100%

Scanned image of the page. Keyboard directions: use + to zoom in, - to zoom out, arrow keys to pan inside the viewer.

Page Options

Download this Issue

Share

Something wrong?

Something wrong with this page? Report problem.

Rights / Permissions

This collection, digitized in collaboration with the Michigan Daily and the Board for Student Publications, contains materials that are protected by copyright law. Access to these materials is provided for non-profit educational and research purposes. If you use an item from this collection, it is your responsibility to consider the work's copyright status and obtain any required permission.

March 08, 2018 - Image 3

Resource type:
Text
Publication:
The Michigan Daily

Disclaimer: Computer generated plain text may have errors. Read more about this.

The Michigan Daily — michigandaily.com
News
Thursday, March 8, 2018 — 3A

by attending a police-community
meeting.

The requirement was designed

to expose future lawyers to the
daily implementation of the law
and help them understand what it
is like to be a police officer.

Law School student Samantha

Jackson, whose father is the
deputy sheriff of St. Clair County,
took the elective because of
her familial connection to law
enforcement. Even though she’s
been exposed to police work from
a young age, during her ride-
along with the Wayne State Police
Department, she said she learned
just how much each department
can vary.

“In my town, my dad has so

much pride in his career and is
really passionate about helping
people, and that’s the kind of
perception I grew up with,”
Jackson said. “And it wasn’t until
I stepped out of that town that I

saw the corruption that many
police departments suffer from,
the unfair treatment, how it’s just
so incredibly different — every
single police department can
really vary a lot.”

Professor of Law Eve Primus,

who teaches Criminal Procedure,
a popular elective at the Law
School, encourages her students
to participate in ride-alongs , but
does not require them to take
part.

“When courts interpret laws

or interpret the constitution,
and when the legislature makes
laws, they do it in light of what
they think are concerns that
police officers face, so I think
it’s important for students to
have exposure and to meet with
police officers to form their own
judgments, whether they think
those concerns are accurate, or
valid, or things the law should
or shouldn’t take into account,”
Primus said.

Law
School
student
Thea

Marriott
said
aside
from

providing legal perspective, ride-

alongs allow people to amend
misconceptions
about
police

officers.

“I think it’s a really beneficial

thing to do,” Marriott said. “I
think a lot of people have sort of
an imaginary idea in their head of
what the police actually do, and a
lot of it is more social-community
work than policing robbers or
something like that.”

Law School student Asma

Husain believes understanding
how the police work is an
important part of being a
lawyer, because police officers
are the facet of law enforcement
that people interact with most
often.

“Criminal law and policing is

the vast majority of the average
person’s interaction with the
legal system, and most people
don’t interact with lawyers, they
interact with the police,” Husain
said. “I think it’s a responsibility
of people who deal with the law
to see (the legal system) from
the perspective that people are
most often going to, and being

aware of not just what police are
doing for communities but the
amount of power they have over
communities and how they’re
using the law.”

In the Policing and Public

Safety elective, about half of the
students chose to participate in a
ride-along. Jackson said that most
of them had positive experiences,
and it increased their respect for
the work police do.

“Some
of
my
classmates

expressed that they had a more
negative perspective of the police,
but after the ride-along, they
still saw problems, and it didn’t
completely change anything, but
they had a little more respect and
understanding for the work that
police try to do, as imperfect as it
can be,” Jackson said.

One
problem
discussed

frequently in the elective was
the copious amount of discretion
police have.

“Police
have
so
much

discretion,” Jackson said. “You
know, we have these laws, tons
of laws, but they’re not perfectly

enforced
and
unfortunately

they’re often not evenly enforced.
That’s the cynical view, and
there’s a lot of truth to that. We
literally don’t have the resources,
no
community,
no
police

department, has the resources
to fully enforce every single law,
to catch every person speeding
on the highway. So they have to
make choices, and it’s interesting
to see what forms those choices
and to be aware of it and to speak
up if you disagree.”

In recent years, this amount

of discretion has come under
fire, with activists suggesting
it
disproportionately
harms

communities of color. AAPD has
recently been the subject of public
scrutiny as the city attempts
to
implement
accountability

measures—almost
four
years

ago, a white AAPD officer shot
and killed Aura Rosser, a Black
Ann Arbor resident. Earlier in
February, City Council passed a
resolution allowing for citizen
oversight over the formation of a
police review board.

