Every single morning, I wake up to the buzz of my phone alarm. Immediately, I check to see a myriad of notifications popped up on my screen and spend at least ten minutes looking through each one before I wash up and get ready for class. Throughout the day, I find myself constantly clicking and thumbing through Twitter, Facebook, Snapchat and Instagram. Occasionally, I’ll stop to look at a striking image or funny meme, but more often than not, I mindlessly like statuses and pictures when scrolling down my seemingly endless online feed. My browser windows are frequently filled to the brim with a ridiculous number of tabs. Some contain pop culture articles from The Guardian, Pitchfork and AV Club, while others are just YouTube videos of movie trailers and clips of old Spongebob episodes. Through social media, I’m constantly connected to current events and an online community made up of friends and strangers. Yet lately, I’ve been feeling a sense of disconnect, dread and angst from spending such a lengthy amount of time on it every day. For a while, I’ve been thinking to myself: How have I become so conditioned to compulsively check social media? And how I can stop? I’ve known for a long time that I’ve been obsessed with using technology. More recently, I’ve been coming to terms with the fact that I am psychologically and sometimes even emotionally dependent on the Internet. It distorts the way I perceive myself and others. It deprives and simultaneously stimulates my energy. And, it dilutes my attention span when I procrastinate. But for some reason, I can’t stop using it. You’re probably asking yourself why I’m talking about this kind of issue when the notion of social media as “addicting” has been scrutinized and discussed heavily by psychologists, bloggers and skeptics. It’s no secret that consuming social media in excess has adverse ramifications and I don’t intend to lecture people with a critical analysis of its damaging effects. A show like Netflix’s dystopian anthology satire “Black Mirror” has already proven that its presence in our society is much more insidious than we may think. And the solution to this problem pretty much speaks for itself: just stop using social media. But how can I, what with having to use my computer every single day and not feel some sort of inclination towards checking my Facebook or looking through Instagram on my phone when I have “down time”? There are far more complex implications of what it means to be “addicted” to social media than having it labeled simply as a mental health issue, or really as an issue at all. It goes deeper than just checking on what our friends are up to or building this virtual façade of our lifestyle for others to see. As a generation built on the Internet, we have been psychologically primed to crave a validation that often feels more tangible and comfortable online than in real life. There’s an episode from HBO’s fantastic, underrated stoner comedy “High Maintenance” that addresses such a psychological complex. In the episode, a tech- savvy 20-something named Anja (Ismenia Mendes, “The Devil You Know”) spends her days updating and constructing a self- deprecating persona on her online accounts. Later on, however, Anja suffers the consequences of her social media obsession when she uploads a photo of the show’s nameless weed- dealing protagonist (Ben Sinclair, “Sisters”) to her Instagram without permission. Towards the end of her segment, a dejected Anja sits in her bed, alternating between a book and her phone, and then she just weeps, feeling the hollowness of her real life and the life she’s made for herself online. What the episode, aptly titled “Selfie,” reveals is a sobering truth about the overwhelming nature of being totally lost in the real world and finding solace in a place that capitalizes on this aimlessness. The episode itself might not be as nuanced as it should be; the commentary on social media is a bit didactic and Anja is depicted as a somewhat negative stereotype of a social media-obsessed millennial. Nevertheless, her co-dependent relationship with social media rings true to a lot of the despair and emotional stress that many young people, including myself, experience on a day-to-day basis. We become dependent on social media precisely because it gives us a false, romanticized sense of comfort, anonymity and power. So how exactly do we self- regulate and moderate ourselves in using the Internet? Should we just continue to be active on our social media accounts and other realms of the Internet? Or should we delete everything, go