(Pr :Mt-rot ar Daily Sixty-Eighth Year EDITED AND MANAGED BY STUDENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN UNDER AUTHORITY OF BOARD IN CONTROL OF STUDENT PUBLICATIONS STUDENT PUBLICATIONS BLDG. * ANN ARBOR, MICH. " Phone NO 2-3241 Tr "I Think I'll Obhit Over To The Army-Navy Club" en Opinions Are Free rUth Will Prevail" I ° i : ° . . A. e -g . z 4II ~~ - - AT THE STATE: Brothers' Fights Film Adaptation T HE DEMANDS of the screen and the demands of a novel upon a story are entirely distinct from each other. Each form of creative communication has its own special conventions and advantages; differ- ent media often convey similar impressions to an audience most successfully when they use dissimilar means. Thus, it has been widely argued that in order to review fairly, a critic must apply to books and movies entirely separate standards of Editorials printed in The Michigan Daily express the individual opinions of staff writers or the editors. This mus t be noted in all reprints. .Y, MARCH 20, 1958 NIGHT EDITOR: RICHARD TAUB Deferred Rush Evaluation Should Wait Upon Facts INDIVIDUAL OPINIONS and evaluations re- garding deferred sorority rushing have only one factor in common--they are biased and uninformed to a large degree. Students on this campus seem to be unwilling to reserve judge- ment on spring rushing until substantial, con- crete statistics and evidence can be presented either for or against the renewed rushing schedule. Reasonably good guesses as to the effects of spring rush have been made by both indepen- dent and affiliated women. However, definite decisions should wait until both the Panhellenic study committee and the SGC evaluation group come up with opinions based primarily on their research. Comments on spring rush-from both soror- ity house presidents and housemothers on the lack of unity within the houses the first semester preceding rush seem to be campus- wide. Rushing, it is claimed, is one of the most unifying experiences the sorority goes through, and once this ordeal is delayed the house begins to lack unity and spirit. The newly-activated classes living in the sorority house for the first semester often maintain friendships merely within their own class and grow apart from the rest of the members. Emotional adjustment of sorority girls is believed to have produced several hazards to deferred rushing. Affiliated women had met freshmen girls in both social and academic situations and had built up certain attachments to some while others were lost in the shuffle. As a result tension began to build within the houses before rushing began. DIfFICULTY IN MAKING QUOTAS has been severely criticized by affiliated women. Pan- hellenic maintains that due to "flexible quotas" every sorority filled its quota - apparently meaning that the basis for determining quota was changed this year allowing most houses to take a larger pledge class than in the past. Individual sorority women have complained that their houses had difficulty filling -the de- sired pledge class, but until definite figures on this problem are released it should not be the basis of an evaluation. On the independent womens' side of the story, several dormitory presidents and house directors noticed a definite increase in partici- pation in dorm activities. The spirit accom- panying these efforts seemed greatly acceler- ated. Emotional adjustment of the freshmen, the primary argument favoring spring rush last year, was considered better this year by both the presidents and house directors. The fresh- man woman was able to adjust better first to the Increased school work and also to living in a dorm with a strange roommate (in most cases) before facing rushing and the emotional problems which accompany it. One dorm president criticized spring rush on the basis that some girls dropped courses for fear of not making the necessary 2.0 grade average for rushing. The University administration has also of- fered an opinion on the matter. Dean of Women Deborah Bacon reported In the 1955-56 Presi- dent's Report "It is the considered opinion of this office that given the tidal wave of college enrollment, the shift back to Michigan's cus- tomary deferred rushing will not damage the economic foundations of the sorority system in Ann Arbor. Academically it removes entirely the element of risk from sororities, since no one may rush who has not already established her 2.0 average." THESE INDIVIDUAL OPINIONS are re-iter- ated every day and each day they grow in their finality. The consensus among Indepen- dents seems to tend towards favoring springj rush; the consensus of sorority women defi-1 nitely favors fall rushing. However, both these opinions ignore the fact that SGC re-installed deferred rushing on an experimental basis for two years and hence changes in the present plan are unlikely for another year. One thing is definite. Spring rush will never