PAGE FOUR THE MICHIGAN DAILY PRIDA V_ NnVV..MRTn in t OXA PAGE FOUR U~Tfl A 'V h~Tfl~7~',T'flI~ IA I A ~A * .~xAr xiv v vA-D5IZx~. 17g x59' .. _ No Octopus Needed . .0 .0 A FAMOUS Charles Addams cartoon of a few years ago pictured a small crowd of people gathered in the center of a busy New York Street. One of the many passersby was shown remarking to his com- panion, "It doesn't take much to attract a crowd in New York." In the center of the small crowd, hidden from the speaker, an octopus was dragging a pedestrian down into an open manhole. It "doesn't take much" to attract a crowd in Ann Arbor, either. The two pre-game pep rallies held so far this year, however, have followed an unfortunate pattern: no octopuses, no crowds. Today's pep rally won't feature an octopus either. But we're betting there will be a crowd anyway. The team will be leaving from Ferry Field today for the big one against Ohio State-a game the experts say we're not supposed to win. But this is. the same Michigan team that has already overcome injuries to down Iowa, Minnesota and MSC-all games we "weren't supposed to win." Wolverine rooters will gather at the Union at 2 p.m. At 2:15, they'll march to Ferry Field where Coach Oosterbaan, Captain Cachey and other team members will "roll 'em up." The sendoff will take place rain or shine-if typical Ann Arbor weather threatens, bring a raincoat. In a football, game, a lot depends on an intangible called spirit. And the team's spirit will depend a lot on how many of us get down to Ferry Field. Let's show the team it doesn't take an octopus to drag us down. --Jon Sobelo ff Awe-Inspiring Ohioans Promise Great Game (EDITOR'S NOTE: Daily reviewer Donald A. Yates, an ardent Wolverine fan who claims he's seen every home game in the past 17 years, con- tributes the following pre-game observations.) THERE IS A shrine for those of us who are worrying our nails and sensing the cold fingers of fear squeeze at our loyal Michigan hearts. At this shrine we gather and gaze in undisguised awe at the object of our uneasi- ness. In the basement lobby of the Union, in a trophy case, are tacked and illuminated in neon splendor the publicity pictures of the Ohio State varsity "eleven." The display is a dread- fully disheartening one. The Ohio team is rank- ed number one in the country; and how their players look - the part! THERE'S THE guard, Parker, cutting in for a savage tackle with the look of the sadist in his eyes; the tackles, Helinski and Machin- sky, big, rough, emanating an attitude of "I dare you!"; and then Cassidy, halfback, strid- ing along confidently with a sneer of contempt on his features; end, Dean Dugger, with the bitter spark of last year's defeat still burning in the dark shadows of his eyes; and Thornton, the center, tough, determined-looking, his brow furrowed with the single responsibility of his assignment; Reichenbach, the guard, with the blind, destructive hate of Frankenstein's mon- ster couched in his obsessed glare; and there is Brubaker, end, a shifty-looking pass-catcher with a rodent-like craftiness suggested in his features; the quarterback, Leggett-how poised, how superior can a quarterback look!; and Wat- kins, halfback, driving ahead at full speed with alert eyes seeking that vital opening; and fin- ally Bobo, the fullback-with the ball clasped to his body-ramming powerfully forward with a devastating, high-stepping pace. You walk away from the case speechless, but with a little clearer perspective. This thought occurs to you: that regardless of what is at stake in the Michigan-Ohio game, regardless of the outcome and the consequences for the vic. tor and the vanquished the game itself is go- ing to be a great one. It will be a game pitting the nation's best team against the valiant "Blue" team whose successes and failures we've attended so closely this fall. THIS REFLECTION makes us feel a little --perhaps just a little-soothed and sustained. Now, maybe we're better prepared for the worst -or for the alternative of .. . Well, there are the impressions that the Ohio State publicity pictures in the basement of the Union offer the Michigan fan. The experience is just a little calming . . . But if you're natur- ally apprehensive about these things anyway, just sit tight and pray. And by all means, don't bother to go out of your way to have a look. --Donald A. Yates