rogue and live under a rock like Patrick Star for a while? The truth is that being active on social media is inevitable, especially if you’re a college student who writes specifically about such a topic every other week. I’ll probably still get distracted from social media when I’m doing my homework — hell, I’ve checked Facebook at least seven times while writing this article. But as addicting as it may be, I’m determined to log out and close my tabs every now and then, and just let the world exist around me. After all, life is much more enriching in the time we spend with others in person than with those we connect with online. The Michigan Daily — michigandaily.com Arts Wednesday, March 29, 2017 — 5A Even big fans of arthouse will find ‘Kuro’ boring COURTESY OF KURO Critiquing art films is as arduous a task as sitting through them. Of course, saying this is close-minded, anti-intellectual and an easy way to get kicked off Daily Arts. For me, a decently “cultured” moviegoer, there’s often no reward for sitting through one of these movies. Instead, I feel stupid for not understanding what the hell just happened on screen — a true low blow for my fragile ego. When jaded by the traditional narrative structures and easy-to-follow plots in most Hollywood pictures, these experimental films feel like a different art form altogether. And, they are indeed. There are almost no similarities between the two styles, except for the fact that both are, in fact, movies. Art house cinema isn’t necessarily boring; it just requires a generous amount of patience. The Ann Arbor Film Festival is a perfect way to get acquainted with this style of filmmaking. One of this year’s entries is “Kuro,” a Japanese movie by Joji Koyama and Tujiko Noriko. “Kuro” tells the story of Romi, a woman living in Paris who cares for her paraplegic boyfriend Milou. Like many other art films, “Kuro” includes practically no dialogue in favor of voice- over narration. Romi, played by Noriko, retells the story of their love and its many complications. Their tale is tragic, yet inspired. Although it’s difficult to follow at moments, some of the stories told by Romi are heart- shattering and true testaments of the human will. “Kuro” attempts to tell two stories: one through the narration, and the other through the various shots of Romi caring for Milou. A lot of the plot is unclear, but it’s unfair to critique an art film as if it were a more traditional major motion picture. The deeper meaning that film snobs love to ruminate over is equally ambiguous, which will leave these aforementioned viewers puzzled for weeks. I’ve given up trying to understand the meaning behind “Kuro,” perhaps because I’m a bit impatient with such challenging stories. Nonetheless, the movie risks being a bit too “out-there” for even the biggest fans of art film. “Kuro” ’s constant narration is complimented by stunning shots that forgo any camera motion, diving into the stillness of the characters’ lives. An art film without quality cinematography (or, any film for that matter) is like an Italian pizza pie without some succulent cheese; it’s never going to be anything but substandard. Still, the camerawork is one of the only engulfing aspects of the movie. After a while, the pretty shots become background to the other lackluster parts of the movie. Directors of experimental films like “Kuro” lack anything close to the budgets of even the most “indie” of indie movies. With this comes very little financial incentive and little payoff for those involved. The filmmakers, therefore, must be deeply passionate about their work in order for the movies to stand a chance. Koyama and Noriko put forth every ounce of passion on the screen. However, the result requires an ample amount of patience and an open-mind. Although I’m not the biggest fan of this genre, I’m a firm believer that art films challenge the norm and influence big-name directors to also push cinematic boundaries. Without people doing the weirdest, strangest stuff, the movie industry as a whole is more likely to remain in a creative lull. “Kuro’s” overlapping “plots” and meditative cinematography, two of the movie’s most special qualities, still don’t feel overly inventive. Regardless, “Kuro” questions the expectations of how a movie should be and ultimately defies them. I’ve always wanted to try to understand experimental movies and dig into their deeper meaning. But sometimes, this is futile, for there’s no intellectual concept to grasp at all. In many ways, movies are purely the most basic form of escapism. Watching