LAURA KASISCHKE ALLAN SEAGER COLLEGIATE PROFESSOR OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE a poetry reading from new and selected poems December 5, 4:10 p.m. Rackham Amphitheatre A public lecture and reception For more information call 734.615.6667 The Michigan Daily — michigandaily.com News Tuesday, December 5, 2017 — 3 feature of the recent tax reform bills and has been met with both criticism and praise, from the left and right, respectively. While Camp sees the reduction as opening the possibility for more economic growth and attracting business, Barr believes there are much more direct ways to raise wages and boost the economy. “I think for this tax bill, these ideas that we need more growth in the economy was really a priority,” Camp said. “And the second was, ‘How do we align ourselves with the rest of the world in terms of international tax policy?’” “This bill, if you say the basic goal is helping the middle class or working-class people, there are much more direct ways to do that,” Barr said. “You could expand earned income credit, you could not do some of the other provisions that have to do with eliminating health coverage, you could lower the rates at the bottom and increase them at the top.” Though Law student Shay Moyal does not necessarily agree with the reform bills, he said there are parts of it he still needs to learn more about. “I have a lot of feelings about the tax bill and I still need to learn it. I believe it’s probably more aggressive than I think it should be, but everyone has (their) own opinion,” Moyal said. “I know something they missed a lot was the international aspect.” Following the Congressional Budget Office, which is recognized for doing nonpartisan analysis on legislation, reported there would be a $1.4 trillion increase in the deficit — and Camp said there has not been as much talk about the possibility of raising the deficit as there has been in the past. “In 2010, I would say the deficit was just a white-hot issue,” Camp said. “Clearly, that has subsided significantly and there could be another reason for that, but in this last presidential election, we didn’t really (touch) on the deficit at all from either side.” Public Policy senior Connor Priest said he had heard many of the points made by the panel already and does not support the reform bills. “I think what they had to say was inciteful, but overall just echoes common, mainstream things you hear about tax reform if you read up on it,” Priest said. “I think it’s (the bill’s) absolutely horrible. I think it’s the most horrendous piece of legislation that has come to the floor of Congress in years.” Both the House bill and the Senate bill were rushed to the floor, in a manner neither Barr nor Camp agreed with. Senate Democrats took to social media to show the handwritten provisions written in, despite being illegible. Schlissel introduced the concerns of many in higher education regarding the House bill, which would end tax deductions for student loan interest and tax tuition waivers for graduate students, and moderated Barr’s. Graduate students have expressed concern over the taxation of tuition waivers PhD candidates earn through teaching and research. “We use the federal government to support lots of activities in the economy that we think are important. It’s hard to imagine a part of the economy that’s more important than investing in our human capital, in our students and young people to get their education,” Barr said. “There’s always room for maybe a simplification of that … but if I were making the choices, I would be doubling down on the tax support we provide to our students, not reducing it.” TAX From Page 1 cooperation between the two groups. “This is more of a collaborative effort,” he said. The two groups perform tests on two robotic arms manufactured by KUKA, a supplier of robotic hardware, in the Autonomous Robotic Lab. In these tests, they place a pile of bean bags or laundry in front of the robot and transmit the appropriate information so that it can find the desired object. This task is momentous for robots, according to Berenson. He explained it is difficult for robots to respond to complex assortments of several objects. “It turns out it’s much more complicated,” he said. “The reason is that when the object is by itself, you just kind of identify it. But when it’s in a pile or a stack, you have to actually move other objects out of the way first. You have to basically be able to reason about what you do when you can’t really see everything in the environment.” Venkataraman compared how challenging these actions are for robots to how inherent they are for humans. “What we feel as humans is so intuitive,” he said. “It’s like this is not even a task, it’s so easy. But looking at it from the perspective of a robot, this is a very complicated task. When (a robot) looks at an image, you need to isolate that this is there, then you need to make a plan. All of these are parameters you need to change.” Dale McConachie, an Engineering Ph.D. student working with Berenson’s team, noted the difficulty is enhanced by the fact objects like bean bags or pieces of laundry are deformable. They’re harder for a robot to manipulate than something hard and rigid. “Math is really good at describing where something hard and rigid is, and if I move my head, where does it go?” he said. “We can do that to some extent with deformable objects, but it gets very computationally messy very quickly. There’s an infinite number of dimensions for something soft and squishy, so how do you describe that efficiently? Do you even need to?” However, to advance robots so they can succeed in a human environment, overcoming these challenges is necessary. Human homes, hospitals and a variety of other places are uncertain, sometimes hectic environments. Brent Griffin, an assistant research scientist in the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, also works on the team and discussed the unforeseeability in human environments and the importance of trying to develop a robot that can solve many kinds of problems. “Robotics has a lot of success in industry because there’s a lot of predictability and certainty,” he said. “We can spend a lot of time tuning or preparing a robot for this specific problem. The thing that we’re trying to get towards is getting to the point where you can have a general applications robot and be fairly