Classifieds Call: #734-418-4115 Email: dailydisplay@gmail.com EFFICIENCY ‑ 1 & 2 Bdrm Apts Fall 2019/20 Rents range $875 ‑ $1850 most include heat and water. Showings scheduled M‑F 10‑3 734‑996‑1991 By Robert Fisher ©2019 Tribune Content Agency, LLC 04/23/19 Los Angeles Times Daily Crossword Puzzle Edited by Rich Norris and Joyce Nichols Lewis 04/23/19 ANSWER TO PREVIOUS PUZZLE: Release Date: Tuesday, April 23, 2019 ACROSS 1 Barcelona buddy 6 Scattered, as seeds 10 Rifle filler 14 Hopeless case 15 Fast-food legend Ray 16 Enjoy a comic book, say 17 Small plucked instrument 19 Fall back (on) 20 “__ Been Awhile”: Staind song 21 Columnist Landers 22 Israeli president, 2007-2014 23 Blackjack card 24 New York region, or its narrow bodies of water 27 Petit or grand crime 29 Docking fee 30 Hog’s nose 31 Objective 32 Fisher-Price product 33 Tropical tree leaf 38 Busy IRS month 41 Not at home 42 China’s Zhou __ 46 Doesn’t miss a thing 49 Forbes publisher Forbes 51 Fluttering pitch 53 Dainty taste 54 Gelatin dish 55 Slugging legend Mel 56 Canonized Fr. female 57 Slimming surg. 58 Popular necktie knot ... and a hint to the starts of 17-, 24-, 33- and 51-Across 62 Cookie cooker 63 Big on 64 Vital heart line 65 “Bill & __ Excellent Adventure” 66 Cap’n’s underling 67 Wyoming’s __ Range DOWN 1 Ten-percenter: Abbr. 2 Native American in a Cooper title 3 Not yet born 4 Precious stones 5 Mars or Venus 6 Like teenagers in the comic strip “Zits” 7 Chimp kin 8 Was victorious 9 Sgt. or cpl. 10 Unpaid debt 11 Kalahari mongoose 12 Source of machismo, perhaps 13 Epic journey 18 Tylenol target 22 Gaza Strip gp. 23 Capp and Capone 24 Greek cheese 25 Mideast ruler 26 NFL analyst Tony 28 Trophy shape 31 Toward the tiller 34 Hang around 35 Grand Canyon animal 36 “Little” Dickens girl 37 Org. hacked at its Watergate offices 38 Require much (of) 39 Lost in thought 40 Signed on for another tour 43 Skill rarely practiced now 44 Not aligned with 45 Little rascal 47 Descendants 48 “Best in Show” org. 49 __ of honor 50 High: Pref. 52 Boxing matches 56 Horse’s footwear 58 Innocuous falsehood 59 Musician Yoko 60 __ King Cole 61 “The Da Vinci Code” author Brown FOR RENT HEY. YOU'RE DOING GREAT AND WE know you can do it. Don't give up! Not every theater company can attempt “Sweeney Todd.” Between its dark humor and sophisticated, fast-paced text, “Sweeney Todd” has many potential pitfalls. For those unfamiliar with the show, the complex plot can also be incredibly confusing upon first viewing. This past week’s production of “Sweeney Todd” by the University’s Department of Musical Theatre put all these concerns to rest. It was a tour- de-force in quintessentially Sondheimic writing, a captivating and convincing take on a famous yet flawed work. The production made use of the Power Center’s large stage and extensive lighting capabilities. In the opening number, when the cast sang from the front of the stage, lights from the pit orchestra shone up on the ensemble, casting eerie shadows on their faces. The set was simple yet sufficient. Foggy factory-esque windows and pseudo-industrial brick walls cast a mechanical backdrop for the play. It was a barber shop and bakery at times and a judge’s home at others. While I usually don’t focus on set design in my reviews, I must take some time to acknowledge the barber’s chair — it was easily my favorite aspect of the production. As Sweeney Todd slit the throats of his victims, he turned them away from the audience. A mere press on the petal at his feet turned the chair into a ramp, delivering his victims into the meat pie oven many floors below. For those unfamiliar with the plot, Todd is a convict who has recently escaped prison. He believes his wife to be dead and his daughter adopted, and he vows to avenge these acts. After winning a bet with a rival barber, Todd opens a barbershop above an (admittedly) terrible meat pie shop. The pies are made out of the flesh of his victims as he slits the throats of various barbershop patrons. Abysmal as this plot may sound, Sondheim manages to give the plot a humorously peculiar spin. At one point, for example, Todd and Mrs. Lovett (the pie shop baker) sing a lengthy, comical song about the various professions of their victims and the types of pie that they will produce. The talents of SMTD seniors Allie Re (Mrs. Lovett) and Jamie Colburn (Sweeney Todd) were on full display in this scene. Colburn was horrifying at times and humorous at others, repulsive at points and yet impossible to ignore. Re was hilarious throughout, particularly when it came to her feature numbers (“The Worst Pies in London” standing out the most to me.) The seemingly indefatigable energy of the large cast of the show also carried it through its nearly three-hour run time. Though not heavily choreographed in a traditional sense, the cast frequently walked hurriedly across the stage or the upper balcony. I felt as though I were amid a bustling 19th-century lower-class community in London. And while Sondheim and Wheeler’s lyrics have a tendency towards wordy complexity — a complexity only heightened by the strange vernacular of colloquial British English — the cast managed to land much of their jokes. Though it was hard to understand every word, I was constantly