DREW PEARSON: McCarthy's Forgotten Record WASHINGTON - McCarthy de- bate in the Senate, like the un- official debate in the nation, has veered toward greater divergence and more bitterness instead of more unity. While a strong group, led by Senator Case of South Dakota. wants to appease Joe, another group, both Republicans and Dem- ocrats, is amazed at the way its colleagues ignore Joe's roughshod trampling over the rights of other senators. This group includes some of the oldest and most distinguished members of the Senate, who cher- ish its prestige as the most im- portant deliberative body among the free governments of the world. Men like George of Georgia, Neely of West Virginia, Hayden of Ari- zona, Green of Rhode Island, have been in the Senate a quarter of a century, have fought to protect its dignity and decorum. And, though they are Democrats and Senator Watkins is a Repub- lican, they have great respect for his judicial temperament; and they resent the attacks on him - from two points of view. No Religious Prejudice One is the implication, given by Monsignor Edward Martin, when introduced as the spokesman for Cardinal 'Spellman in New York, that the move to censure McCarthy was motivated by the fact that he is a Catholic. It happens that Senator Watkins was a bishop in the Mormon Church and his Demo- cratic colleagues bitterly deplore the implication that he or any of them are motivated by religious prejudice. Second, Watkins and the mem- bers of his committee were ap- pointed by the entire United States Senate to perform a duty-namely, study the censure charges. They, therefore, speak for the entire Sen- ate. And when they are charged by McCarthy with being "hand- maidens of communism," many senators feel he is actually con- demning the entire Senate. Furthermore, they point out that 46 original charges were brought against McCarthy by Senators Flanders, Vt., Fubright, Ark., and Morse, Ore., and that the censure committee leaned over backward by boiling them down to only three. McCarthy's Forgotten Record Here are some of the other charges, more or less forgotten while Senator Case argues over the legalistic detail of the date when Major Peress was promoted: 1. Though one censure charge against McCarthy is his refusal to testify regarding his finances, the Watkins committee overlooked the findings of an earlier Senate com- mittee showing how McCarthy col- lected money to fight communism, then invested it on the commodity market. 2. It is well known that Mc- Carthy accepted a $10,000 check from the Lustron Corporation. Yet what isn't generally known is the remarkable coincidence in dates. On Nov. 5, 1948, the Senate in- vestigating committee, of which McCarthy was a member, recom- mended an official investigation of Lustron. Exactly seven days later, Nov. 12, 1948, McCarthy received the $10,000 check from the com- pany he was investigating. 3. It's against the kickback laws for a senator to accept money from his employees. McCarthy got around this by "borrowing" the en- tire bank account of his assistant, Ray Kiermas, whenever he needed it to bolster his stock-market sp,- culating. 4. Eight of McCarthy's past 12 income-tax returns have been found in error. In each case, the error was in McCarthy's favor. For example, during his first three years in the Senate, he reported a gross income of $59,604.59. He claimed stock losses of $43,217.87 and interest deductions of $18,262- .96. This adds up to losses and deductions of $61,480.83 for the three years. In other words, he went in the hole $1,876.24. Yet he :managed to keep a healthy per- sonal bankroll. 5. It's a matter of sworn testi- mony that McCarthy frequently went to the racetracks with Lus- tron's president, Carl Strandlund, At the 1949 Pimlico Preakness, ac- cording to the testimony, McCarthy borrowed money from Standlund to bet on the horses, then gave him a check for the amount. Afterward, Strandlund tore up the check with the quip: "I do that quite often for McCarthy." 