~1 twh £icl4gau &ztty Sixty-Sixth Year EDITED AND MANAGED BY STUDENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN UNDER AUTHORITY OF BOARD IN CONTROL OF STUDENT PUBLICATIONS STUDENT PUBLICATIONS BLDG. * ANN ARBOR, MICH. * Phone NO 2-3241 Strauss In The Wind When Oplinans Are Free, Truth Will PrevailR Editorials printed in The Michigan Daily express the individual opinions of staff writers or the editors. This must be noted in all reprints. SUNDAY, MAY 27.1956 President Of The Repubi THE UNIVERSITY is host today to a most distinguished visitor, President Sukarno of the Republic of Indonesia. The leader of the island nation that is the sprawling young giant of Southeast Asia comes here after an enthusiastic reception in Washington. In his speech before the Congress last week, President Sukarno observed that "the shot that was fired at Lexington on the 19th of April, 1775, was heard around' the world," and went on to declare that it echoes still in the hearts of free men and those who long to be free. The Indonesian leader summed up his his- torical analysis with the statement: "Over half the world the burning words which fired the American War of Independence have been closely studied as a source of inspiration and a plan of action. Yes, this is the period of Asian and African resurgence." The importance of President Sukarno's words to the elected representativesof the American people cannot be underestimated. Now and in the future, it'is hoped that our lawmakers Coordination W "ISPUTES between the military services of the United States, which have gone on so long in our history that they are becoming dangerously traditional, have broken out again in the Pentagon. The problem is a serious one. It consists of the Air Force announcing that Navy airplane carriers can delivet only "small" strategic aid. It consists of Army officials passing out docu- ments to newsmen telling that emphasis on air power can lead only toi "national disaster" or worse. REACTIONS to the latest inter-Pentagon squabbles have been many and varied. De- fense Secretary Wilson, who heads the military branches, was finally pressured into comment- ing, "most unfortunate." Something a little more effetive came from Democratic Senator Dennis Chavez, who threat- ened a funds cut if the "petty jealousies" were not done away with.' Most effective of all, however, were the President's remarks last week. He commanded that the armed forces defend their ideas on national defense, whether they conflict or not. He also insisted that all branches "loyally support" all top level decisions that are made in that field. One of the very reasons for all the fighting in he ranks is that the services often are at a loss of a decision to support. With a firm, TODAY AND TOM( } 0 Rivalry . ~By W SECRETARY WILSON, with the President's support, is insisting that the dispute among the services must not be argued out in public. He said that the Administration will not toler- ate the kind of propaganda which was launched last week-end by the Air Force and by the Army.~ Whether the policy of surpressing the dispute is sound depends, it seems to me, on what the dispute is about. It is reasonably plain from what Secretary Wilson said at the big Pentagon press exhibition that he believes the issue to be "the roles and mission business,"-that is to say, which of the services is to have which of the new expensive weapons. He must have been hearing more than he likes to hear about these rivalries, and he is very much annoyed at finding that the services have gone over his head, hoping to work up public opinion and Congressional support. THERE IS NOT much real doubt, it seems to me, that if only "the roles and mission busi- ness" are at issue, then these issues should be settled within the Pentagon and the National Security Councl. The relative value of one guided missile over another, the military capabilities of the aircraft carriers, the role of the Army in aerial defense -these are questions which neither the gener- al public nor the Congress are competent to de- cide. They are by their very nature questions which have to be answered by the services themselves under the guidance of the President and the Secretary of Defense. But is there not more to this dispute than the roles and mission business of the three serv- ices? We know that there is at bottom a much bigger question, which was raised some time ago by Gen. Ridgeway, of high strategy in the age of nuclear weapons. There is no use pre- tending that this question has as yet been set- tied, that a clear policy has been arrived at by which the services can be guided. . IT WOULD clear the air a good deal if the administration was to admit that policy is in the making hut is not made and that the m - il NIGHT EDITOR: VERNON NAHRGANG S ukarno lic of Indonesia heed them well when considering legislation concerning American foreign policy. PRESIDENT SUKARNO, again in his address to the Congress, gave his reasons for visiting the United States. He said that e had come "to learn something from AmerIca - from America not merely as a place, not merely as a nation, but America as a state of mind, America as the center of an idea." This statement clearly indicates that element of American culture which ,is our most valu- able export. In the majority of our defense and foreign policy considerations, this signifi- cant factor is often overlooked. President Sukarno may have performed a vital service to the American people and their leaders by driving this point home. THE UNIVERSITY is honored by the pres- ence of President Sukarno. We hope that Michigan can contribute in some small way to the concept of America President Sukarno will take home with him. -RICHARD HALLORAN