100%

Scanned image of the page. Keyboard directions: use + to zoom in, - to zoom out, arrow keys to pan inside the viewer.

Page Options

Download this Issue

Share

Something wrong?

Something wrong with this page? Report problem.

Rights / Permissions

This collection, digitized in collaboration with the Michigan Daily and the Board for Student Publications, contains materials that are protected by copyright law. Access to these materials is provided for non-profit educational and research purposes. If you use an item from this collection, it is your responsibility to consider the work's copyright status and obtain any required permission.

October 11, 2017 - Image 1

Resource type:
Text
Publication:
The Michigan Daily

Disclaimer: Computer generated plain text may have errors. Read more about this.

After
an
unsuccessful

attempt at repealing the entire
Affordable Care Act, President
Donald Trump’s administration
repealed a mandate that required
employers to provide free birth
control coverage, which currently
gives more than 55 million women
access to birth control.

These stipulations will allow a

wide range of employers to deny
birth control coverage, including
those with “moral convictions”
against the drug. Because of
this, it is estimated hundreds
of thousands of women will no
longer be able to afford their birth
control, which was free of cost
under the Affordable Care Act.

“Congress has a consistent

history of supporting conscience
protections for moral convictions
alongside protections for religious
beliefs,” the administration said in
a statement.

The
mandate
expands

exemptions from only religious
institutions to all organizations,
including
hospitals
and

universities. According to The
New York Times, Trump said
these mandates will prevent
employers from being “bullied by
the federal government because
of their religious beliefs” and
prevent “risky sexual behavior”
among adolescents.

However,
LSA
sophomore

Helena
Harmon,
executive

board member of the FemDems

committee of the University of
Michigan’s chapter of College
Democrats, said the argument
that the mandates will protect
freedom of religion is thinly
veiled considering the vagueness
of “moral convictions” allows for
anyone to decline birth control
coverage.

“It’s totally a guise and a

political move to appeal to further
right groups,” she said. “I think
it just shows that controlling
womens’ bodies has become a
political issue.”

However,
some
pro-life

students
think
since
some

birth
control
methods
like

abortifacients prevent an embryo
from attaching to the uterine wall,
no tax dollars should be going
towards them. Nicole Hocott,

LSA sophomore and president of
Students for Life, said because the
mandate affects abortifacients,
she is glad her tax dollars don’t
have to go toward them.

“If Planned Parenthood is

technically not allowed to use
tax dollars to fund abortion, then
neither should our tax dollars be
used for that which is essentially
an abortion,” Hocott said. “In
terms of other birth control that
are not abortifacients and just
block fertilization or ovulation,
I am not completely sure on
my stance, but I do know that I
understand why someone would
not want their money going
toward something they see as so
wrong, as this has to do with life
and death, families and culture.”

The breadth of the mandate,

which
allows
universities
to

decline coverage, also concerned
some
students.
However,

Women’s
Studies
professor

Joanne Bailey said University
employees likely do not need to
worry about losing their coverage
based on these provisions.

“Generally
religious

universities like Notre Dame
and other traditionally Catholic
universities
that
would
be

opposed to birth control would
be in the category of those who
would be affected by this,” Bailey
said.

Harmon
agreed
University

students
and
employees

likely won’t be affected, and
furthermore
said
women
in

our generation are privileged to

According to Send Silence

Packing — a campaign designed
to raise awareness of student
suicide and to connect students
to mental health resources on
university campuses — one
of every two college students
thinks about attempting suicide
at some point.

Tuesday,
the
Diag
was

covered by backpacks — each
of them representing one of the
1,100 college students who take
their own life every year.

LSA junior Summer LaPointe

said this number surprised her.

“The number is lower than I

thought, but I’m not exactly sure
why,” she said. “As someone who
struggles with suicidal ideation
even still, I think it really
impresses me that so many of us
are able to continue living and
not die, and it also makes me sad
that as many as 1,100 have killed
themselves and it doesn’t seem
like ‘that much.’ ”

These
backpacks
were

part of a travelling exhibition
called Send Silence Packing.
This campaign has been a

michigandaily.com
Ann Arbor, Michigan
Wednesday, October 11, 2017

ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY-SEVEN YEARS OF EDITORIAL FREEDOM

GOT A NEWS TIP?
Call 734-418-4115 or e-mail
news@michigandaily.com and let us know.