6. McCarthy t w i c e has used forged FBI documents to try to prove his case. First was in the loyalty case of Edward Posniak, whom McCarthy accused of being a Red agent. Joe came up with a "secret FBI report" full of derogatory infor- mation on Posniak: The document, marked with official FBI stamps, "Be Constructive. Ask What He Wants For Christmas" f - ydIL -L'-- .4x LET TERS TO THE EDITOR Defense Department Forgets It's Just a Debate SL Powers ... To the Editor: IT HAS been 137 years since the University of Michigan was founded in 1817. For 129 of those years, it got along without an or- ganized student government. When the first all-campus student gov- ernment was set up eight years ago, it was established with the idea of providing a sounding board for student opinion, for legislating on certain purely student activi- ties, and for advising the Univer- sity administration of student opinion of policies directly affect- ing students. This body was desig- nated as the Student Legislature. Recently, this Student Legisla- ture decided, of its own authority, to extend its powers. In addition to its scope of student affairs, it -now considers University person- nel problems, i.e., who it should hiretor fire, and matters pertain- ing to their pay. Now it appears about to enter a new field of authority-to decide on the qualifications and worthi- ness of those whom the People of Michigan have elected as Univer- sity Regents. Quoting from Tues- day's paper, Miss Joan Bryan of Flushing, N.Y., Chairman of SL's Culture and Education Committee said concerning the Regents' deci- sion on the new Student Govern- ment Council proposal, "If the Regents did not understand the effect that 'virtual lack of acknow- ledgement' would have on student government on campus, 'they are not adequately informed and do not deserve to be Regents'." At present there is a certain Senator in Washington facing his responsibility for allegedly declar- ing that a certain highly respect- ed army official "does not deserve" to be a general. After witnessing the manner in which the Student Legislature has been running afield of its purpose of conducting student affairs, it is not surprising that the Regents areCreluctant to approvet he new SGC. In fact, after hearing this latest outburst, it would not be surprising if the Regents consid- ered doing away with student gov- ernment altogether. -William W. Hanks, '56 BAd. * * * Record Chec;.... To the Editor: N REGARD to a statement by Al Eisenberg in Tuesday's Daily on the Detroit Lions football team, I would like to say Mr. Eis- enberg has not stated the facts. His statement was, "Many ex- pressed surprise at the power and drive of the offensive unit and shock at the usually inept Lion defense which smothered one of the most potent offenses in the pay-for-play world." It has been a known fact for the last two years that Detroit has had the best defense in the league. They have led in the defense de- partment for the last two years. Their pass defense is considered the best and their line has aver- aged fewer yards rushing against than any other line. The offensive unit has always shown power and drive. You cannot win the cnamp- ionship two years in a row with- out a powerful offensive. Before Mr. Eisenberg makes any more statements about the Lions being inept, he had better check the records. Cleck the recoirs a the end of this bear and se who has the best w-ieusive record. The Lions will be on top again -Lynn Evans, '58 * Re: Brown . . To the Editor: such. As what then was it intend- ed? Straight factual reporting of news? If so, then Miss Marks' let- ter with reference to child murder stories seems to overlook one point; there is usually assumed to be some value to such stories-if only that of arousing public indig- nation against such crimes. Is The Daily, then, trying to arouse in- dignation at the existence at large of Russell Brown? I hardly think so. Perhaps it was intended as hu- man interest? Then I propose the following consideration: If Russell Brown had acted as Napoleon in- stead of Innocent III would The Daily have printed a similar ar- ticle? I see only three alternatives: 1) No. In which case, The Daily has the responsibility of showing why the one is suitable Daily ma- terial and the other not. 2) Yes, because it is of sufficient public interest. Then this seems to put The Daily in a class with a Sunday guided tour to Bedlam. 