engaged, more than willing to put forth the effort to understand the text. The unusual orchestration of the musical gave it another twist. It feels more like operetta at points then it does modern musical theater — a harp and nine strings are not exactly components of a standard musical theater pit — and yet this production was approachable and engaging even as it was slightly unusual. In the end, as Todd accidentally murders his wife, intentionally murders Lovett and then is murdered himself, the production managed to maintain the humorous tone that had carried through the work thus far. One common pitfall that I have found in other productions of the work is that it becomes unbelievably morbid at this point. This production, however, managed to maintain a light tone even despite these deaths. As soon as the show ended, the audience was on their feet for a rowdy standing ovation. This was easily the most enthusiastic response to a University production that I have ever seen, perhaps even on par with the great enthusiasm at MUSKET’s “In The Heights” last year. From lighting to singing and set design to acting, this production seemingly had no faults. And when it came to applause, the audience (and this critic) surely took notice. As I left the theater, I found that I had forgotten that this was a student production. Had I walked out onto Times Square in New York City, I would not have been particularly surprised. SMTD’s ‘Sweeney Todd’ exceeds all expectations SAMMY SUSSMAN Daily Arts Writer GLASSNOTE ENTERTAINMENT GROUP ALBUM REVIEW COMMUNITY CULTURE REVIEW Jade Bird’s self-titled debut album, Jade Bird, functions as both a grand announcement of her advent to stardom and a declaration of who she is and who she hopes to be. Bird enters onto the world stage with a string of singles and EPs already notched under her belt, strong and unafraid. The album feels like a firm handshake and a knowing smile. Bird doesn’t seek validation from the audience or critics — let alone amateur college writers like myself. Instead, the pervading sentiment of the album is that Bird knows she’s good — really, really good — and this album is simply her way of letting us know. There’s no arrogance, however, in her music. Jade Bird’s album may trumpet her long-awaited arrival, but it’s a celebration of the self (both Jade, and the listener), not a display of hubris. The 12-track album contains an enticing mixture of vulnerability balanced with strength, heartbreak countered by confidence. Bird seems comfortable within her own skin — her own voice — singing “And that’s my motto / Don’t let ’em near enough to let me down” in the song “My Motto.” She’s open about her vulnerabilities, but sadness is seemingly unwelcome in the powerful display of self- love and acknowledgment that is the album Jade Bird. Yet, while the album is named after herself, Jade Bird is honest about the struggle of knowing one’s self. “Ruins” open the album with energy and gentle acoustics, laying bare Bird’s beautiful vocals. This vulnerability is accentuated with the Bird’s echo of “I’m not sure who I am” — an admission that strikes at a deeper question of what releasing an album can signify to an artist. Yes, it’s a mark of success, talent and hard work. But the release of Jade Bird skyrockets the artist to new heights. Suddenly, the woman named “Jade Bird” is more than who she was. This essential question of who Jade Bird is hangs heavy over the entirety of the album, hinting that this vital introduction is also the artist’s exploration of her own identity. Soul-searching doesn’t last for long, though. Bird blasts through with anthem-level songs like “Uh Huh,” making one almost forget her previous uncertainty. The amount of pure power Bird wields throughout the song is enough to entice the listener to their knees while she sings of control, authority and dominance. “Good At It” and “Love Has All Been Done Before” are full of heartache, but again, Bird doesn’t welcome pity or pining into her music. It’s heartache done the way it should be –– full of passion and vivacity. The album closes on a gentle note with “If I Die,” full of beauty, with the warmth of a piano in the background. By the end of the album, it feels as if Bird has come full circle. From opening with a poignant question of identity to final assertions of “I’m ok with who I am” in her final song, Bird has seemingly found herself, and conversely, the listener has finally found Jade Bird. “If I Die” is heart-wrenchingly lovely, as Bird croons that “If I die, don’t put me in stars / Put me in words, not hallelujahs / They come from the heart and they’ll ring true.” Bird never asks for love, or admiration or acceptance. But here, in these final words, she earns it a thousand times over. Here, at least, this writer can immortalize the songs and memory of Jade Bird as she requests — in unworthy words that can only beg redemption by their bone-deep sincerity. MADELEINE GANNON Daily Arts Writer Jade Bird bids a strong hello with debut album Jade Bird Jade Bird Glassnote Entertaiment Group To honor the end of this school year, a few of us in the film beat have decided to pay homage to a select few of the greatest endings in movie history. For me, no other movie