succeed unless everyone involved in the pro- gram gives it a chance to work out its inherent obstacles and tries to approach the plan with an open mind. A fair evaluation will come about only after all the necessary statistics are tabulated and only' after all bias towards the program is for- gotten. Then and only then will it be time to consider all the arguments-pro and con-and to decide objectively on sorority deferred rush- ing. -JOAN KAATZ WASHINGTON MERRY-GO-ROUND: Postmaster Learns Lesson By DREW PEARSON judgment. "The Brothers Kara- mazov" was a profound and ex- cellent book. To watch the film version objectively, one must at- tempt to pretend for three hours that the novel does not exist. As purely a movie, then, "The Brothers Karamazov" is powerful, colorful, and atmospheric. Al- though the action is too fast and overly episodic, the film is united by a uniformly high standard of acting and photography. The color effects are marvelous. The story as it is presented, however, is dramatically shaky. The violently passionate relati6n- ships between four brothers, their father, and their women are stir- red together and briefly exposed to the audience before an explosion, resulting in the death of the father and the salvation of two of the sons, takes place. The note of sensuality appar- ently characteristic of the Kara- mazov family is struck at the beginning and played upon furi- ously throughout the entire film, but without the philosophical and psychological probing characteris- tic of the novel, the motivations often seem insufficient and the actions too quick, too unexplained. * * * THERE ARE'many characters in "The Brothers Karamazov,", and many situations. All of them are presented as equally important. Unfortunately, the result is not a dramatically dynamic film; rather, an amalgamation of interesting, static, essentially detached pic- tures. In this respect, it is similar to the much-touted, ill-fated "War and Peace" of several years ago. The audience is never given the opportunity to see one character long enough to really understand him. Dimitri, played by Yul Bryn- ner, and Katrina Ivanovna, his overbearing betrothed (Claire Bloom) are the only characters the screenwriter seems to have devoted any care or time to pre- senting. DESPITE the reviewer's state- ments about critical judgments, it is only fair to warn the reader that anyone who has read and even partially understood Dostoyevsky's novel may be made very sad by the film. The acting, especially on the part of- Maria Schell, is fine and sensitive; the story, although episodic, is interesting. Any level but the superficial, however, the movie either botches up or com- pletely ignores. Alyosha, Ivan, and Father Zos- sima have hardly more than walk- on parts and these are innocuous enough to be ridiculous. Occasion- ally, someone seems to have re- membered that "The Brothers Karamazov" is essentially a novel of ideas. These moments, since they are incongruous with the film's general tone, are almost always unfortunate. Chartacters are made to mouth philosophic platitudes and slogans with no apparent understanding or convic- tion at surprising and inappropri- ate moments. -Jean Willoughby Let's Get Down to Cases WASHINGTON -Cabinet mem- bers should know better than to try to influence Speaker Sam Rayburn by any means other than what's good for the U.S.A. Cer- tainly Postmaster General Sum- merfield should know this - now. He made Sam a political offer the other day and was almost kicked out of the Speaker's office. "You know," Sam told friends afterward, "that little . . . came in here and tried to buy my vote. "He wanted me to go for the five-cent stamp. And when I said no, he turned on a chessy cat smile and said: 'Mr. Sam, you could use a few nice post offices in your district, couldn't you?' " MR. SAM didn't detail what happened after that, but his aides say the Postmaster General left immediately, Note - During the Senate de- bate on the five-cent stamp, the Potmaster General moved into Vice-President Nixon's office while a stream of Republicans, plus some Democrats, filed in to get promises of new post offices. Summerfield had a map on the desk. Under the new post office construction bill, a lot of new post offices will be built, and a lot of them were pledged just before that Senate vote. To get an idea how the U.S. Senate has been shirking respon- sibility for checking on the quali- fications of public officials, here is the record of the Senate Com- merce Committee showing how senators virtually kissed Richard Mack on both cheeks when they first confirmed him as a com- missioner to the FCC in 1955. Sen. George Smathers of Miami welcomed: "We are most pleased that the President has seen fit to send over his (Mack's) name as a nominee. It has been my pleasure to have known Richy Mack for about 20 or 25 years and I have always known him to be a very wonderful young man, con- scientious in the things he has done and very able in the jobs which he has undertaken, and it is my own belief that he will make an excellent member of the com- mission." 