PAGE TWO THE MICHIGAN DAILY WEDNESDAY, JUNE 23. 19gt* iI WEDNE.L~uAT~i4D AFIXT1W r,10,11 e Social Science And Congress CHAIRED BY Rep. Carroll Reece (Rep.-Tenn.), a special Congressional committee is investigat- ing tax-exempt foundations operating in the fields of education and social science. The purpose is to determine whether the ideas produced and implemented by grants from the foundations are socialistic, internationalist, subversive or otherwise un-American. The justification offered for the investla- tion is that since the foundations are tax-exempt, they are subject to Congressional scrutiny in order to insure that untaxed resources are not used to encourage un-American ideas. A more blatantly dictatorial thesis is hard to imagine. It is the business of the government to provide, protect and encourage opportunities for creative thought and research in all fields of learning. It is clearly not the business of the gov- ernment to evaluate or approve thought and re- search, or to force them into channels leading to officially approved "truth." Do we not take the Russians to task for exercising state control over. their men of learning? Rep. Reece's investigation is not the first to probe the foundations. Two years ago, Rep. Eu- gene Cox (Dem.-Ga.) led a committee into the self-same area. Rep. Cox, like his successor, smell- ed a socialistic rat in the doings of the Carnegie, Rockerfeller and Ford Foundations, and was de- termined to expose it. His death caused the in- vestigation to be transferred to his colleagues, wh concluded that the foundations are doing a valu- abe, responsible job and ought to be encouraged. Rep. Reece, no doubt unsatisfied with such investigatorial ineptitude, acquired the chair- manship of a special committee and sent in- vestigators out sniffing. What did they find? The New York Times comments editorially: "It is a comic-strip cartoon of a small group of big-foundation trustees-an 'inter-lock' it is call- ed-which, through closely controlled grants to 'accessory agencies' such as the Social Science Re- search Council, the National Educational Associa- tion 'and the American Counci of Learned Soci- eties, has been responsible for a profound revolu- tion-in American research and government: 'em- piricism' in the social sciences (as if that were un-American), 'collectivism' and 'internationalism' in government." In short, the Congressional bloodhounds have detected yet another conspiracy-this one aided and abetted by foundations set tip by those pin- nacles of the capitalist system, the industrial mil- lionaires. The keenest comment on this sort of thing came from Pendleton Herring, president of the Social Science Research Council, while a witness before Rep. Reece's committee. He accused the group of "attempting to rewrite history" by attributing to "conspiracy" the many changes in thought and society that have resulted from men's search for truth under the rapidly changing conditions of the last haf-century. Indeed, many Congressmen seem unable to think in any but conspiratorial terms. It is as though they refuse to accept the verdict of events: if things have gone undesirably, from their point of view-(if we adopt internationalist policies, ex- periment with progressive education, develop new governmental techniques )-it is not because they have been wrong or that times have changed, but because someone has plotted and planned it that way. On these terms, you need never deal with any idea or historical fact on its merits-you can al- ways discredit it as a "conspiracy."' Let it be said that not all congressmen are capable of so degrading their positions. Rep. Wayne L. Hays (Dem.-Ohio), a member of the Reece committee, has been fighting a running battle for reason and, on occasion, for sheer de- cency. He objected vigorously when, a few weeks ago, a witness--until then, completely unknown -was permitted or encouraged to read into the public record a long list of names of eminent educators whom he averred are Communists or Communist-sympathizers. Rep. Hays has pointed out that the committee's staff produced a report "loaded" against the foun- dations, "dredged up" witnesses to support it, and that witnesses have been permitted to "peddle tripe." It is refreshing to hear strong and unafraid language hurled back at the tribe of super-pat- riots who currently afflict and harass the land. Rep. Hays was also able point up the dangerous ignorance of the committee's investigating staff. Interrupting the testimony of one investigator, he read three statements which referred sympatheti- cally to the needs of the "working classes" and cri- tically to irresponsible concentrations