‘Witch’ is terrifying By JACOB RICH Senior Arts Editor A24 is quietly killing it. Do peo- ple realize how many of the great- est films of the 2010’s this New York-based distribution company has financed? None of their films make an enor- mous amount of money — the few that have done huge numbers include “Ex Machina,” my favor- ite film of 2015, and the critically acclaimed Amy Winehouse doc “Amy” — but almost all of them are innovative and excellent. You have them to thank for “The Spectacu- lar Now,” “Obvious Child,” “Under the Skin,” “The End of the Tour” and “Room.” And now we have “The Witch,” a tiny-budget period horror film with a brand-new writer/director attached (Robert Eggers). Stuck somewhere between “The Shin- ing” and “Evil Dead,” this is a bru- tal, tension-filled exploration of Christian guilt so uncomfortable and disturbing that it made two couples sitting in front of me get up and exit the theater 10 minutes in. I didn’t blame them for leaving. This is a tremendous film that continues A24’s streak of high quality releas- es, but it’s not for everyone. “The Witch” is as much about a time and a place as it is about a situation. The film takes us back to primitive America, where surviv- ing each winter was not a guaran- tee. Today, we dull our fear of death with science and comfort, but the harsh wilderness of 17th century New England lacked both of those luxuries. Instead, the God-fearing puritans relied on devout Christi- anity to make sense of their harsh existence. In their world, heaven and hell are unquestionably real, as are evils that lurk in the woods. In an inversion of the classic “don’t show the monster until the end” Spielberg routine, we see the witch right away. We’re talking classic witch in the woods here — this is a gross, wrinkly baby- devouring witch. She’s not mis- understood. She’s a fucking evil witch, and she’s scary and ugly and hangs with the devil. Her purpose? To torture a family of excommu- nicated Christians, struggling to make ends meet on a thatched-roof farm. The heart of the film’s dread is a youthful fear embodied in some of the best performances by children I’ve ever seen in a film. Newcom- ers Anya Taylor-Joy and Harvey Scrimshaw bring us back to that primal emotional experience we had after lying to our mothers or stealing an extra cookie after din- ner — that feeling, lingering for just a few minutes, that our dishonesty might make us burn in hell for- ever. As the family descends into religious hysteria, we see the terri- fying implications of how the dog- matic belief of the parents impacts their children. The power of these scenes would not be as effective were it not for Eggers’s strict adherence to period social customs and man- ners of speech. Even more impres- sive is the actors’s delivery of said speech, so believable that the dia- logue maintains a strict separation from our contemporary reality, but so emotional that we can’t help but empathize with the family’s horri- fying plight. While it does drag around its midpoint, “The Witch” quickly maintains pace as slow-burn sym- phony of familial tension that ends in an electrifying coda. Adhering to the formalist school of Bergman and Kubrick, Eggers and his edi- tor (newcomer Louise Ford) have shaped a thriller that is structur- ally compelling and nuanced. It’s wonderful to see so much new, hungry talent getting the platform they deserve. Films like “The Witch” shouldn’t exist, finan- cially speaking. They’re heavily niche products that don’t make a lot of money. But thanks to mid- tier distributors like A24, cinema can once again exist between the blockbuster and the no-budget indie. We need more movies like “The Witch.” A24 You played yourself. FILM REVIEW A- The Witch A24 Rave & Quality 16 ‘Zootopia’ showcased By VANESSA WONG Daily Arts Writer Move over, New York City; the trendiest urban metropolis is now none other than “Zootopia,” Dis- ney’s latest animated brainchild. An urban city created by ani- mals for animals only, “Zootopia” marks the largest animated world the studio has created to date, with double the number of digital mod- els used in “Big Hero 6.” Matthias Lechner, the film’s Art Director of Environments spoke about the world-building process on Thurs- day, Feb. 18 on campus in a lecture sponsored by the Michigan Ani- mation Club. Lechner emphasized that the “city should be a character itself:” it should feel imaginative, but still be grounded in believability — this is a modern city, after all. To begin the design process, Lechner’s team mentally walks through a typical city experience from the eyes of an animal. The research started by looking into organic architecture shapes, particularly the work of Sagrada Familia architect Antoni Gaudi. The shapes of buildings and city planning are informed by ani- mal behavior and habitats. Zoo- topia has a city center with outer districts representing different artificially-created climate zones: Bunny Burrow, a hilly, rural coun- tryside with kid cubbyholes in houses for the constantly growing bunny families; Sahara Square, a slick desert canyon with an active nightlife to match its nocturnal lifestyle; Tundratown, an icy locale with Russian-inspired architec- ture; Little Rodentia, a model town scaled to the size of a mouse and the Rainforest District, a towering tropical borough. Because animals love nature, buildings are organi- cally integrated into the backdrop. Lechner believes that “a model is successful if ‘life’ is felt, but the audience doesn’t really know why.” He stressed the importance of cre- ating a backstory for every single detail about the city and how it came to be. To recreate the feel of a city’s ever-progressing history, build- ings showcase different eras of architecture while sprinklers arti- ficially create the rainforest dis- tricts’ constant showers. The city infrastructure contains