robust to a lot of uncertainty in the environment, because that’s really what is more difficult about operating in human environments.” Griffin noted the robotics field has developed the appropriate hardware for achieving this goal. He has recently been working with a mobile robot named Fetch. According to Griffin, Fetch is just as physically capable as the robots in movies, but the software used to make it function isn’t yet up to par. Ultimately, according to the researchers, their goal is to make robots commonplace in the lives of humans, specifically the elderly and people with disabilities. Berenson believes their research can be applied to almost any real- world scenario. “Just anywhere you encounter a complicated arrangement where you have to find the object in that arrangement is where you can apply this kind of work,” he said. ROBOTS From Page 1 These characteristics are what make these drugs so dangerous, especially when nearly a quarter of a billion opioid prescriptions were written in 2013, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. According to Michigan State Police and a Kaiser Family Foundation analysis, more Michiganders die from opioid abuse than firearms or car accidents. With the increased availability, deaths due to drug overdoses involving opioids are increasing — taking over 90 American lives a day. The teach-out will offer an in-depth look at the problem and these concerns, showing the multiple causes and results of the epidemic, as well as ways the public can help fight this growing plague. “Participants will have the opportunity to understand the current epidemic by exploring the topic from multiple perspectives,” Devaney said. “Before participants identify and propose new solutions to the crisis, they will learn about the build up to the crisis, the role of pharmacies, the role of the medical community, the role of the pharmaceutical industry and the role of families. Learners will understand how we got here, stigma and what it means for the crisis to be declared a national health emergency.” Jay Lee, a general surgery resident at Michigan Medicine and part of the faculty participating in the session, is also part of the research team at the Michigan Opioid Prescribing and Engagement Network, in which he has investigated physicians’ role in the epidemic. “In 2001, physicians embarked on a well-intentioned campaign to improve pain management for patients,” Lee said. “At the same time, pharmaceutical companies began aggressively marketing prescription opioids. The situation was further exacerbated by a study (Addiction Rare in Patients Treated with Narcotics), which, when taken out of context, seemed to suggest that becoming addicted to prescription opioids was very rare.” Lee is also a researcher in many opioid studies that aim to understand the number of opioids needed after surgery, a factor in the growing amount of opioid dependence. “This information is critical to making opioid prescribing safer,” he said. “Prior to these studies, physicians could only guess about how much opioid a patient would need after surgery. This led to misuse of these medications and an abundance of leftover opioid pills in the community, which frequently end up in the hands of people with opioid addiction.” Lee explained the teach-out will help integrate the public in the solution of the crisis. “These will help people better understand the tremendous dangers of these medications, how to use them safely and how to dispose of leftover medications,” he said. Rebecca Haffajee, an assistant professor of health and management policy, is also part of the teach-out’s faculty. Haffajee said many policies have been put into place, like drug- monitoring programs and pain clinic regulations, but more are still needed for stronger effects. “We are still evaluating numerous policies, as well as piloting new ones, to tackle this crisis head-on without generating other public health unintended consequences — like reducing access to appropriate opioid prescribing or encouraging substitution from prescription opioids to illicit sources,” she said. The teach-out will allow a platform for conversation on this topic and provoke some new thoughts in the public. “We are aiming to reach diverse audiences through this teach-out, to provide views on the crisis from experts of varying fields and perspectives,” she said. “Since almost everyone has been personally affected by the opioid crisis, we all have something to contribute in terms of brainstorming solutions.” TEACH-IN From Page 1 of classes and subjects, Ilyas said he would like to see it become more accessible to undergraduate students by incorporating more connections to internships and jobs for the undergraduate level. “It was a public health graduate program, so a lot of the internships and opportunities the school offers are for graduate students still,” he said. “They’re trying to shift it more to give opportunities to undergraduate students as well. It’s in the process, so I hope to see more of that next year.” Harper also noted the need for an improvement in undergraduate internship opportunities. He explained while the school is currently exploring both domestic and global possibilities with which to connect students, the newness of the program is proving to be an obstacle in this area that has yet to be fully overcome. “Since the School of Public Health has previously only worked with master’s and doctoral students, we haven’t had the resources to really identify and support undergraduate internships,” Harper said. “It would be great if we could start to see funding for internships. Right now, we don’t have the money in the budget.” Harper said the school does have an individual from the Office for Student Engagement and Practice dedicated to working on exploring and expanding new internship opportunities. Going forward, Harper hopes the school will be able to identify more internships for students and find ways to communicate those opportunities effectively. He said the school hopes to see more resources dedicated to supporting internship funding to help offset potential costs, especially for students interested in international internships, thereby increasing accessibility. Reynolds, Ilyas and Harper all talked about professors and faculty as one of the main strengths of the program. The professors for the new undergraduate program are the same as those who teach