-.1 AN., K I V 7 k 1 Page Fourteen THE MICHIGAN DAILY Sunday.October 16,.1955 Sunday. October 16. 1955 THE MICHIGAN DAILY ' vMe MM Vb4LV4 V ! IjJ r 9- 7" Individuality Is Their Beauty [T ALL DEPENDS where you place the emphasis-on what you wear or on who you are. The most interesting and at- tractive girls on campus dress with a flair that enhances their person- alities. Their clothes are appeal- ing, but what they wear never dominates the girl. Fashion magazines have their place, but the really well-dressed girl never swears by them. Fash- ion magazines are never able to say what looks right on you, as an individual - and that distinction means the difference between a nice appearance and a striking ap- pearance. THE GIRLS we have assembled on this and the following page are all distinct personalities, and they never let their attire ob- scure the fact. They wear clothes that are suitable to them, as a consequence making the most of their individuality. If isn't easy to say just what will enhance a girl and bring her into focus. Often it is more than trial and error, but a deeper matter of knowing yourself. To dress to your personality, you have to find your. personality. But theygirls bordering these pages have it-and the result is six well-turned out coeds. arit . Charity & Clarit --Daily-John Hirtzel SERENE-Donna Greenspoon, a senior in art education, has a classic, well-ordered look-and her clothes match it. Here she wears a favorite of hers: grey flannel box jacket suit bound in striped grosgrain. -Daily-Chuck Kelsey SPORTY-Sandy Hoffman leans back in a bulky-knit sweater of her own making. The political science major, now a senior, dresses casually with a distinctiveness all her own. White and red plaid skirt topped with white sweater. ;a?: "i ::?4i {ff;:*:y'; s5: 'W.."V.%. '%.~r.rr...v .I .-"se." . ..:.i ~ Sj'. ri{i a,;' >. yY j .r rJ . ,! y'!r,;;": " ? i+i;{+.'' ,:.3';+ 0 };;J v.."ns+ I .......: .:'.'M1'.IJ J:: fi : J:1'.'Y.")' .V::"f. :"'J::{''f:' f!'A it.'t::.'ll t: {.{ iI w .. .... .... y,... +; va .C7+ ? : {.}ten}",;rnt"t to .: ret^-: v:: r.. r + ""r.": .:c: n". tn"v r"+" ti" ?? "s. :.:S..fi.%?{'v .w".?. .vr}:v.. .}::{{" .rn .vas "xs.;7,.. ..r "n ""rv. r'ti"."r.""" xr: ":r . r.. .r:" :r ". .. :"". ::fv """.? . Svi : .y... ."?lYrw+.".vr: .... :G ?'". +:' Sr r.. {.". w+' .S u ...:r.. *~'"L... .. . ....: r:'.. ,:, .. ..:.,ri rr;..,......,. .....,si:":rr'ยข::r..r....",'"3'f...+??",.. ...r.,....... . . "i .., /."Y. :fit !;%s,.>,.. "s i .. ;'%i.... .,.... , ":r.", .f".? :.v.r.":":":: :"itvc."."." ...,.,..rr.,....:!r .rti} r, .".''a ".. "I I.... By KENNETH E. BOULDING Professor of Economics 1. FARMERS HAVE been grum- bling for at least 6000 years, not wholly without justification. It is the food-and-fiber surplus from agriculture-what the farmer pro- cluces over and above what he eats and wears-that .feeds the non- agricultural population. In an oppressive society the forces of law and the state cmbine to take this surplus away from the farmer without giving him much in re- turn. Even In a progressive society like ours however the farmer gets short-changed for a more subtle reason. In a progressive society, especially one in which agricul- tural techniques are improving, the proportion of people in agri- culture steadily declines. (In the United States, for instance, it has declined from over 90 per cent at the time of the Revolution to about 16 per cent today. There must therefore be some force operating to chase peple out of agriculture into industry. If this is not done with the stick it must be done with the carrot- that- is, industry must be more attractive than agriculture. The relatively depressed incomes in agriculture therefore are paradoxi- cally enough the necessary con- sequences of agricultural progress. 2. THE MAGNITUDE of the differential between agricultural and industrial incomes depends on the mobility between the two groups-that is, one the ease with which the relative transfer of re- sources from agriculture to indus- try can take place. If farmers are wedded to the land it takes a big differential to divorce them. If they can move easily, a slight dif- ferential will suffice to effect the necessary adjustments. 3. IN AMERICAN commercial agriculture of the North and West the mobility problem is not serious except in so far as government price supports have made it so. In America we are witnessing a phe- nomenon unique in history-the disappearance of the rustic. All previous civilizations have rested on a sharp differential between urban (and urbane) culture and rural, or rustic culture. The dif- ferentiation has usually proved to be their undoing. Only in the present century is a society emerging in which the basic culture of town and country is the same. Never has there been less justification for agricultural discontent than in present-day Cover Carl Milles' Orpheus Foun- tain dominates the front page of the magazine section as it dominates the Cranbrook land- scape. This is a re-casting, without the Orpheus, of the original fountain in Stockholm, Sweden.