The Michigan Daily — michigandaily.com Arts Thursday, February 23, 2017 — 5 ‘Fist Fight’ falls short Despite a star-studded cast, Warner Bros. latest film disappoints “Fist Fight” is a movie about two teachers who go ahead and fight each other because that is something you wouldn’t expect two teachers to do. And if there is one thing that “Fist Fight” thinks is funny, it’s teachers doing things teachers wouldn’t normally do. “Look, that teacher does drugs!” “Look, that teacher swears a lot!” “Look, that teacher is a potentially psychotic killer!” “Look, that teacher is Ice Cube!” This list represents a comprehensive compilation of every single joke in the entire hour and thirty-one-minute ordeal that is “Fist Fight.” While jokes like these are occasionally funny, it’s not the kind of humor on which to base an entire feature film. It’s a running joke, a bit. Ultimately, “Fist Fight” is just like the jokes it tells; sometimes it’ll get a laugh, but for the most part, it feels like a one-note sitcom episode that lasts ninety minutes instead of twenty. “Fist Fight” is doubly disappointing considering the comedic pedigree of its cast. Charlie Day, the breakout star of FXX’s terrific “It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia,” stars, squaring off against Ice Cube, who has turned in scene- stealing comedic work in the “Jump Street” movies. The two are backed up by Tracy Morgan (“30 Rock”), Jillian Bell (“22 Jump Street”), and Kumail Nanjiani (“Silicon Valley”), as well as dramatic performers like Dean Norris (“Breaking Bad”) and Christina Hendricks (“Mad Men”). This is an insane cast, and to their credit, they all do great work. Day acquits himself quite well as the straight man of the movie, though the manic energy that has made him the fan favorite character of “Sunny” inevitably shines through. Ice Cube plays the kind of “angry guy” role that he could do in his sleep by this point in his career, but he does it well enough that it’s hard to get too upset over. Arguably the biggest surprise in the cast is Norris, who portrays the high school’s put-upon principal, who seems like he is growing closer and closer to losing his mind as the story wears on. Like much of the cast, it’s a bit role, but Norris makes it one of the more memorable parts of the movie. Still, with a cast this good, there should be material worthy of that talent, and there is little to none to be found in “Fist Fight.” Apart from the absolute dearth of any sort of wit—former Funny or Die writers Van Robichaux and Evan Susser fill the movie with as many F-bombs as possible and erroneously believe that counts as comedy—the film features the bane of modern R-rated comedies: the shoehorned in emotional B-story. You know the one where the main character has to learn the value of friendship or the main character has to learn to believe in himself or the main character has to be a better employee. It’s the storyline where large swaths of people leave the theater to refill their popcorn or go to the bathroom because they know there will be nothing funny for the next five minutes. Here, “Fist Fight” proves to be the most economical kind of movie, as it crams three of these into itself for the price of one. Day’s character has to learn to be a better father and he has to learn to stand up for himself and he has to worry about his job. Not only do these function as a way to give the plot some illusion of stake, but it gives the writers a way to espouse the message of the film as much as possible: words matter. And that is where “Fist Fight” falls shortest of all, because while it all but breaks the fourth wall to get its meaning across, everything that happen within the movie contradicts it. Words matter, but nothing the characters do has any consequences. Words matter, but do whatever you want, it’ll turn out okay. Words matter, just not our words. It is hypocritical in a way that is almost inspiring. If it felt like anyone but the cast had put any effort into it, “Fist Fight” might be salvageable, but it can’t escape its own idiotic duplicity and boring humor. WARNER BROS. JEREMIAH VANDERHELM Daily Arts Wrtier Serving up more than just food As with most businesses, restaurants possess the ability to impact social and political change. Whether it’s by choosing to source their produce from local farmers or by taking a stand on recent anti-immigrant policies, the way restaurant owners choose to run their establishments has far-reaching effects on their communities and beyond. In a recent profile, Detroit chef Kate Williams made clear her awareness of the cultural currency chefs and restaurants carry in driving food and dining trends across the country. This awareness motivates her use of whole animal preservation and local produce from Detroit’s urban farmers. In doing so, she hopes to infuse the national discourse surrounding culinary trends and food consumption with her propensity for sustainability and reducing food waste. Among the increasing movements aimed at boosting sustainability and reducing waste is the farm-to-table movement — a trend that began in the early 1970 ’s and entered mainstream food culture a little over a decade ago. The movement benefits not only the environment and the economy but also improves and sustains the nation’s physical health. Williams is among an increasing number of chefs and restaurants that have taken to the movement. In addition to reducing business costs for restaurant owners, it helps local farmers and creates jobs — a key advantage for cities like Detroit, that are recovering from economic hardship. This movement, and many others, are sparked by the actions of individual chefs. Their unique