because it was something on which he could collaborate with Knapik and Polish acting students. Collaboration made sense, Tulip explained, because of their shared artistic views, in addition to the political unrest under conservative administrations. “These more-to-the-right administrations … seemed to be a common bond,” Tulip said. “We had artistic things in common, we had political struggles in common.” Music, Theatre & Dance professor Vince Mountain, one of the designers of the play, discussed the performance’s visual aspects and explained how a combination of visuals, movement and sound are used to make the play come alive. He noted his appreciation of the unrefined, messy nature of Mee’s plays. “(Mee) talks about on his website … he likes things that aren’t neat,” Mountain said. “He says I want things to crash into each other and be messy and be unresolved, and I do find a lot of mainstream theater is a little bit too neat. Personally, in my own work, I like things that are messy and crash into each other and so the opportunity to do this is really great because you do one thing, and other people contribute.” Kovacs prompted the cast members to speak about their experience working on a play with a unique, movement- based style. Music, Theatre & Dance junior Amanda Kuo was one of the actors who responded, touching on the freedom and vulnerability using her body to convey a message. “Knowing that this was a dance theater piece also meant displaying your body and using that as a means of storytelling and putting an emphasis on that,” Kuo said. “It’s slightly liberating, but also puts you in a vulnerable place because it’s your body, it’s your whole self, not just the text. So in that way, this process has pushed us to stop thinking and just start doing, and trusting each other and creating images.” Knapik explained how she pushed the actors to explore their movements, giving them room to improvise and create, but at the same time making sure they were testing themselves. “It’s not addressing what people are dancing but what is really moving them,” Knapik said. “Addressing what kind of motion they have inside. Really I’m trying to make it in a very specific rhythm that can be challenging also for them. It’s something between being super strict and giving freedom to the creativity.” This creativity and improvisation really appealed to Music, Theatre & Dance senior Kathleen Taylor, who spoke about her appreciation of the play not adhering to one single statement. “It’s been really fascinating for me to be able to work on this piece that is sort of messy and is not necessarily making any one particular statement other than that every decision we make is political, everything we’re putting out into the world at least I believe during this time has inherent political value,” Taylor said. Music, Theatre & Dance junior Daniel Flick said attending the play would be a valuable experience for every potential audience member. “I don’t think there’s a specific audience I would want to see this,” Flick said. “I think everyone can take something away from it and I think it will challenge everyone’s beliefs in a certain way to a certain extent.” The Michigan Daily — michigandaily.com News Thursday, September 20, 2018 — 3 of state it can be a real motivator for people to come out that don’t normally because it’s so unique.” Stabenow, who is up for reelection in November, opened the event by stressing the importance of voting in the midterm election. Among other prominent issues this year, she highlighted clean water, universal health care, net neutrality, college debt alleviation and Great Lake protections. “You understand what’s at stake,” Stabenow said. “We are at a point in time where literally everything we care about is on the ballot.” She also acknowledged the historically lackluster turnout rates across the state and stressed this election needs to be a turning point for Michigan. “Michigan traditionally, unfortunately, has the distinction of being the state with the lowest turnout in non-presidential years,” Stabenow said. “Think about that. This year, we have to change that.” In both the 2014 and 2010 midterm elections, however, voter turnout in Michigan was above the national averages of 37.8 and 36.3 percent, respectively. Voter turnout rates for the 2018 primary rose from 2014 levels, however, indicating turnout may increase come November. Kennedy began his segment by asking the audience members to shout out what issues they cared about the most. He collected a long list of issues –– climate change, access and affordability of higher education, a woman’s right to choose, gun control, universal health care, immigration, racial inequality –– and had audience members raise hands to vote their personal top three issues. He then shared some statistics about today’s economy and the financial hurdles millennials face. According to Kennedy, millennials have to work 4,500 hours of a minimum wage job to afford a college degree, whereas baby boomers only had to work 300 hours. Additionally, Kennedy said, 20 percent of the economy is now essentially a contract or gig economy, so the protections that came with secure employment are gone. He also shared about half of millennials have zero savings. Kennedy used these facts as a motivator for young voters to be engaged and decide on policies that will benefit their futures and ease financial anxieties. “I promise you, you will decide this election, period,” Kennedy said. “You’ll decide it because you vote, or you’ll decide it because you don’t … You guys have a chance