lb Wer 3Mibiigan Bait Sixty-Eighth Year EDITED AND MANAGED BY STUDENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN UNDER AUTHORITY OF BOARD IN CONTROL OF STUDENT PUBLICATIONS STUDENT PUBLICATIONS BLDG. * ANN ARBOR, MICH. * Phone NO 2-3241 "When Opinions Are Free Truth Will Prevail" Editorials printed in The Michigan Daily express the individual opinions of staff writers or the editors. This mus t be noted in all reprints. TURDAY. MAY 10, 1958 NIGHT EDITOR: PHILIP MUNCK Two Looks at Course Booldet PRO ... STUDENT Government Council's plan to pub- lish a course evaluation book is basically sound . . . providling the world "evaluate" is kept in mind. The Council proposes to send out question- naires to all freshmen and sophomores con- taining approximately 20 questions pertinent to an evaluation of a course. On the basis of the answers, providing there is a 50 per cent return of questionnaires cover- ing all major undergraduate courses, the book will be compiled and each course and instructor thoroughly evaluated. That there is a definite place for such a book at the University is unquestionable, for course evaluation of one sort or another takes place every day. STEDENTS go to counselors to receive opin- ions on courses, they question other students about the merit of a certain course, teachers often ask for anonymous course evaluations by their students at the end of a semester. It would seem then, that published evalua- tions, easily purchased by all who desire them would give both students and faculty access to information that could be obtained, but not nearly to such an extensive and unbiased de- gree., These evaluations can serve a three-fold purpose. 1) They aid orientation of students, primarily incoming freshmen, to University courses. 2) They can create interest in courses which might not otherwise receive notice. 3) They can, perhaps help improve the level and teaching standards of the University. ALTHOUGH the book will be sold rather than distributed freely, there is no purpose other than providing a service to students of the University involved. Indeed, if it were financi- ally possible to make this a non-commercial endeavor, it is certain the Council would "clear- ly" approve it. As it is, the Council is reconciled to losing money until the book is established "tradition- wise." However, it seems, that the good that the book can and will do, will make some sacrifice and financial loss secondary. THERE are those who twill say and have said that it will turn into a "sham." Some main- tain that it will become a "popularity contest," in which the more popular courses, although not ri*cessarily the best courses, will be en- couraged. Others say that it will not be an evaluation, but rather it will turn into a "criticism" in which as one educator so aptly put it, "the students will be trying for the teachers' scalps." There are these possibilities of course; how- ever, both seem unlikely primarily because it is SGC which is undertaking the project. It is obvious to all, and especially to the members of Student Government Council, that they cannot afford to publish a booklet which will prove a humbug. They are in no position to do so. The tide of campus opinion, although more favorable than at other times during SGC's short career, is not realistically nor conclusively wit)a the Council. Indeed, it would take little to turn the tide against it. An unethical, un- founded, biased course evaluation booklet could cause SGC to drown in negative reaction, and" for this very reason, the Council has no alter- native but to insure the booklet's success. --JUDY DONER CON . . IT IS NOT CLEAR, as admissions director Clyde Vroman pointed out in yesterday's- Daily, whether SGC's course evaluation booklet is supposed to help the faculty improve courses or to help students elect courses. But the booklet is not capable of effectively doing either. Underclassmen do not have the perspective to consider their courses in either the context of preparation of a major or of the aims of the professor who presents the material. "Do the readings overlap the lectures?" the sort of question which the survey would ask, is mean- ingless if the person asked to answer it doesn't know how important the overlapped material will be in the long run. Underclassmen are capable only of expressing initial reactions, and the faculty receive these from their own evaluation program and from observing students in their classes. Publishing the consensus suggests the nonsensical notion the faculty must be shamed into improving their courses. WHETHER the booklet would help students elect courses, and whether it should, is a much more basic consideration. If this is the aim of the booklet, although SGC never de- termined that it was, then it is not consistent with the Council's avowed concern with