To the Regents, President, and Provost of the University of Michigan and the Provost’s Blue Ribbon Panel (or anyone who is actually listening): It is painfully clear that you are neither prepared to protect academic freedom nor the rights of marginalized students. As the University is under pressure from media, donors, and community members to justify punishing a professor and graduate student instructor for refusing to write letters of recommendation –– a task they are not required to do –– the creation of the Blue Ribbon Panel has served to buy the University some time. This Panel is tasked with “recommend[ing] appropriate considerations and principles” regarding faculty members’ political expressions and their responsibilities to students. However, the panel’s vague charge to recommend considerations and principles, and the limit to its power as a mere recommending body that may be dismissed if found to be of the wrong political bent, demonstrate that the panel’s purpose is to serve as a shallow public relations ploy; a mere facade of serious engagement with the topic at hand. The behavior of the panelists has reinforced this notion. In the almost three months since the Blue Ribbon Panel’s announcement, there have been no public statements about the Panel’s process, how it will operate, or what its research priorities even are. Provost Philbert and the panelists have abdicated their responsibility to the public, opting against transparency and community engagement at every turn. Meanwhile, the “Opportunities for Input” survey put out by the panel was both leading and out of line with qualitative research norms. The first survey question, for example, proposes a set of faculty responsibilities to students, then proceeds to ask survey respondents whether or not they agree with them. This reduces the parameters of subject responses to an agree- disagree binary, a pitfall any novice researcher trained in qualitative research is taught to avoid. In so doing, the Panel’s survey limits the issue to being a simple conflict between student and faculty interests, thereby precluding any considerations that fall outside of that framing. The first “listening session” held on campus in Ann Arbor was just as telling, as it made certain that the panel would not even attempt meaningful engagement with the campus community. Facing a room of faculty, students, and community members, many of whom challenged the very legitimacy of the panel, the panelists refused to respond. When President Emeritus Duderstadt was asked direct procedural questions about the panel’s timeline, or how information collected by the panel would be analyzed, he plainly acknowledged that there was no plan. All other questions were met with silence and disdain, while Martin Philbert and Deborah Goldberg didn’t even bother to show up. Given the climate of fear and fragile calm holding over campus in the wake of threats made against Professor Cheney-Lippold’s job, it is appalling that the panel could not even affirm that survey responses would be anonymous. And while the panel sets out to address political bias among professors, it ironically fails to account for its own problematic makeup. Out of the six faculty members on the panel, none come from humanities departments, and none have professional research experience addressing the racial- colonial dynamics central to the issue at hand. Despite being formed in the wake of controversy over the University’s relationship to institutions in occupied Palestine, there are no Palestinian voices on the panel. There are, however, at least two members with significant relationships or engagements with Israeli academic institutions. Deborah Loewenberg Ball has given presentations or lectures at six different Israeli institutions. Deborah Goldberg has held appointments at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Blaustein Institute for Desert Research at Ben-Gurion University. It becomes difficult, then, to imagine this panel building room for dissenting views or serving any purpose other than to uphold established norms and silencing conscientious objection. In contrast, when U-M student governments on three campuses democratically passed resolutions calling for Divestment, University Regents Denise Ilitch and Mark Bernstein made loaded charges of anti-Semitism against them, the latter calling the resolutions “intellectually bankrupt and morally repugnant.” Clearly, the panel is uninterested in systematically addressing political bias; it serves only to reaffirm the Palestine exception to free speech. For these reasons, the Blue Ribbon Panel should be dissolved. Instead, University leadership should follow the recommendations of letters signed by hundreds of faculty, graduate student instructors, students, professional and academic organizations, and Jewish and Palestinian communities advocating for the right of faculty and staff to engage in conscientious dissent without fear of repercussions. We also call on the University to end its fiscal ties to Israeli institutions and corporations by honoring democratically passed Divestment resolutions on all three University campuses. In doing so, the University can begin to build an environment of academic freedom for the entire campus community. In Protest, Direct Action for Palestine December 4th, 1906: Founder’s Day for the first Black Greek Organization in the world at Cornell University, which began as a result of seven men rallying against racism and segregation in academic institutions and beyond. Established during a time where very few outlets for Black upliftment existed, Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, Incorporated focuses on social and academic achievement with an emphasis on brotherhood at the core of its founding. In addition to being the oldest Black organization and the University of Michigan, Alpha Phi Alpha has developed numerous renowned members that have spearheaded changes in society for generations. Notable brothers include Martin Luther King Jr., Thurgood Marshall and W.E.B. Du Bois, all of which are examples that showcase the prestige and honor of carrying the Alpha title. The Epsilon chapter at the University of Michigan has been around since 1909, making it one of the oldest chapters in the organization’s history. To open their Founder’s Day this year, each one of the members welcomed attendees and emphasized their focus on community through a social hour. Displaying their national recognitions and awards, their hard work shows they have pioneered for over more than 100 years of service and leadership. All nine members openly invited the community for a time of socialization, with food and dance –– creating a day that not only celebrated the founding of their organization but also to uniting the Black community is always a welcome sight on campus. “To me, Alpha Phi Alpha is more than just a fraternity,” D’Andre Simpson, Alpha Phi Alpha Epsilon chapter President