-. executed in Milles' huge studio at the Cranbrook Academy of Art. Milles headed the sculpture department there for 21 years. The series of smaller pictures along the top of the page show, in order from left to right, Milles' Europa and the Bull; the Meeting House on Cran- brook Road, out of which the institutions grew; a pot by Maija Grotell, head of cera- mics; an art student 'throwing' a pot on a treadle-wheel in the ceramics studio. The Academy of Art is shown in two views at the bottom of the page. At the left are stu- dents at work in one of the painting studios, and at right is the Academy Galleries as seen from the south. The Orpheus Fountain ,Was taken with Exacta 66, f8 at S1/100 by John HrtzelDaily chief photographer. American commercial agriculture. a4. THE ONLY serious economic problem in American agriculture is that of non-commercial agricul- ture-the two million small sub- sistence farms, mostly in the South and in the mountains. Here is really rural poverty: here is our great , domestic underdeveloped area. 5. NEVERTHELESS, it is the rich farmers who squawk the loud- est, and the fundamental principle of Democracy is Government by Squawk. On the whole, American agricultural policy is designed to make rich farmers a bit richer, not to solve the problem of the poor farmer. It has been put over on the people partly because the agricul- tural population is outrageously over-represented in Congress, es- pecially in the Senate, but also because of an essentially mistaken concept of Justice. You cannot do justice to a commodity: you can- not do justice to an industry: you can only do justice to people. Failure to realize this humble truth is at the bottom of most of the muddled thinking on agricultural policy. 6. AMERICAN Agricultural Pol- icy revolves around the notion of parity price. This is the price, whether of a single commodity or of agricultural products in gen- eral, at which a given quantity of the agricultural commodity would purchase approximately the same amount of the goods that farmers buy that it commanded in some; "base period"-historically, 1909- 1914. The idea arose in a mere statistical calculation by the econ- omists of the Department of Agri- culture. During the depression however it became the rallying symbol for agriculture discontent, and it retains a powerful emotional appeal to farmers. 7. THE ATTACHMENT to the parity symbol is not wholly un- reasonable, because a depression hits farmers mainly through a fall in the relative price--that is in the purchasing power--of their products, not through loss of jobs. Hence the labor movement is "job conscious" and the farm move- ment is "price conscious." In 1932 farmers were working as hard and producing as much as in 1929: a bushel of their produce however purchased less than half as much as in the former year. It is because agricultural production stays up in a depression that agri- cultural prices fall so low. Because of this also, however, we eat just about as well, on the average, in a depression as in prosperity. The price of parity in a depression would be hunger. Ten Theses on Agricultural Policy I I I S. ALTHOUGH the attachment to the parity symbol is under- standable, it is nevertheless a grave obstacle to the framing of a more rational agricultural policy. Because agricultural policy is price-centered and backward-look- ing, it fails to come to grips with the income problem and with the real problems of agricultural pov- erty. High prices are only good for those who sell something, and are best for those who sell a lot. Hence price supports benefit rich farmers more than poor, commercial farm- ers more than subsistence farmers. Even worse, high price supports tend to "freeze" an obsolete com- modity structure and prevent nec- essary adjustments of output. They therefore tend to create "sur- pluses" which are an embarrass- ment to all. These surpluses cre- ate pressures which are seriously inconsistent with our trade and foreign policies. 9. IF WE must "help farmers" then a policy based on income sup- ports rather than price supports is intrinsically much more sensible. The defunct and not much lam- ented Brannan Plan had this to its credit. Income supports, how- ever, smack of "charity," and have the reputation, at least, of being politically unacceptable. They also ,;-- - .- 2R.2'~~r-~- -~ p ''" -Daily-Chuck Kelsey BOUNCY-Maryanne Domenic is a sprightly young lady whose clothes complement her personality. Here she wears the famil- far bermudas and knee socks with a dash that make them lock exactly right for her. .4. / 'r.r '._ ..qYi S.,.... . ."A.'.. y ,.~ ad .. " -1"ws. S'..' /s. ' N ' . : > x! , ," h ' ~da y "'* W f } '-sf7;.rr~t ow7 ,,,;: for the Love of Luxury L I? L Dalton's classic cashmere pullover goes to town, travels to the country, flies to Capril. Anywhere in the whole wide world, Dalton's precios sweaters of 100% imported cashmere are the 11 finest. We're proud of our collection in magnificent new colors. sizes 34 to 40. $21 .95 And, of court*, all Dalton Caumlr. are durably mothproof.dL 302 South State Street -Daily- juc& Kelsey EFLECTIVE-Cynthia Vary i one of the taw' School's more en- g' ofringse -r clothes, here a black sweater with black.- checgeed.. skirt, always.set ;off ,neyer. deiact from.he striking. appearance.