of wealth and extremes of poverty and riches. Rep. Hays asked the investigator if the state- ments struck him as Communistic. The investigator promptly replied that they sounded Communistic to him. Rep. Hays then revealed the authors of the statements: two Popes of the Roman Catholic Church, including Pope Pius XI. The investigator still refused to admit that the statements were not Communistic. All in all, a neat demonstration of the un- worthiness and the dangers of all attempts to give official labels to ideas, or to control the in- tellectual activity of a free society. The right of Americans to think and experi- ment without governmental supervision wil cer- tainly outlive Rep. Reece's display of primitivism and coercive orthodoxy. -Allan Silver 1Vew Books at Library Jarrell, Randall-Pictures from an Institution; New York, Knopf, 1954. Kesselring, Albert-Kesselring: A Coldier's Rec- ord . . . with an introduction by S. L. A. Marshall; New York, Morrow, 1954. Millay, Edna St. Vincent-Mine the Harvest; New York, Harper, 1954. O'Connor, P. FitzGerald - Shark! New York, The Case of Dr. Oppenheimer (EDITOR'S NOTE- The folowing is the text of a letter sent to the Atomic Energy Commision presenting the American Civil Liberties Union's views on the civil liberties questions raised in the Oppenheimer "security risk" case.) THE AMERICAN Civil Liberties Union has care- fully studied the report of the Atomic Energy Commission's special Personnel Security Board in the case of Dr. J. Robert Oppenheimer. We share in the gratitude that all Americans must feel for the Board's finding that Dr. Oppenheimer is a loyal citizen who, in the discharge of his highly-secret duties, acted with discretion. Within the area of our particular specialty, we suggest that the Board's procedure failed in due process, and in part infringes upon freedom of opinion-principles which are the core of the democracy our nation is striving to preserve against a world-wide Communist conspiracy, and which must be constantly exercised and reaffirmed if we, are to retain our faith in democracy, which is the root of our security. 1. In reviewing Dr. Oppenheimer's continu- ing associations with alleged Communists and their sympathizers as a basis for determining his security status, did the Board judge fully these associations along with other facts about Dr. Op- penheimer's record, particularly the Board's own finding of his loyalty and discretion? The Union recognizes, that in the face of a widespread Communist danger, there is need for tight security regulations, and has not opposed the consideration of a person's associa- tions in judging his employability in a truly sensi- tive agency-which the AEC certainly is-but it believes that such associations should not be con- sidered in a vacuum. Due process, as guaranteed in the Fifth and Sixth Amendments, requires that derogatory information must be weighed under the white light of all other evidence. This is not only a matter of elementary justice to the person un- der investigation but is of paramount importance to the government. How else but by a balanced re- view of all the facts can the best judgment be ap- plied and a correct 'determination be made? Per- haps the Board's decision was made after balancing these associations with its finding of loyalty and discretion, but the report does not state so specifi- cally. Thus, in the absence of such a statement, a fair public reading of the report might create the impression that a total evaluation, which would include the fact that over many years of work on government projects Dr. Oppenheimer did not dis- close any secret information, was not made. 2. Did the denial of certain information to Dr. Oppenheimer, prior to the hearing, which his counsel considered important and which was later revealed during cross-examination by the Board's special counsel, interfere with the fair hearings to which every person is entitled under our Constitution? While the Board's report describes the orderly nature and completeness of the hearing, a real ele- ment of doubt is created as to whether the hearing was wholly fair because of the failure to make this information available. The essence of a fair hear- ing, both for the individual under investigation and the government itself, is to have every bit of information fully explored, for by this process the full truth can emerge. We have noted the Board's statement that Dr. Oppenheimer had the oppor- tunity of confronting and cross-examining every witness that appeared before the Board; and we laud this procedure, but the question still remains if the information Dr. Oppenheimer's counsel de- sired wasn't equally important for the prepara- tion of his defense. Evidently, security considera- tions did not dictate the Board's decision on this point, for the data was used by the Board's spe- cial counsel in cross-examination. We now turn to the question of how the Board's report impinges on free expression. The basis for this opinion is found in two of its statements concerning Dr. Oppenheimer's con- nection with the hydrogen-bomb program. 