3) Countering the above by say- ing that there is a big difference since Russ was "only fooling." I think the best reply, other than asking The Daily to take a closer look at Mr. Brown, is Mr. Moxley's question, "If a person wants to gain attention by acting silly, does The Daily see to it that he is satis- fied?" (I leave to The Daily the problem of assessing their obliga- tions to Mr. Brown.) However the case stands, I think the best way to look at it is that it offers an opportunity for The Daily to do some important col- lege-type editorializing. A frank, open, and full discussion of The Daily's position would not only be in the interest of the campus and The Daily generally, but would help to establish or re-establish The Daily as a responsible mem- ber of the Fourth Estate and not the "black and white and read all over" anomaly which it at times appears. -Jim Stasheff * * * To the Editor: T T WAS September nineteen fifty-four, They all said Ben was through; But they forgot that he once Played for the maize and blue. Students and alums alike Said certainly next year- We'll have a truly good team For which we'll really cheer. They said a boy from Iowa Was going to take his place, But they forgot that Ben once Played for the blue and maize. The team did first start out As it was said they would; They won and then they lost But nothing very good. Then up here came the Hawkeyes Now, boys, said mighty Ben, I too, once wore these colors That's why I know you can. Just give your all for Michigan And then a little more. If you do that there's no need To worry 'bout the score. The boys did give their everything Then and the next weeks too; Ben taught them what it's like To fight for maize and blue. Now we cheer on all sides. The team of Mich. came through The boys found what it's like To play for maize and blue. They say "our Ben's the best" Seems we forgot he knew The spirit which can be aroused When wearing maize and blue. TODAY AND TOMORROW: 'Knowland s Stalemate' Already Exists By WAL1IER LIPPMANN LONDON EXTRACTS FROM Senator ktnowland's speech, which are printed over here, make him sound ni ore like a man having a private night- mare than like a responsible political leader. His is the familiar night- mare of how in about five years the Soviet Union will have achieved atomic armaments so great that the free world will "become par- lyzed and immobilized by the realization that the United States and the Soviet Union could act anal react upon one another with over- whelming devastation." When this atomic stalemate is reached, the Soviet Union will "seek to take over the peripheral nations bite by bite." THE QUESTION we mighi; ask ourselves is whether this atomic stalemate is something that may be achieved in the future or whether in fact it already exists. The anoswer, I submit, is that in regard to all of Europe and of Asia the atorniic stalemate already exists, indeed has existed since the Soviet Union broke the American atomic monopoly in 1949. Ever since then it has been a major premise of the foreign policy of all our allies, as well a:s of the great uncommitted nations like India, that the prevention of atomic war is essential to their survival. The Korean War and the Indo-Chinese War were both of them limited and conditioned by the existence of anatomic stalemate, by "the re- alization"-in Mr. Knowland's words-that atomic war would bring "overwhelming devastation." An atomic stalemate is notsomething that is going to come about a few years hence. It exists now and we have been living in it for several years. WHAT, PRESUMABLY, Mt. Knowland has in mind is not atomic stalemate but the theoretical possibility that the Soviet Union might achieve atomic superiority-that in some years the Soviet Union may have the bombs and the planes and the missiles to strike a knockout blow at the United States. Thisi is a theoretical possibility but the ans- wer to it is plain enough. It is to make sure by spending enough money and taking enough trouble that the strategic air force itself cannot be knocked out by a sneak attack. If that is done, it is not necessary to set up defenses in every town in the United States. For if the retalia- tory power cannot be taken away from us, the atomic stalemate, which now exists, will not be broken. There is nothing in this, however, to justify the notion that there is some critical moment in the near future which, if we act intelligently, is going to be any more critical than the times we are now living in. It is no good for a nation to be in a perpetual state of jtitters over all the theoretical dangers that might beset it. MR. KNOWLAND believes tlut during an