*This review includes spoilers* My favorite romance movie? The one during which the girl dumps the guy at the end and walks off into the sunset fulfilled with the knowledge that she is enough and doesn’t need a man. “Queen” is my favorite not-so- typical Bollywood movie. This movie shattered stereotypes and launched a new era in Hindi cinema. Of course, some of the credit for successful women- oriented Hindi films goes to my fav, Priyanka Chopra, for her iconic role in “Fashion” (a project of which actress Kangana Ranaut was also a part), but “Queen” was the movie that did extremely well at the box office and put Ranaut on the map. Ranaut has gone on to fearlessly call out nepotism and sexism in the industry ever since. “Queen” tells the story of Rani, a woman whose fiancé leaves her days before their wedding. Despite her heartbreak, Rani decides to go on her honeymoon alone and ends up on a whirlwind journey of self- discovery and growth. This movie shattered stereotypes about desi women and what the trajectory of our lives should be. “Queen” is also the least problematic Bollywood movie I’ve ever seen. This in itself is quite an accomplishment, considering the industry we’re talking about. Yet, there were still elements of this movie that bothered me — the tiny details that perpetuate stereotypes despite the fact that the director could have easily made different choices that wouldn’t be harmful. First, there is a moment in the film when Rani is approached by a stranger who is trying to help her. Rani doesn’t know this and all she sees is a Black man standing near her and she screams in terror. It’s a rational reaction for her to be frightened in the context of the movie, but it was absolutely unnecessary for the director to choose the only Black character in the film to be the one who scares her. The image of Black men in India is permeated with the harmful stereotypes we see in U.S. media and accentuated by the fact that most Indians have never even met a Black person. Furthermore, Tim, the only Black character in the movie, has the least lines and isn’t given a backstory. The last scenes of the movie are some of the best, especially the combination of the music and aesthetics. However, these are the only scenes of the movie where Rani’s hair is straightened. Throughout most of the film, Rani wears her hair naturally curly, and as a curly-hair girl myself, this is one of the many reasons I loved her character so much. However, the final scenes, when Rani is portrayed as her most badass and confident self, her hair is straight. This sends the subtle message that straight hair is more beautiful and somehow more closely associated with feeling empowered. The most typical Bollywood element of this movie is the flashback showing how Rani and her fiancé Vijay fell in love — Vijay essentially stalked her until she finally agreed to have dinner with him. This is how most Bollywood movies go — women are pursued until they finally “wear down” and “agree.” In fact, sexual harassment and assault in Bollywood isn’t just limited to what we see on-screen. The industry itself is also rife with instances of well-known actors taking advantage of actresses. “Queen” was refreshing because Rani doesn’t end up with the stalker at the end. Since I first watched it, “Queen” has become one of my favorite Bollywood films. Though there are details that I find troubling, the beauty in seeing a main character who is strong in her convictions and unwavered by society’s expectations is hard to measure. A movie like this is rare in mainstream Bollywood, but it’s exactly the kind of high-quality cinema I want to see. Interracial relationships haven’t been something accepted in America for a long time at all. It was only legalized about 50 years ago with the landmark Loving v. Virginia Supreme Court case, during which a Black woman and a white man took their wedding vows in Washington, D.C., but then moved to Virginia, a state that banned interracial marriage. Due to this law, the couple was indicted by a grand jury four months into the marriage, and they were forced to move back to the place where they had taken their vows to avoid another year of imprisonment. Luckily, when the couple appealed to the Supreme Court, the case overturned the conviction and struck down the law in Virginia. Fifty years ago is not that long ago. There are people still alive who very well remember interracial marriage illegalization. However, that being said, there has still been progress with the general public’s perception of interracial couples. Well, most interracial couples. The media has played a big role in this with movies like “The Big Sick”, “The Incredible Jessica James” and even the newest heartwarming romantic comedy “To All The Boys I’ve Loved Before”. TV shows like “The Flash”, “Scandal” and “How To Get Away with Murder” have also featured interracial couples as main plot points. However, do you notice a pattern with these forms of media? These are all some of the most popular movies and TV shows, yet all feature a person of color and a white person. It’s never two interracial people of color who come together. In fact, there seems to be more positive representation in mainstream pop culture of a white person with a person of color than even two people of color from the same background together! To give one example of many, Aziz Ansari got our hopes up in the first episode of the