tall metal pipes disguised as plant roots, and a plethora of car options fit every animal shape and size. The team also created a subway map connecting the different districts, and contemporary products, bill- boards and advertisements target- ing specific animal needs peek out behind — details seemingly minor, but essential enough in building a fully fleshed out world that signage design merited its own job title. Even the flags in Little Rodentia are stiffer because they require smaller pieces of cloth. This metic- ulous attention to detail is what makes the world of Zootopia burst with vibrancy. Lechner chuckled when a stu- dent asked about “Easter Eggs” — hidden references to other Dis- ney animated pictures — scattered throughout the movie, saying that as a parent of a young child, he feels confident that “Zootopia” contains a wealth of little background sto- ries to withstand repeat viewings. One such instance to watch out for is a calendar featuring “Big Hero 6” ’s San Fransokyo in the police chief’s office. However, it’s important to note that environment design is not an isolated process. Designers and screenwriters work closely together at the beginning of the filmmaking process, meeting in collaborative meetings at least every six weeks for critiques so that the storyline and animation can build off each other and grow in the same direction. Though Lechner estimated 80 percent of designs didn’t make it to the final movie, his team can tweak elements to fit new storylines. For example, a scene featuring a Bunny Burrow house was cut, but the house design was adapted to become the train station in the final version of the film. For every shot, the art direc- tor oversees sketch creation, which the modeling department digitally arranges. Next, the looks department, supervised by the production director, takes these basic shapes and adds textures, surface colors, and other artifi- cially created details. The opti- mization team uses a program to bounce light off shapes to further render color and detail. The pro- cess for each scene takes about a month and a half, though the teams do work on multiple scenes concurrently. A delightfully bumbling tale of talking, two-footed animals needs an environment with the zeal to match. With its large scale and lovingly crafted details, “Zoo- topia” delivers. “Zootopia” will be released on March 4, 2016. Baroque quartet By DAYTON HARE Daily Arts Writer Music making is, and always has been, a communal activity. Though we lack an abundance of concrete docu- mentation, it is likely that the very earli- est instances of music making involved com- munities of people coming together to sing and play early percussion instruments. Over time these gatherings developed in complexity and rit- ualistic practices — both social and spiritual — sprang up around them, many of which still exist in some form today. However, in many tradition music mak- ing also began to become more grandiose, slowly becoming dis- connected with its communal roots. This is arguably the case with the European tradition of classical music, as is particularly evident in the advent of large symphonic orchestras and the ‘opera-as-spectacle’ culture that has developed over the last sev- eral centuries. Despite all this, the social nature of music making is still very evident in specific areas, notably that of chamber music. It is often chamber musicians, rather than large ensembles, who can be found participating in outreach events and com- munity activities (a fact which, granted, has as much to do with organizational challenges as ensemble ethos), but chamber music’s social nature is perhaps most obvious in the closeness of the performers. In the early history of cham- ber music, often it was played by a group of friends for personal enjoyment, and in today’s profes- sional world this is still the case for many performers. Ensemble Nevermind, the group of friends who will be bringing their music to Ann Arbor on Wednesday evening, is no exception. “I used to study the modern flute for pedagogie, and Baroque flute,” Anna Besson, who is the flutist of Ensemble Nevermind, said in an interview with The Michigan Daily. “And Robin, the gamba player, and Jean, the harpsichord player, used to study the viola da gamba and harpsichord because it’s really [the] early music department.” Besson went on to explain the origins of Ensemble Nevermind in more detail, and how the play- ers metas peers at conservatory. “So we basically met at Con- servatoire supérieur de Paris … except Louis, we all used to study there. We started to play together in another ensemble, with singers, and finally we just found out that it worked very well, the four of us,” Besson said. “We used to get all together for chamber music or for our exami- nations, for example … we used to share our friendship just to participate [in] each examina- tion. And so we decided, because we were close friends, to go ahead after our studies and start something together.” The four founders of Ensem- ble Nevermind — Besson, Louis Creac’h, Robin Pharo and Jean Rondeau — brought the group into existence about three years ago, creating a perfor- mance group which special- izes in chamber music from the Baroque period (c. 1600-1750). “For concerts, of course, it’s a quartet, so we can play music from, I would say, end of 17th century … until, I would say the end of [the] 18th century, because after this period of course harp- sichord and viola da gamba disappear from orchestras and music chambers, because of the Revolution.” In addition to their profes- sional specialization in Baroque and other early music, the youthful friends of Ensemble Nevermind enjoy playing other genres together for recreation. “For fun, we like to play a lot of music, so we improvise a lot when rehearsing,” Besson said. “It can be like contemporary music, or