atorbic stalemate the Soviet Union will take over the world bite by bite. I am not myself a blythe optimist about the future butt I do not read the present and the future as does the Senator from California. It is a striking fact, for example, that the great period of Communist expansion in Europe and Asia took place while we had an aitomic monopoly, took place before the atomic stalemate began in 1949. Senator Knowlend will remember that China was bitten off before the Soviet Union had. an atomic bomb. IT IS ALSO worth noting that since 1949 the losibes and gains have not by any means been one-sided. The Communists have advanced in Indo-China. But they have suffered a great setback of enormous stra- tegic importance in Yugoslavia. What is more, in Western Europe as a whole the Communist position has deteriorated. All that this shows is that the relation between atomic power and the ebb and flow of Communism is complicated and indirect. There is no ground for Senator Knowland's prediction that the political future of the free world is going to be determined by the ratio of ,atomic arm- aments. There is no ground for his assertion that an. atomic stalemate means the Communist conquest of the world. There is just as good ground for believing that, an atomic stale- mate, which renders general war intolerable and improbable, will give the free world a better chance in the rivalry for the allegiance of man- kind. Let no one forget that freedom works best in peace and that all war regimes, even cold war regimes, have to become centralized, 11- liberal, and arbitrary. TO SAY, as he does, that in the atomic stalemnate nation after nation will be "nibbled away" is to sound as if Mr. Knowland wants to go to war as soon as possible. If that is what he believes, he owes it to his country to say so frankly. If that is not what he believes, then he may fairly be asked to explain more clearly just what he is talking about. DAILY OFFICIAL BULLETIN A i*1 I IN A Defense Department order a few days ago, West Point and Annapolis students were forbidden from taking part in intercol- legiate debates considering the question "Re- solved: That the United States Should Extend Diplomatic Recognition to the Communist Government of China." Asked later for com- ment on this move, President Harlan H. Hatch- er said that "the midshipmen are -under strict military discipline and are in a service which is traditionally policy-enforcing, not policy-mak- ing. Such an order would be incredible if ap- plied to other schools," he continued, "but in regard to the Naval Academy you must con- sider that the subject is extremely sensitive and the students are military personnel." ALTHOUGH THE students involved are mili- tary personnel, this should not disqualify them from debating a topic which is currently of national importance. They have as much right to discuss this question as any other college debater possesses. The question of admitting Communist China is the standard one during this school year for all college and university debating teams and clubs, including the one here at the University. Barring midshipmen and cadets from partici- pating in a nationwide series of debates on this topic has the effect of barring inter-collegiate debating by their teams entirely this year. ONE OF the reasons given by the Defense De- partment for the new dictum-is that the subject has already, been decided by policy-makers and therefore is not a topic to be further debated. This is quite fallacious; as policy is constantly under reconsideration by policy-makers and the public. It would seem strange if the armed forces couldn't tolerate any disagreement with Defense Department policy among its future officers. But this banned debate is not even a real disagreement. It is only a mock disagree- best arguments for whichever side of the issue he happens to be on. Following the policy laid down by the mili- tary, it is easy to visualize a time when West Point and Annapolis debate teams are disquali- fied entirely from debating on any topic of national interest which has been temporarily "solved" by policy-makers. -Joel Berger Sixty-Fifth Year Edited and managed by students of the University of Michigan under the authority of the Board in Control of Student Publications. Editorial Stafff Eugene Hartwig....... ..........Managing Editor Dorothy