100%

Scanned image of the page. Keyboard directions: use + to zoom in, - to zoom out, arrow keys to pan inside the viewer.

Page Options

Download this Issue

Share

Something wrong?

Something wrong with this page? Report problem.

Rights / Permissions

This collection, digitized in collaboration with the Michigan Daily and the Board for Student Publications, contains materials that are protected by copyright law. Access to these materials is provided for non-profit educational and research purposes. If you use an item from this collection, it is your responsibility to consider the work's copyright status and obtain any required permission.

January 28, 2015 - Image 10

Resource type:
Text
Publication:
The Michigan Daily

Disclaimer: Computer generated plain text may have errors. Read more about this.

So the ban on whaling in Oklahoma (Oklahoma!) may be the

most bizarre law in the U.S., but some laws here in Michigan are

still pretty darn weird.

2B

Magazine Editor:

Ian DIllingham

Deputy Editor:

Natalie Gadbois

Design Editor:

Jake Wellins

Photo Editor:

Luna Anna Archey

Illustrator:

Megan Mulholland

Maggie Miller

Editor in Chief:

Jennifer Calfas

Managing Editor:

Lev Facher

Copy Editors:

Hannah Bates

Laura Schinagle

Emma Sutherland

THE statement

THE LIST

IN THE BACKSEAT
Couples are banned from making love in an automobile
unless the act takes place while the vehicle is parked on the
couple’s own property.

NO HAIR, HE CARES
A woman isn’t allowed to cut her own hair without her
husband’s permission.

PANCAKE SYRUP DAY?
Known to few, throughout the state the last Sunday of
every June is known as “Log Cabin Day.”

DAILY VIDEO: ARE YOU HAPPY?

BUZZFEED, BUT BETTER

FIVE STRANGEST LAWS IN MI

HOOP THERE IT IS
In Grand Haven, no person shall throw an abandoned hoop
skirt into any street or on any sidewalk, under penalty of a
five-dollar fine.

WELL I’M SCREWED
Drunkenness on any train is prohibited within state
lines.

1

3

5

Wednesday, January 28, 2015 // The Statement

This week I sat in my Economics

102 lecture and learned about the
utility function: the relationship
between consumption and “happi-
ness” — conceptually measured in
fictional units called utils.

Despite pages of textbooks and

explanations from multiple pro-
fessors that economics is model-
based and not literally based, my
anti-arithmetic mind rejected this
form of measurement. How could a
small graph and equation quantify
human happiness?

But beyond this resistance, I

questioned why and when and since
when did humans feel the need for
this type of economic organization.
And if humans felt the need for eco-
nomic organization, at what point
did humans desire a moral — or
in some people’s eyes, religious —
organization?

Humans organized economi-

cally in the early 18th century when
Nicholas Bernoulli theorized the
decision-making patterns of con-
sumers. Between Adam Smith,
John Maynard Keynes and hun-
dreds of others, economics has
evolved, but always continued to
provide humans with a structure of
looking at their world.

When humans were nomadic,

they found a spirit in everything
they interacted with: the river, the

sun, powerful animals, great lead-
ers and themselves. The earliest
form of religion was through imi-
tation of the things they admired.
They found these concepts so pur-
poseful that they were driven to
imitate them as a form of guidance
for survival.

In his book, “A Man’s Search for

Meaning,” Viktor Frankl chroni-
cles his experience in concentra-
tion camps during World War II.
He observes that those who found
meaning in their daily routine,
despite their dire circumstances,
were the ones who preserved and
survived.

Karen Armstrong, a former

Roman Catholic nun, wrote in her
book “A History of God” about the
evolution of three monotheistic
religions: Judaism, Christianity
and Islam. One observation that she
makes is that the three religions, all
in their own way, believe God is a
figure that gives humans this type
of purpose. The line of thinking
translates to: God made you for a
reason.

Humans across generations have

found that religion gives them a
purpose. Though, in some ways, I
believe this sounds as if religion is
a social crutch, there is no denying
that it is also a tool that motivates
humans to think about their mor-
als, their ethics and their purpose
here on earth.

If religion grants purpose and if

a concept of purpose grants a suc-
cessful life, then, like economic
utils, fictional religious utils hold a
valuable place in our world too.

From the Pews: A religious util?

B Y C L A I R E B R YA N

ILLUSTRATIONS BY MEGAN MULHOLLAND

2

4

Back to Top

© 2024 Regents of the University of Michigan