1. Following the President's decision, he did not show the enthusiastic support for the program which might have been expected of the chief ato- mic advisor of the government under the circum- stances. 2. "We are concerned, however, that he may have departed his role as scientific advisor to exercise highly persuasive influence in matters in which his convictions were not necessarily a reflection of technical judgment, and also not necessarily related to the prgtection of the strongest offensive mili- tary interests of the country." In our view, the idea of "enthusiastic support" of a government policy as a security criteria runs contrary to the whole democratic concept of a free society based on free thought. The whole idea of a democratic society ,envisions the working to- gether of men with enthusiasm for and against a policy, and even men without definite enthusiasm. For it is this clash of views, this exercise of di-' versity, that has produced both the spiritual and material advances of American democracy. The atomic and hydrogen bombs were made because free men, debating together within a security framework, finally agreed. Dr. Oppenheimer was one of those men. Of course, it might be entirely proper to discharge a man as a government advisor because his advice was no longer desired in view of his failure to enthusiastically support a pro- gram; this is a risk which any man in public life can fairly be expected to run. But to stigmatize the man as a security risk for failure to overtly mani- fest such support runs counter to all our tradi- tions of freedom of belief and association. The importance of free and full debate within government councils, even of matters of the high- est, security importance is also Involved in the Board's statement that only .technical judgment should be given by scientists working on govern- ment programs, even though it acknowledges "that any man, whether specialist or layman, of course, must have the right to express his deep moral con- viction; must have the privilege of voicing his deepest doubts." However, the emphasis in the Board's report on Dr. Oppenheimer's departure from his role as scientific advisor does not consider the fact that the democratic principle of freedom of h~if s n4 nfrr~n o 4t. o;- if- ..,.. "You Remember Us. We Helped In The 1952 Campaign" STATE DEPT. -- " r p ON THE WASHINGTON MERRY-GO-ROUND WITH DREW PEARSON 1! XZettepi4 TO THEEDITOR The Daily welcomes communica- tions from its readers on matters of general interest, and will publish all letters which are signed by the wri- ter and in good taste. Letters ex- 1 ceeding 300 words in length, defama- tory or libelous letters,, and letters which for any reason are not in good taste will be condensed, edited or withheld from publication at the discretion of the editors. r( DAILY OFFICIAL BULLETIN The Daily Official Bulletin is an official publication of the University of Michigan for which the Michigan Daily assumes no editorial responsi- bility. Publication in it is construc- tive notice to all members of the University. Notices should be sent In TYPEWRITTEN form to Room 3510 Administration Building before 3 p.m. the day preceding publication. TUESDAY, JUNE 22, 1954 VOL. LXIV, No. 1S Notices President and Mrs. Harlan Hatcher cordially invite members of the summer faculty to an informal reception honor- ing the visiting faculty on Friday, the twenty-fifth of June. from eight until ten o'clock, at their residence. President and Mrs. Hatcher invite all summer session students to an inform- al reception at their residence on June 24 from 8:00 to 10:00 p.m. school of Education film festival on International Education. Thursday eve- ning at 8:00 p.m. in Auditorium B of Haven Hall will be the first of a series of films on international education to be held every Thursday evening throughout thesix weeks' session. The first one includes a program of three films on British education, and will be accompanied by comments from Pro- fessor Joseph A. Lauerwys, Professor of Comparative Education, University of London, and Editor of the Education Yearbook, an annual publication on world education. The public is invited. Ushers are urgently needed for Anna Russell concert