planet just wasn’t good enough anymore? In hindsight, I think our little second grade hearts were broken because we truly did love Pluto. It was every student’s favorite planet — the underdog, the little guy. Oh you like Jupiter, Sarah? We get it, your dad’s a broker at Meryll Lynch. Your favorite planet is Saturn, Jason? No one cares that you’re in accelerated math. Pluto was the planet for the rest of us, the ones with no rings, no red storm, no semblance of life. When Pluto was told it wasn’t good enough, we were told we weren’t good enough. Everyone always says kids are the future, the next generation will change the world — how could we do that when no one will respect us? It wasn’t just the second graders, though. The world felt the effects of the diminished Pluto. Just in the past month, 13 years since the tragedy of Pluto, there have been numerous articles about just how bad everybody wants Pluto to be a planet again. We just want it to be happy, to be recognized again, to stand along the big boys of the Milky Way. Honestly, I think all of us see a little bit of Pluto within us. Yeah, it sounds silly to care so much about an insentient rock, but this stuff hits home. We’ve all been told we’re not good enough, and if an entire planet can be ousted, so can we. I don’t care what the IAU says, they can’t tell us how to see Pluto, no matter what fancy degrees they have or how many telescopes they own. For Venetia Burney, for heartbroken second graders and for NASA administrators that can’t let things go, there will always be Pluto. And for Pluto, there will always be those who never give up on it. WIKIMEDIA COMMONS In defense of puny Pluto SAMANTHA DELLA FERA Senior Arts Editor B-SIDE: FOR THE SAKE OF PLUTO The first few bars of the theme music for “Star Trek: The Next Generation” sounds more like ambient music at a yoga retreat than the introduction to an ’80s imagination of the year 2364. Then things speed up, soaring into a marching band-esque crescendo, and it’s clear: This is the future. The Star Trek franchise includes 12 movies, eight television shows, two theme park attractions, two magazines, about 850 novels and 17 series of comic books. The cultural impact of the show can’t be understated — it’s where we got “live long and prosper,” “beam me up, Scotty” and “make it so.” It inspired “Galaxy Quest” and “Futurama,” a few notable scenes in the music video for Eminem’s “We Made You” and even a 2010 training video made by the Internal Revenue Service. The franchise garners the kind of obsession that’s endearingly embarrassing: flashing the Vulcan hand salute, having intimate knowledge of Klingon chess, making detailed costumes for conventions. “Trekkie” has become cultural shorthand for a very specific kind of fixation. It suggests, with a patronizing wink, that wanting to be part of the world of “Star Trek” requires a mix of social isolation and naiveté. Instead I think it requires hope, or a profound lack of it. At the height of my Star Trek fandom, I was never the kind of enthusiast who found themselves mired in the minutiae of the show. Instead, it was the big picture that I latched onto. I watched “Star Trek: The Next Generation” with my mom when I was in middle school; we liked the cleanliness of the Starship Enterprise and the grand, sweeping views of planets and stars. The world of the show (an immense silver vessel, aliens with ridged foreheads) seemed very far away from the setting and context of my life at the time: our little row home in Philadelphia, homemade pumpkin ice cream, math homework, forgetting to hang my suit up to dry before swim practice. Now, rewatching the show, the associations have become reverse engineered. “Star Trek” is inextricable from the way it felt to be fourteen and think the future could contain absolutely anything. According to “Star Trek,” everything we’re worried about right now will be OK. There will be other things that go wrong — a species intent on taking over the universe, arguments between factions of aliens — but these concerns are foreign enough that they’re intriguing rather than scary. The show depicts its fair share of pain and suffering, but usually it’s the aliens who suffer in any permanent way; when humans do, it’s an aberration from the new normal that’s been created. By the time the Enterprise is exploring new worlds, we’ve eliminated climate change, war, disease, xenophobia and sexism. On Earth, everything is as it should be. In the rest of the universe, though, these things still exist, and nearly every conflict on the series involves starship crews becoming entangled with random and calculated unfairness, cruelty and moral complication. We get Klingon in-fighting, alien merchants selling slaves, a civilization about to be decimated by its dying star. “Star Trek: The Next Generation” is especially prone to depicting easily-recognizable versions of real quandaries. The characters encounter everything from sex trafficking to territorial disputes on distant planets, and they’re forced to confront moral codes that exaggerate the ironies and falsehoods of our own beliefs. Familiar dramas play out: Apartheid is displaced onto a matriarchal society in “Angel One,” and the Israel-Palestine conflict plays out with a group of alien separatists in “The High Ground.” Here lies the ethical problem with “Star Trek,” and also the thing that is so deliciously attractive about it. Every earthly dilemma has been outsourced to an alien species, and we get to be the arbiters of goodness, the agents of scientific reason. Who wouldn’t want to buy into this vision of the future? When I was in middle school and watching “Star Trek” I imagined