ranking demonstrates how the University and its schools are deeply engaged with the world off campus. “The continued growth of the research productivity of our faculty is important evidence of the amazing strength of the University of Michigan,” Schlissel said. “I am proud that U-M research spans the breadth of our outstanding university and addresses many of society’s most pressing questions and challenges.” The federal investment in the University totaled $852 million last year, covering 55 percent of the University’s total volume of research over the last year. Federal investment encourages research at the University that supports public health, national security and economic competitiveness. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which is consistently the greatest external sponsor of research at the University, granted $579 million to the University in fiscal year 2018. Internal research spending increased 8 percent from fiscal year 2017, totaling $524 million in fiscal year 2018. These trends are consistent with the 2018 budget signed by President Donald Trump in March, which approved the greatest increase in allocation to U.S. research in a decade. Industry expenditures also increased 9 percent, totaling a record high of $109 million in fiscal year 2018. The increase in expenditures led to a tangible increase in research in fiscal year 2018. According to the report, there were a record breaking 484 new inventions last year, the number of startups almost doubled to 21, and the Office of Technology Transfer signed 218 license and option agreements with companies hoping to commercialize these discoveries made at the University. S. Jack Hu, University vice president for research, said the financial support allowed the University to produce a large amount of valuable research under the vision Research to Serve the World. “As credit to our innovative campus community and strong external collaboration, the University of Michigan has conducted the largest volume of research of any public university in the United States for eight consecutive years,” Hu said in the University release. “This type of support allows us to advance knowledge, solve challenging societal problems, create new products and services that enhance quality of life, and support students and postdoctoral fellows in research and training.” impacts fake news has on public political opinion. “What I want to answer for you today are some questions like these: How prevalent was fake news consumption in 2016, what effects does have on people’s political attitudes and behavior and how are people being exposed to this dubious content in the first place?” Nyhan said. During his lecture, Nyhan put a particular emphasis on his findings that contradicted popular perceptions of the influence of fake news. “The average person, regardless of party, is not consuming this heavily skewed diet that many folks would predict,” Nyhan said. “There’s a relatively small subset of people who have strong predispositions to seek out and consume pro- attitudinal information.” This subset of people, as Nyhan explained, were identified through a cognitive reflection test, or a measure of one’s capability for thinking analytically about information presented to them. According to Nyhan, his survey demonstrated this subset of people were far more likely to believe fake news sources, particularly when information was presented more than once. “These (fake news) stories come to seem familiar,” Nyhan said. “You’ve seen fake news before, now you see it again, maybe you think it’s more likely to be true. We did observe a small but statistically measurable effect here.” As Nyhan explained, the foundations of his work were influenced by the crucial 2016 report “Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election,” written by political scientists Hunt Allcott and Matthew Gentzkow. According to Allcott and Gentzkow’s report, fake news doesn’t rely on an established audience or reputation to reach digital readers. “Content can be relayed among users with no significant third party filtering, fact- checking, or editorial judgment,” Allcott and Gentzkow wrote. “An individual user with no track record or reputation can in some cases reach as many readers as Fox News, CNN or the New York Times.” Alain Cohn, an assistant professor at the School of Information with a focus on economics and moral decision making, said he was particularly interested in Nyhan’s points about the strategies of persuasion utilized by fake news sources. According to Cohn, Nyhan’s work intersects with his own in several capacities. “I teach a course on persuasion and social influence,” Cohn said. “In my course I try to teach students how they are going to be persuaded in political contexts but also in consumer contexts.” Though his analysis of fake news impact presented serious implications, Nyhan contended fake news had a central impact on the outcome of the 2016 election. As he explained, the impact of fake news is far more complex than many make it out to be. “It’s pretty hard to tell a story about how vote choice was affected by fake news when the people you would expect to be the most unsure about which candidate to vote for are consuming very little fake news,” Nyhan said. “It really challenges this simplistic account of the 2016 election.” Cohn, on the other hand, worries fake news could have unforeseen yet drastic consequences. “Those who consume fake news have already made up their opinion,” Cohn said. “However, if they become more extreme, that might be dangerous. There are other ways fake news consumption may affect society, even if it’s just among a minority.” Though faculty made up the majority of the audience Monday afternoon, students are also taking up the question of fake news, especially in the context of social media. LSA sophomore Mackenzie Freeman, a communication studies major, told The Daily in an interview last month fake news is an issue that, if left undetected, could alter the efficacy of news altogether. “This is really problematic because people see the news as being able to express the truth and that feature is being taken away,” she said. the Michigan Union renovation so we actively informed the campus community, including student employees, over those years,” Pile wrote in an email interview. Public Policy junior Nick Martire worked at the Union Starbucks for about seven months. Martire said he was aware of the closing before his employer told him. “While