100%

Scanned image of the page. Keyboard directions: use + to zoom in, - to zoom out, arrow keys to pan inside the viewer.

Page Options

Download this Issue

Share

Something wrong?

Something wrong with this page? Report problem.

Rights / Permissions

This collection, digitized in collaboration with the Michigan Daily and the Board for Student Publications, contains materials that are protected by copyright law. Access to these materials is provided for non-profit educational and research purposes. If you use an item from this collection, it is your responsibility to consider the work's copyright status and obtain any required permission.

March 22, 2017 - Image 12

Resource type:
Text
Publication:
The Michigan Daily

Disclaimer: Computer generated plain text may have errors. Read more about this.

Wednesday, March 22, 2017 // The Statement
4B
Wednesday, March 22, 2017 // The Statement

5B

Art Matters

proposed NEA elimination threatens performing arts community

b y Yo s h i k o I w a i, Deputy Statement Editor
I

t’s a Saturday night and the audi-

ence at the Power Center for

the Performing Arts is stunned.

Silence floods the walls of the the-

ater. I can almost hear the person

next to me holding their breath. The stage I’ve

performed on eight times since I started my

dance training at the University of Michigan

is tense and torn, like I’ve never experienced

before. “Betroffenheit” by Kidd Pivot and

Electric Company Theatre has the full house

of 1,200 people in a standing ovation. Tears,

shock and wonder fill the audience.

“Betroffenheit,” a theater-dance perfor-

mance, is a visual and physical representation

of grief, addiction and trauma. Based on writer

and performer Jonathan Young’s experience

of losing his daughter and cousins to a fire, the

combination of movement, sound and space

is both arresting and thought-provoking. It’s

the kind of physical, psychological and emo-

tional effect we as performing artists strive to

achieve in our years of training — something

that crosses the proscenium stage and perme-

ates the lives of the viewers — something that

makes them question the world they inhabit.

Award-winning performances like “Betrof-

fenheit” are hard to come by. During middle

school and high school, I saw some artists of

this caliber during trips to New York City, but

these world-class performances came with

expensive tickets that made seeing everything

I wanted unrealistic. My orchestra ticket to

see “Betroffenheit” in Ann Arbor though, was

$20.

***

This year alone, the University Musical

Society — an Ann Arbor-based performing

arts presenter affiliated with the University —

brought multiple internationally recognized

artists to campus. The night before “Betrof-

fenheit,” three-time Grammy award-winning

jazz quasi-collective Snarky Puppy took Hill

Auditorium. In early February, Ping Chong +

Company, recipient of National Medal of Arts,

did a theatrical performance on Muslim iden-

tity. Just a month before, Bessie Award-win-

ning Ohad Naharin’s Israeli dance company,

Batsheva, performed at the Power Center.

In January, UMS announced that current

New York Philharmonic president, Matthew

VanBesien, will be the next UMS president

beginning this summer. Last November, the

Grammy award-winning Berlin Philharmonic

did an orchestral residency with University

students.

Since its establishment in 1880, UMS pres-

ents approximately 75 performances a year

and hosts more than 100 educational events

per season. In 2015, UMS was the first uni-

versity-related arts presenter to receive the

National Medal of Arts from then-President

Barack Obama.

Looking back on these 138 years, the UMS

line-up of performances is even more impres-

sive. Before his retirement, Leonard Bernstein

conducted four performances in the country

with the Vienna Philharmonic; Hill Audito-

rium was one of them. In 2001, UMS president

Ken Fischer started a multi-year partnership

with the Royal Shakespeare Company. And let

us not forget that Yo-Yo Ma will be perform-

ing on campus this April. What’s most surpris-

ing is that students can see his performance

for less than the cost of a dinner at any Main

Street restaurant.

As a senior in high school applying to col-

leges, I researched the cities and local per-

formance venues of each of the schools I

considered attending. Ann Arbor stood out to

me. Not only was I drawn to the quality of the

School of Music, Theatre & Dance’s curricu-

lum, but also the Ann Arbor arts environment

itself. I considered conservatories in New

York City and Los Angeles until I realized

Ann Arbor offered the same opportunities —

except here, I can go to a football game at noon

and then an opera at night. Since I started my

dance training at the University three years

ago, I have seen and taken classes from artists

I could maybe meet in New York City or Chi-

cago or Montreal or Israel. Maybe. Needless

to say, the School of Music, Theatre & Dance

School is nationally ranked along with the

performing arts conservatories on the coasts.