thin the Military definite foreign policy, there would be top level decisions for the military to keep in mind. THE PROBLEM is even bigger-a problem of military discipline and military-civilian re- lations. For the most part, military experts are sincere in their jobs. They're trying to make the best defense plans they can in their indi- vidual branches. However, wha tis needed is more coordina- tion between these branches. Defense experts, however sincere they may be, are achieving no purpose by allowing these inter-Pentagon squabbles to go on as they do. This brings in the civilian-military relation- ship. The armed forces have always come under civilian control through the Congress. Perhaps what is really lacking here is the failure on the part of civilian authorities to pay enough attention to the military experts who are subordinate to them. EVEN THOUGH the civilians are on top, they should be listening to the ideas of the spe- cialists under them, as well as clamping down on military men. who persist in deriding the other branches. Military defense, after all, is a cooperative effort, with higher-ups laying down policy statements after consultation with experts on all levels, and all participants accepting and upholding these decisions. -VERNON NAHRGANG Uri" ' :; af)o ,r* . se ~zyM 2,. wy1' s 1. t '~r . ° \" i - a .?--! " Qty t A~s i 6 r+T 'AS I'o1 WASHINGTON MERRY-GO-ROUND: By DREW PEARSON Backstage reason for the Army- Air Force feud that has sud- denly hit the 'headlines is a pub- licity campaign that both services decided to launch to win public and Congressional support. Without consulting their alleged boss, Secretary Wilson, the Army brass gave their campaign a cen- tral theme: "A Decade of Inse- curity." The Air Force then came back with a reverse theme en- titled: "A Decade of Security through Global Airpower." While Charlie Wilson was look- ing the other way, the Army loaded its publicity guns with ideas for speeches, magazine articles, and press leaks. These were care- fully calculated to sell the Army's views to the public. * * -' THE AIR FORCE promptly or- ganized a more ambitious, long- range publicity program. In a pri- vate memo to its publicity boys, the Air Force urged: "We must take the public past the point of uncertainty. We must convince them that investment in the Air Force will net a superla- tive payoff in continued freedom and safety. Convincing the public will take a long-range public rela- tions blueprint. . . .Coipmanders at all levels will review their indi- vidual programs and initiate ag- gressive action to support the pro- gram." Noting that public opinion is "the most powerful tool of all, more powerful even than war it- self," the Air Force memo called on its publicity boys to "mold opinion and channel the vibrant tensions of public thinking." * * * DESPITE this highfalutin' lan- guage, the Air Force recognizes the practical problem of com- peting for public attention with the election campaign. Accordingly, the confindental memo noted that "1956 is an elec- tion year." It then offered this advice: "Politics is a tough and un- reasonable competitor for all media and audiences. For this rea- son, in the fall of 1956, USAF will be forced to relinquish most of the national stage to political exposi- tion. During this period, USAF em- phasis and concetration will shift to community relations and inter- nal activities. Opportunities in na- tional media will continue to be exploited, but probably at a con- siderably slower pace." It's relatively easy for the mili- tary to operate without their civilian chiefs in the Pentagon knowing what is happening. So the Army and Air Force got their press campaign well under way before Secretary Wilson finally woke up and began to crack heads together. GRAND OLD battler for peace between industry and labor, Cyrus Ching, was honored on his 80th birthday by leaders of both labor and industry, ranging from Sec- retary of the Treasury Humphrey, the biggest coal operator in the world, to M. M. Anderson of Alcoa, and Dave McDonald of the United Steel Workers. Chief tribute to Ching was paid by the man who caused him the most trouble shortly after the war. -John L. Lewis. * * * THE DEEP-VOICED head of the mine workers told how Ching sum- moned him to a strike conference. "In keeping with my traditional policy of obeying- the call of myI government," intoned John L., "I wen to see Cy Ching. "'This is not a strike,' I told him. 'This is a temporary state of stabilizing inactivity.' "Geoorge Humphrey sent one of his coal barons," contiued John L.I "A man with a high hat and a golo chain. When people saw him and Cy Ching beside him, theyI felt sorry for me. "Mr. Ching haid there must be a policy of give and take. "'I'm going to take all I can get,' I told him. "'I'm not giving a thing,' re-{ plied the coal baron." (Copyright 1956, by Bell Syndicate, Inc.) FINNING ESSAY: Academic Freedom: A Potential Force (Ed Note: The following essay received first prize in the Academic Freedom Week essay contest.) By PETER TYLER HALL THIS IS A plea for more intellectual freedom at the University of Michigan as the present state of excessive interference in academic life by the University administration serves only to undermine the foundations of American democratic society. To support this allegation of unnec'essary restriction and its danger is the purpose of the first part of this paper: the second section is concerned with reasons for the conflict as it has developed at Michigan, and the last part will put forth a solution aimed at realizing this poten- tial force. The Danger of a Restrictive Policy .. . W HY DOES regulation of academic life constitute an undesirable policy? Because taken altogether, regulation