4 Thursday, July 20, 2017 The Michigan Daily — michigandaily.com OPINION NISA KHAN EDITOR IN CHIEF SARAH KHAN EDITORIAL PAGE EDITOR DAYTON HARE MANAGING EDITOR 420 Maynard St. Ann Arbor, MI 48109 tothedaily@michigandaily.com Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan since 1890. Talley is special for her looks BRENNAN POPE | COLUMN STEPHANIE MULLINGS Unpopular opinion I pride myself on “keeping it real” or “telling it like it is.” As expected, it can occasionally get me into trouble. Or sometimes, my realism and formulations may be altered in an attempt to morph my thoughts into what people want to hear … or maybe what they consider easier to handle. That being said, I am making the executive decision to keep it real regarding the topic I am about to discuss in an attempt to offer a fresh perspective and dialogue. Just a little food for thought. Hopefully I do not find myself in any trouble. Last month, University of Michigan President Schlissel unveiled a new initiative titled the Go Blue Guarantee. Starting in January 2018, any current or future in-state student whose family earns $65,000 or less will be eligible for free tuition for four years. For the record, let me state, I think this is absolutely fantastic. There are some students who will benefit from this, giving them access to a stellar education which may have been a distant fantasy because of the ever-so-daunting tuition bill. However, if you noticed I used the word “some” to describe whom the Go Blue Guarantee will affect. This was entirely deliberate, because that’s just it. It will affect some but nowhere near close to a majority of students who need financial support at the University. As an out-of-state student, recognizing none of this will affect me anyway, I was easily enamored by the words “free tuition” and the praise from the administration and alumni in the press and across social media. However, I realized that this initiative is kind of like fresh new wallpaper. Once you begin to peel back some of its allure, you find the same wall that you tried to cover up, which … in all honesty, isn’t that promising. Otherwise, you wouldn’t have tried to cover it up in the first place. As I started considering these thoughts, I became increasingly aware of the criticism I may receive regarding my opinion. It may come across as controversial or pessimistic to say the least. Hence my selection of the title for this piece. However, as I began conducting my research, I was surprised to find that I was not the only person who shared this viewpoint. A few days after the Go Blue Guarantee was introduced, I noticed a post from a Students4Justice activist on Facebook. “Although half of the families in Michigan would qualify for this new financial aid initiative, how many of these students will actually have the chance to be accepted and to attend the University of Michigan?” it read. “This is not an initiative to bring more of these students to our campus. Let me know when UM’s initiatives will start to combat the disappearing Black population and other underrepresented communities of color.” The reactions to her commentary were pretty split, as some illustrated their support through likes, while others debated in the comments. It was Jamie’s post that triggered my own investigation. My findings shine light on a different outlook of the Go Blue Guarantee, and more importantly answers the question, what is this initiative actually doing? At the beginning of this year, The New York Times published a set of data which reflected statistics regarding the socioeconomic status of students attending the University. Come to find out, the median family income at the University is $154,000, and 66 percent of the student body are identified as part of the top 20 percent income status. This is the highest median family income of the other 27 public colleges nationwide classified as “highly selective” that were polled. According to the 2015 U.S. Census, the median family income in the state of Michigan is $48,876 so it is indeed correct that half of the families in the state Michigan would qualify for the Go Blue Guarantee, yet, clearly these students don’t seem to attend the University. Why is that? In the years since 2008, the proportion of low-income recent high school graduates who enroll in college has seen a significant drop. In 2008, 55.9 percent of low-income students enrolled in college; by 2013, that the rate drastically decreased to 45.5 percent. — Stephanie Mullins can be reached at srmulli@umich.edu. T he way children interact with each other is beyond fascinating to observe. The jokes they find funny, the way they tell secrets or even how they fight, there is endless ammunition for a comical blend of sociology and entertainment. I am fortunate enough to have a front row seat to this show due to my 8-year- old twin brother and sister. Watching them converse with each other and hearing stories they share about their friends prove very insightful to understanding the world of an elementary school student. How their family, friends and society have shaped their principles, priorities, tastes and behavior. Recently, I observed something that particularly struck me as enlightening to the principles society imparts on everyone, even those as young as 8. My sister, Talley, showed me a book her class made at the end of her last school year. It was a heartwarming book where each page was written by a different student who explained why they thought Talley was special. Each student had a similar book dedicated to them. I read some like, “Talley is special because she stands up for me,” that left me with a strong sense of pride for my sister. All kept with this sweet theme until suddenly I was confronted with a page that left me conflicted. It read, “Talley is special because she is beautiful.” Initially, I thought to myself, “How sweet of this boy!” However, this feeling quickly transitioned to me questioning the sentiment, “My sister is special because she is beautiful?” Out of all the qualities, what makes her special is her appearance? I thought about what this imparts to Talley. Will she think she should only care about her appearance? If her peers don’t care about her intelligence, personality or interests, will she? Will she think that her beauty is what makes her special? I thought of what this shows us about the young boy who wrote the comment. Is it already ingrained in his mind that the most important aspect of a woman is her appearance? Does he care about Talley’s other qualities? I asked myself, can I be mad at this boy? And I resolved that I couldn’t; at the end of the day, he issued my sister a compliment. But I could take this instance to evaluate the social conditioning that fuels invisible sexism in our society. I took this as a very poignant example of benevolent misogyny, or misogyny that takes the form of a compliment or as subjectively positive. While this kid had no intent to be prejudiced in any regard, or even for that matter no ability to understand sexism, his words have unexpected consequences. I’m sure he has learned this from the many adults whose first words to girls are about their outfits or their appearance. So, it’s impossible not to expect the little boy to also comment a girl’s beauty, and it’s impossible not to expect the girl not to care about her beauty. However, this situation leaves me unresolved. To expect men to never comment on a young girl’s appearance seems both unattainable and undesirable. Everyone enjoys being complimented on their looks or clothes from time to time. However, young girls need to be taught that they are much more than what they look like. And that starts with telling girls that. I don’t see anyone telling my brother he’s special because he’s handsome. — Brennan Pope can be reached at popeb@umich.edu. Read more of this column at MichiganDaily.com Will she think that her beauty is what makes her special? Unsigned editorials reflect the official position of the Daily’s Summer Editorial Board. All other signed articles and illustrations represent solely the views of their authors.