6A — Monday, October 12, 2015 Arts The Michigan Daily — michigandaily.com EVENT REVIEW Sui recounts her life By CAROLINE FILIPS Daily Arts Writer The world of Anna Sui is ever- evolving, consistently arresting and above all, unlike any other. For the past 34 years, the Detroit-born fashion designer has absorbed the intricacies of countless cultures and rendered them wearable, an approach best epitomized by her offi- cial Instagram bio. “I invite my friends around the world to share a peak into my mind,” it reads. Last Thursday, a near-packed Michigan Theater caught a glimpse of Sui’s wordly psyche as she shared her story of breaking into the fashion industry, creating an enduring inter- national brand and staying true to herself. As part of the Penny Stamps Speaker Series collaboration with The Institute for the Humanities and Detroit Creative Corridors Center (dc3), Sui spoke in a conversation for- mat with Detroit-based fashion styl- ist Paulina Petkoski. “We’re always happy when we can find people from the area who have gone on to find success,” said Chrisstina Hamilton, director of the speaker series. “She’s been so suc- cessful internationally and across markets.” Hamilton prefaced the discussion with a synopsis of the recent New York Times article by Guy Treaty, “When Fashion Shows Were Fun” — a wistful recount of the industry’s incipient years of playful spectacle, a far cry from today’s over-commer- cialization. And yet, Treaty applauds Sui’s everlasting contingency on exu- berance and lauds her as the high point of New York Fashion Week. “Today, the most fun is always to be had at an Anna Sui show,” Hamil- ton said. “Her collections take you on a journey that’s unparalleled in the fashion industry.” Sui’s initial fashion fascination is a familiar tale — a childhood marked by lusting over the glossy pages of fashion magazines, adorn- ing bedroom walls with captivat- ing snippets and industry profiles. She recalled her formative years as a time of obsession for all things rock ‘n’ roll, television and of course, fashion — inspirations that continue to manifest into her collections. “I think growing up in the sub- urbs, I was just purely a product of pop culture,” Sui said. “As a kid you just think you have to find the magic key and I think, from that point on, I was really living my dream.” Along with collaging her dream world, Sui diligently researched design schools and ultimately decid- ed on Parsons School of Design in New York City, where she mingled with noted fashion photographer Steven Meisel, who remains a dear friend. Parsons also allowed her to break into the industry by way of eavesdropping. “I overheard two seniors at Par- sons talking about a job opportu- nity when I was still a junior,” she recalled. “It was with my favorite designer Erika Elias’s line for Char- lie’s Girls … so I took my portfolio over to see her and I got hired.” Under Elias’s strict direction, Sui learned everything from sewing techniques to drape work. To this day, Elias’s mantra resonates — “if you’re talking, you’re not working.” “She would say, ‘just inspire me, do what you want,’ ” Sui said. “She was a really tough boss, but I learned so much from her.” Sui then went on to cultivate the decade-long foundation of her first collection. She took on various free- lance jobs and spent seven years working on men’s collections in Italy, alongside bourgeoning design- er Marc Jacobs. “He was just a young kid obsessed with fashion, the way I was obsessed with fashion,” she said. After an experiential education within the industry, Sui debuted her inaugural collection. Soon after, she took her first trip to Paris to observe Paris Fashion Week in action along- side Meisel and a remaining slew of stylish companions. During their adventures, Sui and Meisel attend- ed a Jean Paul Gaultier show with Madonna — an experience that lent her the confidence to keep pursuing her craft. “We got to the show and she leaned over and said ‘Anna, I have a surprise for you’,” Sui said. “She opened up her coat and said ‘I’m wearing your dress!’ That was one of the big things that gave me confi- dence.” By 1992, Sui established her flag- ship boutique in SoHo, the first of 50 eponymous edifices. The decorum of red floors, purple walls, black lac- quered furniture, paper maché dolls and all things art nouveau became longstanding Anna Sui motifs. Though Sui’s work ethic speaks volumes to her success, she insists that a majority of her business ‘just happened’. Though it wasn’t always a straightforward path. “Practically every penny I made went right back into the business,” she said. “As the business grows, you need more capital. It’s a hardship worrying about money all the time.” She also refers to 2008’s finan- cial crisis as a reality check for the fashion world, but believes it prompted an era of analyzing and strategy planning in the ever- changing industry. Perils aside, Sui believes she has the best job in the world. Her knack for translating any facet of the cur- rent zeitgeist, whether it be modern phenomena or her recent travels, is positively uncanny. She absorbs the essence of everything from Victo- rian cowboys to her recent Tahitian travels and stunningly refracts it. “I think the thing I love most is the research, it’s kind of like my con- tinuing education,” she said. To those aspiring a fashion-centric career, Sui stressed the importance of travelling and the willingness to relo- cate, two markers of her own career. Her idiosyncratic aesthetic has also helped her elevate her business. “You can never tell if it’s for a good girl or a bad girl,” she said. “I think that’s part of the appeal.” For those who were unable to attend the lecture or Sui’s tropical SS16 show in New York, a sample of her distinctive clothing is on display at the Detroit Historical Museum as part of the Booth-Wilkinson Gallery exhibit, Fashion D.Fined. ‘AHS’ still not boring ALBUM REVIEW By DREW MARON Daily Arts Writer Say what you will about “American Horror