100%

Scanned image of the page. Keyboard directions: use + to zoom in, - to zoom out, arrow keys to pan inside the viewer.

Page Options

Download this Issue

Share

Something wrong?

Something wrong with this page? Report problem.

Rights / Permissions

This collection, digitized in collaboration with the Michigan Daily and the Board for Student Publications, contains materials that are protected by copyright law. Access to these materials is provided for non-profit educational and research purposes. If you use an item from this collection, it is your responsibility to consider the work's copyright status and obtain any required permission.

March 07, 2017 - Image 1

Resource type:
Text
Publication:
The Michigan Daily

Disclaimer: Computer generated plain text may have errors. Read more about this.

The
Senate
Advisory

Committee
on
University

Affairs met Monday evening
to discuss working rights
of
graduate
students
on

visas
and
the
University

of
Michigan’s
policy
on

transgender bathroom rights.

The committee was joined

by
Interim
Provost
Paul

Courant
and
John
Ware,

president of the Graduate
Employees’ Organization at
the University, who reached
out to SACUA for support
in
the
GEO’s
fight
for

increased working rights. The
conversation began with a
statement from Ware, asking
for support from SACUA in his
organization’s
negotiations

with Human Resources at the
University for a new three-
year contract.

The
GEO’s
principal

concern has to do with the
number of hours graduate
student
instructors
are

permitted
to
work
each

week. As Ware explained to
SACUA, students on certain
visas — including the F-1 visa,
which 30 percent of graduate
students are on — can work
a maximum of 20 paid hours
per week during the academic
term.

“The important issue is

the fluctuations,” Ware said.
“Typically, how that happens
is there’s some more intense

period of work during the
term. For example, there’s
an exam, some assignment
due, and there’s a desire
for that to be graded and
turned around quickly, so
there’s some work to do in
the week following that. And
that presents a problem for
international GSIs, because
our current contract allows
their supervisors to ask them
to work in a way which puts

them in violation of their
visas.”

According to Ware, the

GEO would like this 20-hour
restriction to be applied to all
GSIs, not only those on visas.
The committee broke into a
discussion of whether it was
fair to extend the regulation
to all GSIs. David Wright,
SACUA member and Ross
School of Business professor,
began
by
expressing
his

worries about the policy.

“I’m
always
a
little

concerned when we impose
a
regulation
on
everyone

that only affects 30 percent,”
Wright said. “By definition,
we’ll be putting a constraint
on the 70 percent which can’t
work in their favor, because
unregulated is always better
than regulated.”

Ware responded to Wright’s

In recent years, researchers

have discovered certain genetic
mutations
are
now
linked

with serious diseases in men,
including prostate cancer. These
genetic mutations, referred to
as BRCA1 and BRCA2, were
previously
thought
solely
to

increase a patient’s risk of breast
cancer. This recent discovery has
prompted doctors at Michigan
Medicine, formerly the University
of Michigan Health System, and
specifically urological surgeon
Todd Morgan, to develop the
Prostate Cancer Risk Clinic — the
first of its kind.

In 2012, the U.S. Preventive

Services Task Force, a group
of national experts that gives
recommendations about clinical
preventive
services,
gave

the
existing
prostate
cancer

screening a grade D.

“The
U.S.
Preventive

Services Task Force (USPSTF)
recommends against prostate-
specific
antigen
(PSA)-based

screening for prostate cancer,”
the
recommendation
read,

advising against the blood test

michigandaily.com
Ann Arbor, Michigan
Tuesday, March 7, 2017

ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY-SIX YEARS OF EDITORIAL FREEDOM

GOT A NEWS TIP?
Call 734-418-4115 or e-mail
news@michigandaily.com and let us know.

INDEX
Vol. CXXVII, No. 39
©2017 The Michigan Daily

N E WS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

O PI N I O N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

A R T S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

S U D O K U . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

CL A S S I F I E DS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

S P O R T S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

See CENTER, Page 3

First clinic
for prostate
cancer to
open at UM

RESEARCH

Center will more regularly
screen male patients for
genetic predispositions

ERIN DOHERTY
Daily Staff Reporter

MATT VAILLIENCOURT/Daily

SACUA members are joined by Rob Sellers, Vice Provost for Equity and Inclusion and Chief Diversity Officer, in the
Fleming Administration Building on Monday.

