100%

Scanned image of the page. Keyboard directions: use + to zoom in, - to zoom out, arrow keys to pan inside the viewer.

Page Options

Download this Issue

Share

Something wrong?

Something wrong with this page? Report problem.

Rights / Permissions

This collection, digitized in collaboration with the Michigan Daily and the Board for Student Publications, contains materials that are protected by copyright law. Access to these materials is provided for non-profit educational and research purposes. If you use an item from this collection, it is your responsibility to consider the work's copyright status and obtain any required permission.

March 30, 2018 - Image 3

Resource type:
Text
Publication:
The Michigan Daily

Disclaimer: Computer generated plain text may have errors. Read more about this.

with The Daily, discussed actions
the University has taken to address
the incident. LSA sophomore
Corrina Lee suggested a workshop
for government representatives
to better understand race and
racism, especially with regards to
racism on campus.

“It’s being treated as an OSCR

(Office
of
Student
Conflict

Resolution)
violation
of
the

Student
Code
of
Conduct,”

Schlissel said. “I think the way it
will resolve is with some type of
restorative justice but that really
depends upon the people who
brought forward the complaint
and then the willingness of
the students themselves who
committed (this) really pretty
terrible
and
offensive
Snap,

whether they’re in a place where
they can learn from this and be
remediated.”

With regard to racist incidents

happening on campus in the past
year, Schlissel wants to focus on
having established structures for
investigation and punishment.

“My job is to make sure that

we have structures established
and the right set of rules to make
sure when bad events do happen,
we can investigate them, attempt
to figure out who’s responsible
and then, once we’ve done that,
find the appropriate punishment,
be it restorative justice or on the
other extreme, sanctions against

the people who are responsible,”
Schlissel said.

The LSA Student Government

has also recently discussed taking
action within LSA SG and on
campus to tackle bias incidents in
general, including the blackface
incident.

And yet, student employees

at Victors café have been left
feeling their voices are not being
heard after having been left
out of the loop with regard to
the investigation and Fokken’s
employment status. Employees
say Victors management has
done little to address the incident
and has not updated student
employees about whether or not
Fokken is still an employee. An
anonymous
Victors
employee

said they believed Fokken was
still
employed,
though
the

circumstances are unclear.

“We don’t know the status

of her employment,” the source
said. “However, all of us here
believe it sounds like she’s still
hired. The dining workers said
they can’t give an update on
her employment, but one of my
coworkers went down and told
them we don’t feel comfortable
with her working here.”

The source also said Fokken

sent an apology email to all
Victors staff through a work
portal, but said it came across as
insincere.

“She
issued
an
apology,”

the source said. “However, it
didn’t quite look sincere and it
made quite a few of us mad. It
seemed like someone told her to

apologize and basically wrote it
for her.”

Victors
manager
Gerry

Heiden declined to comment on
Fokken and the incident.

“It
honestly
feels
like

they’re brushing it off still,”
the anonymous source said.
“The process is slow in general,
but it feels like there’s no
consequences.
We
feel
like

there were no consequences
and she got away fairly easily,
however, we don’t know the final
outcome.”

Although
he
could
not

comment on specific details of
the case without permission from
Fokken, University spokesman
Rick Fitzgerald said in an email
interview BRT has been working
to address the incident and
extend assistance to students
affected by the Snapchat.

“In
this
instance,
the

Bias Response Team offered
support services to individuals
impacted by the Snapchat post
and to the specific individuals
who reported the post as a
bias
incident,”
Fitzgerald

wrote.
“Housing
Diversity

and
Inclusion
staff
reached

out to impacted residents at
Mosher Jordan Residence Hall.
In addition Michigan Dining
professional staff have been in
communication with impacted
student employees in Michigan
Dinning (sic).”

The Michigan Daily — michigandaily.com
News
Friday, March 30, 2018 — 3

BIAS
From Page 1

CARTER FOX /Daily

Brandon Marshall, wide receiver for the New York Giants, discusses his experience with Borderline Personality Disorder at the Mental Health
Roundtable in Rackham Thursday evening.

ME NTAL HE ALTH ROUNDTABLE

for a building dedicated to the
sciences.