aca- demics. Giving freshmen and sophomores a guide to "gut courses," and encouraging them to evalu- ate the courses they are taking in those terms for others is not good educational practice. It is quite possible a student's recation might be favorable to a professor labeled as having "nothing to offer." If "nothing to offer" sounds harsh it is necessary to point out that Ron Gregg's com- mittee is using the Harvard Crimson's course evaluation booklet as a prototype. That booklet sounds more like the Harvard Lampoon staff turned it out-it labels one course " a real gut," its subject matter "almost indistinguishable." SINCE THIS BOOK is the pattern and because there is no reason to expect questionnaires here to be any more interesting to go over preparatory to publishing a booklet, SGC's course evaluation booklet should be every bit as superficial though perhaps not as funny. But suppose for a moment the staff Gregg has assembled from SGC and The Daily does a conscientious job. Suppose the students eval- uate the courses they have taken the past year more fairly, more carefully than they generally do in the faculty's evaluation. The book would still tell students things they should learn through the grapevine or by observation if at all. An evaluation booklet might say "the out- side readings are rarely, if ever, mentioned on the final" and no one would read any of them. It might say "the early lectures present material you can pick up in recitation" and no one would ever go to lectures. Maybe the students who would casually accept this little book as gospel are the type that would cut chronically anyway as soon as they found these things out, but there's always the possibility that letting a student who intended to sleep through college into a course which had a lot of work might wake him up. But SGC doesn't seem to regard this as valuable; they're going to warn this guy in terms he can understand so he can go back to sleep. -THOMAS TURNER "Naih -Wrong Kind Of Summit" ;~e. C' ,,. ""aM * wr S - r-" A R --9- - f 3 . r AT HILL AUDITORIUM: A vsharian Provides Virtuoso Performance WHEN reviewing performances of what are essentially amateur groups, one is often torn between the desire to be kind and the de- sire to be accurate. In this regard I recall an anecdote told of violinist Mischa Elman. Elman was on tour, and found himself deluged with a procession of local "musicians" in each town. So often in such cases, the visiting artist tends to give inaccurate judgements to spare- the feelings of the people involved. But often a comment like "A small voice, but shows great promise" would lead the poor family to mortgage the farm to pay for development of a talent which really wasn't there. Elman, upon being confronted with this situation looked up and said: "A small voice . . . but rotten." His wife never let him publicly judge amateurs again, but perhaps his point is well taken. After this lengthy explanation, last evening's concert by the School of Music at Hill Auditorium can be considered. Beyond any question, the high point of the evening was a performance of the first move- ment of Brahms' D major violin concerto by violinist Michael Avsha- rian; Carl Karapetian conducting. Avsharian showed himself to be a first rate mhusician, turning in an excellent performance of an extreme- ly difficult piece of music. The conductor had his orchestra well under control; it is remark- able to get this much music from a student orchestra. First on the program was a Mozart /piano concerto, K. K. 491 in C minor. David Effron, conductor, took this a trifle slow, but this is a matter of taste, of course. Pianist Nelita True played all the notes, but never got off the ground; instead, aiming for a restrained,' and fairly unsubtle approach which will not do with Mozart piano concertos. The Griffes "Poem for Flute and Orchestra" came next, played with a great deal of enthusiasm by a husband/wife (or brother/sister) team, Kathleen Course, flute; Thomas Course, conductor. The flute went into some difficlt passages and emerged'unscathed An unfortun- ate microphone placement allowed WUOM listeners to hear too much of the flutist's breathing, but this is a minor matter. Percussion was well managed. * t * *I WASHINGTON MERRY-GO-ROUND: Acheson A ffirms Dulles' Policy By DREW PEARSON MARJORIE CRAMPTON, a graduate student in violin, played the second and third movements from Wieniawski's second violin concerto. This is a typically uninspired and uninspiring mid-nineteenth century virtuoso concerto, which got a generally adequate performance under the direction of Harry Dunscombe. After the intermission, Arthur Hegvik played saxophone in Ibert's "Concertino da Camera," a jazzy, modern work for alto saxophone and eleven other instruments. Certainly this showed off Hegvik's not incon- siderable talents, although