Like another road loss to a ranked team, the sight of a Michigan quarterback running for dear life is nothing new. Last year, it led to injuries for Wilton Speight and Brandon Peters. It nearly did the same to Shea Patterson on Saturday, as the junior quarterback missed parts of the fourth quarter with cramps after being pressured all night. Officially, Patterson was sacked three times and hurried on another six occasions. In reality, though, it was much worse. The Wolverines’ offensive tackles looked almost helpless. Patterson rarely received a clean pocket to throw from — pressure from the edge or Notre Dame stunts came almost instantaneously. It showed in Michigan’s offense: quick throws were its only reliable way of moving the ball, and the Wolverines had just three plays of 15 yards or more with one offensive touchdown. But during Monday’s press conferences, coach Jim Harbaugh said he wasn’t concerned — and rather encouraged — by his offensive line’s performance. “I thought it was improved,” Harbaugh said. “We look at it and there was quite a few boxes that were checked (as) this is improved. We’ll continue to get better, but it was one of the areas I think we’re improving in.” Michigan started Jon Runyan Jr. and Juwann Bushell-Beatty at tackle, along with Ben Bredeson, Cesar Ruiz and Michael Onwenu — left to right — on the interior Saturday. Despite a plethora of glaring mistakes and the presence of reserves like redshirt freshman tackle James Hudson and junior guard Stephen Spanellis, Harbaugh said he’ll stick with the same group next week against Western Michigan. “I think the way we played this week is the way we’ll play the next game with the offensive line,” Harbaugh said. Junior tight end Sean McKeon and sophomore wide receiver Nico Collins echoed similar positive sentiments about the group, noting that fall camp isn’t the same animal as the Fighting Irish’s elite front seven. “I thought (the line) looked good,” McKeon said. “The offensive line, obviously, they gotta work to build chemistry maybe even more than they tried to build in camp. So just got to build more chemistry up front.” Added Collins: “(It’s a) great o-line. I feel like the criticism they (get) shouldn’t be talked about because I know how hard they work.” Harbaugh and his players’ comments heavily contrast what’s being said outside Schembechler Hall. Fans, understandably frustrated by Michigan’s fourth- straight loss dating back to last season, were quick to scapegoat the offensive line for Saturday’s results. And while there were other issues — defensive penalties and the spectacular play of Notre Dame quarterback Brandon Wimbush — the offensive line was the most detrimental by far. It cost the Wolverines the ball or points on four separate occasions. In the first quarter, Patterson took a 17-yard sack that pushed Michigan out of redshirt sophomore kicker Quinn Nordin’s range. Later, on second-and-goal at the two, Notre Dame got to Patterson again, forcing the Wolverines to settle for a field goal. The Fighting Irish’s pressure was also pivotal to Patterson’s interception and fumble — though both were partially avoidable. Despite those plays, however, Harbaugh was encouraged by his quarterback’s performance. “The thing that stood out the most was his accuracy, location of the balls,” Harbaugh said. “He was accurate all game. … First time in a game situation, I thought he ran (the offense) extremely well.” That’s precisely why Michigan’s offensive line play is so frustrating for fans. For all the flashes Patterson showed Saturday, he won’t realize his potential if a defensive lineman is constantly in his facemask two seconds after the snap. And it certainly won’t be realized if Patterson’s hurt. Harbaugh said his line has “improved”, and to be fair, that’s a relative word. He could genuinely feel like it has taken a step up from last year. But it wasn’t good enough Saturday. Not even close. Michigan’s offensive line has a long way to go. And no amount of Harbaugh and his players singing kumbaya changes that. Saying or Doing? Michigan has talked about its positives from Saturday’s game, but the product on the field wasn’t so sterling. » Page 2B A different kind of pain After all of the hype for Michigan’s 2018-19 season, Saturday’s loss caused a new level of heartache.w » Page 4B Design by Jack Silberman Evan Aaron / Daily The Michigan Daily | michigandaily.com | September 4, 2018 B SPORTSTUESDAY LINE OF INQUIRY MICHIGAN 17 NOTRE DAME 24 MARK CALCAGNO Daily Sports Editor A week ago, sophomore center Cesar Ruiz stood in front of reporters and made a proclamation. “Our offensive line will be the one strength of our offense this year,” Ruiz said. When pressed with a follow-up, he