4A - The Michigan Daily - Monday,_September 11, 1995 J e ~rI iuu zi J~.R Co SIGN ON THE DTnD L mE 420 Maynard Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Edited and managed by students at the University of Michigan I I MICHAEL ROSENBERG Editor in Chief JULIE BECKER JAMES M. NASH Editorial Page Editors Don't expect Duderstadt to pack hA' bags anytime soon Unless othervise noted, unsigned editorials reflect the opinion of a majority of the Daily's editorial board. All other articles, letters, and cartoons do not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Michigan Daily. Stri ngs attached What occurs when our leaders take 'U' cash? T his summer, the University held its sec- ond annual Leadership 2017 program. The program, which is sponsored and funded by the University, pays student leaders who participate approximately $5,000. It is de- signed to train these students in skills that will benefit the University and the student groups they represent. Leadership 2017 has some commendable goals. It presents an excellent opportunity for student leaders to become better educated about the inner workings of the University. The more these leaders know about the Uni- versity, the better prepared they are to utilize its resources and voice concerns over its shortcomings. The program also allows lead- ers of different student groups at the Univer- sity to meet, communicate and possibly work on joint ventures, strengthening ties between student groups on campus. Furthermore, par- ticipants are required to complete a self- designed project to advance the work of their student groups. Despite the program's good intent, there were several problems with the selection process and the funding. Heeding criticism about last year's closed selection procedure, the University sent out applications in an ostensible attempt to open the process to more students. However, those picked for this year's program ended up much the same as last year's: leaders of large student organi- zations - making the "open" selection pro- cess little more than a joke. Even more troubling, students should not be getting money from the administration based on their leadership positions at the University. This could compromise student leaders' autonomy in making decisions for or against the administration. The most glaring example of this possible conflict is Michigan Student Assembly Presi- dent Flint Wainess' attendance at the pro- gram. Wainess clearly stated during last spring's presidential campaign that he op- posed Leadership 2017 because student lead- ers received money from the administration. His attendance, therefore, contradicted his campaign position. Wainess cannot simulta- neously represent students to the administra- tion and be paid by the administration. His actions this summer betrayed not only his campaign position, but his responsibility to the student body. The Leadership 2017 program, if contin- ued, must search for other sources of fund- ing. Money should be solicited from sources outside the University, perhaps from alumni or from corporate sponsors. This would pre- vent possible conflicts of interest between the administration and student leaders. The University might also consider creating a class that can be taken for credit. This way, students could get training during the entire academic term, without giving up their sum- mers to unpaid work - which would be the result of uncompensated participation in Leadership 2017. Leadership 2017 can be a good program if properly funded. If the University is truly dedicated to maintaining a program designed for leadership development - which would serve students well - both the University and student leaders such as Wainess need to devise an alternative way of running Leader- ship 2017. E very year universities across the country wage war against each other in a winner-take-all fight to lure top school administrators - a rare breed of brilliant educators-turned-administrators with awe- inspiring track records - to their school with offers of unlimited power, bottomless budgets, a new home and hefty salaries. LSA Dean Edie Goldenberg was one of four finalists in the recently concluded search for the next University of Washington presi- dent. Princeton University wooed former President Harold T. Shapiro, whose name was given to the renovated UGLi library. Former Engineering Dean Charles Vest could not resist the chance of a lifetime to take the presidency of MIT. Whenever a major national position opens up, University PresidentJamesJ. Duderstadt, now entering his eighth year in the position, comes up on every search committee's final list of nominees. This summer, Duderstadt was under consideration to replace the retir- ing University of California president, Jack Peltason. The prospect ofa $243,000-a-year job as president ofthe statewide University of Cali- fornia system - which comprises nine cam- puses and 150,000 students - was not enough to entice Duderstadt away from the New Athens along the Huron. For