my employer did tell me about the Union renovation, I knew about it already when they told me,” Martire wrote in an email interview. Because Starbucks was a leased operation, Martire said he did not receive University assistance in finding his new job at the Alumni Association. But Pile said for those students employed by the University in the Union, alternate placements were arranged. “In many cases, the students now work at the League and Pierpont,” Pile wrote. “Any student who was working in the Union and wanted another position was given that opportunity.” Pile said the Union also hosted a job fair for students employed by non-University operations within the Union to assist in finding another job. As for the upcoming CCRB renovation, Widen said student employees were informed of the renovations through meetings and email announcements after the Regents voted on it in September, though many were aware of the project from other means. Similar to the Union, time was given before the start of the project to allow for the necessary changes of employment. “The CCRB isn’t scheduled to close for replacement for two more years,” Widen wrote in an email interview. “As we get closer to that time, we will make adjustments to our hiring.” Widen said students who may be working at the CCRB in two years will work with Recreational Sports to find alternate placement. “We have other facilities like IMSB, NCRB, Sports Coliseum, Elbel Field, and Mitchell Field that all need student staffing,” Widen wrote. “In addition, we have a number of programs that need student employees as well, e.g. Group-X, Personal Training, Intramural Sports, Club Sports, Adventure Leadership.” LSA junior Mikaela Bradley currently works at both the CCRB and the Intramural Sports Building. In an email interview, Bradley said she will no longer be a student at the University when the renovations begin; however she expected if she still were a student, she would try to continue working for Recreational Sports. “If the CCRB was closing earlier, I would definitely try to ensure all of my shifts were at the IMSB so that I could still work with recreational sports,” Bradley wrote. Bradley also added some students are under the assumption that renovations will be occurring very soon. “A lot of students that don’t work at rec sports seem to think the renovations are going to happen much sooner than they are,” Bradley wrote. “I have had several patrons ask me when the CCRB is closing and they are often surprised that the remodeling is still a few years away.” Widen added Recreational Sports has experience with renovations over the past few years. “We’ve gone through this same process of making adjustments for student employees recently with the IMSB (2015-2016) and the NCRB (2017-2018) were each closed for their own renovations,” Widen wrote. checked for correctness. Senate Assembly Chair Neil Marsh expressed his belief that the resolution is something more abstract, that supporting CSG would not take away from the faculty assembly. “I see this (resolution) as being fairly non-controversial and its heart is in the right place,” he said. “I don’t see any particular downside to us saying we support (their) resolution once it’s been passed.” Next, the assembly welcomed Jerry May, University vice president for development. One of the largest projects for the Office of Development, the Victors for Michigan campaign, which began in 2011 and is coming to its close, has raised over $5 billion and is the most successful fundraising campaign in University history. May, who announced his upcoming retirement last spring, explained his role of overseeing all fundraising activities and answered the questions of assembly members. Members of the assembly mentioned many University programs receive consistent funding, like the Ross School of Business, while other areas needing improvement do not recieve as many donations. Though donors cannot be told where to give their money, May said, many decide to donate to multiple areas instead of just one. “I’m a huge believer in multiple relationships in multiple areas, and not having one development officer … that hoards your relationship with a donor,” May said. “What I find is the more (an individual) is exposed to the breadth of the university, the more likely they are to give to more than just their one degree.” University Provost Martin Philbert then spoke to the assembly, highlighting the recent introduction of parental leave benefits for University faculty and staff. Philbert discussed how it’s a joint responsibility to child rear, and this benefit will make the University a more attractive place to work. “In a time where there are lots of issues that divide us, this is one of those that unites us,” Philbert said. “We will support the members of our community who need time to bond with their children.” The meeting concluded with questions from members of the assembly to Philbert, primarily regarding the Office of Institutional Equity amid criticism of the office’s sexual misconduct investigations, especially within the School of Music, Theater & Dance. OIE’s annual report released earlier this year found more reports were filed with the office, though the number of investigations dropped. Philbert voiced support for the policy and process as a whole. “I’ve heard concerns about the length of time it takes to complete some OIE investigations,” Philbert said. “We’re always working to ensure that those investigations are fair, thorough and timely.” The student sexual misconduct policy dictates OIE should strive to complete investgations within 60 days of their filing — anecdotal evidence reported by The Daily found, however, students were waiting from five to six months at times for responses to their reports. Philbert said some factors delay the completion of certain investigations, and opened the conversation to include suggestions from the assembly to make this process more efficient and effective. Philbert concluded the meeting by explaining the implementation of mandatory online sexual misconduct training for faculty members in the years going forward. The Michigan Daily — michigandaily.com News Tuesday, November 27, 2018 — 3 ASSEMBLY From Page 1 RESEARCH From Page 1 COUNCIL From Page 1 EMPLOYMENT From Page 1 I have had several patrons ask me when the CCRB is closing and they are often surprised that the remodeling is still a few years away I am proud that U-M research spans the breadth of our outstanding university