second season of “Master of None” when he found a Black woman he was romantically interested in. However, he lost his phone and as a result communication with her forever. Of course, he proceeded to fall in love with a white Italian woman, and not without the periodic flux of interest and disinterest in the South Asian woman who appeared within the season. There’s always an edge of fear and controversy of calling this out. Interracial couples and friendships that are a white person and a person of color aren’t negative by any means, and calling this disparity out doesn’t imply they are bad in any way. They should still be encouraged — it’s just that there needs to be more romantic and even platonic representation of what two different non-white cultures look like together. Hollywood has been making great strides in diversity lately, but as with any institution mainly founded by people with privileged identities, there is unsurprisingly always room for improvement. When I was 11 years old, I decided to wear a headscarf. I knew I would eventually wear one because as a Muslim, I believe it’s required of me. While others don’t, it all depends on people’s personal beliefs. My close friends wore one, and so did my mom, so it seemed like the appropriate time to take the plunge. When I told my mom I wanted to wear a scarf, she took me out to buy headscarves for girls my age. Before I knew it, the day came when I chose to wear one in public for the first time. It was pretty anticlimactic. My mom was going to the grocery store, so I wore a cardigan as I normally would, and put on my headscarf. I remember walking out the door, self-conscious, because it was the first time I went out in a scarf and I thought those who knew me would stare. But nobody did. It was just like any other day. I should clarify, however, that I’m from Dearborn, Michigan. Dearborn is home to the largest population of people of Middle Eastern origin in the United States and has a large Muslim population. So, my wearing a scarf was completely normal, as many other girls and women in Dearborn wear headscarves. I also didn’t feel any different on my first day of sixth grade, which was the first time I wore a scarf to school. The only time I did feel weird was when I went outside of Dearborn. People from Dearborn refer to this phenomenon of the “Dearborn bubble,” because it’s like we live in our own protective shell and I’m starting to realize the truth of it. When I went to Twelve Oaks Mall in Novi for the first time, which is only 35 minutes away, I remember feeling people stare at me. I don’t know if this was because I was self-conscious because there weren’t many Muslims around, or because it actually happened. As I’ve grown older, however, I’ve learned not to let people’s staring bother me. But my headscarf wasn’t the only thing that made me feel different from others. While I may look different from many Americans, I’m still an American. On a family trip to Lebanon, I realized how different my sisters and I were from my cousins. They always refer to us as Americans, because we don’t entirely fit into their culture. We prefer English music to their Arabic music, and we have distinct fashion tastes. Even the way they style their headscarves is different than how I style mine. Still, when I come back home, some Americans don’t think I’m American. In fact, I was once walking to class when I heard two voices behind me talking about how many Arabs (people of Middle Eastern origin) are boaters (derogatory term for immigrant) and don’t understand English. I wanted to tell them English is my first language and I was born here. But either out of fear or not wanting to give them the pleasure of provoking me, I just kept on walking. I have never felt like I really fit in anywhere except Dearborn, where I’m still judged by others, but so is everyone else. Yet we’ve somehow created a culture of our own — a part of the old country and part of our own country. I don’t feel like a true Lebanese when I visit Lebanon, and I feel different than some Americans in America. But I’m just like many people from Dearborn, the child of immigrants. I hope I find that same sense of belonging in Ann Arbor, where I’ve come to realize people differ in many ways, not only in their backgrounds. At the University of Michigan, people can be whoever they want to be, without facing judgement as harshly as they might face it somewhere else. I’ve found I can be myself and be welcomed by inclusive communities here on campus, such as PILOT. PILOT is a student-run organization that works to empower and make leaders of students from underrepresented minorities on campus. This organization welcomes each of its members like family, which is truly an amazing thing. Inclusive environments like PILOT here at Michigan, makes me glad to say I’m a Wolverine. The Michigan Daily — michigandaily.com Michigan in Color Monday, October 8, 2018 — 3A Fitting in: leaving home for AA Bollywood: “Queen” defies tropes Cultural context and power dynamics: who has the right How “interracial” is Hollywood’s interracial relationships? SWATHI KOMARIVELLI MiC Blogger EFE OSAGIE Assistant MiC Editor KHADEJA JOMAA MiC Columnist ZAINAB BHINDARWALA Senior MiC Editor CASEY TIN/Daily Who has the right to say the word nigger? Not nigga, with an a, but nigger. Hard r. If you’re Black, at this point into the article you’re probably enraged this word is being