doubled down. “You’ll see.” Saturday night, in Michigan’s 24-17 season-opening loss to Notre Dame, anyone with two eyes and a television set saw plenty. They saw a quarterback constantly needing to evade oncoming rushers. They saw a normally potent rushing attack held to 58 yards on 33 carries. They saw a group incessantly blown around like a tin roof in a hurricane. For months, anyone who walked through Schembechler Hall was inundated with buzz about a new offensive line. Simplication from new offensive line coach Ed Warriner, they were told, was going to cure all ills from a group that finished 117th in adjusted sack rate. So much for that. “They brought a lot of blitzes at first,” reasoned junior running back Karan Higdon, “brought more guys than we can block.” The statement — while mathematically true — belies the scarred, fatal flaw plaguing this program. The Wolverines’ offensive line is a problem that has no answer. It will hold back an offense that is otherwise filled with playmakers. It will force schematic changes that mask its weakness. It could get its quarterback — who showed flashes of brilliance — injured. With Michigan in opposing territory at the end of the third quarter, hoping to close a double-digit gap, Notre Dame got a free rusher to junior quarterback Shea Patterson’s blindside. Patterson showed his elusiveness, evading a crunching hit, and scrambling for nine yards. One play later, the Fighting Irish ran a simple stunt, freeing a defensive lineman past Ruiz, and barreling through Higdon. Forced to release the ball early, Patterson heaved up a prayer as he was hit. Notre Dame defensive lineman Julian Okwara was waiting for the easy interception. As he learned quickly, evade the swarming rush on one play, it’ll just be back the next. “They got us on that one inside blitz that we didn’t pick up,” said Michigan coach Jim Harbaugh. “It was a good impression that their front was bringing the entire night. Some we blocked, yeah. Could we be better? Yes. We’ll work to improve.” Added fifth-year senior defensive lineman Chase Winovich, when asked about the struggling unit: “I know they’re working hard. Just like myself and everybody else on this team, we’ve got corrections to be made. They’re a well-coached group of individuals and they’re going to be sure to leave those corrections moving forward.” On this night in South Bend, the offensive line was far from the only reason for the loss. The defense over- pursued on nearly every play in the first half, and paid dearly for it. Penalties mounted up — on both sides of the ball — to derail any semblance of momentum. At times, the offensive scheme looked familiarly bland. Notre Dame executed its game plan to perfection, pushing around the interior of Michigan’s defense like rag dolls. There is reason to believe this team can mend those issues as the season progresses. There is no such reason to believe the offensive line will do the same. Redshirt freshman James Hudson will undoubtedly see time as early as next week at one of the tackle spots, if for no other reason than there’s nothing to lose. Coaches and players have been sure to commend his talent during spring, with the competition for a starting spot coming down to the wire. He has the frame and athleticism. Freshman Jalen Mayfield might also get a shot, under the same whimsical rationale. He’s drawn rave reviews from the coaching staff and players. But Harbaugh, Warriner and the rest of the coaching staff spent weeks of spring practice, offseason workouts and then fall practice, only to conclude MAX MARCOVITCH Daily Sports Editor that these were the five best offensive linemen to combat a formative Notre Dame front seven. To expect Hudson, Mayfield or any replacement to be a magic elixir would exceed naivety. Help will come the next couple weeks in the form of Western Michigan and SMU. Neither foe will offer Michigan anything resembling Notre Dame’s talented front seven. It could be a time to grow. It will certainly be a chance to see what the younger options have to offer. “It’s the beginning,” Harbaugh said, when asked about his level of concern with the offense. “It’s the beginning for us. We’re not treating it like the end.” But Saturday was a chance to back up the talk against a real opponent in a real environment against a real defense. Fans waited to see what Ruiz and the offensive line had in store. Saturday night, they got their fill. What they saw, though, was just more of the same. The offensive line is not a strength, at least not yet. It is the common denominator luring an offense back into the familiar confines of mediocrity. Far from promised improvement, o-line shows more of the same Harbaugh, players defend offensive line