This performing arts bubble — Ann Arbor

— from education to exposure, is a Midwest-

ern gem for aspiring performers and the pub-

lic, according to Aaron Dworkin, dean of the

Music, Theatre & Dance School.

“We’re a very unique place, as it relates to

the arts,” Dworkin said. “We are solidly in the

Midwest, yet we have arts experiences, train-

ing and institutions that rival anything on the

coasts,” Dworkin said. “We are in many ways

in that center — whether it’s a presenter like

UMS, whether it’s our school and the fact that

we lead the nation in so many of our depart-

ments.”

*****

Last Thursday, the Trump administration

released a proposed federal budget calling

for the complete defunding of the National

Endowment for the Arts and the National

Endowment for the Humanities. Public fund-

ing for the arts had long been a low-hanging

fruit for fiscal hawks — even though the annu-

al cost of $741 million composes less than one-

tenth of a percent of federal spending. But this

announcement marks the first time in history

that a sitting administration proposed to dis-

continue either the NEA or NEH.

The NEA is an independent federal agency

founded by Congress in 1965. The organiza-

tion provides financial support to arts organi-

zations and projects across the country. Over

the years, the organization has expanded its

aid from performances and educational expe-

riences to even health-care projects, like the

NEA Healing Arts Partnership. Founded in

2011, the partnership works to promote arts

therapy, placing art therapists in veteran hos-

pitals across the nation.

Every year, the NEA funds various Music,

Theatre & Dance School research projects and

performances. The George and Ira Gershwin

Critical Edition — an ongoing scholarly analy-

sis of Gershwin’s music — and Youth & Adult

Community Programs — an educational pro-

gram that exposes local Ann Arbor residents

to different performances — to name a few

who receive funds.

In 2016, the NEA awarded UMS with

$30,000 to bring performances, residencies

and other educational programs to Ann Arbor.

“Betroffenheit” was one of them — in addition

to the American Ballet Theatre, Camille A.

Brown, Taylor Mac and others.

The proposed cuts were announced mere

minutes before I was to interview the dean

and assistant dean of the Music, Theatre &

Dance School. When we sat down, it was clear

they were still digesting the potential loss of

the NEA.

Dean Aaron Dworkin, a member of the

National Council for the Arts, which makes

recommendations for individuals and organi-

zations to be awarded the National Medal of

Arts — the presidential award for outstanding

artists — said he is unsure of the effects of the

proposed budget, as it awaits a lengthy con-

gressional revision process. He emphasized,

however, the proposed budget suggests a lack

of value placed on the arts in American soci-

ety.

“Budgets are moral documents,” Dworkin

said. “Budgets reflect the values of an institu-

tion or the values of a nation.”

That same day, I interviewed UMS Presi-

dent Ken Fischer, who was visibly disturbed

when we met. He argued the proposed budget

is motivated by ideology and not a genuine

desire to balance the budget.

“There seems to be no understanding of the

role the NEA has been playing,” he said. “It

gives grants that could maybe total the wing

of a defense jet, but look at what it does to

bring a quality of life to this country. UMS has

received funding each year from the NEA. It

is an important part of our budget, but what

it is more than anything, is a statement that

our country cares that the arts are important.”

However, he stresses to look at the opportu-

nity the crisis brings, that “artists will rise to

fill the vacuum that is created by the potential

loss of the NEA.”

Dworkin and Melody Racine, SMTD senior

associate dean for academic affairs, also

struck a defiant tone, emphasizing that with

lost federal funding, it would be their respon-

sibility to further provide platforms for artists

to continue their craft.

“We must be artist citizens now,” Racine

said. “We need to be very good at what we do

in the arts, but we need to also be very aware

of what’s happening in the political world.

We need to be very aware of what’s happen-

ing with our planet. We need to be very aware

with issues of diversity, equity and inclusion.

The more we know about outside our own

field, the better ours becomes.”

The
educational,
administrative
and

entrepreneurial drive of the administration

reassures me as an Music, Theatre & Dance

student. Even if the discontinuation of pub-

lic arts funding doesn’t survive the budget

review process, it’s hard not to interpret the

proposal as saying “the arts don’t matter.”

My attitude is not alone among Music,

Theatre & Dance students. Spencer Schaefer,

a Music, Theatre & Dance junior studying

French horn performance and ethnomusicol-

ogy, emphasized that he pursues his craft not

for future potential wealth but for the sake of

art.