one wonders if conductor Robert House might have shaped the piece more. Perhaps not, Ibert is not a first rate composer by any stretch of the rule. Still, one must remember the saxophone literature is limited. The lone vocal selection was "O Isis Und Osiris" from Mozart's "Magic Flute," sung by bass Willis Patterson, and conducted by Howard T. Howard. It is difficult to assess Patterson's abilities on the basis of this short exercise in the declamatory vocal style, but it seemed properly solemn. Apparently, School of Music students compete for places in this concert; final choices being made by a faculty committee. This oppor- tunity undoubtedly is an invaluable one for these students, since it af- fords them a rare opportunity to perform and conduct under condi- tions approximating the "real thing." Thus the concert serves a dual function, since it also acquaints local audiences with contemporary talent. ! Y , WASHINGTON - A private luncheon meeting between ex- 'Secretary of State Dean Acheson and a group of Democratic Sen- ators recently learned that if Acheson were Secretary of State today he would follow practically the same policies as John Foster Dulles. Acheson gave some evidence of this during one closed-door meet- ing of the Democratic Advisory Committee when he balked at a proposal by Gov. Averell Harri- man of New York to change the wording of Acheson's Democratic policy statement on foreign af- fairs. Adlai Stevenson, another member of the advisory commit- tee, also wanted to change the wording but Acheson was ada- mant. The wording, he said, would have to stand. THE SENATORS who invited Acheson to lunch included Albert Gore of Tennessee, Joe Clark of Pennsylvania, William Proxmire of Wisconsin, Frank Church of Idaho, and the unofficial Sena- tor from Alaska, Ernest Gruening. They were surprised when Ache- son" displayed some bitterness at his old friend, George Kennan, whom he had recommended for the all-important post of United States ambassador to Moscow and who was the original author of the American policy of Soviet "containment." This' was the Acheson-Truman policy of build- ing American bases and a NATO wall, all around the Soviets to block further expansion. Kennan has now advocated co- existence with Russia, has indi- cated that conditions have changed since the days when he recommended a tough, uncom- promising policy against Russia. Kennan has also favored a de- militarized zone in Central Europe in which there would be no mis- sile bases, either American or Russian. Acheson in talking to the Sen- ators was vigorously opposed to a demilitarized zone. S * * *, ILLUSTRATING Arab bitter- ness, Acheson told how he had attended a meeting of Arab United Nations delegates whom the State Department had invited to a country club near New York. Acheson spoke in glowing terms of a new era of prosperity and peace in the Near East which would be obtained by rebuilding the famous irrigation works on the Tigris and the Euphrates Rivers. Acheson told the Senators how he had given the Arab leaders a picture of the good life ahead, told of the desire of the United States government to bring hap- piness to the Arab world, of plans to send in American capital and the great future of the Arab people through the development of this irrigation project. It was implied that they would have to forget their bitterness toward Is- rael. The Arab leaders sat and lis- tened transfixed to every word that he said, Acheson told the Senators. After he had finished they came up and congratulated him.. * * *, THE State Department, which has been doing a good job of get- ting foreign visitors acquainted with the United States, should keep an eye on some of its unof- ficial diplomats inside 'the U.S.A. They seem determined that for- eign visitors not get to know the American people who, after all, are a somewhat important part of the United States. In Prescott, Ariz., the State De- partment and the Governmental Affairs Institute are represented by Miss Lela Roach of the Busi- ness and Professional Women. She seems to believe that foreign visi- tors should see the Grand Canyon but not get to know American people. When Italian members of Parliament visited Arizona, great pains were taken that local Ari- zona newspapermen should know nothing about the dinner given in their honor. Again, when Chilean members of the Chamber of Deputies stopped off at the Grand Canyon, the press and radio stations were boycotted. This was not the fault of the Chileans, but rather the local unofficial "Diplomats" who had motorcars warmed up, ready to whisk the visitors off for a full dose of scenery with no contacts with the American way of life. (Copyright 1958 by Bel Syndicate, Inc.) T-David Kesse To The Editor_ . 