Alexander Winchell, a regent

and geology professor in the late
1800s, was found to have published
racist academic papers, maintaining
white people are physiologically
pre-dispositioned to be the superior
race.
In
the
document
from

University President Mark Schlissel
supporting Winchell’s name to
be removed from West Quad,
the Committee found his novel
“Preadamites: Or a Demonstration
of the Existence of Men Before
Adam” to be incredibly dangerous
and
utilized
today
by
white

supremacist groups.

“(Preadamites)
was

unambiguously racist and ‘out of
step with the University’s own
aspirations in those times as
well,’” Schlissel’s response read.
“According
to
the
committee,

portions of this book continue
to be used today to support
White
supremacist
views,

thereby amplifying the negative
contemporary effect of the Winchell
naming, especially on ‘the actual
building of communities’ that we
should aspire to in our residential
housing.”

Last
Monday,
Schlissel

announced he agreed with the
committee’s findings and asked the
board to remove the names from the
building and hall.

During his opening statements,

Schlissel urged the board to vote
yes on his proposals to rename the
buildings. However, he echoed
his sentiments from his interview
with The Daily last Monday, saying
further building name changes
should not be expected anytime

soon after these two.

“Under our review principles,

those who wish to change formally
designated names of spaces or
buildings carry a heavy burden to
justify the removal of a name and
that this should be a rare event,”
Schlissel said. “I believe that the
burden has been met in these two
instances.”

Schlissel then invited Terrence

McDonald,
the
chair
of
the

President’s Advisory Committee
on University History, to present
the
committee’s
findings
and

express
his
support
for
the

renaming. McDonald, a history
professor and the director of the
Bentley Historical Library, said
the committee operates on the
understanding that the decision to
name a building is a conscious one
and removing said name does not
eliminate the history from existing.

“We believe, first and foremost,

that we are all wedded to the
University’s past with all that is
uplifting and troubling within it and
we must understand and remember
it but we believe equally, second, that
historical memory and historical
commemoration are not the same
thing,” McDonald said. “Changing
the name of a space does not change
or erase our history. It revises a
previous decision to commemorate
something in that history.”

Prior to the vote, Public Policy

junior
Kevin
Sweitzer,
who

submitted the proposal to rename
Winchell House, spoke during
public comments on agenda-related
topics. He said this process of
submitting the request was worth
it to see another, more respectable
individual be honored with the
space in the future.

“At my time at the University,

I have grown a lot as a person and
when I learned that we still honor
Alexander Winchell, who is an

objectively wrong person in science
and philosophy, I was astounded
and it caused me to bring forward
the petition,” Sweitzer said. “This
University has taught me a lot and I
firmly believe the right decision will
be made today to vote to rename
the space in West Quad and honor
someone who is worthy of our
support moving forward.”

LSA senior Joshua Hasler, one

of the members of the group who
proposed the C.C. Little building
name change, also spoke and said
Little’s work with eugenics supports
causes such as the “alt-right” and
the white supremacist Richard
Spencer, whose ideology calls for
a “white ethno-state.” Hasler said
this cannot be an ideology the
University supports.

“Little was no tepid supporter of

American eugenics,” Hasler said.
“He believed it was an essential
part of human progress. It is
especially important to rename the
C.C. Little Science building now
given the renewed prominence of
xenophobic and eugenic policies
and ideas in American political
discourse … The University of
Michigan must demonstrate that
it does not celebrate the ideals of
White supremacy and eugenics
by commemorating the legacy of
this movement and its campus
geography.”

Regent
Andrea
Fischer

Newman, R, echoed Schlissel’s
and McDonald’s comments from
earlier, reiterating the difficulty
that should come with changing a
building’s name but acknowledging
the University should always work
to right their wrongs.

“Changing
historical
names

should be difficult,” Newman said.
“Doing the right thing, though,
shouldn’t be difficult.”

Newman
also
addressed
a

concern about University culture

before
voting,
mentioning
the

University
population’s
current

usage of C.C. Little’s name to
identify the Central Campus Transit
Center. She said she believed it was
important to “change the student
vernacular” in regard to the bus
stop as a part of the vote.

After hearing the opinion of

public
comment
speakers
and

Newman’s comments, the Board
of Regents voted unanimously
to remove the names from the
C.C. Little Science Building and
Winchell House.