has the cumulative effect of forcing the academic community, students and faculty alike, unalytically to accept the status quo. The foundation of our society and eonomy is the thinking mind of the intellectually free man. Access to information is needed to form intelligent decisions. A paternalistic program not only does not encour- age the thinking mind but definitely discourages it by punishing those who depart from conformity. A free-choice society must foster in the individual the development of that critical judgment essential to carry the responsibility that the individual has to such a society, whereas an authoritarian, society develops only compliance unquestioning obedience of every command. The danger of any restrictive program to a free society is this extension of regulation, unnoticed until too late, to every area of life, which ends in totalitarianism. America is more an experiment in anarchy than in totalitarianism, and proper functioning depends on a mature, informed electorate. A POLICY restricting academic freedom undermines American demo- cratic government by limiting the development of the individual who is the basis of our society. There is little opportunity to exercise and train the selective and choice-making faculties; if a choice is ocered, it is usually between presented alternatives. Complete freedom of choice, even to setting up the alternatives between which he must choose, is the goal of the thinking man. His constructiveness, his originality, his individuality, all are reduced to the extent his mind is fenced by the limitations of another kind. An intelligent decision is founded on a perception of all factors; the whole truth must be known before a possibility exists of knowing what is right. The administration, by its protective censorship, impedes knowledge of the whole truth. The Place of the University in Society ... THE UNIVERSITY of Michigan, then, has a duty to the student and to society to prepare the student to take his place as an educated individual in, and to have a greater influence upon, the affairs of the community in which he may reside. The development of critical judgment is part of the educational function, and free enquiry is part of the educational process. Restriction substitutes dogmatic axioms for free enquiry, and a resulting intellect- ual status quo would replace progress. The University is a leader and experimenter in the development of our society-its products play an important role in society, and attitudes generated at college persist throughout life. Therefore, it must develop in the individual the mature, self-reliant outlook necessary to well- adjusted life in modern America. There is no way around It; the Univer- sity must encourage free thought. Conflict of Administration with .Academic Community ,. IN EDUCATION as in government the myth of the omni-competence of the administrative group has supplanted the ancient theory of indi- vidual sovereignty and responsibility. Treating the academic community in the manner of a father dealing with his children is becoming policy to an increasing degree. For what sort of state does a paternalistic policy prepare us?.A planned economy. At the University of Michigan as in government, there is no reason why the regulators should be any wiser than the regulatees. The administration is guilty of pushing free thought and intellect- ual goals into the background in favor of entrenching the more material and mechanical aspects of college life. Is it possible that although agreeing on the goals of education, the administration substitutes itself as a goal? The jobsof an administrator is to minimize trouble. He has little power of his own; he merely interprets and keeps the trouble that results from his interpretations from getting to his superiors. THE WHOLE administrative process is one of finding excuses for not doing things-plausible, palatable excuses. A restrictive, paternalistic policy is easiest to administer because it offers a simple test of what to regulate and it generates its own excuses. The factor causing a conflict of administrative with academic goals is the outside pressure, from taxpayers, voters, and state legislature, to conduct itself in a fashion above reproach, that is, without controversy. The administration is led to bend over backwards to maintain good relations with its "superiors." Developing Academic Freedom . THE DEVELOPMENT of critical judgement and responsibility does not imply a downpour of responsibility on the younger members of our academic community, blighting as it were the budding maturity. A gradual easing of restrictive regulations seems to be the answer, taking place throughout the individual's college life. Are students mature enough for Academic Freedom? The administration holds that the heady wine of responsibility and freedom requires a mature individual. The difficulty with this argument is the circular reasoning involved; the student must be mature to be trusted with responsibility, yet shouldering responsibility develops ma- turity. One does not exist without the other; the students must have academic responsibility in order to develop maturity. A second answer to this argument is that if students 'are not mature enough to cope with freedom and responsibility in academic matters at college; when and where will they? Allowing students to make fools of themselves teaches them what it is that makes fools. The administration ought not to be afraid to let the students make fools of themselves-that's what they are here for. From a Potential to a Kinetic Force . .. BASICALLY the solution is to reserve to the academic community control over academic matters, and limit the administration to administration. The