After participating in a ride-

along at the Washtenaw County
Sheriff’s Office, Husain said she
can understand how the amount
of freedom police officers are
granted could affect communities
of color in unassuming ways.

“I think I had kind of an

outsider’s perspective of the
statistical disparities in what
happens to communities of color
in dealing with the police and
what that looks like,” Husain said.
“But I think seeing how the police
operate on a day-to-day basis,
I got a more informed view of
how that might happen and what
attitudes might perpetuate that,
and not even to be too forgiving,
but it’s not a matter of, ‘Oh, here
are the police who go out saying
I’m going to be looking at people
of color harsher than I am going
to be looking at your typical white
citizen.’ I think seeing that from
the officer’s perspective as well
is useful, especially if you’re
working on remedying those
problems and actually coming up
with viable solutions.”

AAPD
From Page 1A

Called the arterial everter, it

could be applied to a multitude
of procedures including breast
mastectomies or severely injured
limbs suffered from car wrecks.

This medical success greatly

impacts the field of reconstructive
surgery and health care.

The arterial everter works in

addition to existing equipment
known as the GEM microvascular
anastomotic coupler system, made
by
Synovis
Micro
Companies

Alliance Inc., a supplementary
company owned by Baxter.

The GEM coupler is an appliance

that works adeptly with veins;
however, when attempting to sew
small
millimeter-sized
arteries


with extremely dense walls, it can
make tissue transfers incredibly
difficult.
The
arterial
everter

disperses the compact walls over
the coupler, effectively connecting
the wide arteries.

Paul
Cederna,
a
professor

and chief of plastic surgery at
the University Medical School,
and Albert Shih, a professor
of biomedical and mechanical
engineering, were co-teaching a
senior-level
engineering
design

course when they realized the
coupler deficit challenged their
students to devise a solution.

“The students struggled but then

they excelled at end and created
a great design,” Shih said. “Is this
significant? Yes. You dream about
your innovation being used by
someone so it can enact change.
Eventually it will happen, it hasn’t
happened yet, but it is in the right
pathway to reach an impact on
health care.”

Jeff
Plott,
a
mechanical

engineering research fellow and
doctoral student in Shih’s lab, serves
as the product development mentor
on the project. Plott revealed the
trials of the developmental process.

“We started our design process

with a ton of brainstorming by
conjuring
up
many
different

ideas, and then started narrowing
that down with a combination
of what we think works versus
what is feasible to make versus
how is it going to get through the
regulatory landscape? We then
starting thinking more of it; it can
be something that is commercially
viable,” Plott said. “You’re kind of
balancing all of those things. By the
end of the semester, the students
had prototyped a device that was a
first proof of concept. It showed that
it was possible to flip an artery over
the pin and that is where we left off.”

Plott then paired with other

surgeons at the University to
further evolve the concept and
transform it into a product that
could be monetized.

“That device made by the

students was far away from being
something that was usable by
surgeons in the future and also
something that was manufacturable
and economically viable,” he said.
“So, after that semester, I led the
development of transforming the
device into something that could
meet all of these requirements.”

In order to make the transition

from idea to marketed technology,
the Coulter Translational Research
Partnership Program, a sector of
the Department of Biomedical
Engineering,
provided
funding

for product design and testing. It
also gave expert advice to fully
develop the technology and place it


into the hands of the health care
business.

Baxter then signed the licensing

agreement with the University for
the arterial everter to be accessible
worldwide. However, Baxter will
first need to file for Food and Drug
Administration approval and other
licenses.

After working tirelessly with

students, surgeons and engineers,
Plott rejoices over the success of the
technology.

“This licensing agreement is a

great validation of our idea. Our end
goal, of course, is always to make a
difference. This partnership will
greatly accelerate that path and will
enable us to get us there as quickly
as possible,” he said.

SURGERY
From Page 1A

LSA SG President Nicholas

Fadanelli,
an
LSA
senior,

sponsored the resolution, citing
the mission of the government
to serve LSA students and their
concerns.