4,* * THIS WAS not what Sen. Smathers said three years later, after Mack got in hot water. On March 5, 1958, Sen. Smathers stated: "I have never had any close personal association with him." The glowing endorsement Smathers had given Mack three years earlier was on June 16, 1955. If he had read the Washington Merry-Go-Round, as Smathers always does when Florida is men- tioned, he would have noted on May 27, 1955 that Mack was de- scribed as "a Florida Utilities Commissioner reported to be a friend of the telephone company." Smathers had three weeks to check further on Mack. Instead, he eulogized him. Sen. Holland of Florida did the same. He said Mack would do "a splendid job,"' had a "wealth of experience which should highly qualify him," etc. The only senator who bothered to ask critical questions was Mike Monroney of Oklahoma, a form- er newspaperman. Other' senators buoyantly, joyously embraced the Florida commissioner who later was to be fired from the FCC. * * MOST interesting inside devel- opment at the recent SEATO con- ference -- aside from intimations by our Asiatic allies that they wanted to pull out of SEATO - was a visit of Indonesian rebels to Manila. They hoped to see John Foster Dulles to urge aid for the revolt against President Sukarno and his allegedly Red-infiltrated government. Dulles.refused to see them on the ground that he couldn't be in the position of encouraging re- bellion against President Sukarno, but the rebels did see other Asi- atic representatives of the Free World, including the Philippines, and arrangements were made to give them undercover aid. The Indonesian revolt was one of the most important questions discussed at the meeting. Optim- ism prevailed that the rebels would win. (Copyright 1958 by Bell Syndicate, Inc.) WINTER ISSUE: Generation Excellent GENERATION is an exception- ally good college magazine. The layout and art work in the winter issue are excellent and the literary content of a high standard. Nancy Willard's "The Birthday House," an insert which is a chil- dren's book of sorts, exemplifies the flexibility of the college liter- ary magazine. Both drawing and text are unbroken pleasure. The three stories have their separate achievements and fail- ures. "Old Folk's Hone," by Louis Magyesi is awkward in exposition, wooden in description, and some- times crudely obvious;,yet it suc- ceeds, like many American short stories, by its accumulation of the detail of immigrant life. Translate it from Hungarian farmers in Louisiana to Yankee farmers in New Hampshire, and I suspect that the story becomes banal. A hard subject for Americans to write about with honesty is jazz. So many phony novels and poems have celebrated the jazz musician as the romantic outcast. Al Young's "Another Hairdo" is not about jazz, which may be what saves it, but it includes jazz and talks about it without becoming faked. The story is about a marvelous phony girl named Mirah who writes poems, and a jazz musician friend who, in a moment of inci- sive literary criticism, compares her work to the music of Guy Lom- bardo. THERE IS always the problem of depicting the revolting with- out making the reader revolt. Al- though Mirah would doubtless say, "Sometimes I feel like a little child who's trying to play grown-up." I could wish the author had spared us. The last sections, denouement and climax, are unsatisfying in the details of motive; one suspects that the author is bored with the story and is trying to write his way out as quickly as he can. Eight poems, one a translation, complete the magazine. Peter Zi- mel's "One, Beautiful'is the long- est and most interesting. I think it is bad-taken seriously as it should be taken-but its badness intrigues me. The poem is made of adjec- tives, which is like saying that the structure of a building is its paint. The nouns are apt to be weak and vague, the verbs transparent. Add adjectives to a prettified Eliot and you have the scheme of this poem. You don't make beauti- ful poems out of beautiful objects, yet all words here partake of the frailty. Yes, the diction is soft, the poem sentimental. What, then, is in- triguing? In the first place, Zimels has an ear which is using the line structure of free verse to create good rhythms. In the second place, for all the bad emphasis in his diction, the best words in Zimel's poem move in a crazy way that sounds like the poetry of someone obsessed with words, a good obses- sion for a young poet. If there were bone to this flesh, it would be worth a cartload of beautiful objects. -Donald Hall DAILY OFFICIAL BULLETIN The Daily Official Bulletin is a official publication of the Univer- sity of Michigan for which the Michigan Daily assumes no