100%

Scanned image of the page. Keyboard directions: use + to zoom in, - to zoom out, arrow keys to pan inside the viewer.

Page Options

Download this Issue

Share

Something wrong?

Something wrong with this page? Report problem.

Rights / Permissions

This collection, digitized in collaboration with the Michigan Daily and the Board for Student Publications, contains materials that are protected by copyright law. Access to these materials is provided for non-profit educational and research purposes. If you use an item from this collection, it is your responsibility to consider the work's copyright status and obtain any required permission.

October 03, 2018 - Image 12

Resource type:
Text
Publication:
The Michigan Daily

Disclaimer: Computer generated plain text may have errors. Read more about this.

Wednesday, October 3, 2018 // The Statement
4B
Wednesday, October 3, 2018 // The Statement

5B

Nurses describe cuts to patient care at Michigan Medicine

M

egan Duncan, a cardi-
ology nurse at the Uni-
versity of Michigan

Hospital, began filing reports with
her superiors detailing concerns
with the hospital’s new remote
heartbeat monitoring program in
Summer 2017. She was met with
little-to-no response from the
Michigan Medicine administra-
tion.

Beginning in July 2017, Michi-

gan Medicine moved almost all
cardiology
patients

outside

of the intensive care unit — to a
remote heart rate monitoring sys-
tem, referred to as remote telem-
etry, that largely replaced licensed
nurses with technicians. Before
then, almost all hospital patients
with heart monitors had their
heart rates monitored by live nurs-
es; outside of eight patients linked
to a limited remote screening pro-

gram moni-
tored by a single nurse.

As soon as Michigan Medicine

began using remote telemetry was
rolled out in scale, Duncan and
other nurses in her unit began
experiencing issues with the tech-
nicians.

“Sometimes I found

myself having to edu-
cate (the technicians)
when
they
didn’t

report an incident in
time or didn’t report
it at all,” Duncan said.
“We
noticed
lags.

Sometimes
a
heart

rhythm would change
and they would never
call or call much later.
Often,
they
didn’t

know what it was,
which was alarming. They’re sup-
posed to be trained.”

Duncan

explained
technicians
are stationed
in the base-
ment of their
respective
unit to watch
the
heart

monitors and
report
back

to the nurses
when chang-
es occur; she
added
there

were no sen-
tinel
events

in her unit,
but there was
still concern
about
harm

coming to the

patients.

Technicians within the remote

telemetry unit typically monitor 40
patients at a time and are allowed
to monitor up to 64 patients,
according to Duncan, a stark con-
trast to the personalized attention
nurses could offer patients when

they were only able to see three at
a time. Before the hospital began
employing the technicians, only
eight of the unit’s patients were
monitored remotely by a single
nurse in the cardiology unit base-
ment for the cardiology unit, while
all the other patients with heart
monitors had in-person monitor-
ing by nurses.

While the technicians work

in
the
basement,
technicians

and nurses within the hospital
do not interact personally. Dun-
can explained the only contact
the nurses within her unit had
with the technicians was over the
phone. The lack of contact within
the cardiology unit resulted in
hostility between the two groups.

“I think the technicians thought

we didn’t trust them after we
started filing incident reports,”
Duncan said.

Many nurses such as Duncan

believe the hospital’s implemen-
tation of remote telemetry with
technicians reflects a devaluation
of nurses under a management cul-
ture at Michigan Medicine that has
become increasingly profit-driven
at the expense of staff and patients.

Ian Robinson, the president of the
Huron Valley Area Labor Federa-
tion — who was involved in the
recent nurses’ strike — said he
has seen a drastic shift at Michi-
gan Medicine toward a corporate
mindset.

“It’s a new model that is taking

place at the University,” Robinson
said. “It is a model that has moved
from focusing on the interests of
the public to profit.”

In an email statement, Michigan

Medicine senior communications
representative
Beata
Mostafavi

said the hospital’s new remote
telemetry practices were intended
to improve patient care by enabling
immediate, continuous monitoring
and by facilitating greater collabo-
ration across hospital staff.

“Remote
telemetry
provides

real-time monitoring of patients
who are at risk for cardiac events,
significantly improving the ability

to observe and monitor hospital-
ized patients’ hearts around-the-
clock,” Mostafavi wrote. “A skilled,
highly trained team of registered
nurses, cardiac technicians and
other Michigan Medicine staff
monitor patients in every unit that
has cardiac monitoring. These
teams
collaborate
to
interpret

patient cardiac rhythms and iden-
tify patients who require clinical
attention, which helps improve
patient care and outcomes.”