Faculty Senate is the body now in being most appropriate for this purpose. A compromise is feasible, retaining some .4 1, .1 4f ORROW: and Turmoil ALTER LIPPMANN the Pentagon in the dispute over the strategic roles of the Army and Navy but in such mat- ters as the differences between Mr. Dulles and Mr. Stassen. There being as yet no firm deci- sion about the role of the Army in future wars, Mr. Dulles and Mr. Stassen do not have an agreed view of what to say about the reduction of the Red Army. Anyone who thinks he knows the answer to the undecided questions of high strategy is merely exhibiting his own inability to realize the complexity of the problem. HAVE THE impression, which may well be mistaken, that American strategic thinking is deeply affected not only by the new weapons but by the undigested consequences of the Korean war. That war was a searing exper- ience, and the brunt of it fell upon the Army. Putting aside the question of whether it was wise to commit a ground army to a land war in Korea, the fact is that this involved a sudden reversal of what had been settled American strategic policy. The policy was not to commit ground forces to a war on the Asian continent. The unresolved question, which haunts and perturbs American military thinking, is whether the Korean war was a precedent which estab- lished a new policy, or whether it was a unique affair marking the exception to a settled policy, IF KOREA was a precedent, as many seem to think it was, if we need to be ready to fight a series of wars of the Korean type, then General Ridgeway and the Army are obviously right. But if Korea was an exception to -the general rule that in regard to Asia we are not a land power but a sea and air power, then the responsibility of the ground army has been greatly reduced. It would do much to clarify the deeper issues in the Pentagon if it were known whether Korea was the precedent of a new strategy of intervention on the ground, or whether it was the exception to the older policy of not inter- vening on the ground. riF~rmm . 4+-ee ..npm---- uhnx h ~rtrnth- It I TALKING ON TELEVISION: t A Preview of S ummer Shows BY LARRY EINHORN Daily Television Writer And so ends another television season - a season in which Sgt. Bilco, Perry Como, Hal March, Mickey Mouse, big-money quiz programs, Alfred Hitchcock and "Wide Wide World" successfully entered the field. And a season in which Milton Berle, Jackie Gleason, the "Com- edy Hour," Jimmy Durante, and Arthur Godfrey saw saw their rat- ings dwindle. Enough said about last season. We leave the newsreel and come to the coming attractions, (The car- toon appears - elsewhere on this page.) IN THE IMMEDIATE future, the summer season, the national con- ventions steal the spotlight. Once again all three major television networks will completely cover both conventions. Betty Furness will return to the political picture. New technological developments will give the home viewers a better view of the proceedings. During the summer omst of the panel programs and quiz shows will continue live. Many of the filmed situation comedies and dra- mas will show re-runs. his "Talent Scouts" rem'ain with a summer replacement filling in for Artha'. The "Ed Sullivan Show" carrys on sans Sullivan with vari- ous luminaries taking over as hosts and hostesses. AS USUAL the All-Star football and baseball games, a few golf tournaments and the regular base- ball games will make up the bulk of sporting events to be televised during the summer. Two new quiz shows will debut this summer, trying to repeat the performance of another quiz show which also started in the summer. High Finance and "Twenty Steps to $1,000,000" will bothe be seen on CBS-TV. At least one psectacular is being planned for the hot months. "Bachleor Girl", an original musi- cal comedy with words and music by Steve Allen, will be seen on July 15. And as a public service television may have to step into the law en- forcement business. If the situa- tion gets any worse this summer Broderick Crawford a n d his "Highway Patrol" may have to come to the aid of Richard Tracy and help him find the automobile which houses Flatop's boy. THE MAJOR re-shuffling of Buddy Hackett, who has had so much success on the "Perry Como{ Show", will star in a "Stanley", a situation comedy which will be seen for one of the half-hours va- cated on Monday night because of the Caesar switch. Dianah Shore and Bob Hope will handle most of the shows in the old Milton Berle time-slot. Martin &- Lewis will probably do their shows at this time. This leaves Milton Berle and Martha Raye out in the cold where they belong. * * * THE DANNY THOMAS "Make Room For Darry" format will be slightly changed for Jean Hagen, who plays the part of Danny's wife is leaving the show. Since Miss Hagen has become such an integ- ral part of the show the writers will make Danny widower in the series instead of writing in a new wife. Heib Shringr's new hour- long variety program will be seen on Tuesday nights. Even though CBS recently an- nounced that it was cancelling Godfrey's Wednesday night pro- gram Arthur still insists that he will be back with a new, show which will not include his "Friends". The present spectaculars will re- main and new ones are now being planned. NBC will present a spec- 4 sort of emergency powers in the administration, on the theory that the threat of regulation is as good a regulator as regulation itself. Certainly a change in student Sattitude is required, from its pres- ent well-kndwn apathy to one of initiative and intellectual re- sourcefulness; the senior members of the faculty have the responsi- DAILY OFFICIAL BULLETIN -'4 The Daily Official Bulletin is an official publication of the University