“I think a lot of people are unaware of what

it means to be an artist because they see dance,

they see installations, they see artwork, they

hear music, but don’t understand the time it

takes, and what it means to someone,” he said.

“These people aren’t cashing out and making

tons of money off of this, no. This is putting

a roof over their heads so they can continue

to create their project — and maybe, they can

come back and eat something.”

*****

In a country where the performing arts

are implicitly underappreciated, the role of

the performing artist becomes more complex.

There is no option to stop — if this is the lan-

guage I’ve used for 18 years, there’s no forget-

ting it or learning a new one now.

When I look back on “Betroffenheit” and

wonder why it affected me the way it did,

I can’t come up with words to accurately

describe the movement, or search for some-

thing in a thesaurus to find one that’ll fit. I

tried.

When a performance does its job, it gives

you the unutterable. It describes the space

between your mind and your hands that des-

perately try to explain the sensation of an

experience whether it is good or bad.

Schaefer agreed when we spoke about the

role of the emerging performing artist.

“Even if I’m not going to make a dime off my

art, that doesn’t mean it can’t impact someone

and it still means something to me,” Schaefer

said. “I’ll find a way to put a roof over my head,

it’s never about that. I think that’s why the art

is going to keep going. It’s so crushing to see

that it could get more and more distant with

the lack of funding from it, within the pop cul-

ture and main culture of society.”

This argument is reinforced by faculty. The

word “quit” simply does not exist in the art-

ist’s vocabulary.

“The best thing that we can do is to learn,

prepare, train, become great artists,” Dworkin

said. “The best thing you can do when the arts,

or whatever field you’re working in is poten-

tially diminished or under threat, is to become

more excellent — to make a better argument

for it. I’ve learned to not to predict the future,

but project and prepare. Because luck is when

preparation meets opportunity.”

But I don’t know how I could have prepared

for this. The proposed budget’s complete dis-

missal of the arts has made me question my

craft and therefore identity. How do I tell my

graduating friends that everything will be

OK when the already minimal support for the

starving artists is completely gone?

It’s less of a question of whether the arts

matter — of course, they do. The question is

how the aspiring, still unknown artist enters

a world where their existence is undervalued.

The dialogue starts sounding a lot like other

conversations that have surfaced in the recent

political climate.

*****

As a violinist, multi-media artist and now

an educator, Dworkin’s resilience is some-

thing I admire.

“From my perspective, there is no doubt,”

Dworkin said, his voice unwavering. “It’s just

that we have to make the case and make the

argument, because the arts pervade so much of

what we do — it’s just not recognized amongst

many people how pervasive the arts are, and

that the arts require training and facility. It’s

not like you can magically play an instrument

or sing or dance, it requires years of training,

development, craft, ingenuity and creativity.”

Over the course of the last few days, this

pervasiveness of the arts has been a recurring

theme. Even as a performing artist in school

with other performing artists, I sometimes

lose sight of the breadth of this field. Fischer

doesn’t.

“This will be one where I hope anyone who

has been to a theater, dance or music perfor-

mance, who owns an iPad, or an iPhone, and

looks at the design, who drives a car, thinks:

Who are the people designing these things

that have made America great?” Fischer said.

“They are people who have been artists and

designers. For anyone to think it’s just a bunch

of rich people going to see the Metropolitan

Opera benefitting from this, they need to get

their facts straight.”

The potential demise of the NEA and with

it, the national support system for the arts, not

only affects current artists, but future genera-

tions of artists as well. Whether they are in

training like me, or haven’t yet picked up the

violin or paintbrush, the lack of access to the

arts has foreseeable consequences.

I know for a fact that I would not have pur-

sued a college degree in this craft if I weren’t

exposed to choreographers and dancers who

made my jaw drop and entire body tingle when

I was younger — I simply wouldn’t have pur-

sued it if I didn’t experience the full-blown,

unadulterated power of the artist myself. I

wanted to communicate the unutterable.

The experience of the arts is irreplaceable.

If I’ve learned anything from 18 years of train-

ing, it’s that live art is fleeting, but maybe for

the same reason, most resonating. It seems

most lively in the sense that it requires your

fullest attention in the moment, to be stored

in your memory, as more of a sensation than

artifact. After all, it is an experience.






COURTESY OF WENDY D PHOTOGRAPHY

COURTESY OF THE SCHOOL OF MUSIC, THEATRE AND DANCE








ARNOLD ZHOU/DAILY









FILE PHOTO/MICHIGAN DAILY

Back to Top

© 2024 Regents of the University of Michigan