“Part of this is not only

to establish what our stance
should be, especially given that
our mission is to actively seek
the voice of LSA students and
their interests, but also to grant
students something where they
do have a say regarding this,”
Fadanelli said.

Counsel Nathan Wilson, an

LSA junior, was also in support of
the resolution.

“I
think
there’s
some

disagreement about the question
on
the
merit
of
changing

Michigan time,” Wilson said.
“The
opposition
that
I’m

understanding is getting bound
up into having to oppose the
replacement of Michigan time
because
of
(an)
instinctive

reaction
from
students
and

that on the merit we should be
opposing the change to Michigan
time just for the sake of a guttural
student instinct. I don’t think that
this opposition holds true in the
circumstances like these where
it is not an issue that students are

unfamiliar with.”

Elected
Representative

Amanda Delekta, an LSA junior,
raised concerns over the binding
nature of the proposal and a
potential lack of representation.

“I think there’s a difference

between asking a question and
being bound to their response,”
Delekta said. “We are in this
room to discuss these issues
and have a conversation … it’s
dangerous to just link yourself
to that binding question. Also, I
think we all need to think about
how though students may be
educated about Michigan time,
the number of students who vote
in our elections is so small, so it’s
not a representative sample of our
student body.”

A change.org petition has

734 signatures as of Wednesday
evening asking the administration
to not remove Michigan time,
citing concerns that professors
will not end class at the proper
time and may run over.

“As of May 1, they’re getting

rid of ‘Michigan Time,’ a long-
standing tradition and travel
time for students, and shifting it
to leaving 10 minutes before the
end of class,” the petition reads.
“We already know how often
professors spill over class time
and this will most likely end in
students arriving late to their
other classes and still showing up

on Michigan Time.”

The organization also voted on

the proposed topics for the student
government’s upcoming election
ballots. These topics include pass/
fail usage, an establishment of
a General Learning Center and
residence hall card readers.

Fadanelli
also
mentioned

LSA
SG
will
meet
with

University officials regarding the
University’s
endowment
fund

investments. Last month, the
Detroit Free Press released an
investigative report stating the
University invested $4 billion of
its $11 billion endowment into
global projects by top donors. The
Free Press is now in a legal battle
with the University regarding this
report.

“It’s the belief of LSA student

government that if there is
no issue like the University is
claiming, having an investigation
just to show the public, because
this is a public institution, that
everything is up to code would
clear the University’s name,”
Fadanelli said.

Two
resolutions
were

also proposed. One included
allocating $500 to LSA facilities
to install a water refill station
in Haven Hall, while the other
will make an amendment to the
student government’s bylaws to
standardize the designation of
subcommittees.

LSA SG
From Page 1A

“If you know your history, then

people can’t give it back to you in
the wrong form,” French said.

Lecturer Anne Berg explained

how
the
Nazi
party
used

fabricated scientific claims to
promote and encourage racism
in Germany and compared this to
the current eugenics argument.


In this respect, she admitted
society today is not too different
from Nazi Germany.

This past fall, protests broke

out across campus as students
groups called on the University
to change the name of C.C. Little
building and bus stop, as their
namesake was a former University
president and President of the
American Eugenics Society.

“Nazis were lucky that they

had so much of a rich history of
scientific evidence and visual
legacies to draw on to build a
racial state that thankfully has
not yet been paralleled,” Berg
said.

Associate professor Rudolph

“Butch” Ware highlighted the
roots of racism from an Islamic
perspective
in
18th
century

Africa. Despite the fact literacy
rates were higher in regions
of Africa than in any part of
Europe, African people were
nonetheless seen as slaves. Ware
cited classical Islamic teachings
that racism stems from pride,
and urged the audience to set
their pride aside and engage
in dialogue to understand how
white supremacy has occurred
and what it has done.

Several speakers also focused

on the historical inaccuracies
from a national perspective.

Assistant professor Matthew

Spooner referenced the Haitian
revolution and Rebecca J. Scott,
a Charles Gibson Distinguished
University professor of history,
discussed the Reconstruction-
era government of Louisiana to
highlight the lack of historical
knowledge many hold, and how
this ignorance warps views of
current social problems.

“If we can’t understand the

past, we will be blind to the
present,” Spooner said.

