Directed by John Neville-Andrews • Dept. of Theatre & Drama Dec. 7 at 7:30 PM • Dec. 8 & 9 at 8 PM • Dec. 10 at 2 PM • Power Center Reserved Seating $30 & $24 • Students $12 with ID League Ticket Office • 734-764-2538 • tickets.smtd.umich.edu By William Shakespeare 8 —Tuesday, December 5, 2017 Sports The Michigan Daily — michigandaily.com 2017 Season in Review: Offensive Line One step forward, one step back. That described the state of Michigan’s offensive line this season. The Wolverines’ running game blossomed, featuring as the clear focal point of the offense. At times, if you squinted hard enough, you could see shades of Jim Harbaugh’s Stanford outfits — more so than through his first two years in Ann Arbor. After a few inconsistent performances early in the season, during which Michigan seemed to run an equal amount of gap-blocking and zone schemes, the Wolverines hit their stride midway through the year. It wasn’t very nuanced. Michigan found success by becoming less diverse, running mostly powers and counters. But it got the job done. Pass protection, meanwhile, was another story. Quite simply, Michigan regressed badly. Through 12 games, the Wolverines gave up 34 sacks, ranking No. 112 in the nation. Last year, Michigan ranked No. 27, allowing just 18 sacks total. This year’s struggles haven’t just manifested themselves in sacks allowed, though. Time after time, the Wolverines’ quarterback — whether it was Wilton Speight, John O’Korn or Brandon Peters — had to evade heavy pressure. That dictated what Michigan could do on offense, from the routes receivers and tight ends could run to how many extra blockers the Wolverines had to use. Of course, allowing your quarterback to take so many hits isn’t optimal. That’s something Michigan learned twice this year, with both Speight and Peters suffering injuries after big hits. Much like blocking itself, everything on offense is interrelated. The carousel under center made it difficult to run the ball, as tougher opponents could key in on it. Despite how well the Wolverines ran the ball at times, their struggles in pass protection show that a blend of the two is needed to field a successful offense. HIGH POINT: The Wolverines spent plenty of time paving holes in the run game. Those efforts began at Indiana on Oct. 14, when Michigan gashed the Hoosiers for 271 rushing yards on 44 carries with three touchdowns. That day, Karan Higdon became the first Wolverine since Denard Robinson in 2012 to run for 200 yards — and the first running back since Mike Hart in 2007 to reach that mark. Against Rutgers, Michigan totaled 334 rushing yards and four touchdowns. The Wolverines improved upon that only one week later, averaging 10 yards per carry against Minnesota en route to 371 total rushing yards. “It was a stalwart performance,” Harbaugh said after that game. “... I’ve never seen that many plus 50-yard runs in one game, any team I’ve ever coached or been on.” LOW POINT: Well, this could either have been the lasting image of Speight lying crumpled on the ground, three of his vertebrae having been cracked, or Peters knocked out cold after a jarring hit. Against No. 5 Wisconsin, Michigan gave up two sacks and seven tackles-for-loss. One week later, No. 9 Ohio State racked up five sacks and seven tackles-for- loss. The ground game couldn’t get going against any of the Wolverines’ tougher opponents, either. Michigan ran the ball 39 times for 102 yards in a 14-10 loss to Michigan State, 37 times for 58 yards in a 24-10 loss to the Badgers and 36 times for 100 yards in a 31-20 loss to the Buckeyes. THE FUTURE: Michigan’s problems with pass protection might not be immediately solved. Michigan will lose Mason Cole, a dependable four-year starter at left tackle, without any obvious replacements. Right tackle also remains a question mark entering next year. The interior of the line does appear to be set, with some combination of Ben Bredeson, Cesar Ruiz and Mike Onwenu. With those three, Michigan has a strong foundation to build upon in the run game. All three fit perfectly in a gap- blocking scheme, with each displaying the requisite agility and strength to block powers and counters successfully. Mental errors — which plagued Bredeson his freshman year and Onwenu earlier this year — were cut down as the year progressed. But that trio, too, will need to improve its pass blocking if the Wolverines are to make strides on