Sunday, April 29, 1956 THE MICHIGAN DAILY Page Threo LIBERALS vs CONSERVATIVES By PETER ECKSTEIN dence over the aborted expression Daily star write of the general will. POLITICS may be a corrupt field -no doubt it is. But nowhere _ANOTHE nlong-standing on- has the corruption extended furth- flit, and one leading to some tha rutefiexndef language confusion in isolating the differ- er than in the field of language. ences between liberalism and con- Terms which were once meaning- sservatism, was the conflict over ful tools of political classification terole of the state Jefferson have been reduced to mete jargon gave a reasonably good account of This deterioration has been most the phase of history through which complete and most lamentable in e had of h n hr hih the terms Iibrt1 and conseivative he generalizing and concentrat- With the cuirent retuin to favor ing all cares into one body of the term conserative inow ver has destroyed the liberty and the its proponents may choose to be righ of men in every govern- labsr it wis adje itires like "pi- pment which has ever existed under gressive" or "moderate we are at the sun." least hearing msre of a defense of v,°x bot sies.n Wee hea deiise oday, But it was not government per both sides We(e he levirx today, se Jefferson opposed, only that Robert Taft might not reply, as which violatedhis principle that he did a fe years ins s a news- "care of human life and happiness man's question. that I , guessed and not their destruction is the every man considered himself a first and only legitinate object of liberal and that he included him- THOMAS JEFFERSON ROBERT TAFT WILLIAM JAMES good government." It was a coy- self i the catrory t ... Every centralization a threat .. Every man a liberal ...Every demand an obligation ernment which aided society in the But if there is more defense of achievement of its wants which both sides there is still little defi- the liberal-conservative muddle been liberal, many have falsely happens to be enjoying good for- Jefferson favored. nition of either, accompanied by was made by Prof. Arthur Schles- associated the two concepts. What tune for the moment As increasingly poular control much misuse of terms. The Pres- inger of Harvard University and is important, however, is the dire- over the state put it on the side dent of the united States recently Author Russell Kirk in the New tion of change, not change itself. EXAMIATION of a few trends of fulfilling those wants, the liberal attempted to describe his own Vor' Tim s msazine. In the Iibeal's Utopia it i the in the dispute between liberal- view could retain consistency only philosophy by sayig that "In all After reecting several of the conservative who would advocate ism and conervativism might by shifting toward favoring a larg- those things which deal with ore 'uierable definitions Prof. change, throw light on the essence of both. er role for the state. people, we must be liberal, be mr unrbedfntos rf human. In all those things which Schlesinger settles on describing a The so-called "radicals of the The question of control of the through the human. I all thse thing whichCONSERVATIVESthog te deal with the people's money or liberal as one who believes that right" certainly advocate change state has been a traditional battle- ages have attempted to impose their economy or their form of "society can and should be im- to "improve" the status of society, field, the liberals leading the way a numr of restrain on the ex- government, we must e conserva- proved and that the way to im- and liberals object, characterizing tire' m tprove it is to apply the human the conservative proposls as at- in the evolution from monarchy pression of majority will and the eem yt . n inteiect to social and economic tempts a "turning back the clock." and theocracy to democracy as we satisfaction of human wants. There Presumably, then. conservative is prol'ms.' Schlesinger later calls The do so, however, only because know it. Conservatives threw many is often an appeal to the past, as to be translated as "tight-fisted" the conservative-liberal dispute a of the assumption that history is ideological obstacles in their way: when Edmund Burke described the and liberal as "generous," but the "contesr . . . between the past and on the side of the liberals, as gen- monarchy was defended as stem- state as "a partnership not only President's statement leaves us the future," between those who erally it has been. But history ming from James I's "divine right between those who are living. but completely in the dark on the very prefer courage and reason to those works, it is said, in terms of rear- of kings'" aristocracy was, in between those who are living, those relevant issue of using public who favor caution and reverence. tions and cycles, and when con- Hamilton's words, the proper rule who are dead and those who are to funds to meet public needs, servativism is on the ascendancy of the "rich and well born;" theo- be born." dCHLESINGER'S definition, with it is the liberal who begs caution cracy drew its authority from the Thomas Paine replied in the lib- SUCH dsaso mzye ay its emphasis on change and the and reverence. i"realed word of god." eral tradition when he wrote. with a contempt for "semantics" ambiguous term "improvement," is After the Taft-Hartley law was Boston clergyman John Cotton "Every age and generation must which is ussally reserved for "met- open to serious question. enacted, for example, many liberal put the theocratic case simply: be free to act for itself in all cases aphysics," both being considered Anglo-American society has groups proposed to "turn back the "The more any law smells of man as the ages and generations which a sure way to haggle interminably evolved from a fundamentally il- clock" to the New Deal's Wagner the more unprofitable" it is. Popu- preceded it . . . It is the living, and over arbitrary and meaningless liberal beginning in absolute mon- Act. The clock is wedded to neither lar sovereignty was unthinkable; not the dead, that are to be accom- distinctions. Yet impatient as we archy. Because the direction of side but is rather the hopelessly the will of God, his chosen servants modated." may b wish the truggle for a d- mst finitioy se ue stin e vmr wt me- ost change in that society has capricious mistress of whoever inor of the "well born" took prece- See STRUGGLE, Page I finition, we use the terms with a reckless frequency that demands definition as its only restraint. There seems to be something that binds together Jefferson, MACHINE WASHABLE "INSURED"PLEETS AND PRESS-FREE SEPARATES Jackson, and Franklin Roosevelt and that sets them off from Itam- ' 'ton and Hoover. something called FROM liberalism, something sie can sense and often agree upon, but have difficulty defining. A recent attempt at clarifying If you're looking for care free fashions, look no further! We've just To received a shipment of the prettiest cotton print skirts, blouses, and pants A ever seen and they require no care to LETTIR. keep them looking fresh and new. All are machine washable. .. the Pleetset skirts are UNSURED to be permanently pleated . . . the CAMPUS pants and matching print or contrasting plain blouses ore PRESS-FREE ! ITRErrA ill1l LETFR ON South. U. Scoopneck blouse 3.95 Odolisque smarty pants 4.95 FINE L;I'ITER PPERS I aswoiderful, the way beautiful IEato tapereuikens the urge to writ! You're