to actually send a message to every single politician and aspiring politician about the direction of the nation that we see today.” Kildee, Dingell, Driskell and Brown also talked about the importance of youth voter engagement in the midterms. Kildee discussed Flint, Michigan, which lies in his congressional district, as an example of failed government leadership. “What happened in Flint was not a storm, it wasn’t an accident. It wasn’t some unforeseen, unpreventable disaster,” Kildee said. “It was the predictable result of a philosophy of government that says those kids (from Flint) come last, and the people at the top – the wealthy, the powerful – are the folks who are going to get the resources that could have guaranteed clean water for these kids.” Dingell, along with several of the other speakers, brought attention to the Big Ten Voting Challenge, a competition among the 14 Big Ten universities to get the highest student turnout rate on campus for the midterm elections. LSA sophomore Marni Balamut attended the event in preparation for voting in the midterm election. “Obviously with the midterms it’s so important to be voting and especially as young people, the policies of this presidency affects us so much,” Balamut said. “To be able to hear Congressmen and people really representing us talk to us as real people and telling us important issues and stuff from their experience is important.” After the event, Lounds said she was happy with the student turnout, as well as the quality of speakers she was able to secure. “We have such a force of Democratic power in the southeast side of the state,” Lounds said. “It’s awesome to get them all together and see what we can really do together.” DEMS From Page 1A PANEL From Page 1A Professor Kristin Hass is currently teaching a course on Detroit and finds the increased programs and initiatives in Detroit exciting. “We have a lot to learn from the history of the city and the people of the city,” Hass said. “I wouldn’t want to over-promise on the impact, (but) everybody aspires to have a positive impact on the city.” Holloway said the goal for initiatives and programs is for the University and the city to mutually benefit. To further the productivity of programs, Holloway said local support is important. The University has 300 projects grounded in and around Detroit. “In order to accomplish our goals in relation to research and education, we have to do that with local support and local partners. We want to realize the reciprocal benefit, working with local partners. The dialogue is important.” Underlying the University’s new ventures in Detroit is its pre-existing relationship with the city — or at times, a lack thereof. The University was founded in Detroit in 1817, but departed for Ann Arbor two decades later. In the last half-century, city residents have lived through post-industrial decline, bankruptcy and population loss — and some members of the campus community question the motives behind the University’s partnerships. “There was a point at which my recommendation was that we pull out of Detroit altogether — that we didn’t really mean it,” former professor Martha Jones told The Daily last summer. “Now that was more of a provocation, but it’s not so far-fetched. That would be in keeping with one vision of who we are. As an institution, we’re very late in coming to Detroit... we weren’t sure if we wanted to be a university that just happened to be in southeastern Michigan. A few years ago, I wound up doing a survey of all the programs in Detroit emanating from Ann Arbor, and there are scores of them. But after itemizing them, they didn’t really have one coherent mission or vision.” In a similar vein, University alum Stephen Wallace criticized common research approaches to Detroit. Wallace, a Detroit native, sparked debate at a Ford School policy talk two years ago wherein a Detroit deputy mayor called the city a policy “laboratory.” “I found that referring to Detroit as a laboratory for public policy experiments (was) very offensive because you’re dealing with people’s real lives,” Wallace pointed out. “I am very fortunate to come out of my neighborhood DETROIT From Page 1A and go to one of the best schools in the world, but I had a lot of opportunities that some people don’t have and to refer to their lives and their futures as experiments … is a very slippery slope. It causes you to view the city and the people in it as something less than human. University alum Michael Chrzan is a native of Detroit and now teaches math to Detroit high school students. He said when the programs are well developed, they can be valuable to the community. “I’m a fan of large institutions doing work like this if it’s done in conscious ways, where there’s clear thought given on the impact on the community,” Chrzan said. “One of the big critiques I’ve heard of Michigan, especially the School of Ed, is that the work they do, they almost are using students as guinea pigs. It’s a fine line between research.” He also stressed the University does try and balance research with understanding the students. The P-20 Partnership is a program that Chrzan thinks is needed, emphasizing the idea of a teacher residency would be useful. “The teacher residency was an idea they were trying to pilot when I was in a teaching intern program,” Chrzan said. “I was really excited to hear about that, we really need it in the profession.” According to Holloway, the University operates under three principles when meeting with communities for dialogue: recognition, respect and equitable partnership. “When