better or for worse, depending on whom you ask, it seems the 52-year-old Duderstadt is here to stay. Don't believe me? Just take a look at the plans for his new half-million-dollar, 4,500-square-foot retire- ment home he's building right here in Ann Arbor - certainly a clear indication that Duderstadt intends to remain president or at least stay at the University until he retires. His retirement home, to be completed in mid-October, is located on a half-acre wooded lot worth $170,000 on Glendaloch Road, on the city's east side near the exclu- sive Ann Arbor Hills. Henry Landau will build the $470,000 two-story residence that comes with a ground-floor den and master bedroom that opens to a deck. (Negotiations for an Ethernet connection between Duderstadt's retirement home and the University's computers net- work are still in the works.) Duderstadt currently lives in the Univer- sity-owned mansion, the President's House, located on South University. The 13,000- square-foot, 22-room residence has housed all 11 University presidents since it was built more than 150 years ago. But Du'derstadt elected not to sell his other three-bedroom home on Delaware Drive on Ann Arbor's south side, which he bought 25 years ago while still a lowly assistant engineering pro- fessor. What is it about Ann Arbor or the Uni- versity that convinced Duderstadt he can never leave? Was it the passage of Proposal A in 1993, which slashed the cost of home ownership by shifting the burden of school finance to sales tax? Is it a recent 14-percent salary increase that put his annual compen- sation past the $230,000 mark? (There is also some speculation that Nike provides Duderstadt with athletic apparel that he wears during home football games.) Could it be the University's stellar aca- demic credentials? (We barely made the top 25 this year. We placed 24th in the annual U.S. News and World Report ranking of U.S. colleges, tumbling three spots from last year.) Certainly credit rating agencies will look favorably on Duderstadt's decision to build his retirement home in Ann Arbor - raters and investors like to see stability at the top. Whether Duderstadt's commitment to remain at the University will result in a mass exodus of deans and faculty members re- mains to be seen. Last year witnessed the retirement of the long-time provost, Gilbert R. Whitaker, and the resignation of the deans of the College of Engineering, Rackham and the School of Natural Resources and Envi- ronment. If this is any indication, then many more schools will be minus leadership in the near future. As a weekly columnist who spends far too much time looking over building per- mits and city records and surfing not the World Wide Web but Lexis-Nexis, I know it's time to get some fresh air away from the confines of Ann Arbor - to get a new perspective on life. Maybe Duderstadt will join me? - Cho is an LSA senior. He can be reached atjcho@umich.edu. JIM LASSER SHARP AS TOAST NOTABLE QUOTABLE 'The conduct that Sen. Packwood Is (accused of) ... would have been unacceptable at the time Christo- pher Columbus discovered America.' -Sen. Richard Bryan (D-Nev.) Pack it in Sen. Packwood's ouster has a positive side LETTERS Sen. Bob Packwood (R-Ore.), after al- most three years of political wrangling and a call for expulsion by the Senate Ethics Committee, has finally resigned from the Senate. Packwood's decision to resign, which he proclaimed to be "the honorable thing to do," came in the face ofan overwhelming 10,145- page compilation of evidence that shows the true extent of his misdeeds. In a 6-0 decision, the Senate Ethics Committee, led by Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Kan.), called for Packwood's expulsion. The committee's report depicts a senator who tampered with evidence, repeatedly ha- rassed and exploited female subordinates, and pressured lobbyists to provide consult- ing fees for his ex-wife in order to lower his alimony payments. His original diary tapes revealed that Packwood believed he had com- mitted a felony in his efforts to evade cam- paign contribution limits. Despite Pack- wood's self-proclaimed "honorable" resig- nation, the evidence in this report leads to the conclusion that Packwood has conducted himself most dishonorably. The Packwood affair is only one in a long line of Congressional mishaps. It is easy to cite the case as another example of corrup- tion and abuse of power in an institution already besmirched by the recent conviction of Rep. Mel Reynolds (D-Ill.) for having sex with a minor on his campaign staff. How- ever, although Packwood is resigning in dis- grace, this sordid affair should not make Americans lose sight of the fact that the Senate properly policed itself and recognized Packwood's abuse of his position. In light of the overwhelming evidence against.Packwood, expulsion would seem to be the Senate's only option. But a unanimous call for expulsion from the Senate has not happened since before the Civil War. Given this, the process leading to Packwood's