the graduate program. “We have amazing faculty teaching the classes,” Harper said. “They do a great job of bringing public health into the classroom. They bring examples of the work they’re doing out of the real world. To have a professor that not only talks about a particular public health intervention, but is actually doing this around the globe, that’s a unique experience you don’t always get to see.” Because they all have hands-on experience in the field, Ilyas said, his professors have also been able to help give him direction by acting almost as mentors, discussing how they became involved with the work they do today and giving advice to students. Reynolds added the diversity of professors’ backgrounds strengthens the diversity of classes. As they are all experts in their various fields, she said, they are able to teach and communicate very effectively about the topic. Reynolds said this wide range of classes has been helping her narrow her track as she explores different options. “Even if I can’t physically take a class, I know that they exist,” she said. “There are some graduate student courses open to undergrads if we’re interested … some things you wouldn’t even think about, but you would want to know later in your career. You can take a class on obesity, a class on cancer, a class on biopathology. Every little niche is covered, so you have a lot of options.” Emily Youatt, the managing director of the Office of Undergraduate Education at the School of Public Health, said students’ positive response to the Public Health faculty is not one- sided. She said faculty, in turn, love being able to learn from interactions with undergraduate students and hear the new ideas they bring to public health. “The students this fall have made a really positive impression on the faculty here, who for the most part had not taught undergraduates before and were a little timid about working with them,” she said. “The students have really shown themselves to be amazing — they’re so engaged, they’re so bright. They’re eager to ask questions that sometimes graduate students wouldn’t. They’re a little less inhibited, which makes for much more interesting classroom conversations than you might get at the master’s level.” Youatt said because of this classroom interaction, faculty members are continually coming to her with new ideas for a class they would like to create and teach. She said a benefit of the program being brand new is there is always an opportunity to quickly incorporate these innovative ideas into the curriculum. LSA sophomore Sydni Warner heard about the public health program from a friend in its first cohort. Because she was not sure what public health really was at the time, Warner attended an informational session to learn about public health as a whole and the University’s undergraduate program in particular. “I liked the policy side of public health and the behind the scenes work that goes into it,” Warner said. “I think patterns of disease and disease is really interesting, so the epidemiology part especially I just fell in love with … I decided, ‘OK, this is what I want.’” Reynolds also encouraged prospective students to consider the public health program, regardless of whether they’ve always had an interest in the field or it’s entirely unknown to them. “For people that don’t know what public health is — either they haven’t heard of it or don’t know what it does — they should really look into it if they value public service and think they could lend a hand in any way,” she said. “If you’re interested in medicine, if you’re interested in politics, if you’re interested in biology, there’s a place for you in public health and you could find something you really love here.” PUBLIC HEATH From Page 2 Jansohn said. “I was wondering why they didn’t tell us to leave. If they didn’t tell us to leave, then I guess it was probably fine.” South Quad resident Amin Tonmoy, an LSA freshman, said he also asked officers he saw in his hall. “The chances of this happening seem pretty low, but it’s still pretty scary,” he said. “He’s hiding and the police are after him, so I still feel okay (because) the police are right here. Knowing if he’s been found or not will be very helpful.” Both said they hoped for more communication and clarity on the case moving forward, but recognized the complications in securing the scenes. “I don’t feel nervous going back to West (Quad) because no one told me to be nervous,” Jansohn said. CRIME From Page 1 sides. Councilmember Sumi Kailasapathy, D-Ward 1, urged the man and others like him to stop and think about the lifetime impact a development like this would cast upon each resident. “Coming from a Third-World country, this really bothers me because this is what the World Bank and IMF would tell Third-World people … ‘You’ll suffer in the short run, but your economy is going to grow so much you’ll be thankful for us,’” said Kailasapathy, who was a refugee from Sri Lanka. NIMBY, or “Not In My BackYard,” is a pejorative term for people who oppose unpleasant projects in their own neighborhoods but will readily hand other neighborhoods the same burden. That being said Councilmember Chuck Warpehoski, D-Ward 4, criticized opposition for not having a coherent alternative vision for what to do with the land. “This inconsistency, this lack of a voice, I’m hearing many completely different things from even the residents makes me highly skeptical that there’s a possibility to have a coherent negotiating position,” Warpehoski said. In the end, the motion to change the zoning passed, with Kailasapathy, Anne Bannister, D-Ward 1; Jane Lumm, I-Ward 2; and Jack Eaton, D-Ward 4, dissenting. Mayor Chris Taylor praised the decision, saying it is a positive step toward creating a more walkable Ann Arbor. “(Lower Town) is going to be a part of our town that will be changed substantially over the next couple of years, and I believe that these changes will ultimately be difficult but … I believe it will be better for community,” Taylor said. Council also voted to approve the city’s winter 2018 deer management plan, which aims to kill 250 deer and sterilize does on a mass scale. The new plan has brought controversy as the city eliminated the rule in which a sharpshooter cannot shoot within a 450-foot radius of an occupied building or home. CITY From Page 1 These ideas that we need more growth in the economy was really a priority