1. INTERPRETING THE NEWS: From Secretaries to Summits A Year for Human Relations 197O MAY BE just another year in the Cold War, and there is always the possi- bility that man may pick that year to bomb himself out of existence. But there is a happier alternative: 1970 could become the most im- portant year in history. A group of clinical researchers, meeting in New York last week, called for an intense study of -man under a large-scale program similar to the International Geophysical Year. They pro- posed that it be called the International Human Relations Year, and be scheduled for 1970 in order to allow detailed plans to be made and the problems of international cooperation to be worked out. Although there would be many difficulties in setting up such a Human Relations Year, the rewards would be worth the trouble. Not only Editorial Staff PETER tCKSTEIN, Editor JAMES ELSMAN, JR. VERNON NAHRGANG Editorial Director City Editor DONNA HANSON,......... ,. Personnel Director CAROL PRINS .................... Magazine Editor EDWARD GERULDSEN .. Associate Editorial Director WILLIAM HANEY.................Features Editor ROSE PERLBERG .................... Activities Editor JAMES BAAD .......................... Sports Editor BRUCE BENNETT ............ Associate Sports Editor JOHN HILLYER. .............. Associate Sports Editor DIANE FRASER .......... Assoc. Activities Editor THOMAS BLUES...... Assoc. Personnel Director would man gain some the insight into his nature which he so obviously needs, but it would also, have the corollary advantage of being another valuable experience in interna- tional cooperation-perhaps it could develop into a habit. IF WORLD-WIDE enthusiasm were generated for this project, cooperation of the world's governments could be insured. The difficulties of international cooperation are, however, in- significant in comparison with the problems of coordination between the various scientific dis- ciplines which would be involved in the Year. For example, many University authorities in the social science fields said that the scope of the Year might be narrowed into one field instead of encompassing-as they said it should -all branches of social science. There is no doubt that there would be many serious obstacles in the way of setting up an International Human Relations Year. To do so, a hard-working, almost evangelical, organ- ization would have to be established. But with stockpiles of hydrogen bombs lying around, man must learn to understand himself; and this plan presents too great an opportunity to do this to let it wither away. -JAMES SEDER New Books at theLibrary Payne, Robert - The Terrorists: The Story of the Forerunners of Stalin; N.Y., Funk and By J. M. ROBERTS DEAN ACHESON, who walked out of the State Department seven years ago a badly bruised man, despite his high world reputation, is re-emerging as a public figure and a power in the Democratic party. Indeed, he -sounds sometimes like a man who is running for Secretary of State in 1960. His friends are quick to discount that. They say he took a lot of pummeling for four years, at a time when American policy was being adjusted to a complicated and dangerous new world situation, and has no desire to go back. His renewed activities are attributed to a belief that there is greater acceptance of his ideas now, and that he can talk without danger to the Democratic party. * * * IN FACT, Acheson is now credit- ed in some circles with filling a party need. This theory is that Adlai Stevenson, despite his world travels and careful studies of in- ternational affairs, is more theo- retical than Acheson and handi- capped by his two defeats for the presidency. Acheson kept in the background for three years after the 1952 campaign in which the Republi- cans attacked him unmercifully and undoubtedly damaged his prestige. He quietly practiced law in Washington. During that time the attack shifted to John Foster Dulles as it always shifts to any secretary of state in a period when complex problems are being met. that the Eisenhower administra- tion lacks the vision to do the job on these matters about which he agrees with it in part or in whole. This is a tried political formula. It presages rising Acheson prom- inence in and out of partisan af- fairs. And that's all, his friends insist. . * Summit Conferene .. . THE Western Big Three's sug- gestion that Italy might take part in a summit conference does more than pave the way for bargaining on the Soviet demand for numeri- cal parity between Communist and non-Communist participants. It is, probably even more direct- ly, a result of strains within the North Atlantic Treaty Organiza- tion itself. In UN disarmament discussions the Soviet Union has made a involved and their abilities to make an important contribution. There is recognition, however, that this position may have to be compromised later if there is to be a conference. The mention of Italy now lays