published in a news article. If you’re white, you’re probably just plain uncomfortable. You can rest assured though, because the writer of this article is also Black, which makes this okay. Or does it? The word nigger is taboo. Even just typing the word makes me uncomfortable. Why? Partially because it’s a traumatic term that encompasses years of brutal history Black people faced at the hands of their oppressors. Because it’s ugly and holds too much pain. Also because it’s practically forbidden. Arguably it’s one of the most avoided words in our English vocabulary, censored before you have a chance to understand what someone’s trying to say. But does censoring it protect us from the harsh triggers of the word or just gloss over a history that can never be erased? I typically hold the belief that if you’re not Black, you shouldn’t say it. Ever. But recently I’ve questioned this after discussing the use of the word — and if it’s okay for non-Black people to say it in plays and productions — in one of my classes. I wanted to discuss my personal opinion on it, which was a bit hard to do as I was the only Black person in the class that day. This blurred the line between having a fruitful conversation and taking the role of “educating” the other white students in my class, as all the white students would inevitably look to me as the definite stance of who deserves to say the word. Besides obvious reasons of not having to be a spokesperson for my race, I could not provide an answer. Even among Black people it’s not clear who deserves to say that word. I personally think it’s okay for Black people to say nigger and nigga because I see it as a form of reclaiming a word that was used against them for so long, taking the power away from it by making it their own. This follows same way women have reclaimed the word “pussy” and “bitch.” But is it exactly the same thing? Because the words “pussy” and “bitch” don’t have the same cultural significance as the word “nigger.” And I’m not saying this to rank the pain caused by different words as that argument is virtually pointless, but it’s still important to note pain is different. A lot of Black people believe the word deserves to die because of the amount of pain it’s caused and probably also believe it’s past the point of reclaiming. In 2007, the NAACP held a “funeral for the n-word” to lay it to rest and prevent it from doing any more harm. Something important to note is the coffin carried during the funeral though had the word “nigga” on the side, not the word “nigger.” Nigga is the reclaimed, now colloquial form of the word used casually among Black people and in their music. The word nigger, however, was the actual contemptuous word used by white people in the past. But does laying the word down to rest actually pave the way for a future without hate or racial slurs? Or does it even placate all of those who have been traumatized by that word for ages? One good point made by Jordan Cooper is even if the n-word is laid to rest, “They’ll (white people) just come up with other words — like ‘thug.’” Al Sharpton once said, “If you call yourself the n-word, you can’t get mad when someone treats you like that.” This brings into question the idea of what Black people are saying to white people on how they should be treated if they call themselves that word. In my opinion, white people shouldn’t be looking to Black people on how to treat Black people anyway. If they’re curious then they should just ask us. Also, because white people aren’t Black, they definitely should not be treating Black people the same way other Black people do. But that’s a whole other conversation on appropriation of culture. The discussion on who has the right to say nigger is something that will undoubtedly carry on for a while. Within Black people it’s more of a personal choice on who can say it. Even I, as a Black person, feel hesitant on whether I have the “right to say it.” Yes, I am Black but I’m also a first-generation Nigerian. My ancestors did not share the same history as Black people here whose ancestors went through slavery. It might not even be my word to reclaim and I’m profiting off my privilege as an African-Black person that allows me to say this word with which I don’t share the same history. But though I don’t share the same history as my Black brethren across the diaspora, I still feel the same pain living as a Black person in America, in a world that wasn’t built for me and is so eager to bring me down. In a world Where a police officer could take the life of my brother, cousin, father and it wouldn’t matter if they’re Nigerian or “African-American” Black. In a world where I get called that word on school trips for laughing too loudly with my friends. Regardless of this, it’s still a personal choice among all Black people of who can say it, not something on which we might not come to a consensus. At least not anytime soon. Despite the significance of this word though, at the end of the day this unfortunately might just become another battle in linguistics. But one that no one is willing to have. Interested in writing about campus or pop culture? Michigan in Color is hiring bloggers! Email michiganincolor@michigandaily.com for more information. “[T]he director could have easily made different choices that wouldn’t be harmful” “This follows the same way women have reclaimed the word ‘pussy’ and ‘bitch’” SADHANA RAMASESHADRI/Daily