Scanned image of the page. Keyboard directions: use + to zoom in, - to zoom out, arrow keys to pan inside the viewer.

Page Options

Download this Issue


Something wrong?

Something wrong with this page? Report problem.

Rights / Permissions

This collection, digitized in collaboration with the Michigan Daily and the Board for Student Publications, contains materials that are protected by copyright law. Access to these materials is provided for non-profit educational and research purposes. If you use an item from this collection, it is your responsibility to consider the work's copyright status and obtain any required permission.

May 11, 1954 - Image 4

Resource type:
Michigan Daily, 1954-05-11

Disclaimer: Computer generated plain text may have errors. Read more about this.


.l'. E hl1Cltl6AT'V .OAlLY

TUESDAY, MAY 11, 1954

PAGE POUR 'i2Lk~SIJAY, MAY 11, 1954



The Faculty
THE SUSPENSION of three faculty mem-
bers by President Hatcher yesterday-
a temporary action "without prejudice to
the final action in their cases"-is not sur-
prising and may not be entirely unjustified.
If, by refusing to answer questions of the
Clardy Committee, the three faculty mem-
bers have "raised a question about their
competence as teachers," they have by no
means answered this question merely by
relying on their Constitutional rights.
President Hatcher's statement makes clear
that the suspension is made "pending a
thorough investigation by the University."
In more reasonable times, the temporary
suspension might not have been justified.
The University could then have taken its
time and deliberated fully on the merits of
these men as teachers, before taking any ac-
tion. But these are not reasonable times.
President Hatcher, faced with the necessity
of "doing something" to avoid compromising
the reputation of this midwestern state uni-
versity in the minds of a not-too-reasonable
public did the best he could in a difficult
It is assumed the suspension represents
merely the first step in a fair and judi-
cious investigation and review by the ad-
ministration and the special faculty Sen-
ate subcommittee set up for just such a
The suspended teachers are all apparently
well qualified academically-their experi-
ence, the testimony of their colleagues and
students, and the various honors they have
received all attest to that.
It is hoped that the proper University
agencies will act as quickly as possible to
clear these men of any undeserved sus-
picion which now attaches to them, to
evaulate fairly their fitness as teachers,
and to restore them to the unqualified
espect of the community unless they have
clearly demonstrated their unfitness to
Failure to answer questions is by no means
a sufficient reason for overthrowing the sol-
id reputations of these men. There is no rea-
son to doubt that the faculty members who
sit in judgment on these cases will require
more damaging evidence of unfitness than
this to warrant their recommending action
against their colleagues.
-Gene Hartwig, Dorothy Myers,
Jon Sobeloff, Pat Roelofs,
Becky Conrad, Nan Swinehart

The McCarthy Problem
And Mr. Jenkins

LAST WEDNESDAY Mr. Jenkins found
himself face to face with the fundamen-
tal issue of the McCarthy problem, and miss-
ed the point entirely. As a result of his in-
comprehension-surely for no other reason-
he advised the Chairman of the Committee,
of which he is the counsel, to make a ruling
If it is sustained and becomes a precedent,
it is a license to lawlessness and an invita-
tion to anarchy. Mr. Jenkins upheld Sen.
McCarthy's claim that government employ-
ees, including officers of the Army, are not
bound by their oath or by the laws or by any
ties of loyalty to their superiors and to the
service if-in their own private and secret
opinion-it would be a good thing to break
the law.
Mr. Jenkins could not have realized
what he was, doing. For the doctrine that
men may break their oath and violate the
law secretly-if it suits their private con-
victions-is the very principle of disloyal-
ty. It was in accord with this very prin-
ciple-that their own consciences were su-
perior to the laws of the land-that Fuchs
and Allen Nunn May and the Rosenbergs
For the benefit of those who have not fol-
lowed closely this tortuous and badly con-
ducted hearing, what happened was this.
Sen. McCarthy produced what he said was
a copy of a letter written in 1951 by Mr. J.
Edgar Hoover to Gen. Belling of the Army
Intelligence. As a matter of fact, Mr. Hoover
never wrote the letter of which Sen. Mc-
Carthy's paper pretended to be a copy, to
which his name was signed though in fact
he never signed it. It is established that this
document was fabricated by or at least with
the collaboration of an officer in the mili-
tary intelligence. The fabricated letter is
based on a confidential and genuine docu-
ment which the fabrication misrepresents,
The Senate Committee had, therefore, been
offered a piece of paper which was not what
it pretended to be, which not only used ma-
terial that it was against the law to use but
falsified the meaning of that material as
Manifestly the law had been violated. An
officer'in a position of trust and of high
sensitiveness had violated the law by the un-
authorized disclosure of confidential docu-
ments. And second, a document had been
fabricated and offered to the Senate as evi-

