8 — Friday, April 10, 2015 Arts The Michigan Daily — michigandaily.com UMix is right idea, wrong place for controversial film By JAMIE BIRCOLL Senior Arts Editor I honestly never thought there would be cause to write about “American Sniper” again. I never thought discussions of rape on campus and serious allegations against the Univer- sity for failure to adequately help victims of rape and sex- ual assault would be not only supplanted, but completely drowned out by movies. Mov- ies, in the grand scheme of things, are not important — use- ful, helpful, but not important. Human health and well-being are important. But the people have spoken. This Friday at UMix, you have the option of seeing one of two films: “American Snip- er” and “Paddington.” One of these films is entirely appropri- ate for UMix Late Night, one is not. UMix is about inclusivity, fun, social gathering where you don’t worry about the political and social implications of, well, anything — these are all things that “American Sniper” does not promote. It doesn’t belong at some alternative to Friday night shenanigans; it’s a serious film with serious repercussions and truly disturbing content. It shouldn’t have been shown in the first place. But it will be, so it’s only fair we discuss it. The decision to pull the showing of the film was a wise one. As stated above, it doesn’t belong at UMix. However, having seen the film and having commented on it extensively already (and having discussed it with multiple people with multiple viewpoints), I understand the argument for showing the film. I admit “American Sniper” is a one-sided portrayal of one white American male who’s tasked with the job of killing Muslim people, who are presented in an incredibly one-sided fashion, but that is not the point of the film, and it isn’t a verbatim recreation of the words Chris Kyle wrote in his book. This is a complex character with multiple motives and values. It’s a character study, not an overt attempt to promote American pride or violence. So stop associating “proud to be an American” with “American Sniper,” stop putting this character on a pedestal. Chris Kyle as portrayed in “American Sniper” is a disturbed, conflicted individual. The viewer needs to separate the book and the film: these are two different media, from two different writers, with two different goals and two different results. But even if appeals to the artistic intent of the work fall on deaf ears, perhaps a call for reason reaches you. Disagreement does not permit censorship. If you are uncomfortable with the film, then do not see it. Your dislike of some media should not permit others from partaking, and your opinion about that media does not supersede those of others; you are not infallible, yours is not the only opinion on this campus. If you are truly unsettled by “American Sniper,” then you need to open a dialogue. In fact, the University should open a dialogue by hosting a speaker, following the film, to discuss at length both sides of the argument (somewhere other than UMix). That is how we exchange ideas; that is how we achieve understanding. Sweeping the film under the rug and pretending it never happened accomplishes nothing and, in a way, proves a little cowardly. How do you expect to actually foster discussion and understanding if you only wish to shut down the conversation before it even begins? Whatever your thoughts on “American Sniper,” it’s impor- tant to recognize that film and art are meant to foster debate and ideas, not to succumb to your individual, preconceived notions of right and wrong. Director Michael Haneke said, “The ideal film scene should force the spectator to look away … if you want to talk about a problematic topic, the film itself should do it justice.” That we continue to have this debate proves that Clint Eastwood did at least some- thing right in crafting his film. We can spout all this rhetoric about sensitivity or free speech or tolerance, but neither side can rightfully claim to represent those tenets without shutting up and listening to what the other has to say. And in fact, the major- ity, even more than the minority, has an obligation to do so. This is one of the best and brightest campuses in America — it’s about time we, the students, the administration, the teachers, all of us, start acting like it. Open dialogue on ‘Sniper’ needed WARNER BROS “I’ve got the talking bear in my sights.” VICTORIOUS VOICES UnCommonly righteous. By AMELIA ZAK Daily Music Editor A generalization, by definition, is a sweeping statement or concept obtained by inference from specific cases. It is a word that refers to the process of using several personal anecdotes, or the collected experiences of others, to create an overarching statement or idea. The music industry holds a number of these abstractions. There’s the notion that rock music is dead, or that Spotify and Pandora are killing the industry, or that traditional record stores have virtually disappeared; the list is fundamentally endless. Enshrouded within these generalizations, however, is a kernel of truth. Next Friday, April 17 at Hill Auditorium, when Antwaun Stanley and Brendan Asante and his musical collective Video 7 take the stage to open for R&B and hip-hop legend Common, a few more generalizations will be left tarnished — perhaps even destroyed. In fact, Stan- ley and Asante, in tandem with Common’s inevitably moving performance, will trump mul- tiple routine assumptions of our apparently ill-fated music indus- try. At a fair price and with the most genuine of intentions, their opening set won’t orbit around preconceived notions regarding stardom, money or overinflated levels of hype. These more mate- rial elements are pertinent for heavy hip-hop performances. But not this concert nor it’s open- ing set; this performance is set to transcend the classic form. Bouncing off the acoustically unequaled walls of Hill Auditori- um, the music of these University of Michigan graduates will create a musical mural of hip hop, trap jazz and Motown, all with the intention of actualizing an envi- ronment of emotion, energy and inspiration with their audience. Stanley’s early introduction and successes in the music industry are almost prodigal. Born and raised in Flint, Michigan, it was at the age of three that Stanley’s mother noticed his impeccable capacity to carry and create a tune. “The story goes that I was in the kitchen with my mom, sitting at a little kids table with its per- fectly yellow chairs, and while she was cooking she was hum- ming ‘Amazing Grace.’ She slowly stopped and noticed me sitting there and that all the while she was singing, I had started to hum along and create my own version of the song.” From then on it was only a mere matter of time before the word of this incident and Stanley’s irre- futable skill was disseminated through the local neighborhoods and community. The infatua- tion for the young Stanley and his incredible skill moved from local to larger followings. Sony and Dreamworks signed Stanley before he eventually transferred to a Michigan record label. “I had a wonderful manage- ment team and eventually, so many years later, I was led to an independent label titled Bajada Records in Detroit,” Stanley humbly explained. With Bajada Records, Stanley released his first independent gospel project, I Can Do Any- thing, for which he was nomi- nated as “Best New Artist” and “Best Music Video” in the 2008 Stellar Awards, gospel music’s highest honor. Simultaneous to those successes, Stanley was a student here at the University pursuing a degree in Sociology and Music. His scholarly under- takings remained imperative, but Stanley’s artistry never strayed from his collegiate mural. Groove Spoon was a college funk band that Stanley and other musically- inclined students formed during their time. The group experi- enced great levels of appreciation and success across campus, from house parties to the coveted slot as openers to President Barack Obama’s 2012 commencement speech. After college, Stanley’s talent threaded itself into numer- ous other musical endeavors, expanding to contemporary funk and soul bands like Ann Street Soul and Vulfpeck. “I’m interested in anything that feeds your soul. And that could be jazz, that could be hip hop or that could be gospel music,” Stanley elaborated. “I find myself stepping back and saying, ‘What kind of creativity do I have today?’ and that could mean anything. Maybe that’ll mean I’ll try a little jazz or a little pop or country. However it comes out. It’s good to broaden your mind because, when you do, you are able to collaborate with folks who have a completely different background musically. And that could at times have you produc- ing something that would have maybe never come to life.” Once the inspiration is found, Stanley flourishes. By entering every musical experience and performance as an excavator of inspiration, the structure of genres and the music industry as a whole is belittled, and maybe even diminished. This ability to instantly broaden his talents in the name of creativity has manu- factured a musical chameleon with a particular zest for live per- formances. “Any time I go to a live show I leave with something — a piece of you is taken. You leave uplifted or empowered or ready to make a change. With live per- formances, and this one in par- ticular, we’re creating a theme of trying to see things in a bet- ter light – I think that is this concert and it’s mindset, all still under the umbrella of hip hop,” he said. The music and voices of the opening performance will surely do just that. Entering with their own genres and creations, next Friday’s stage is set to be ensconced with various musicians, instruments, and even one beloved Robert Hurst when Stanley and Brendan Asante’s Detroit based musical collective, Video 7 envelope the auditorium. Brendan Asante, an Auburn Hills native of Ghanian descent, is a more recent graduate of the University who aided in the creation of the Video 7 collec- tive here on campus over the past two years. Operating under the axiom ‘we don’t see genre, we just hear sound,’ Video 7 and Asante don’t want their artistry to just be seen or heard, they want it to be felt. Under numer- ous artistic mediums like film, music and even app design, the collective has begun to expand into a collaborative force of musicians focusing on the feel- ings associated with the experi- ence of receiving music. It’s easy to argue that this goal, the desire to make their music noticed and effective, is a high stakes mission. They’re asking for more than just placid consumption, they are looking to make an individual feel some- thing, whatever that may be. That is a difficult task, surely, but when a group incorporates a harp surrounded by synthesiz- ers in their live performances, instilling and inciting emotion doesn’t appear as burdensome. “Whether it be music, film, app design, whatever, we’re trying to be innovative and turning all of it into an overall experience,” explained Asante. “Instead of being just automati- cally processed because ‘soci- ety’ can already make you like that. Video 7 is doing things that, well we are just trying to rewire the brain patterns a bit and soak up just as much as we can because it all feels new.” Stanley and Video 7’s perfor- mance can’t be categorized or predicted. Drawing on influenc- es from the music anthologies of J Dilla, Detroit’s Motown music and modern hip hop, the set will be defined by the audience. They’ll bounce from the presen- tation of classics and modern pieces, then into a more experi- ential set where, upon the audi- ence’s request, any song, sample or beat that the onstage band presents can be instantly trans- formed with Video 7’s beats, their pre-recorded tracks, or by the very musicians onstage. “J Dilla was an expert at inserting a groove into what- ever he did. Whether it was his beats or his music, the groove was always infectious and got your head knocking. In this same form we’re going to be using the foundation of all the original beats but then tak- ing those classics and pulling the rug out from under them,” Asante said. Generalizations derail and distract. They are powerful, so potent, in fact, that they can misinform any ductile audience. But buried within each, embed- ded in some nook or cranny of the idea, lies some semblance of truth. There’s the issue of the ever-powerful genre, for exam- ple, and our society’s desire to categorize and define all music. Or the notion that most, if not all, live music performances need a certain level of hype or stardom in order to be truly effective. Surely both are true in some concert landscapes. But next weekend a jack-of-all- trades talent who bypasses the structure of the genre to find the inspiration, Stanley, is set to collaborate with an amalga- mation of artistry focused on innovation within the musical experience, Brendan Asante and his Video 7 music collec- tive. Before hip-hop legend Common engulfs Hill Audito- rium on April 17, one of gospel music’s chameleon talents and Asante’s assemblage of millen- nial talents will crawl through and melodiously destroy the generalizations. Common’s openers break musical molds FILM NOTEBOOK MUSIC INTERVIEW