at Hill Auditorium on Monday, July 19. If you are interested in ushering for this concert, please re- port to Mr. Warner at Hill Auditorium between 5 and 6 p.m. during the week of June 28. Cerce Francais: The Summer Session Cercle Francais will meet weekly on Wednesday evening at 8:00 through the month of July, in the Michigan Lea- gue. A varied program of music, talks, games; and discussions is planned. These meetings are open to all students and residents of Ann Arbor who are inter- ested in France and things French. No previous membership is necessary. All are welcome. Consult the League bulle- tin and the Daily for place, details, in- dividual programs. La Petite Causette: An informal French conversation group will meet weekly through July in the Round-Up Room of the League, Fridays at 3:30. A faculty member and a native French assistant will be present but there is no formal program. Refreshments are available nearby, and all persons in- terested in talking and hearing French are cordially invited to come. Art Loan Prints will be available for summer rental to students and staff in Room 510 Admin. Bldg., June 24-25. A rental -fee of 35c per print will be charged.-. PERSONNEL REQUESTS Allen Industrial Products, Inc., Battle Creek, Mich., a company seving the material handling industry and the contractors equipment industry, has openings for graduates with background in chemistry, physics and mechanical engineering. U.S. Naval Training Center, Bain-' bridge, Maryland, has an immediate need for three Librarians, GS-5. The City of Vassar, Michigan, is tak- ing applications to fill the position of Sewage Treatment Plant Operator. Ap- plicants must have education and/or experience in the field of sanitary or civil engineering. Applications must be filed by June 30, 1954. The Institute of Living, Hartford, Conn., has announced a newly estab- fished Supervised Course in Mental Hos- pital Practices to begin Sept. 15, 1954. This program, lasting one year, will in- clude two main phases, the first in the Nursing Dept., the second in the De- partment of Educational Therapy. Col- ege graduates may apply for this course; preference will be given to those with majors in Psychology or Sociology. For additional information concerning these and other employment opportuni- ties, contact the Bureau of Appoint- ments, 3528 Administration Bldg., Ext. 371. Any veteran who is eligible for, and wants, education and training allow- ance under Public Law 550 (Korea G.I. 3111) MUST report to Office of Veter- ans' Affairs, Room 555 Administration Building between 8:30 a.m. and 3 p.m. Wednesday, Thursday, or Friday of this' week if he is enrolled in the University for the first time. He must have with him his tuition receipt and any Veter- ans Administration forms he may have American Astronomical Society, aus- pices of the Department of Astronomy. Technical session. 9:00 a.m., Auditor- ium B, Angell Hall. International Mass Communications Conference on Nuclear Energy Develop- ments, auspices of the Department of Journalism. Session Six. "Biological Effects of Irradiation." Dr. Frank H. Bethell, Pro- fessor of Internal Medicine; Dr. Isa- dore Lampe, Professor of Radiology; Dr. James V. Neel, Associate Geneticist, Institute of Human Biology. 9:00 a.m, Rackham Amphitheater. Association for Computing Machinery Annual Meeting, auspices of the College of Engineering. General session. Address by S. B. Wil- liams, President, Association for Com- puting Machinery; and A. C. Hall, Tech- nical Director. Bendix Research Lab- oratories, Detroit. 9:30 a.m., Auditorium A, Angell Hall. Luncheon. "Electronic Computers in Business." John Spellman, Arthur An- dersen Incorporated, Chicago, 12:15 p.m., Michigan League. Technical sessions. 2:00 p.m., Angell Hall. Dinner Address by George J. Huebner, Chrysler Corporation, Detroit. Botanical Seminar. Dr. K. L. Jones wil Ispeak on VARIATION IN STREP- TOMYCES at 7:30 p.m. in Room 1139 Natural Science Building. Academic Notices Doctoral Examination for Don Edwin Dulany, Jr., Psychology; thesis: "Avoid- ance Learning of Perceptual Defense and Vigilance," Thursday, June 24, 7611 Haven Hall, at 10:00 a.m. Chairman, E. L. Walker. Spots and Dance Instruction-Wo- men Students Classes in golf; tennis; swimming; posture, figure and carriage; and mo- dern dance are open to all women stu- dents registered in summer school. Take advantage of this free insruction! Equipment for all activities is available for class use. Sign up for classes now in Barbour Gymnasium, Office 15. Exhibitions Clements Library. Rare astronomical works. General Library. Women as Authors. Kelsey Museum of Archaeology. Egyp tian Antiquities-a loan exhibit from the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York City. Museum Hours, Monday through Friday 1-5; Sunday 2-5. Michigan Historical Collections. The University in 1904. Museum of Art. Three Women Paint- ers. Museums Building, rotunda exhibit, Indian costumes of the North Ameri- can plains. Events Today Ballroom Dancing lessons at the Michigan League. Beginners at 7:00 p.m. Intermediates at 8:00 p.m. Coming.Events Department of Speech Summer Play Schedule: July 5-10, Shakespeare's HAM- LET; July 21-24, Mary Chase's MRS. Mc. THING; July 28-31, Sheridan's THE CRI- TIC; and August 5. 