INDEX
Vol. CXXVII, No. 8
©2017 The Michigan Daily

N E WS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

O PI N I O N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

A R T S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

S U D O K U . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

CROS SWO R D. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

S P O R T S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

ACA leads to drop in MI uninsured

Health Insurance In Michigan

1,692,500
2013
2016
&

Michigan residents were on Medicaid in

currently enrolled
through individual
marketplace

Source: Kaiser Family Foundation

to lose coverage when Health
Alliance Plan leaves the
market at the end of the year

The uninsured rate in 2013: 11%
The uninsured rate in 2016: 6%

in
2,168,900

456,000
9,100













DESIGN BY MICHELLE PHILLIPS

CAMPUS LIFE

Since gaining full control of the White House, Senate and House, GOP has attempted repeal

Since the Affordable Care Act

was signed into law by President
Barack Obama in March 2010,
Republicans have made its repeal a
central piece of their party platform.
Since gaining full control of the

White House, the Senate and the
House of Representatives, various
Republicans have made multiple
attempts at repeal, falling just a few
Senate votes short each time.

But that hasn’t stopped President

Donald Trump from utilizing the
full capabilities of the executive
branch to dismantle the program
and undermine its effectiveness.

His administration has cut the open
enrollment period for the individual
marketplace in half (and during said
period shuts down the healthcare.
gov website for 12 hours every
Sunday), indicated the IRS will not
enforce the individual mandate
penalty for people eligible to enroll
in the marketplace, drastically
cut funding for navigator groups

helping people enroll and declined
to guarantee cost-sharing reduction
payments to insurance companies,
among other things.

The effect of all this is particularly

notable in Michigan, a state that has
enjoyed relative success in health
insurance coverage under the ACA.
From 2009 to 2011, the uninsured

ANDREW HIYAMA

Daily News Reporter

Exhibition
eulogizes
suicide with
backpacks

CAMPUS LIFE

Display set up on the Diag
represents 1,100 student
suicide victims each year

NICOLE TSUNO
Daily Staff Reporter

Birth Control is Rad

9 out of 10 women
of reproductive age
will use birth control
in their lifetime

New Birth Control Regulations

Health and Human
Service Offcials said that
the new rule would have no

impact on 99.9% of
Women in the United
States

The Agency calculated
at most
120,000
women would be
affected.

Roughly 200
entities have been
involved in 50 or
more lawsuits over
birth control

DESIGN BY OLIVIA STILLMAN

Trump administration rolls back
birth control coverage requirement

White House officials cite the protection of religious and moral freedoms as motives

CARLY RYAN

Daily Staff Reporter

On Edge

Michigan in Color and

The Statement look at how

students of color combat

campus apathy.

» Page 1B

michigandaily.com

For more stories and coverage, visit

See BIRTH CONTROL, Page 3A

See OBAMACARE, Page 3A

See BACKPACKS, Page 3A

The University of Michigan

launched an onlinebias response log
this week amid student requests for
more administrative transparency
regarding bias incidents. The log
details all bias incidents reported
to, and actions taken by, the Bias
Response team since July 1.

The
Bias
Response
Team,

part of the larger Division of
Student Life, works to maintain
an inclusive campus environment
for all students and support those
who may have been impacted by
such bias incidents. As noted in the
log, the team of professional staff
members also refers victims to
appropriate University resources as
needed.

In a statement provided by

the
Office
of
Public
Affairs,

Nicole Banks, assistant dean of
students, emphasized the level of
professionalism possessed by those
on the Bias Response Team.

“This
team
of
skilled

professionals
represent
many

aspects
of
the
University

community and work to coordinate
a comprehensive response to each
individual incident,” Banks said.

See LOG, Page 3A

University
launches
bias report
log online

ADMINISTRATION

Incidents listed on the
site go back as far as July;
includes written, verbal

KAELA THEUT
Daily Staff Reporter

The
growing
necessity
to

distinguish free speech from hate
speech, especially in context of
life at the University of Michigan,
was the central topic of disccusion
at a panel held Tuesday at the
University Law School. The panel
related this topic in relation to
recent events on and outside
campus as well as the upcoming
visit
of
controversial
figure

Charles Murray this Wednesday.
The event was co-sponsored by
the Law School and the Ford
School of Public Policy.

Dan Korobkin, deputy legal

director of ACLU Michigan,
drew much of his talk from his
own work at the ACLU, where he
litigates civil liberties issues like
free speech. Korobkin cited the

First Amendment as a protection
to protest an administration, but
also highlighted its recent use
in protecting the expression of
hateful ideologies.

Korobkin claimed the legal

protection of what we know as
hate speech and protesting is one
of the most difficult parts of his
job, especially when students later
related this to the Charlottesville,
Va.,
protests
in
which
an

estimated 80 percent were armed
with weaponry.

“They key to me is that the First

Amendment
actually
includes

the word ‘peaceably’ in it, which
implies to me that if you are
planning to have a march for
political reasons, but also bring
your guns and do it in a way that
is designed to intimidate counter-
protesters … that’s not what the
First Amendment protects,” he

Panel talks ‘U’
protests, free
speech and
hate speech

See PANEL, Page 3A

Deputy ACLU legal director and professor
contextualize, distinguish kinds of speech

KATHERINA SOURINE

Daily Staff Reporter

michigan in color x the statement

Back to Top

© 2024 Regents of the University of Michigan