a movie is an experience meant to break up the occasional mundanity of everyday living. Unfortunately, “Kuro” only adds to it. WILL STEWART Daily Arts Writer ANN ARBOR FILM FESTIVAL SAM ROSENBERG SOCIAL MEDIA COLUMN Wired & Weary: Dependence on social media DakhaBrakha’s unique take on Ukranian folk COURTESY OF DAKHABRAKHA Distinctive, bright, unconventional and passionate, Ukrainian folk band DakhaBrakha is set to bring their unique talents to Ann Arbor this Wednesday, March 29 at the Michigan Theater. Bill Smith, founder of Riot Artists and DakhaBrakha’s North American agent, discovered the quartet at a concert in Greece about five years ago. “Everybody in the audience was mesmerized,” Smith said. Formed in 2004 at the Kyiv Center of Contemporary Art in Ukraine by Vladislav Troitskyi, an avant-garde theater director, DakhaBrakha combines the simple tenacity of their voices with hints of varied artistic influences to create an original performance experience. In spite of the group’s limited English, their artistry transcends typical language barriers. They’re influenced by sounds from around the world, at once both familiar and authentically foreign. Their name stems from old Ukrainian, meaning “give / take,” and that’s exactly what their music does. “I would rely on what they call an ‘ethno-chaos,’” Smith said. “It is quite a mixture of genres. It’s based on long- forgotten Ukrainian folk songs that they have revived … they have re-arranged them with a multitude of other influences, whether it’s rap, jazz (or) classical, while retaining the basic folkloric music. It’s clearly recognizable, but they changed it in a way that absolutely inspires the public.” A small and powerful force, DakhaBrakha consists of musicians Marko Halanevych (vocals, darbuka, tabla, didjeridoo, accordion, trombone), Iryna Kovalenko (vocals, djembe, bass drums, accordion, percussion, bugay, zgaleyka, piano), Olena Tsybulska (vocals, bass drums, percussion, garmoshka) and Nina Garenetska (vocals, cello, bass drum). “They start off very dramatically, and the tempo changes throughout,” Smith said. “I can’t say that I have a favorite part of their concerts because it’s all so well put- together … so many presenters have told me that they’re the highlight of their entire season, and a few of them have said (they’re) the highlight of their careers.” Their music has a quiet, incomparable force to it; it’s inherently captivating. “It’s fundamentally Ukrainian, Eastern European folkloric music. It’s so accessible that people in Mexico described a show there as a ‘rave.’ Other people see it differently,” Smith said. “It takes maybe five or ten minutes into the concert for the public to grasp it if they’ve never seen the group, and then they simply embrace it and go wild. It’s amazing how they stir the public.” Somewhat ethereal in nature, their vocals are accompanied by layers of beads and tall, woolen hats, allowing DakhaBrakha to craft a visually stunning concert that’s difficult to look away from. Some of their pieces are slower, sharply contrasting with the intensity of others and lending a depth to their performances. One of their more popular tracks, “Baby,” from their 2014 album Light, sits comfortably at about seven minutes long. Seemingly narrating a story through unfiltered emotion, it’s hopeful when it needs to be and dangerous when it so desires. The song embodies the evolutionary feel of DakhaBrakha’s music: The band is able to communicate a story that reaches all audiences no matter the langauge differences. Riding on the strength of their sound, the group uses their performances to universally attach themselves to those around — watching, listening, feeling. Strange, thoughtful and, at times, other-worldly, DakhaBrakha’s performance is sure to be memorable. With an artistic vision as idiosyncratic as theirs and gripping vocals to match, it’s best to approach the night with open hearts and minds. Resting atop the foundation of pure love imbued in DakhaBrakha’s concerts, this Ukrainian quartet is set to share their joy with Ann Arbor this Wednesday. ARYA NAIDU Daily Arts Writer UMS presents “DakhaBrakha” Michigan Theater Wednesday March 29 @ 7:30 PM $12 - $20 Students, $24 - $52 Adults COMMUNITY CULTURE PREVIEW “Kuro” 55th Annual Ann Arbor Film Festival Michigan Theater When jaded by the traditional narrative structures and easy-to-follow plots in most Hollywood pictures, these experimental films feel like a different art form altogether In spite of the group’s limited English, their artistry transcends typical language barriers