6, 7, and 9, Mo- zart's opera, THE MARRIAGE OF FIG- ARO produced with The School of Mu- sic. Season tickets are on sale daily from 10 a.m. until 5 p.m. inrthe Lydia Mendelssohn Box Office, north end of the Michigan League, for $6.00-$4.75- $3.25. All performances are in the Lydia Mendelssohn Theatre at 8 p.m. Interreligious Cooperation in School & Community. Thursday Lunch Seminar Leader: DeWitt C. Baldwin, Coordi- nator of Religious Affairs. The first of five sessions. Cost Lunch served. Lane Hall-12 noon. Students and faculty welcome, Reservations requested. Excursion to Henry Ford Museum, Greenfield Vilage &rEdison Institute ending with dinner at Belle Isle and Band Concert. Saturday-9 a.m. to mid- night. $1.50 plus food. Call Lane Hall (NO 3-1511, extl 2851) for reservation by Wednesday night. Linguistic Forum Lecture, Thursday, June 24, 7:30 p.m., Rackham Amphi- theater. Professor Bernard Bloch of Yale University will speak on "Linguis- tics as a Science.' Thursday, June 24-Duplicate Bridga at the Michigan League, 7:30 p.m. WASHINGTON. - Vice-President Dick Nixon, who has buised him- self backstage on behalf of Sena- tor McCarthy in the past, is busy again. He is trying to patch up all breaches in Republican ranks and get pro-McCarthy and anti-McCar- thy Republicans back onto one har- monious team. To that end, he has been holding highly 'secret conferences which at present make it look as if Dick himself might emerge as the chief leader of the GOP. Those attending the conferences have been Senators Dirksen of Illi- nois and Mundt of South Dakota, both good friends of McCarthy's; also Len Hall,, the GOP national chairman; Postmaster General Summerfield, the only Cabinet member still in McCarthy's corner; and at times Senator Ferguson of Michigan. McCarthy himself has attended some of these meetings. The general discussion is to the effect that Ike himself doesn't un- derstand politics, is weary of the whole McCarthy fight, so the less he is bothered the better. There- fore it has been suggested that Nixon should be the sole liaison with the White House, and that he will bother Ike just as little as possible. Furthermore, since Nixon, a Cal- ifornian, is something of a rival of Senator Knowland of California, the Nixon conferees would like to make Senator Dirksen the Repub- lican leader of the Senate at the next session. This would be a sop to the McCarthyites, also would help remove a potent Californian who could challenge Nixon for the presidency in 1956. So far McCarthy has promised to go along with the boys and be good. He won't jump over the traces, he says. Of course, he has said this before. Incidentally the Nixon group has not yet sucked in Attorney General Brownell or his assistant, William Rogers, the latter having been the last Republican to try to patch up an agreement with McCarthy, at Miami last Christmas. France Is Not Out Those who have seen Mendes- France operate in Washingtot ad- vise that we not discount the new premier of France. Judging from the heavy vote he got supporting his new cabinet, others in France feel the same. Though Mendes - France was viewed with a certain amoun of skepticism by U.S. Ambassador Douglas Dillon in his reports from Paris, the fact is that the new pre- mier has had experience in Wash- ington as first executive director of the World Bank. There, Ameri- cans who came in contact with him, including the first U.S. head of the bank, Eugene Meyer, found him most friendly to the United States and one of the highest type officials on the bank. He was anything but a left winger. It was Mendes - France's conten- tion in the early years immediately after the war that if France had gone into Indochina promptly and vigorously, the whole matter could have been cleaned up. He so ad- vised American friends at that time. Since then, and as the Indochi- nese war has dragged on, he has refused to go into various French cabinets which have had no pro- gram. He now believes the only course is to wind up the war. After salvaging as much as