jazz music, or tradi- tional music, it depends. It helps … to relax also.” Besson also spoke about the ensemble’s upcoming perfor- mance in Ann Arbor this week, saying the program to be pre- sented will largely be for quartet “In Baroque music ensembles you always have a trio, even if there are four musicians, because two of them are playing basso continuo, so they play the same part,” Besson said. “And we’ve decided to really play music for quartet, which means that viola da gamba and harpsi- chord have two separate parts.” Besson also described some of the specific pieces Ensemble Nevermind will be performing, detailing her history with them and talking about the compos- ers. “When we decided to read the “Paris Quartet,” by [Georg Philipp] Telemann, which are very [sic] written for quartet, it was like really what we wanted to do,” Besson said. “Because we perform like a string quar- tet, in fact — there is no leader, it is ensemble, we just act like if we’re a string quartet. With a first violin, second violin, alto — ah well, viola — and cello, it’s really the same.” Ensemble Nevermind’s CD of Quentin and Guillemain, among other composers, will be coming out on the 22nd of March, the first release of the group. “[François] Couperin [is] the last composer we will play, because sometimes you have the continuo with harpsichord and viola da gamba, but sometimes the gamba also plays a soloist part,” Besson said. “So some- times it’s a trio, sometimes it’s a quartet, so this is very interest- ing, it’s in between.” Besson also explained some of the philosophical reasons behind what Ensemble Nev- ermind does, and the goals of the group in terms of societal impact. “Usually people always ask ‘Why ‘Nevermind?’ ’ And in a way — yes we are French, but it doesn’t matter, in the sense that music belongs to everybody,” Besson said. “It doesn’t belong to people from 60 years-old, as we usually see in the concert hall, at least in France. And (the age discrepancy) is a pity, because we want to touch everybody, and especially young people.” Besson concluded on an opti- mistic tone, conveying her hope that through Ensemble Never- mind’s music they might change the way early music is perceived. “So maybe, with the fact that we have taken some funny pic- tures, and some videos that we’re not wearing black clothes — we just want to change a bit this vision of Baroque music … music belongs to everybody. There is not an age to listen to Baroque or classical music.” COMMUNITY CULTURE PREVIEW Ensemble Nevermind Wed., Feb. 24, 8 p.m. Walgreen Drama Center Free KANYE WEEK Why I don’t love ’Ye By KEN SELANDER Daily Arts Writer I have a very dirty secret that will make most people with a musical inclination gasp: I’ve never listened to much Kanye. As terrible as this might sound, let me reflect on how I caught myself commit- ting such an unspeakable hip-hop sin. You see, there’s a lot of music out there in the world — a whole lot. If you want to bring out some fancier words you could say there’s a pleth- ora, or perhaps a surplus. So much that one doesn’t have time to listen to all there is. I’ve never listened to The College Dropout or 808s & Heartbreak. And yes, of course I’ve heard singles like “Heart- less,” “Jesus Walks” and “The New Workout Plan” at a party or in a friend’s car. But there’s just so much of Yeezy’s discography I don’t know. Are you angry with me? Or just disappointed? That’s OK. Let me bring the discussion to a place you might find yourself, too. When I browse around Spo- tify or YouTube and find some tune that will keep me feeling good while I’m strolling around campus, I don’t just listen to it a few times and then put it on the shelf. I abuse the song. I listen until I know all of the words. I press play until I dread the song, until I can’t enjoy it for the next six months because I’m so sick of hearing it by the time I’m done with it. I’m currently in the mid- dle of this process with much of the Arctic Monkeys discography and Born Sinner by J. Cole. Listening to a song this fre- quently, or at least in relation to all the other music available, is taxing and time consuming. One artist I simply haven’t focused on is Kanye West, but I do have some working knowledge of his work because hearing his songs is inevitable. While it seems he’s advanced to a miraculous level of media attention since some- where around the time he inter- rupted Taylor Swift at the VMAs, his music has been on the radio far before that. “Gold Digger,” “Flash- ing Lights” and “N****s in Paris” are prime examples of songs I’ve heard despite the dense walls of the rock I live under. Being conscious of my gap in popular music knowledge, I fig- ured I’d give Yeezus a play when it came out. All the hype was there. I figured it’d prove to be solid ammunition for some future casual conversa- tions. But man, it was harsh on the ears. I had to cut my listening short somewhere in the middle of “Blood on the Leaves.” For all I know, “Guilt Trip” “Send It Up” and “Bound 2” may be rad tunes, but I wasn’t feeling it. I know what Kanye was doing, but he did too much: Yeezus was too artificially artsy for me to take any joy out of it. Kanye was simply trying too hard, but then again that’s Kanye as I understand it. Yeezus was not my jam. I said it. I’ll start bracing myself for the shit storm. So as bizarre as it sounds, I’ve barely listened to any Kanye and I despise Yeezus. I’ll listen to The Life of Pablo, though I fear it’ll be akin to Yeezus, but appearances by Kendrick and Chance the Rapper sound appealing. Classic Kanye records will definitely make their way to my playlist in the coming months when I get around to it, but as a student there’s only so much time to listen to music and I simply haven’t prioritized Mr. West. The Michigan Daily — michigandaily.com Arts Wednesday, February 24, 2016 — 5A FILM PREVIEW