Myers............................City Editor Jon Sobeloff............. ........Editorial Director Pat Roelofs......... ... ..Associate City Editor Becky Conrad........................Associate Editor Nan Swinehart.........................Associate Editor Dave Livingston...................sports Editor Han ley Gurwin.... .... .Assoc sports Editor Warren Wertheimer.............Associate Sports Editor Roz Shilmovitz........................Women's Editor Joy Squires..................Associate Women's Editor Janet Smith.................Associate Women's Editor Dean Morton................,.....Chief Photographer Business Staff Lois Pollak .......................Business Manager Phil Brunskill ..,...........Associate Business Manager Bill Wise....... .............Advertising Manager Mary Jean Monkoski.................Finance Manager Telephone NO 23-24-1 Member of THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Member ASSOCIATED COLLEGIATE PRESS The Associated Press is exclusively entitled to the use for republication of all news dispatches credited to it or otherwise credited to this newspaper. All rights or republication of all other matters herein are also re- served. (Continued from Page 2) Academic Notices Law School Admission Test: Applica- tion blanks for the Feb. 19 administra- tion of the Law School Admission Test are now available at 110 Rackham Building. Application blanks are due in Princeton, N.J. not later than Feb- ruary 9, 1955. Students in Mr. Litzenberg's English 127 should prepare the assignments in Mill for class discussion and bring their texts to class Fri., Nov. 19. Logic seminar will meet Fri., Nov. 19 at 4:00 p.m. in 443 Mason Hall. Mr. Livesay will continue to discuss the proof of the completeness theorem of Godel. Astronomical Colloquium. Fri., Nov. 19, 4:15 p.m., the Observatory. Dr. Wil- iam Liller will speak on "Stellar and Nebular Photoelectric Spectrophotom- etry at Michigan." Biological Chemistry Seminar: Dr. Herbert L. Davis, Surgical Research As- sociate of Wayne County Board of CountyaInstitutions, will speak on "The Fate of Fat." Room 319, West Medical Building, Fri., Nov. 19 at 4:00 p in Concerts Scenes From Opera will be presented by the Opera Class Fri., Nov. 19, at 8:30 p.m. in Auditorium A, Angell Hall. The class is directed as follows: Josef Blatt, -Music Director; valentine Windt, Stage Director; and Jeanne Parsons, Choreographer. Scenes from Act. II of "Carmen" by Georges Bizet, Scenes from Act III of "The Bartered Bride" by Bedrich Smetana, Scenes from Act those in the lower regions of the stadium. If one cannot see the in- tricate formations, the rendition of popular selections is often II of "La Traviata," by Guiseppe Verdi, and Scenes from Act II of "Die Zauber- floete" by Wolfgiang Amadeus Mozart. The Stanley O~uartet. Gilbert Ross and Emil Raab, :violin, Robert Courte, viola, and Oliver Edel, cello, will pre- sent the fourth program in the series of Sun. afternoox. concerts covering the Beethoven Quarf;ets at 3:30 p.m. Nov. 21 in Rackham Lecture Hall. Quartet in F major, Op.. 18, No. 1; Quartet in E-fiat major, Op. 74; Quartet in A mi- nor, Op. 132. Open to the public with- out charge. EventsT oday Inter-Guild Pau'ty. Fri., Nov. 19, at 8:30 p.m. in the* Presbyterian Student Center. Square chancing, called by Grey Austin, group gaanes (including a Wal- rus hunt), groups singing, and refresh- ments. (Admissit'n 40c. Hillel: Fri. evetning services 7:15 p.m. followed by an Oneg Shabbat pageant. Episcopal Studk3nt Foundation, Can- terbury Club, 7.:30 p.m., Nov. 19, at Canterbury Houge. Dean Deborah Ba- con, the Chaplain, and others will dis- cuss "The Churith and Desegregation." Coffee Hour wLU. be held in Lane Hall Library, Fri. at 415 p.m. The Michigan Christian Fellowship will be guild host. Wesleyan Guild. Fri., Nov. 19-Inter- guild Party at the, Presbyterian Church, 8:30 p.m. First Baptist Curch. Fri., Nov. 19. 8:00 p.m. Guild revcreation at IM Build- ing. University of Michigan Newman Club will be host to Newman Club dele- gates from the sitate of Michigan for a three day convention. Talent Show Fri. from 8:00-12:00 p.m., panels and workshops, Sat., dinner at 6:00 p.m.; Communion Breakfast Sun. following 9:30 a.m. Mass. Speaker for the dinner will be Prof. G. B. Harrison, and for the breakfast, Usibop C. L. Nelligan, of Assumption Univarslty, Canada. All