Not even an hour after the

vote, the sign outside the former
C.C. Little Science Building read,
“1100 North University Building,”
a temporary name outlined in
Schlissel’s proposal. There is no
word on when or how new names
for the building and hall will be
selected but the conversations and
suggestions are sure to follow in the
coming weeks.

LEO Bargaining Efforts
Before the regents meeting

began,
LEO
organizers
and

supporters filled the Union to
show their support for the contract
bargaining efforts of University
lecturers.

LEO started conversations with

the administration for increased
salaries and benefits in October of
last year. Currently, the salary for a
full-time lecturer at the University
is $34,500 in Ann Arbor, $28,300
in Dearborn and $27,300 in Flint.
The administration had initially
responded to LEO’s demands with
a $1,000 increase to the starting
salary in 2019, a $750 increase
in 2020, a $500 increase in 2021
and a 1.5 percent annual raise for
Ann Arbor alone. LEO lecturers,
however, were unsatisfied with
the numbers, and referred to the
proposal as “insulting.”

Prior to the meeting, Philip

A. Christman, a lecturer in the
University’s English Department,
explained
the
administration’s

reluctance to meet the group’s
requests was frustrating because
they could meet LEO’s needs
without causing much financial
burden on the University.

“I think the word insulting is

most appropriate,” Christman said.
“It’s not like we haven’t given them
a ton of information. We hired a
guy to audit the University’s books
to show not only that we’re getting
a very, very small percentage of the
revenue that we generate for the
University but that the University
could easily meet our demands
without really breaking a sweat.”

Christman also addressed some

students’ concern about an increase
in lecturer salaries impacting the
amount of tuition. However, LEO’s
auditing efforts of University funds
shows students would not have to
pay more if their demands were
met.

“Students will ask me, with good

reason, ‘Can the University meet
your demands without raising
tuition on us?’” Christman said. “I
personally don’t want a raise if it
means another tuition hike, there’s
been enough, but that’s not what is
at stake, and we’ve shown that to
the University.”

As LEO lecturers come near their

contract expiration date on April
20, they have authorized a potential
vote for a strike if the administration
does not adequately respond to their
demands. Alex Elkins, LEO lecturer
and organizer, remarked that of the
54 percent of LEO membership who
responded to an online survey about
the decision to strike if needs were
not met, 78 percent of individuals
voted yes.

“Our membership are clearly

engaged
in
the
process
and

discontent with the current paces

and progress of negotiations and
are hoping to move forward with
walkouts should negotiations not
make any progress,” Elkins said.

However, while a strike is a

possibility, Christman admitted
he, along with other lecturers, did
not want the situation to result in
walkouts.

“(The
administration’s)
last

counteroffer on salary was just
insulting,” Christman said. “I think
the most important development is
that, and it’s a development none of
us are too happy about, but we have
been authorized by our membership
to call a strike if the University
doesn’t move significantly. We don’t
want to do that but the way is pretty
clear for us to do that if we have to.”

During the public comments

portion of the meeting, LEO
lecturers and supporters had an
opportunity to express their wishes
for increased wages to the board.
After Víctor Rodríguez-Pereira, a
lecturer in the Romance Languages
and
Literatures
Department,

outlined his three jobs as a full-
time lecturer, barista and tutor, he
expressed his frustration with his
current salary from the University.

“When someone greets me with

an enthusiastic ‘Go Blue’ I can
relate, I do go blue,” Rodríguez-
Pereira said. “I go blue when I
look at my paystubs, and I go blue
when I think about my first two
years here when I had to eat all of
my meals on the floor because I
couldn’t even afford a couch. I go
blue when I think of last summer,
when I lived under the impending
fear of eviction because I couldn’t
keep up with my rent, and before
anyone forgets, again, I work three
jobs.”

couple felt frustrated by the limited
treatment options available for their
daughter, further inspiring them to
aid the fight against cancer.

Their gift will focus on cultivating

elite scientists and elevating the
University’s science and medical
platform in six areas: cancer research
and technology, collaboration in the
cancer field, cutting-edge scientists,
scientific freedom, new researchers
and scholarship support.

“I call Michigan ‘Collaboration

U’ because so many different units
work together to solve problems,”
Rogel said in a statement in the
release. “We have the advantage of
97 graduate departments rated in
the top 10 in the country. Putting
all this brain power and excitement
together is going to help us find a
cure for cancer. It will make people’s
lives better, and that’s the most
important thing.”