we were moving closer toward the show’s version of the future: egalitarian, democratic, creative. Now when I watch the show, I vacillate between hope and escapism. I want to believe that “Star Trek” is predictive of how things will turn out for humanity. I want us to wander the universe in brightly colored uniforms, listening to operas sung by sentient robots. I hope we will find our way to peace. But if that’s not what the future holds, if it’s more war and injustice and greed that we’re headed for, then all I want is to watch Captain Picard hold court on the bridge one more time. Trekkie optimism, or: On the merits of Klingon chess MIRIAM FRANCISCO Daily Arts Writer PARAMOUNT PICTURES B-SIDE: MUSIC NOTEBOOK There’s something so magical about the night sky. Yes, the millions of glowing balls of fire above our heads, so far away that we perceive them as only twinkles in a sea of darkness, are astounding to think about. And yes, there’s no act more humbling than staring into space and comparing yourself to the scale of the universe. But the true gift of the night sky lies in something much harder to articulate: the magic of the unknown. Just like our expansive oceans, with points deeper than Earth’s tallest mountains above sea level, we know very little about outer space. The vast majority of space matter is unidentified; we know it’s there based on its gravitational pull on other matter, but we can’t see it with our eyes. This dark matter is second only to dark energy, which is causing the universe to accelerate in its expansion, a forward feedback loop with its feet permanently off the brakes. Yet here we are, nice and cozy on our Earth, rarely stopping to gaze up into the night sky and wonder about everything that remains to be discovered. In bustling Ann Arbor, though, looking up into the sky will reward you with a fuzzy haze of gray. Between lamp posts on South University, streetlights on State Street and the glow from buildings bordering the Diag, light pollution blocks the gems of the sky so effectively that it’s hard to even make out what you’re missing. But I’m always looking, trying to catch a glimpse. Whether on a bright fall afternoon, cloud- covered, misty day or warm summer night, my first instinct upon stepping outside is to gaze up, take a deep breath and smile in solitude. To know that it’s just you and that beckoning expanse above, if only for a moment, is the best form of therapy. Growing up in the Metro Detroit area has given me very few chances to see the night sky in all its glory without ambient light washing everything out. The most memorable time happened to be two weeks ago, in the depths of Acadia National Park in Mount Desert Island, Maine. At 8 p.m., I sat wiped-out in the backseat of my family’s rental car, my legs quaking slightly from trekking all day and my Circadian clock disoriented by the early sunsets on the eastern-most state of the East Coast. The endorphins from earlier in the day had faded away, leaving me with an empty but peaceful feeling in my stomach, something close to gratitude for being alive, though I couldn’t place my finger on the emotion at the time. Our destination? Sand Beach in the heart of Acadia, always populated by tourists and locals alike. New pairs of feet continually trampled the sand below, only to have their footprints washed away by the roaring Atlantic in an instant. Sand is a deceiving name: Shell fragments make up the majority of the soft earth, teeming microorganisms are littered throughout the rest. During the day, one can clearly make out the looming granite rocks rising on either side of the sand stretch, forming a small bay with calm waters. At night, it’s a whole different story. The wooden steps felt foreign under my feet as I descended in the darkness: My feet had forgotten that I’d taken the same path the day before in broad, piercing daylight. Everywhere I looked was shrouded with intense darkness. The only color I could make out was jet black, putting even the poignant black of ink cartridges to shame. We stumbled onto the beach, faintly able to make out the mound of people in the distance. Everyone else had brought a blanket, some were cuddling under sleeping bags. We sat on the bare sand, letting it fill our shoes and seep through the gaps in our clothes. If you’re going to stargaze on the beach, best to do it right, no boundaries necessary. There was light, just not the kind one might expect. All I had to do was look up and the night sky shone upon me, glad that my eyes had finally found its destination. Millions of stars danced in the night, teasing me, inviting me to dance with them. The broad band of the Milky Way stretched from horizon to horizon, home to millions of stars, planets and us, the Earth. Park rangers pointed out dozens of constellations smiling down at us. I smiled back up at them. This world has always been there, waiting for the right moment, the right place, to show itself. Second only to the total solar eclipse of 2017, I’d never beheld anything like it. I can only grasp at memories of that night, close my eyes and let the stars that fill my mind push all my lingering thoughts away. Whenever I get the chance to gaze again, I know they’ll be waiting. Soul-searching and solace-seeking in our solar system TRINA PAL Senior Arts Editor B-SIDE: COMMUNITY CULTURE NOTEBOOK The only color I could make out was jet black, putting even the poignant black of ink cartridges to shame Yet here we are, nice and cozy on our Earth, rarely stopping to gaze up into the night sky and wonder about everything that remains to be discovered It was every student’s favorite planet — the underdog, the little guy