the groundwork for bargaining on that point. THE situation within NATO however, demanded something on its own. Indeed, the Soviet sug- gestion itself is believed to have been based at least in part on the hope of making trouble for the Big Three. At the last meeting of the NATO Council it became evident that Italy and some of the smaller nations were worried by the tri- power domination of disarmament discussions, and by the big power ability to break off negotiations with the Soviet Union without too much consideration for others. Italy has been doing some be- hind-the-scenes agitating about it for a long time. For one thing, she- thinks a badly disorganized France receives a ranking above Italy in international affairs which is not warranted by the ac- tual difference in power. West Germany, Belgium and some of the other smaller nations subscribe to the general theory that NATO must not be run by Nixon .. . To the Editor: THE INCIDENTS which occurred during the visit of Vice-Presi- dent Nixon to Peru constitute an insultofthe most reprehensible nature to our nation. The Vice- President was not visiting Peru as a private citizen, but as a repre- sentative of the United States of America; therefore, the insult was not to him personally, but to our nation as a whole and to every individual United States citizen. Nixon is irrelevant. .Coming from a nation with whom relations have been close and cordial for many years, such an insult is all the more inexcus- able. If we don't demand, official apologies from the Peruvian Gov- ernment and the two institutions of higher learning (but appar- ently not of common decency), San Marco and the Catholic Uni- versity, we're not entitled to the respect we seek. Some persons may attempt to rationalize the incidents as Com- munist inspired, but unless all the university students are Commun- ists this doesn't mitigate the insult. Still less will it explain the con- duct of the students at the Cath- olic University, especially that of the president of the student body. To interrupt the Vice-President with the insulting remarks used is conduct of the crassest nature. During the past year a large 'number of foreign dignitaries have visited the University of Michigan campus, and were treated with the respect due them. I cannot imagine any student body in the United States conducting itself in a man- ner similar to that of the Peruvian, students, but if they ever did, I have no hesitation in saying they should be summarily expelled and denied the privileges of attending any other institution of higher learning. It is reassuring to find that common decency and the tradi- tional Spanish-type graciousness is not extinct in Peru, but when it takes the uneducated dock workers in Callao to prove it, it's time for the so-called intelligencia to do some serious introspective re-eval- uation. -Herman Siqueland, '60L Cleanliness . . To the Editor: MR. JUNKER has called the issue of "clean" and dirty Mr. Junker and the AEC have hinted that a "clean" H-bomb can have useful landscaping purposes in peacetime. This is an immoral rationalization for the uses for which it is now intended. No in- strument of war which will be used to kill millions of people whether by direct destruction or indirect radiation can possibly be clean. This paraphrasing seems like a nightnare in which somehow a children's bedtime story and Edgar Allen Poe have become unhappily confused. By some perversion of morality in this nightmare, the "good guys" are assuming moral leadership and "creating a moral force strong enough to keep world peace" by promising to kill those who don't agree with their par- ticular brand of ethics. -Torre Bissell, 160 Really? . To the Editor: A BOMB is a bomb is a bomb Arthur S.,Bechhoefer, '58 DAILY OFFICIAL BULLETIN The Daily Official Bulletin is an official publication of the Univer- sity of Michigan for which the Michigan Daily assumes no edi- torial responsibility. Notices should be sent in TYPEWRITTEN form to gRoom 3519 Administration Build- ing, before 2 p.m. the day preceding.- publication. Notices for Sunday Daily due at 2:00 p.m. Friday. SATURDAY, MAY 10, 1958 VOL. LXVIII, NO. 158 General Notices Spring Meeting, Michigan Linguistic Society, Sat., May 10, 9:30 a.m., Rack- ham Amphitheatre. A and D Open House: Fri. and Sat., May 9 and 10, College of Architecture and Design. Exhibitions, speakers, movies and demonstrations will high- light the two-day program. Exhibitions will be throughout the school and also in the area" surrounding the school. The public is invited. June graduates may now order their caps and gowns at Moe's Sport Shop on North University. Concerts Student Recital: Jack Heller, violin- ist, will present a recital in partial ful- fillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Music in Aud. A, I' {j. 4- A '9 -4 M', . k I