res- ignation may be a sign of hope that the Senate can, in fact, govern itself. Perhaps this is evidence that the body of government that has lost the trust of so many Americans is finally making a change for the better. Or is it? Even after members of the ethics panel issued their ruling, politics seemed to be the order of the day for Majority Leader Bob Dole (R-Kan.). Mere moments after proof of Packwood's incredible wrongdo- ings were made public, Dole lobbied to allow Packwood to stay in office for 90 days - enough time for the powerful, albeit dis- graced, chairman ofthe Senate Finance Com- mittee to push through important Republican legislation, a cornerstone of Dole's presiden- tial campaign. By claiming it would take Packwood time to "get his things in order," and therefore insisting that the senator be allowed to stay and vote for 90 days, Dole put himself to shame while the rest of his party admitted Packwood had to go. Just days later, however, Packwood's date of departure was set for Oct. 1. As he leaves the Senate, Americans can breathe a sigh of relief - not only at his leaving, but at the message it sends: that behavior such as his can not and will not be tolerated. Daily neglects to mention safeguards in Mcard To the Daily: I appreciate freedom of the press as much as anyone, but there were numerous misstatements of fact in your Mcard editorial ("DUMCard," 9/8/95) which I would like to clarify: 1. First of America cannot add any fees, change any fees or change any card options with- out the approval of the Univer- sity. The card is the property of the University, not First of America. 2. First of America is contrac- tually obligated to provide a "no minimum balance account" op- tion for the duration of the con- tract. 3. Ifa card is lost or stolen, the value of the CashChip may be lost just as when you lose your wallet or purse you risk the loss of any cash. 4. The BankStripe (or debit stripe), along with a confidential PIN (Personal Identification Number) known only to the cardholder,allows the cardholder to access their bank account with- out First of America. No funds are actually stored on the stripe. Use of the Mcard in an ATM or at a merchant location requires the use of a PIN, thus protecting against unauthorized use (unlike Entree Plus). 5. Merchants cannot legally charge a transaction cost to the cardholder and any merchants charging such a fee should be re.nnrted fin the Micard OCffice. proceeded without inci- dent, partici- pants had an opportunity to provide comments. We listened to those comments * ,.~4 ~ 3 / #" Sound familiar? It should, for the notion of the "Com- pany Store" is exactly what the HEOCORE D AN and as a result made program changes to respond to issues and concerns that were expressedre- garding accessibility, utility and safety. We appreciate and encourage constructive and fact-based com- ments about the Mcard as we want to provide a service that is high quality and meets the needs of students. The Mcard program is new, large and complex, and the communication of accurate in- formation is the most difficult - yet most important - part of the program. Up-to-date information is available on the Mcard Home Page (url: http://www.umich.edu/ -busfin/mcard.html) and com- ments may be sent by email to mcard@umich.edu. Robert E. Russell Assistant Director, Financial Operations Mcard Project Director Resist 'U' schemes to control your pocketbook To the Daily: There once was a small town where everybody worked at the sam facto'rv. The owners of this~ University has seen fit to introduce with the creation of the new "M-Card." It would be easy to sit back and ignore this latest outrage, to say, as did the English Attorney General in Ireland of rebellious activities in 1914, that "this ac- tion is no more mischievous than any that have come before." Yes, let us pay this card no mind, and utterly forget the lessons of his- tory. The English ignored the ac- tions of the Irish rebels, and the next thing they knew, 8 million men lay dead in France, and Ire- land was a free nation. While it is perhaps not in our power to fo- ment armed rebellion or encour- age mass slaughter, we can still show the administration and the supporters of the "M-Card" that we have minds of our own. Let us not allow the University to func- tion in loco parentis by holding our purse strings. Refuse to accept this new card. Refuse to accept the asinine and offensive advertising campaign created by the supporters of this card, before the administration begins to believe that the students at this University are truly like the benighted "Theodore M. Cardman," whose life sadly re- volves around gloating over foot- ball victories and the grudging realization that "graduation re- quires I library visit per year." Students at Michigan are sup- posed to be among the best and I I 1 I I I I i I I I I I : 1 . ----- ----- I I 0~ I~ 0 I 0'i m=I 7MKI CD il CL . mcI Lo ~ o EI _ f tII U) I a, ~ e I HOW TO CONTACT THEM Ann Arbor Mayor Ingrid B. Sheldon