Associate professors Stephen

A. Berrey and assistant professor
Allan Lumba made clear how
historical
interpretations
of

racial minorities in the United
States has contributed to their
treatment today. Berrey focused
on the interpretations of African

Americans and Lumba on Asian
Americans. Both Berrey and
Lumba used narratives of racial
hate crimes to showcase how
easily the perpetrator can hide
their motives, and how the real
story can lie hidden for decades.

“(This can be fixed) by telling

our
stories,
challenging
lies,

hyperboles,
half-truths,
and

fictions,” Barry said.

Geoff Eley, a Karl Pohrt

Distinguished
University

professor
of
contemporary

history, and Prof. Rita Chin
examined the roots of xenophobia
and its current presence both
globally and nationally. Chin
discredited the widespread belief
that xenophobia toward Muslims
in Europe dates to before 9/11, and
Eley explained how globalization
has created anxieties it originally
aimed to abolish. Eley argued

against the common positive
interpretation of globalization,
stating the combined effects of
globalization lead to warfare-
related destruction, encouraging
the massive migration of peoples.

“(The) global creation of a

borderless world drive people to
want to create borders at home,”
Eley said.

TEACH-IN
From Page 1A

Read more at
MichiganDaily.com

vice
president
for
medical

affairs, and David Spahlinger,
executive vice dean for clinical
affairs, faculty members list
several reasons for their “deep
disappointment in the concept
and rollout of the Victors Care
Program.”

According
to
the
Victors

Care
website,
services

include “24 hour access to the
patient’s physician or covering
physician via telephone, text,
or email, Same or next day
appointments, Unhurried visits,
A yearly executive style physical
examination, Assistance with
scheduling tests and specialty
appointments,
Minimal
wait

times (and) A written summary
report detailing the doctor’s
findings and recommendations
from
the
yearly
physical.”

There are also several bullet
points listed for “executive style
physical examination.”

The
website
specifically

notes memberships purchased
on or before June 30, 2018 will
be available for $2,700, or $225
a month, until June 30, 2019.
Starting July 1, memberships
will increase to $3,600 per year.
All
memberships
purchased

will expire in July 2019, when
the annual membership fee for
all members will become the
same. Membership fees are said
to cover personalized care, take
place of billing insurance for
primary care visits and allow
the organization to limit the
number of patients physicians
can treat.

Drawing on the program

description, grievances listed
in the faculty letter include:
being unaware in the content
of the Victors Care program
invitation
letter,
video
and

website; discriminating against
the underserved; promotional
materials
suggesting
Victors

Care
patients
will
“receive

preferential
treatment
at

Michigan Medicine based on
ability
to
pay”;
implication

that if receiving Victors Care

is quality care, receiving care
from traditional primary care
physicians is not quality; and
a concern that Victors Care
promotional
materials
and

website recommend care that is
not evidence based.

“We ask that the institution

stop recruiting our patients to
this program and advertising it
as providing much better care
than all the rest of our primary
care clinics,” the letter reads.
“Victors Care purports to offer
‘better’ health care to those with
enough money to pay a large
access fee. The University of
Michigan is a public institution
and our commitment is to serve
the public, not a private few.”

The letter also includes direct

quotations
from
Michigan

Medicine faculty, one of which
notes: “This reinforces UM as
an elitist institution catering
to the wealthy.” The letter has
since been signed by more than
200 Michigan Medicine faculty
members.

Masson,
however,
claims

Victors Care supports equal

access to health care.

“We’re committed to ethical,

accessible
care
for
all
our

patients and whatever programs
we put in place should not
diminish that in any way. This
will not adversely affect the
access of other patients to our
outstanding health care system,”
Masson wrote in her statement.

Efforts
to
contact
Runge

and program organizer Kim
Eagle, an Albion Walter Hewlett
professor of internal medicine,
were forwarded to Michigan
Medicine spokespeople.

“Some faculty and staff have

raised concerns,” Masson wrote.
“We’ve listened to them and are
working together to come up
with solutions that are mutually
satisfactory for the benefit of our
patients.”

Daniel
Berland,
associate

professor of internal medicine,
voiced his disappointment in the
program.

MEDICINE
From Page 1A

Read more at
MichiganDaily.com

Back to Top

© 2024 Regents of the University of Michigan