offense next year. It all starts up front, and Michigan was far too inconsistent this season. Michigan suffers 71-62 loss to Ohio State COLUMBUS — On the road, with the crowd roaring during Ohio State’s 14-0 run, the Michigan men’s basketball team needed a bucket. It prompted the predicament the Wolverines have faced so far this season: Who would come up with a basket with adversity in their face? Gone are Zak Irvin and Derrick Walton Jr. — two former Michigan players capable of fending off pressure at the most opportune times. When it mattered most Monday night, no Wolverine proved capable of stopping the bleeding in time to escape with a win. “I called every number I could call,” said Michigan coach John Beilein, “and it didn’t happen.” Spurred by an energetic 26-3 second-half run, Ohio State (2-0 Big Ten, 7-3 overall) overcame what was once a 20-point Michigan lead to secure a 71-62 win. The loss sets the Wolverines (1-1, 6-3) back to .500 in Big Ten play, and sends them into two big non-conference matchups with a sour taste in their mouth. Michigan followed up Saturday’s 16-2 start against Indiana with another strong start against the Buckeyes, taking a 14-6 lead early. With similar offensive precision, the Wolverines assisted on four of their first five field goals and 11 total in the first half. Eight different Michigan players scored in the first half and six hit at least one 3-pointer, en route to a frame in which the Wolverines made seven threes, turned the ball over just twice and scored 1.42 points per possession. They appeared to be on their way to a comfortable victory — their second convincing win in the early stretch of Big Ten play. But Jae’Sean Tate, Keita Bates- Diop and the Buckeyes had other ideas. Initiated by a rare, five-point possession late in the first half, the Buckeyes carried their momentum out of the halftime break, scoring 19 of the first 22 points in the half and stymying Michigan’s once-potent offense. “As good as we were in the first 18 minutes of the first half, we were equally as bad in the second half,” Beilein said. “We couldn’t make a basket or couldn’t make, really, a right play in that time. … When things got a little tough, we really had trouble stepping up.” The Wolverines never regained their composure, playing a half eerily reminiscent of the second half against North Carolina. Midway through the second half, Tate attacked the rim with vigor, lowering his shoulder into the chest of junior forward Duncan Robinson, and finished through contact to narrow the deficit to only one point. Robinson, regularly the target of the duo’s attack, struggled to handle their physicality in the post. “We try to be positive (when facing opposing runs), kinda get back to what got us there,” said fifth-year senior Duncan Robinson. “That noise happened, we have to band together, do a better job of that. We kind of frayed when we hit some adversity.” Tate and Diop combined for 21 of their team’s 45 shots and 32 of their 71 points, challenging Michigan’s forwards all night and dictating the physical nature of the second half. There were some positives from the Wolverines, particularly from unexpected sources in the first half. Two days after watching the entire Indiana game from the bench, fifth-year senior guard Jaaron Simmons looked the most comfortable he’s been in a Michigan uniform, notching three assists in his seven first-half minutes. Two days after watching his younger counterpart — freshman Jordan Poole — steal the show, sophomore Ibi Watson earned the first minutes off the bench at the shooting guard position and immediately rewarded his coach with a 3-pointer and defensive energy. And two days after not scoring, sophomore Zavier Simpson showed poise in the pick-and- roll, scoring seven of the team’s first 19 points despite coming off the bench once again. Simpson brought a modicum of composure to the Wolverines as they began to crumble in the second half. His ability to attack the rim off the pick-and-roll proved to be one of the team’s only sources of scoring down the stretch. Despite those efforts, the game was decided in the second half. Michigan shot 18 percent from the field, scored just 19 points and made only one of its last 10 field goal attempts — the lone make being an uncontested dunk with the game essentially over. With no ability to counter Ohio State’s punches, the Wolverines will have to head back to