edi- torialresponsibility. Notices should be sent in TYPEWRITTEN form to Room 3519 Administration Build- ing, before 2 p.m. the day preceding publication. Notices for Sunday Daily due at 2:00 p.m. Friday. THURSDAY, MARCH 20, 1955 VOL. LXVIII, NO. 122 General Notices The following student sponsored so- cial events are approved for the coming weekend. March 21, 1958: Alpha Omicron Pi, Pledge Party, 800 Oxford. Chi Phi, Party, 1530 Washtenaw. Phi Delta Theta, Open House, 1437 Washtenaw. Phi Kap- pa Psi, Open House, 1550 Washtenaw. Sigma Alpha Epsilon, Record Dance, 1408 Washtenaw. Sigma Kappa, Pledge Formal, Pine Lodge Inn, Brighton. The- ta Chi, Record Dance, 1351 Washtenaw. Theta Xi, Party, 1345 Washtenaw. Zeta Beta Tau, House Party, 2006 Washtenaw. Wenley, Party. March 22, 1958: Alpha Chi Sigma, Bowling Party, Ann Arbor Rec., 1319 [N THE SPRING the birds fly North, the grass starts growing and someone sets the ma- chinery in motion for a summit meeting of the heads of the world's major powers. Just as the spring .always comes, there is again a move- ment to gather these government heads in some cozy nook for "top level talks," only this time the Soviet Union apparently wants a summit meeting, almost desperately. However, whether the Soviets want it or not there seems little point in having any meeting of this kind unless it is held on a different basis than those in the past. The major fault of summit conferences is that little of significance is accomplished as a result of them. During the last such meeting, it was the resolve of the heads of government to "reduce international tensions." Aside from this being a rather vague description of the discussion matter, the last meeting was fol- lowed by intensified propaganda barrages by all parties concerned, the Mideastern situation, the Formosan tensions, the Hungarian revolu- tion, the trouble in Indonesia, the appearance of the space satellite and an increase in arms expenditures on both sides of the Iron Curtain. Thus it can be seen that what "tension re- ducing" there was has a lasting effect of per- haps one or two days at the most. In light of this, it seems worthless for the United States to participate in any future meet- ing aimed at "reducing tensions" or at any such broad subject. The past has shown these to be doomed to failure. It is time, then, to try a different approach to summit meetings; it is time to limit and designate the scope and num- ber of topics discussed. For example, a meeting on arms would be limited to specific plans for disarmament or limitation of atomic and hydrogen bomb tests instead of a vague topic covering not only the military but social and political aspects of the subject. An even better idea would be to discuss the opening of a new front to the cold war- namely the economic front. Perhaps the United States should unofficially challenge Russia to another race, a race to see who can supply the most non-political economic aid to under- developed countries of the world. Certainly in the Soviet Union's attempt to convert the neutral countries to the Russian doctrine they could not allow themselves to be exceeded by the Americans in such a propaganda-loaded field. Nevertheless, the topic discussed is not totally important-what is important is that it should be very limited and very specific. We have seen that nothing has been accomplished by mere discussion of broad philosophical topics and it is now time to limit the scope of the talks until something concrete can be accomplished. There is a possibility that something can be accomplished at a summit meeting, if an agenda which provides the opportunity for dis- cussion of specific topics can be agreed upon. If such an agenda, however, cannot be drawn up, President Eisenhower would be better ad- vised to stay in the United States, devote him- self to national affairs and pour the costs of a summit trip into this year's already short government revenues. -PHILIP MUNCK 4 LETTERS TO THE EDITOR:^ Distribution of Socialist Literature Defended INTERPRETING THE NEWS: Speaking the Big Stick Distressed ... To the Editor: AM PARTICULARLY distressed by the acquiescence of The Daily in the intimidation of some Young Socialists last Thursday. I am even more alarmed by the sat- isfaction of Edward Geruldsen with the fundamental "Rightness" of our capitalist democracy, which has made us the "greatest nation in the world," as attested by "a standard of living unmatched anywhere in the world." Success is equated with right. Our system is the consummation of history. We must not tolerate destructive criticism of such a system. Maybe it's true that the Young Socialists, or Trotskyites, are a splinter group of screwballs. May- be we don't agree with them, per- haps we think their views are de- structive. But Civil Rights may not be arbitrarily qualified or they cease to be rights. Editor Geruldsen says:".. - the socialists should be prevented from continuing their propagan- da efforts simply because there are laws against their present methods." I wonder if Mr. Ger- uldsen's conscience has ever come into conflict with some of the amazing rules of conduct laid down by our various legislative bodies? What is a man to do when faced with A. n17Pgs innohbaloPi9law? 