said. “It’s an everlasting brotherhood that has allowed me to grow as a leader, serve my community, and most importantly meet the uncles of my future children. The brotherhood and service of my fraternity goes beyond college and I will forever have an impact on the world through my organization.” The social hour was followed by a step reception. Through the cold and windy air, all Alpha brothers stood on the steps of Rackham graduate school, proudly showcasing their black and gold colors with heads held high. Brothers performed their difficult, sharp and powerful stroll routine, reciting the fraternity’s critical moments in Alpha history. In honor of Founder’s Day, the Alphas paid homage to its 1907 founding at Cornell University. From Founder’s Day and beyond, Alpha Phi Alpha continues to be a localizing agent for cultivating fellowship in the Black community. Multiple Black students came to show their support for the group, including their sister sorority, the newly initiated Beta Eta chapter of Alpha Kappa Alpha sorority, making the Founders Day a memorable and historic night for all. When I joined Michigan in Color as a Senior Editor, I didn’t know that I would find a home. I have found some of my closest friends, change agents, and accountability partners in this platform. Over time, I have learned that we are more than a newspaper. We are a catalyst, a moment, to both uplift and preserve the truths of students of color. I feel immense pride in being a part of an organization that has contributed to over one hundred years of generational knowledge, and I feel even more proud as Michigan in Color goes into its fifth year of preserving the voices and experiences of people of color on campus. It is evident that our impact has exceeded the boundaries of our campus and has inspired other universities, such as UC Berkeley, to establish their own sections for students of color. It is with great honor and elation that I present my voice as an empowered, happy, confident Black Woman, shredded of the insecurity that made my voice tremble years ago. I have found great solace and spiritual healing through the power of words and truth telling. In a world where women of color, and Black women especially, are subject to extreme levels of hypervisibility and systemic silencing, Michigan in Color has been a space for me to reclaim my visibility and agency and to define who I am and what I stand for. It’s been a platform that is unique in its simultaneous embrace of PoC intellectuality and authenticity. Just as I have developed my confidence as a Black female scholar, I have gained so much from being privileged to the insights and lessons that other students have shared through our platform. I am unsure if I think of myself as a writer, nor am I sure if I think of myself as a journalist. However, in a time period where journalism is showded in falsehood and malice and when PoC voices are systemically silenced and sidelined, I know that a platform such as ours is critical. I give credit to MiC for so much of my growth and abundance of opportunity. I have traveled to Washington, D.C. and explored the roots of my African-American heritage. I have critically analyzed film representation, and I have joined other student organizations in community and fellowship. Most importantly, MiC has given me new friends and a close- knit community of activists and change-agents who have held me accountable to expanding my capacity for empathy across identity intersections. I will forever be grateful for this experience, and I look forward to furthering the mission and potential of our publication. It is within the pages of a campus newspaper that I offer a platform of refuge — a platform to tell your story amongst the countless pages and think-pieces that are trying to tell it for you. I offer a space grounded in radical self-love and belief in the power of storytelling and words, a place to unlearn and unpack generations worth of taught self-hate and identity dissonance. I welcome you to write your truth, one word at a time. Making a newspaper every night is really hard. Coupled with the pressure of uphold- ing “128 years of editorial freedom” and a full load of classes, many nights mak- ing a newspaper seems like a miracle. But what’s made it manageable have been the thoughtful, resilient advo- cates I work beside. What’s made it fun is the ability of Daily staff to take their work very seriously without taking themselves seriously. What’s made it feel crucial are the times when I get to help put a woman of color on the front page, the times when a story moves me to tears or laugh- ter or both, and knowing that maybe one more person feels affirmed in their ability to tell stories and maybe one more person listened to a story they wouldn’t have heard other- wise. It’s that last feeling, the idea that any one published story could change someone’s worldview or make some- one’s day, that brings me to the Michigan in Color desk. I’m here because right now, nothing feels more impor- tant than giving a platform to those who are quieted, ig- nored or misconstrued. Too often, journalism’s gatekeep- ers prevent journalists of col- or from entering the field in fear that people of color are too biased by their own iden- tity to write objectively or in fear that people of color are too “risky” and will alienate racist readers. I am confident in the ability of Michigan in Color to help combat journal- ism’s systemically discrimina- tory structures. However, the onus of fixing a systematically discriminatory system cannot be placed entirely on journal- ists of color, and I hope that in my tenure, The Michigan Daily as a whole can help dis- mantle journalism’s cycle of inequity. I am so grateful to Ashley and Jason for believing in my ability to help lead this sec- tion, and I am so humbled by the Michigan in Color staff I will be working beside –– you guys are reason enough to join. Notably, I would not be here if not for Christian, whose unending initiative and creativity modeled the similarly unending opportu- nities this space provides, if not for Nisa, whose journal- ism journey gave me some- thing to aspire to, and if not for Maya, who is certainly the best boss I’ll ever have. It is an extreme privilege to have access to this space, and I hope to do right by its beau- ty and history. This is going to be a year of being loud and brave and energetic and vul- nerable –– I can’t wait for you to hear what we have to say. The Michigan Daily — michigandaily.com Michigan in Color Monday, January 14, 2019— 3A NA’KIA CHANNEY, EFE OSAGIE & LORNA BROWN Managing MiC Editor and Senior MiC Editors An Open Letter Regarding the Blue Ribbon Panel DIRECT ACTION FOR PALESTINE MiC Contributer Why I joined Michigan in Color NA’KIA CHANNEY/Daily Spotlight: Alpha Phi Alpha, Inc. Carly Ryan Na’kia Channey NA’KIA CHANNEY/Daily CARLY RYAN/Daily Nothing feels more important than giving a platform to those who are quieted