we engage with a partner in Detroit, they’re giving us their time and their support, and we need to respect that,” Holloway said. Hass agreed the University should approach Detroit with respect. “I emphasize approaching the whole thing with humility,” Hass said. “Detroit as a city and the people of the city are not anybody’s laboratory. I think the presence of the University could be a wonderful thing.” Chrzan mentioned growing up in east Detroit, he didn’t hear much from the University. Even today, he said the University might want to consider which regions they focus on and invest in. “There are a lot of investments being made in northwest and western regions that I’m not hearing about in eastside neighborhoods, which gets into the crisis of ‘New Detroit,’” Chrzan said. “If the University isn’t careful they could wind up exacerbating things like that.” As for the new space in the Rackham Memorial Building, Holloway said the University could use the new area for classrooms and community dialogue. “The purchase of the Rackham Building is part of a statement really from the University that we think we have a long-term engagement with Detroit.” Knowing that this was a dance theater piece also meant displaying your body and using that as a means of storytelling Washtenaw County Commissioners will consider first salary raise since 2013 vote Elected officials to vote on new bill proposing 70 percent salary raise to bring average wage to $27,056/year The Ways and Means committee of the Washtenaw County Board of Commissioners discussed a salary raise Wednesday night. The nine elected officials currently make an average of $15,911 per year—under the new proposal, these wages could rise to $27,056 over the next two years. Though The Daily could not confirm whether the measure was voted on Wednesday night, the proposed salaries would represent close to a 70 percent increase.The measure seeks to pay the commissioners— who serve in their capacities part-time—45 percent of the median income in Washtenaw County. County Board Chairman Andy LaBarre (D) told MLive he expects the raises to pass with most of the board’s support. “This is certainly a job where, if you’re looking to do it right, it can come to a half- time commitment, sometimes even more if you’re in leadership,” he said. “But right now, the wage we pay I think sort of produces a board that either has folks who are no longer in the workforce, folks who are maybe students or have a non-traditional setup, or some folks, if they have full-time jobs, they either have to have a lot of flexibility in those jobs or they’re not able to do as much as other commissioners.” The average wage for county commissioners in the state of Michigan is currently $18,700. The board last made headlines for unanimuously adopting a racial equity policy earlier this month. The salary measures will go before the entire board for confirmation on Oct. 3. RIYAH BASHA Managing News Editor that’s built into corrections,” he said. “Even though it’s called corrections, there is a bias to keep you illiterate, to keep you at a remedial level, and it takes a village to get former inmates back into society.” When Sanders was released, he was helped by several University of Michigan and Wayne State University social work interns as well as his sisters to get a state identification card and health insurance, in addition to completing other re-entry regulatory steps. He claimed one of his proudest accomplishments since prison was registering and later voting for gubernatorial candidate Abdul El-Sayed. “This is very important for you guys: Determine your own fate, and don’t do it just after the primary, do it so you aren’t left with someone that somebody else picked for you,” he said. “The same day I got out of prison, being there for almost 43 years, first thing I did was register to vote. And I went with Abdul.” Sanders’ transition back into society was a difficult one, especially in terms of finding work. He was hired at McDonald’s after a successful interview, when his status as a former felon wasn’t mentioned until the end. He hopes to contribute to the field of social work or law in the future. Sanders mentioned Gov. Rick Snyder’s ban on the checkbox designating former felons on job applications as an institutional step in the right direction. Sanders received help from the Unviersity’s Information Alliance for Community Development, which he said was essential to gaining fluency in digital work applications and general technological skills. Rackham student Ihudiya Ogburu researches digital literacy in the School of Information, and described the effort of this organization and why she felt compelled to spearhead the program. “I’m interested in understanding how returning citizens or people who were formerly incarcerated use technology in general, and how they go about looking for jobs in this digital society,” she said. “We just finished interviewing last week, it’s on Sundays from 2:00 to 5:00 pm, and we want to further recruit volunteers.” Graduate student Yixian Zhou explained her interest in the transitionary period between incarceration and returning to society brought her to the lecture. “The reason why I came here is that I’m curious about this topic — there are a few topics about how when people came from prison, and how people transition and adapt into normal life. This is a completely different life than in prison. I’m curious about that, and also how people handle mental health issues and change their thoughts and conceptions to adapt to society.” PARALEGAL From Page 1A