Story,” but it’s never been boring. With “Hotel,” the horror anthol- ogy once more stages an all- out assault of every con- ceivable vice, repression and dirty thought, even if the final product isn’t perfect. Though the show has yet to achieve the poetic transcen- dence of the grotesque that elevated “Hannibal” into a mas- terpiece, it nonetheless creates a fascinating universe. Like all of “AHS,” “Hotel” is undoubtedly heightened, painting its world with distorted lenses and a dark, velveteen-hued palette. “Hotel,” like its predecessors, relishes in the perverse. The look and feel of the Hotel Cortez — the true main character of the show — can best be described as a fetish club, operating in an alternate dimension and run by the staff of the Overlook Hotel from “The Shining.” If “Hanni- bal” was about making the grue- some seem beautiful, “Hotel” defiles the sacred, daring the viewer with sadistic glee to keep watching. “AHS” is not pleasant, and many viewers will likely be turned off by the show’s utter lack of compassion. It’s also a little hard not to be distracted by Lady Gaga, who never really disappears into her character to the extent of someone like Denis O’ Hare (“True Blood”). Though viewers will come for Gaga, but it’s character actors like O’Hare who give the show its sense of identity. The “AHS” regular plays a cross-dressing front desk worker named Liz Taylor, who leaves as equal an impression silently reading a copy of “Ulyss- es” as Gaga does in entire scenes of dialogue. The rest of the cast seems to be retreads of charac- ters from previous seasons, but the amount of fun Kathy Bates (“Misery”), Lily Rabe (“The Whispers”) and Sarah Paul- son (“12 Years a Slave”) have onscreen is infectious. The majority of the story is beyond insanity, and it’s this commitment to the absurd that saves the show. Falchuk and Murphy’s style is like “Twin Peaks” and “Rocky Horror Pic- ture Show” had a baby that was adopted by horror direc- tors Dario Argento and James Wan. The whole thing’s so pulpy and melodramatic, yet so oth- erworldly, you forgive it for its transgressions, at least for now. The problem with “AHS” always ends up being its prog- ress as the season goes on. Sea- son one is often praised for being tied, even if by a thread, to the reality of the present. However, despite some of the hate thrown at it, season two (“Asylum”) remains the most memorable. It was this season that threw out the preoccupation with the real world and delivered some- thing that felt more like music, with characters being played like power chords rather than human beings. Edward Sharpe live By REGAN DETWILER Daily Arts Writer In my head, Edward Sharpe & the Magnetic Zeros aren’t just a band, but actually a nomadic tribe that travels from fantastical forest clearing to fantastical forest clearing. This is where they make their music circles, and I picture a lot of handmade percussion instruments floating in the air around them and that they’re mysti- cally glowing orbs of light. No one has show- ered in months, so everyone smells like a mixture of body, river water (that they bathe in) and wildflowers (that they sleep in), and this is exactly how it should be — the inevitable outcome of this life that can be chaotic and hectic and also undeniably beautiful, as long as we stay in it together. In fact, they aren’t just a band; they’re a music collective made up of two core musicians, founder Alex Ebert and Jade Castrinos, and up to 12 other members. Whether this qualifies them as a tribe or not, it seems to go without saying that their music is basically made to be played live, which is why their latest release, Live In No Particular Order: 2009-2014, is absolutely a dream. It takes songs from all three of the band’s albums, played from 2009, when their first album came out, to 2014, after their third and most recent album came out. My first particularly memorable encounter with Edward Sharpe and the Magnetic Zeros was in 2010; I’d just started freshman year of high school and the group’s debut album Up From Below, featuring the uni- versally beloved “Home,” had come out a year earlier. Knowing this song had gained the confidence of a junior I idolized — she was alterna- tive, cool, but unbelievably open, and seemed to always be in touch with the real magic of life: love and com- munity. She seemed to emanate the Ed Sharpe mindset, taking a gap year between high school and college to live in a sustainable farm community. I found it no surprise that her Spotify profile showed her listen- ing to Live in No Particular Order at the same time I was, the day it was released. The album opens with “Better Days,” a track from their most recent album, unexpectedly titled Edward Sharpe and the Magnetic Zeros. This song is a nod to hope and should be everyone’s go-to on a bad day. It speaks of how we all go through bad times, but what the hell: “down with history, up with your head,” because “we might still know sorrow, but we got better days.” For me those words mean we got better days in the sense that we got days actually better than the ones we’re living now, but also that we got this song, “Better Days.” In this sense, even if the future doesn’t look up right away we have this song, music itself and the ability to feel with others. Up next is the only record- ing from 2009, an NPR Tiny Desk recording of “40 Day Dream,” which is the first track on their first album — a little celebration of beginnings and a drop of honey for longtime fans who can appreciate the context. Then there’s the famed “Home,” which has over 100 million plays on Spotify and which the group man- ages to perform four years after its release with just as much zealous love and enthusiasm as if they were singing it live for the first time. They do this despite the fact that the rela- tionship between Jade and Alex eventually ended; now, instead of being romantic partners, the two are simply great friends and artistic partners. This time, during the part of the