Members of the Comprehensive

Cancer Center span 53 departments
and nine colleges of the University.

The center was ranked 12th in
the nation by US News and World
Report and is consistently in the
top 10 in research funding from the
National Cancer Institute, according
to the press release.

“The University of Michigan

takes
great
pride
in
our

commitment
to
research
and

education
focused
on
solving

humanity’s greatest challenges,”
University
President
Mark

Schlissel said in the press release.
“I deeply appreciate Richard and
Susan Rogel’s unwavering devotion
to this commitment. There has
never been greater potential for
fundamental discovery to lead
to
dramatic
improvements
in

the treatment of cancer. Their
wonderful gift will further elevate
the life-changing impact of our
cancer center while advancing the
amazing work of our faculty and
students and inspiring new hope
for millions of patients around the
globe.”

DONATION
From Page 1

Read more at
MichiganDaily.com

of white students. Though the
proportion of students from
underrepresented backgrounds
has reportedly lagged in these
programs, there has been a
noted 15 percent increase in
students
of
color
studying

abroad, with the University
ranking sixth in the largest
population of students who
study abroad.

Many
of
the
panelists

expressed
how
much
they

cherished
their
experiences

abroad, while still speaking
frankly about the challenges
they faced.

LSA
sophomore
Amira

Mandwee said studying abroad
was an opportunity for her to
discover the world and learn
about new cultures. Growing
up, her family didn’t possess
the means for travel, so she
jumped at the opportunity to
travel through the University
and
satisfy
her
childhood

yearning to explore.

“I’ve wanted to study abroad

since I was young since family
vacations weren’t a thing,”
Mandwee said. “I grew up first-
generation and being around
many other first-generations,
so I wanted to amplify those
experiences.”

Marcus Hall, a graduate

student in the Ford School of
Public Policy and the School

of
Information,
echoed

Mandwee’s sentiments, saying
while
he
didn’t
have
the

financial resources to travel,
he
was
constantly
around

different cultures, which only
drove his desire to go abroad.

“Coming
from
a
lower-

income background and first-
generation, I never thought
that going abroad was feasible,
but because I was always
surrounded by people who
came from many international
backgrounds, I always found
myself in international spaces,”
Hall said.

Though
many
of
the

panelists conveyed their initial
excitement of studying abroad,
and
how
their
experience

overall was incredibly positive
and
life-changing,
Business

senior Akshay Chhajed revealed
how specific racist instances
made him feel uncomfortable
while he was volunteering with
refugees in Greece.

“People
would
stare

dumbfounded, that I could
speak Greek (as someone of
South Asian descent),” Chhajed
said.

LSA
sophomore
Brandon

Bond
also
shared
similar

experiences
of
receiving

odd looks abroad but said
the culture he visited was
welcoming and interested in
his culture as well.

“In Barcelona, being Black

was more noticeable,” Bond
said. “I got weird stares. But in
Mexico, people were intrigued

by students of color, and were
interested in who we were.”

According to LSA sophomore

Nyla Hart, the panelists’ stories
resonated with her and served
to both ease anxiety about her
upcoming study abroad trip
and brought her attention to
issues she may encounter.

“As a person of color going

to study abroad, this was very
relevant and I wanted to hear
their experiences and know
what to prepare for,” Hart said.
“Peru has people of color, but
it’s a very conservative country.
I am worried about having
to articulate that I am Black
and American, but it will be a
teaching moment.”

LSA
sophomore
Jamaica

Jordan said the panel eased
some of her worries about
racism abroad.

“I was worried after hearing

their experiences with racism,
but after they talked about
their experiences some more,
I was back to feeling fine,”
Jordan said.

The talk ended with words

of encouragement for audience
members to find their own
study
abroad
programs

and
experiences.
Students

like
Social
Work
student

Lauren emphasized that even
though it may be difficult
in the beginning, it will be
worthwhile at the end.

REGENTS
From Page 1

Read more at
MichiganDaily.com

ABROAD
From Page 1

Read more at
MichiganDaily.com

Read more at
MichiganDaily.com

Back to Top

© 2024 Regents of the University of Michigan