SACUA implements new transgender
bathroom policy, outlines GEO demand

Committee agrees all students can use bathroom of their gender identity

MAYA GOLDMAN

Daily Staff Reporter

michigandaily.com

For more stories and coverage, visit

See BATHROOM, Page 3

Last week, the Mackinac

Center for Public Policy filed a
lawsuit against the University
of
Michigan
regarding
the

state’s Freedom of Information
Act, claiming the University
failed to provide the documents
requested within due time.

On Nov. 16, Derek Draplin,

a reporter with the Mackinac
Center’s
Michigan
Capitol

Confidential media outlet, issued
the request on behalf of the
nonprofit Michigan corporation
to release University President
Mark
Schlissel’s
emails

containing the word “Trump”
from July 1 to Nov. 16 of 2016.

In the aftermath of the

presidential election, Schlissel
released a statement endorsing
University-sponsored
events

that aimed to provide resources
and information for students
who felt heavily impacted by
the election results to gather
and share ideas. One event was
a vigil at which Schlissel spoke,
encouraging advocacy among
those who did not support the
election results.

See LAWSUIT, Page 3

Mackinac
Center sues
for delayed
FOIA reply

ADMINISTRATION

Claims University failed
to respond to requests in
due time, seeks penalties

DYLAN LACROIX
Daily Staff Reporter

Students, professors evaluate LSA Race

and Ethnicity course requirement

DESIGN BY NOAH SHERBIN

Faculty look to adjust R&E classes to address post-election political climate, review occurred in earliest days of presidential campaign

LSA junior Ryan Gillcrist,

academic
affairs
committee

chair
for
LSA
Student

Government, has taken three
Race
and
Ethnicity
classes

before this semester, but he said
the one he is enrolled in right
now feels a little different than
the others.

“When I took classes first

year and second year … I mainly
thought about issues of racism

and intolerance in the context
of the courses themselves,”
Gillcrist said. “But I think
that, especially in this political
climate, I’ve started to think of
the classes more in the context
of the present.”

The current national and

campus climate in wake of
actions by President Donald
Trump which have draw focus
on issues relating to race and
ethnicity. Both this semester
and last, the University of
Michigan has faced racist and
anti-Semitic
posters
across

campus and emails sent to
students in multiple academic
programs. Before, anti-Muslim
chalkings covered the Diag.

In response to these issues,

many students and faculty think
the LSA Race and Ethnicity
requirement — which has its
roots in helping to solve similar
situations — plays an important
role in easing political tensions
on campus this semester.

“I wonder what would’ve

been going on if this was
happening a year later.”

Created in 1990 in response

to demands from the student
group Black Action Movement
III, the Race and Ethnicity
requirement
has
long
been

used to address complex social
issues at the University. Since
its conception, all LSA students
have been required to take
at least one R&E class before
graduating, although many, like
Gillcrist, end up taking several.

The
requirement
was

reviewed for the second time
in its history during the 2015-
2016 school year. The review
committee,
led
by
Angela

Dillard, LSA associate dean of
undergraduate education, took a
critical look at the requirement
and the way it contributes
to students’ education. The
committee
made
several

recommendations,
including

smaller discussion sections for
large R&E lectures.

“We
periodically
review

all our degree requirements,”
Dillard said. “For years, R&E
has kind of been on the list
of things to do. I had a huge
interest in it, and the time
seemed right.”

The
review
of
the

requirement
occurred
in

the
earliest
days
of
the

presidential campaign, before
the
University
community

knew how the outcome of the
election would impact issues of
race and ethnicity on campus.
However,
review
committee

member Holly Peters-Golden
— who teaches Introduction to
Anthropology 101, one of the
most popular classes students
take to fulfill the requirement

does
not
believe
the

MAYA GOLDMAN

Daily Staff Reporter

See REQUIREMENT, Page 3

Back to Top

© 2024 Regents of the University of Michigan