ending better captures the beauty of cinema and the power of nostalgia than that of “Cinema Paradiso.” The scene is simple. Salvatore, our protagonist, much older than he was at the beginning of the film, watches a compilation of old movie scenes made for him by Alfredo, his childhood mentor. No words are necessary — we can tell everything we need to know through his eyes, which quickly fill with tears. The scenes remind him of his childhood years working at a movie theater, all the things he once felt and all the things he’s lost. Despite the tears, Salvatore has a smile on his face. Although the past is gone, his memories of it will never leave him. “Cinema Paradiso,” especially its ending, is a profound love letter to cinema and its ability to help us remember our own stories. — Elise Godfryd, Daily Arts Writer “Good Will Hunting” is one of my first cinematic loves and it continues to rank in my top 10 for a number of reasons, including killer music, a knockout cast and some of the most quotable lines ever. But perhaps the greatest charm of Van Sant’s masterpiece is its, truly flawless ending. In the final scene, Sean (Robin Williams, “Mrs. Doubtfire”) opens the mysterious note in his mailbox from Will (Matt Damon, “The Martian”), and grinningly reads the unforgettable phrase, “I had to go see about a girl,” the same last line from the story he told Will months before about how he met his wife. Cutting to the open road and Will’s battered- up car, we are filled with the same sense of satisfaction as Sean, proud at Will for driving off into the sunset after Skylar (Minnie Driver, “Grosse Pointe Blank”). Simple, yet profound, the final moments of the car coasting down the interstate, accompanied by the iconic Elliott Smith ballad “Miss Misery,” fall perfectly in line with the tone of quiet profundity reflected throughout the film, and distinguish this ending as one of the most gratifying and full-circle of all time. — Samantha Nelson, Daily Arts Writer “Annihilation” is not a perfect movie. The loose adaptation from the first part of Jeff Vandermeer’s Southern Reach trilogy was a quilt of fascinating ideas executed poorly. And yet, many of its flaws are forgettable because of the film’s truly horrifying final 20 minutes. In what has to be one of the strangest dance-offs ever conceived, a colorful pulsating alien transforms into a doppelganger of Natalie Portman’s Lena. What follows is a jarring, skin-crawling series of physical maneuvers. The most revolting aspect is that the alien is not attacking her; It is simply mirroring her movements. When she reaches out her hand, it punches her back. When she runs for the door, the alien pins her against the door so it too, can escape. The finale of “Annihilation” is a testament to the realization of heady themes into a simple yet effective conclusion. It demonstrated some of the most ambitious filmmaking of 2018 and, for the most part, redeemed the movie. — Anish Tamhaney, Daily Arts Writer I’m cheating a little bit, but Hirokazu Kore-eda (“Nobody Knows”) made me. My ending scene is not technically the final one from “Shoplifters,” but rather the perfectly unsatisfying rift that Osamu (Lily Franky, “The Devil’s Path”) and Shota’s (Jyo Kairi, “Erased”) informal father-son relationship comes to under Kore-eda’s artful direction. In it, Shota boards a bus and leaves the surrogate father who failed him, Osamu desperately chases, calling Shota’s name, and all Shota can do is watch. But as he watches, he whispers, calling Osamu “Dad” for the first time. What a way to elaborate on one of the best lines of “Shoplifters,” spoken several scenes earlier. “If they really loved you,” Osamu’s partner Nobuyo (Sakura Andô, “100 Yen Love”) tells Yuri (Miyu Sasaki, “Samurai Gourmet”), whose birth parents neglected her, “this is what they’d do,” and surrogate mother rocks daughter back-and-forth in her arms. If you know the harsh reality of love in families, this is the scene you end with: full of hesitation, of waiting too long to say important things, of not knowing how to say goodbye. But in those futile pursuits, Kore-eda seems to see the purest kind of love in the act of trying anyway. I see it, too. — Julianna Morano, Daily Arts Writer Go ahead. Make your jokes. I’ll wait. “Which ending are you picking? Hurhurhur.” Now tell me: Which of the endings to “The Lord of the Rings: Return of the King” are you going to cut? What catharsis are you going to you going to deny the audience, you monster? Is it Aragorn’s coronation and the Hobbits finally getting recognized as heroes? Is it their return to the Shire, where they realize that despite everything they did, life in their home has gone on and will continue to go on as usual? How about Frodo leaving Middle- Earth because he can’t cope with everything he went through? Oh, I see, you’re going to take away Sam’s happy ending, because even though he’s the one person to resist the call of the One Ring, he doesn’t deserve to settle down and have a family who loves him as much as we do. No, these endings are all perfect, and this movie is perfect. — Jeremiah VanderHelm, Daily Arts Writer Our film favorite endings FILM NOTEBOOK 6 — Tuesday, April 23, 2019 Arts The Michigan Daily — michigandaily.com