song where Jade and Alex usu- ally tell the story of Jade falling out of Alex’s window and he was falling “deep, deeply in love,” the pair had members of the audience come up to the stage and tell their own sto- ries of being home whenever they’re with one another, whether the love is romantic, platonic or familial. The last actual song on the live album is “All Wash Out,” which is the closing song of their 2012 album Here. It’s a solid minute-and- a-half longer, the time filled with added harmonies and hums from both Jade and other members of the band, and also with a final clap session from the crowd to go along with the gentle beat of the song. Dreamy instrumentals are made up of gentle strums on both the acoustic and electric guitar, trumpet, piano and a variety of drums, snaps and whistles. The added vocals and the already multilayered instrumentals (all played live) contribute to the communal feel of the song and the entire album thus far. Though much of the group’s work focuses on maintaining hope and lightheartedness through the chaos of life, a lot of onerous and intense emo- tion has obviously gone into creating all of this music, showing that the musicians may not only be remind- ing listeners to stay uplifted, but reminding themselves as well. It only seems appropriate that this last song tells us to “let it all wash out ... in the rain.” It’s as if the musicians are telling themselves to let themselves be cleansed of the emotion in all of those live performances, but also telling their audience to do the same. This sense of togetherness is perfectly encapsulated in the last track, which isn’t a song but simply a recording of a collection of noises, voices, accidental strums and nudg- es on the drums that were filling the air, presumably before or after a show. It’s called “All Together – Live,” and is the only track without a time or place in its title. Instead it’s simply about being together at a live performance: the band, the audi- ence, all together. A+ Live in No Particular Order: 2009- 2014 Edward Sharpe & the Magnetic Zeros Community Music Group B AHS: Hotel Season 5 Premiere Wednesdays at 10 p.m. FX FILM REVIEW ‘Malala’ nothing new By MADELEINE GAUDIN For The Daily “This is Malala Yousafzai, she is the naughtiest girl in the world.” The teenage activist’s brother says this to tease her, but for some in her home country of Pakistan, the sentiment holds true — she was “naughty” enough to be targeted by the Taliban. Malala became a household name in 2012 when she was shot on her way to school, following a decision by Taliban leaders outlawing the education of girls. Since then, she has become a leading advocate for human rights and equal education for women. In 2014, she became the youngest recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize. Through numerous television appearances, speeches, and her autobiography “I Am Malala,” the generalities of her story have become well known in the Western world. Davis Guggenheim’s (“An Inconvenient Truth”) latest documentary, “He Named Me Malala,” tries to break past the public image of “Malala” to the teenage girl underneath. However, the film comes across as an hour and a half episode of “60 Minutes,” scratching a surface that has already been scratched. Malala is powerful, and the work she is doing for girls around the world is inspiring, that seems to be all we get from the film. Malala’s relationship with her father is central to the film and provides the possibility for some more depth and provocation. The film’s title alludes to the formative role her father, Ziauddin Yousafzai, plays in her activism. In Pakistan, Yousafzai was a school owner and education activist, who, as we learn in the opening animated scene, named his daughter after a woman who used her voice to inspire her country to fight for what they thought was right. He was a vocal activist for education equality in Pakistan, making it on the Taliban’s list before his daughter. The question looming over their relationship is: How much did her father influence, or even push, her into this type of activism? It’s a question hinted at and skirted around throughout the film. The pursuit of its answer would provide “He Named Me Malala” with the depth it so desperately needs. What Guggenheim does capture is the stark contrast between Malala’s age and her role in the world. In one scene, she is shown laughing at clips from “Despicable Me” on YouTube, but is interrupted by a phone interview in which she is asked about death threats from the Taliban. Minions and murder aren’t supposed to exist in the same world, but for Malala they do. What is the toll of her type of activism? We know Malala suffers physically for her beliefs, but is she suffering emotionally as well? The film hints at these questions, but unfortunately decides not to answer. Guggenheim isn’t one to shy away from controversy in his films. His 2010 film “Waiting for Superman” criticized the American Public School system by asking tough questions and seeking answers. “An Inconvenient Truth” sought to find the, well, inconvenient truth about global warming and greenhouse gases. Both films prompted debate and discussion in a way “He Named Me Malala” does not. Perhaps that is because Guggenheim’s latest film is targeted at a different, younger audience. He seems to spend a good amount of time telling the audience, “Hey, look, Malala is just like you!” She fights with her brothers, she teaches her dad how to tweet and she even fails the occasional biology test. In that way, “He Named Me Malala” works as a YA documentary, aimed at an audience too young to already know her story. “He Named Me Malala” provides a wonderful role model for young audiences, but doesn’t give many answers for viewers in search of the human behind the media phenomenon. FOX SEARCHLIGHT We can’t say anything mean! Malala is too good! “Malala Yousafzai is the naughtiest girl in the world.” TV REVIEW B He Named Me Malala Fox Search- light Michigan Theater