tastes and practices have the power to shape how food is made and consumed in our country. Not all trends and movements are rooted in culinary practices, however. Recently, many restaurants took it upon themselves to support their local communities by championing immigrant workers — who make up over a quarter of the industry — and closing their doors on Thursday, February 16th in “A Day Without Immigrants.” The national movement, sparked by President Donald Trump’s recent, highly controversial anti-immigrant policies, sought to defend immigrants, who form the backbone of the restaurant industry. In January, Sanctuary Restaurants was founded to protect employers and workers from becoming the targets of hate or harassment by educating them on their rights and calling on consumers to increase their awareness. The organization’s maxim is the belief that, “There’s a place at the table for everyone.” Over 280 restaurants have already joined the movement, including Ann Arbor’s Zingerman’s Deli. The movement seeks to create inclusive dining environments and hold restaurant owners, workers and consumers responsible for fostering safe spaces and responding to the racism and discrimination that have permeated the national discourse surrounding immigrants. This type of response uses the particular position of restaurants in their community and the economy to make a political statement and to advance social change on a scale that extends far beyond their respective local environments. On a small-scale level, restaurants serve a valuable role as cultural hubs, bringing together members of their communities and individuals from outside to share in unifying, common experiences. They exhibit a range of diverse cultural practices that introducer patrons to philosophies and practices they might not experience elsewhere. a fundamental and necessary aspect of communities across the nation. As cultural mainstays, restaurants are positioned to take the kind of stance that Sanctuary Restaurants and other movements advocate for to mobilize real change. Restaurants play a vital role in their local business communities. Whether a hole- in-the wall local joint, a small time food truck, or a high- end dining spot, restaurants are pillars of their local communities and the nation’s overarching economic and cultural ecosystem. Drawing crowds from all over the world, they possess the ability to aggregate numerous and varied constituencies. Even on a small scale, the way restaurant owners choose to present their businesses is reflective of attitudes of inclusion and social consciousness. In her interview, Williams expressed her desire to make her restaurant approachable to all, particularly to those deterred from certain price points. Be it simplified decor or a more affordable menu, this form of cultural and economic awareness strives to make dining a more equitable environment. Though instability is common within the industry, with restaurants shuttering and failing to launch regularly, those with staying power have a profound impact on their communities and a clear expression of their unique cultural voice within the culinary landscape. It’s these kinds of establishments and culturally-savvy owners that create enduring spaces and practices that shape their communities in the long run and that ultimately shape who we are as consumers. SHIR AVINADAV FOOD COLUMN FILM REVIEW “Fist Fight” Rave Cinemas, Goodrich Quality 16 Warner Bros. SINGLE REVIEW It’s not a surprise that Lana del Rey’s newest single is about love. But instead of gravi- tating towards the sensual, melancholy-heavy sound of 2013’s Born To Die, “Love” is delicately suffused with nostalgia and sweeter, more tender emotions. Lana swaps out the chorusing violins that fea- tured prominently in both “Born to Die” and “Dark Par- adise,” replacing them with a steady, gently bobbing beat and airy, rustling background noises, which emphasize the unhurried tone and dreamy atmosphere of the track. Wispy, ethereal electronics further add to the softness of the song overall. Like most of her work, “Love” has a distinctly cinematic sound to it; it’s easy to picture it playing over a scene from the 2013 film adaption of “The Great Gatsby,” which featured her “Young and Beautiful.” Something about the effort- less breathiness of her voice as she reaches for higher tim- bres and the candid, buoy- ant innocence of the lyrics (“It doesn’t matter if I’m not enough / For the future or the things to come / ‘Cause I’m young and in love”) per- fectly captures the essence of young love. Even if the listener hasn’t experienced it, “Love” encourages imagina- tion, nudging us to let loose and take advantage of the possibilities available to us while we still can. But “Love” isn’t merely about the freedom and naivete of the emotion; it’s also a song of admiration for those who are still able to experience love’s carefree nature. “Look at you kids with your vintage music / Comin’ through satellites while cruisin’ / You’re part of the past, but now you’re the future,” Lana coos in the first stanza, a hint of motherly pride unmistakable in her voice. Even as the piece builds into a sweeping cre- scendo, it never loses any of the lush luminosity that keeps it fresh. At its most intense, the song glides with a sugary, carefree melodious- ness — but at every end it’s purposed. — SAMANTHA LU “Love” Lana del Rey Polydor ARE YOU INTERESTED IN WRITING FOR ARTS? Email anay@michigandaily.com or npzak@michigandaily.com for an application. Questions/concerns? Don’t hesitate to reach out. “Fist Fight” is doubly disappointing considering the comedic pedigree of its cast POLYDOR Read more at MichiganDaily.com