Despite
Michigan
Medicine’s

claims, Duncan fears the practice
has actually created a barrier for
communication at the hospital and
the lapses of communication that
seem to accompany the practice
could negatively impact patients’
health.

“Overall, we feel that remote

telemetry is a barrier to interdis-
ciplinary
communication,
and

can result in delay of care; both of

which can result in negative out-
comes for the patients and family,”
Duncan wrote.

Though the University invested

a significant amount of money in
the change — it remodeled a level

of the basement and purchased
new monitors — Duncan believes
this was part of a long-term strat-
egy by Michigan Medicine to cut
costs by reducing the number of
nurses needed, at the expense of
patient care.

“Remote telemetry isn’t a cut-

back issue,” she said. “They spent a
significant amount of money on it,
but in the long run it’s speculated
they invested in remote telemetry
in order to possibly down-staff
nursing in the future. If they don’t
need a nurse to monitor a patient’s
heart and a technician can monitor
more hearts at once then they can
staff less nurses.”
W

hile staffing has been
a key issue in the 100
days of bargaining-

leading to the University of Michi-
gan Professional Nurse Council’s
tentative contract agreement with
Michigan Medicine, nurses also

cite
cutbacks
Michigan
Medi-

cine has made in other aspects of
patient care.

Allison Carroll, a nurse in the

pediatric hematology and oncology
unit at C.S. Mott Children’s Hospi-

tal, said budget
cuts inhibit her
role as a care-
giver
to
her

patients.

“As
nurses,

we feel deval-
ued,”
Carroll

said. “We real-
ly aren’t asking
for
anything

we didn’t have
before.”

Carroll

explained
the

hospital
used

to keep graham
crackers on her
floor for dia-
betic
patients

or
patients

undergoing
chemotherapy
who struggle to find their appetite,
but the budget cuts have eliminat-

ed important amenities
like this.

“We can order them

through food services
but it can take up to
an hour, and by then
the patient undergoing
chemotherapy
might

have lost their appe-
tite,” Carroll said. “It
sounds insignificant but
patients in the oncology

unit struggle to keep down food.”

Similarly, Lynn Detloff, a nurse

within
the
Brandon
Newborn

Intensive Care unit at Mott Chil-
dren’s Hospital, said Michigan
Medicine’s cutbacks on programs

designed to support nurses in pro-
viding personal care to patients
have negatively impacted her role
as a caregiver.

Detloff explained the hospi-

tal has significantly cut back on
bereavement trays — trays of food
that are brought to families follow-
ing the loss of a loved one.

“If there was a death in our

unit or any other unit, we would
set them up for the family so they
wouldn’t have to leave the bed-
side,” Detloff, the chair of the
bereavement tray committee in her
unit, said.

Until a cutback on bereave-

ment trays in May 2018, nurses
could provide food to up to 15 fam-
ily members per patient. Bereave-
ment trays included anything from
bagels, cereal, pastries, oatmeal or
yogurt and juice for breakfast or
an array of sandwiches and cook-
ies. Now, the nurses are limited to
offering 8 trays with a limited menu
of a blueberry muffin and orange
juice for breakfast or a granola bar
and a piece of fruit. Michigan Med-
icine did not respond to a question
about how much these bereave-
ment trays cost, or how much was
saved in cutting the choice of food.

“The bereavement trays are just

one of the things we do in the hos-
pital to show empathy for families
going through a difficult time,”
Detloff said. “(Michigan Medicine)
has a surplus of $103 million for the
2018 budget. It seems heartless for
them to cut back on bereavement
trays when it is our job to care for
families.”

Bereavement trays are not the

only patient care item Michigan
Medicine has dropped from their
budget.
Danyel Tharakan/Daily

Audience members wear red in support of University hospital nurses in their ongoing labor dispute at the
Regents’ Meeting at the University golf course Thursday.

File Photo/Daily

The University of Michigan hospital.

“Sometimes a heart rhythm would

change and they would never call or

call much later. Often, they didn’t know

what it was, which was alarming.
They’re supposed to be trained.”

“As nurses, we feel devalued. We
really aren’t asking for anything

we didn’t have before.”

Emma Richter/Daily

The University of Michigan hospital.

REMOTE TELEMETRY AND

GRAHAM CRACKERS:

by Grace Kay, Daily Staff Reporter

See NURSES, Page 6B

Back to Top

© 2024 Regents of the University of Michigan