possible. Americans who know the new premier, and who conferred with him when he was last here in September, suggest that France may be in for new rejuvenation un- der his leadership. After all, France has come through with some sur- prising strength at times when she was considered finished, including the Battle of the Marne when the German army was almost at the doors of Paris. McCarthy's Tax Probes Senator McCarthy's statement that he will investigate a Demo- cratic senator for wrongdoing has brought a sardonic chuckle from one of McCarthy's Republican col- leagues, Senator Williams of Dela- ware. During all of this session of Con- gress, Williams has wanted the right to probe certain income tax irregularities, including those of senators. But he has been stopped by the Republican high command. Williams was given this right by the Democrats when they controlled Congress, and as a result, the pub- lic witnessed the strange spectacle of a Republican, Senator Williams. probing the tax irregularities of Democrats and given complete Democratic carte blanche to do so. Williams did an outstanding job. But when his own Republieans took over Congress, Senator Milli- kin of Colorado, GOP chairman of the Senate Finance Committe3, refused to give Williams the same power. As a result Williams has been largely silent at this session. Obvious reason why Millikin hob- care of his friend, Commissioner T. Coleman Andrews. Washington Pipeline Some of the big magazines which supported Ike so vigorously in 1952 are not at all happy about Sum- merfield's mail rate increase. Al Cole of the Reader's Digest, who handled the direct mail political campaign for Ike in 1952, com- plained to magazine publishers at the Greenbrier Hotel in White Sul- phur recently that the post office is running a smear campaign against magazine publishers. "We are being smeared," he said, "by our own administration." ... After all the squabbling over raising postal rates, the House Rules Com- mittee should send the postal-in- crease bill to the House floor this week. This bill would boost the price of stamps from three to four cents for first-class mail and five to seven cents for airmail ... The Rules Committee is approving a twin bill, raising postal workers' wages. Prediction-The House will ap- prove the combination postal bills, but I also predict the Senate will kill the increase in stamp prices. Farm Leaders' Handouts It now develops that certain prominent leaders have been col- lecting soil conservation payments for their own farms at the same time they have been denouncing those payments. Of all the farm leaders, Farm Bureau President Allan Kline has been the loudest in attacking the soil conservation program. "Payments for practices which have become a normal and ac- cepted part of farming operations . should be discontinued," he told Congress with ringing right- eousness. "Farmers recognize that the practice of adding fertilizers to tillable acres is a necessary and profitable expenditure for obtain- ing increased production. Pay- mentsishould berdiscontinued on those practices." Yet the confidential records at the Agriculture Department show; that Kline has been taking hand- outs for these very practices. In 1947 he collected $231.91 for con- touring corn and spreading fertili- zer on his farm in Benton County, Iowa. In 1948 he accepted another $113.08 for plowing under green manure. In 1949 he applied for $234 for fertilizer practices and an- other $54 for other conservation steps. This was prorated down to $212.14. Again in 1950 he collected $247.14 for spreading lime and fer- tilizer. His total application in 1951' was for $307.20, but this was re- duced to $281.43. More Farm Payments The same pattern has been fol- lowed by other farm leaders, in- cluding National Grange head Her- schel Newsom, who testified on Capitol Hill. "We feel that there is little justification for making (soil conservation) payments to the farmers who would automatically carry out necessary conservation practices at a profit to themselves without incentive payments. The inability of low-income farmers to finance these practices has been used as an argument for direct subsidy payments, but we cannot solve basic farm problems by put- ting farmers on a dole. We rec- ommend elimination of the present system." Yet Newsome has been accepting subsidies for his own 492-acre farm in Bartholomew County, Ind., ever since 1943. He collected $216.44 in 1943, and submitted ap- plications each year thereafter. In 1949, for example, he collected $105.25. In 1950 he accepted $199.05. In 1951 his mother, Mrs. Nellie Newsom, made out the application and got $90. NOTE-Farmers must make out complicated "intention sheets" and sign applications to collect their payments, so they can't claim the money was unsolicited. (Copyright, 1954, by the Bell Syndicate) Sixty-Fourth Year Edited and managed by students of the University of Michigan under the authority of the Board in Control of Student Publications. Editorial Staff Dianne AuWerter...Co-Managing Editor Alice B. Silver.... .0-Managing Editor Becky Conrad ............Night Editor Rona Friedman..........Night Editor Wally Eberhard............Night Editor Sue Garfield..........Women's Editor Hanley Gurwin..........Sports Editor Jack Horwitz......Assoc, Sports Editor E. J. Smith........ Assoc. Sports Editor Business Staff Dick Alstrom.........Business Manager Lois Pollack.......Circulation Manager Bob Kovaks........Advertising Manager Telephone NO 23-24-1 The Truth To the Editor: HAVE BEEN informed that, as a result of hearings conduct- ed by a -subcommittee of a com- mittee of the House of Represen- tatives on the campus, several members of the faculty have been suspended from their positions,' due to their unwillingness to ans- wer questions put to them by members of the subcommittee. A Professor was reported to me as having explained that if it were found that a professor was a member of the Communist Party, he should be, in the opinion of the faculty group responsible for such a person cannot be a good teacher or researcher. This middle premise is not self-evident to me. I think it is wrong. If men can still reason peace- ably together about such ques- tions I would like to state my rea- sons; but basically, I think you would agree that the only way one can determine whether a persoli is in fact a good teacher or re- seacher is to find out what he does in the classroom or in the laboratory. If we find that he is instructing his students' on tlh proper techniques of manning the barricades or taking over the pub- lic utilities on the day of revolu- tion, we may perhaps legitimately interest the FBI in his affairs, a particularly if this does not seem to be relevant to the subject mat- ter of his teaching or research. If - he happens to be in the Depart- ment of Poliitcal Science, he should not be dismissed. Such in- c struction might prove useful coun- ter-intelligence. Sidney Hook objects such men cannot pursue truth because of their Marvian (or Stalinistic) convictions. Who among the Pro- fessors is so devoid of humility as to claim that he is completely single-minded in his search for the truth? (You can no doubt name several; intellectual pride is well-known to be their besetting vocational sin.) Let them teach their little doctrines. Truth is greater than any of them. But for God's sake, let their students t freely consider them all, not merely the official "Truth" smil- ed on by the commissars in Wash- ington. J. H. Davenport Grad. School, '51 4. Guatemala Crisis By J. M. ROBERTS J.R Associated Press News Analyst Critics of the United Nations are citing the Security Council's failure to take any positive steps about Guatemala as additional evidence that something needs to be done to make the organization more ef- fective. Its strongest supporters would like to see that happen, too, but are not inclined ,to throw up their hands in futility because such , strengthening is not in sight, The extraordinary Sunday ses- sion at which the Council was able merely to express a desire for a cease-fire in Latin America came just slightly more than four years after that other Sunday session in which the organization was able to make the most momentous decision of its brief life. That was to inter- vene in Korea. The different circumstances of the two meetings point up perfectly the trouble with the United Nations. It is not united. Action at the 1950 meeting was possible only because Russia was boycotting the Council for the moment. Action last Sunday was impossible because Russia was right there with her veto. It should be remembered, how- ever, that there wasn't much the Council could do about Guatemala anyway. What is going on in Guatemala is, in the first place, unclear. The Council was faced with charges by Guatemala against two neighbor- ing states, Nicaragua and Hondu- ras, accused of fomenting the rebellion. But it was an appeal which the remedy sought was not very clear, and in which the charges themselves were vague. Russia took the opportunity to acuse the United States of being behind the whole thing. That was the tip-off why the Council could not decide between Central American states, nor even develop a line of inquiry which might make possible a decision between them. The United States wanted the whole matter turned