'af..fr The courts of the land have agreed that the first amendment is subject to the following limi- tation: Whatever the opinion, whosoever expresses it, restric- tions on freedom of expression can be applied only when the statements and circumstances in which they are uttered involve a clear and present danger of evils which the government has a right to prevent. We are currently faced with two dangers: the possibility of war and the possibility of depression. The national interests of the United States stand opposed to those of Soviet Russia. We should be exerting our most intelligent and flexible efforts to reconcile our conflicts without resorting to war (a method of decision that is no longer decisive and that would probably render unimport- ant the issues that precipitated it). The dreadful alternatives of peace with possible U.S. submer- sion vs. a war to preserve our brand of democracy can no long- er be simply stated on Patrick Henry's terms. We are not in need of unilateral unanimity but most terribly in need of discussion and constructive thinking. It is doubt- ful whether the suppression of revolutionary propaganda is worth the suppression of revolutionary the average man today what his worries are and he will say (1) his job and income and (2) hospital bills. We may have the highest average standard of living in the world but while the income of Oilman Paul Getty may be con- trasted with that of the college educated coloured man who sweeps the university stairs - why, there's room for improve- ment. Faced with such problems can we say we are an unqualified suc- cess? That there is not a more urgent need for change than ever before? We must not retreat into inflexibility. The government reflex of status quo maintenance at all costs is the surest way to self-destruction. The way must be left open for change; for sugges- tion and discussion of change, for criticism of every kind. Let's not even attempt to justi- fy it on moral or legal grounds. Let's just act according to our own enlightened self interest toward peace and a decent life for all mankind. Our democracy must be dynamic or perish. -Mary Meagher Memories,. . To the Editor, READ Mr. Geruldsen's editorial Sunday with a feeling of in- by some students at the campus UN on Saturday? I would further inquire as to who would deter- mine whether a deviant view was 'constructive' or not, and how the 'constructivism' of the view would be determined. Perhaps we could establish an office of Inquisitor- General, and supply him with rack, star-chamber, et al. I would remind Mr. Geruldsen that this country was established by individuals, many of whom held views widely divergent from those now generally accepted, e.g. Thom- as Jefferson and Thomas Paine, and that the United States at that time enjoyed an agricultural and commercial economy, rather than the present one whose multifarious blessings we were not privileged to enjoy until after the Civil War. I would remind him of the fact that, in this country, a person has the right to hold and advocate any opinion or philosophy that he wishes, so long as he does not slander nor advocate the over- throw of the present system of gov- ernment by force and violence. As Mr. Justice Holmes pointed out in the Gitlow case, " . , . if, in the long run, the beliefs ex- pressed in proletarian dictatorship are destined to be accepted by the dominant forces in the communi- ty, the only meaning of free speech is that they should be given their chance ... A By J. M. ROBERTS Associated Press News Analyst THE UNITED STATES has not made clear her position on the relationship between the various anti-Communist pacts she has spon- sored, and thereby is subjecting herself to criti- cism. First European reaction to the just-ended Southeast Asia Treaty conference has been to criticize its declaration in favor of closer links with NATO and the Baghdad Pact, on the premise that this continues undue emphasis on the military aspects of the world situation. The London News Chronicle praised that part of the SEATO communique which empha- sized economic, political and cultural coopera- tion, but asks: "Then why did the conference have to call for closer linkswith NATO and the Baghdad Pact? This part of the communique is a bad psychological mistake. The peoples of Asia do not as a whole care for loud military gestures; they suspect them." THE LONDON TIMES says little would be gained by linking SEATO with the other pacts. The United States has not envisioned such a link. Indeed, she is opposed to consolidation ,4 't,