Ann Arbor with its most frustrating loss of the season. “They came at us,” Beilein said, “and we did not respond.” MEN’S BASKETBALL Inconsistency shows again for ‘M’ C OLUMBUS — If you’ve tried predicting much about the Michigan men’s basketball team, you probably haven’t been too successful. You’re not to blame, though. Coach John Beilein’s squad has been a mashup of different lineups and star performers on a nightly basis. The revolving door that has rested on Beilein’s psyche has revealed both the question marks and the potential for the Wolverines this season. It’s perhaps the lingering uncertainty that keeps him up at night. The closest semblance of a hero in Monday night’s 71-62 loss to Ohio State was sophomore point guard Zavier Simpson. Did you guess that? Me neither, but no hero should have been required — win or loss. Michigan was up by 20 points at one point, and the Buckeyes had no answers to combat the offensive onslaught. But just 19 second-half points by the Wolverines — their worst half output of the season thus far — provided Ohio State with more chances than it could have imagined, and Michigan paid the price. “Anytime you lose in the Big Ten, but especially when you lose to your rival the way we did, it’s just frustrating,” said senior guard Muhammad-Ali Abdur- Rahkman. “We just gotta go back to the drawing board.” In their two-point loss to LSU in the Maui Invitational, the Wolverines faltered late, which overshadowed scintillating scoring outputs from junior Moritz Wagner and redshirt sophomore Charles Matthews. In the smackdown by North Carolina — a game that Michigan was expected to lose — underclassmen showed promising signs of composure on the road. Against the Buckeyes on Monday night, Michigan was cruising and no star was needed. Ohio State finished the half on a 7-0 run, closing the Wolverines’ lead to 13, injecting signs of life into an otherwise lulled crowd. “I actually told them I’m glad we aren’t up by 20 at half,” Beilein said. “Because if they make a run, they just made a run. Now, let’s go out there with some purpose.” That purpose was realized far too late. Right out of the gate, the Buckeyes went into overdrive. Ohio State hit seven quick field goals, while Michigan could hardly decipher how to put the ball in the basket. And after a 26-3 run — with a lone 3-pointer from Eli Brooks for the Wolverines — the Buckeyes were staring at their first lead all game with 12:29 to go. “We couldn’t score and we couldn’t stop them,” Beilein said dejectedly. “This is something, it’s gonna be a journey all year for us until we grow our young kids, right? And our veterans embrace their new roles as being the guys, right? Being the guy that’s gotta make a shot, that’s gotta make a play at a certain time. “Our freshmen and sophomores made some baskets, but there weren’t many in the second half, were there?” Sure, Michigan quickly battled back to make it a tit-for- tat contest, but Ohio State knew it was the better team on the court then, and it wasn’t going to blow its comeback efforts. Jae’Sean Tate and Keita Bates- Diop were unflappable versus the Wolverines’ frontcourt, a response that wasn’t met in kind. When CJ Jackson’s free throws gave the Buckeyes their final, unadulterated lead with 2:59 to go, it was a game of “hot potato” to resurrect the Wolverines, but no winners emerged. “We like to play as a team, nobody wants to be considered a hero or playing hero ball,” Abdur- Rahkman said. “We just try to play within the offense, and we didn’t get good shots and passed up some good shots, too.” Beilein has emphasized that it’s still early and that his team stumbled against the Buckeyes last year and rebounded. The players say they will have to have short-term memory about this game, but Michigan is already almost at the halfway point of its season. That begs the question: When do results like this happen just too late? Wolfe can be reached at eewolfe@umich.edu or on Twitter @ethanewolfe. AMELIA CACCHIONE/Daily Sophomore left guard Ben Bredeson and the offensive line had a fair share of ups and downs over the course of the year. ORION SANG Daily Sports Editor KATELYN MULCAHY/Daily Michigan coach John Beilein said his team simply couldn’t stop the Buckeyes on their decisive run in the second half. The Wolverines held a 20-point lead, but then fell apart in Columbus MAX MARCOVITCH Daily Sports Editor ETHAN WOLFE Daily Sports Editor