dence. When the counsel fO' the Army, Mr.
Welch, asked for the name of the officer who
had participated in this lawless operation.
Sen. McCarthy, who was under oath, refused,
saying that "You will never get that infor-
* * *
SEN. DIRKSEN then intervened to ask Mr.
S Jenkins and Chairman Mundt for a rul-
ing as to whether it would "be required of
a witness, consonant with his oath, that he
reveal the source of a document when he
had pledged himself to respect the confi-
dence and not reveal the source.' To this
Mr. Jenkins replied, "It is elementary that
the Senator does not have to reveal the name
of his informant. That is one of the most
elementary principles engrafted in the law.
Otherwise, law-enforcing officers would be
so hamstrung and hampered. as that they
would never be able to ferret out crime. I
unhesitatingly rule that Sen. McCarthy does
not have to reveal the name of his inform-
Mr. Jenkins would have been wiser to
have been less unhesitating and less cate-
gorical. For he has put himself and the
committee and the Senate in the position
of protecting a government employee who
knowingly violated the law. This is an un-
tenable position for a law-making body.
The Senate cannot make laws, and then
rule that it will support a Senator who is
protecting a violator of the law.
Where did Mr. Jenkins lose his way and
end up as the defender of the subversive
doctrine that a man may violate the law se-
cretly if, in his own private opinion, it would
be a good thing to violate the law? The
clew to Mr. Jenkins's error is in the bold-
face sentence above-in his saying that
without the power to protect their inform-
ants "law-enforcing officers would be so
hamstrung and hampered as that they
would never be able to ferret out crime."
That is quite true of law-enforcing officers.
Mr. Jenkins's error, which is the fundamen-
tal error at the root of the McCarthy prob-
lem, is to assume that a committee of the
Legislative branch of the government are
"law-enforcing officers" who "ferret out
It is precisely this error of Mr. Jenkins's
-that Senate committees may act as
"law-enforcing officers"-which has caus-
ed all the violence, the confusion, the in-
justice and the demoralization. For the
American system of government is found-
ed upon the separation of powers, and the
McCarthy problem has been created by
his invasion of the powers of the Execu-
tive, and by the failure of the Executive
to resist the invasion and to defend its
McCarthyism is fundamentally unconsti-
tutional in spirit and in practice. The Am-
erican government cannot be made to work
if its fundamental principle is flagrantly
and systematically violated. It is systemati-
cally violated if the Legislature takes upon
itself the law-enforcing functions of the
T HIS AFFAIR of the fabricated letter is a
demonstration of how the violation of
the fundamental principle of the Constitu-
tion leads to lawlessness and anarchy.
* ,*,
Why did Sen. McCarthy encourage an of-
ficer of the Army to violate his oath and
to break the law? Because that was the on-'
ly way he could obtain for his committee in-
formation collected by the legitimate law-
enforcing officers of the government. Why
did he have to break the law to get the in-
formation? Because it is not the business1
of Congress to enforce the laws, and the
use and disclosure by Congressional cam-
mitees of information needed for law-en-
forcement makes it much more difficult for
the legitimate law-enforcing officers to en-
force the law.
In short, the Senator was engaged in work
which is contrary to the principle of the
Constitution, and so he resorted to lawless
methods to carry out his lawless enterpiise.
Since there was no lawful method by which
a legislative committee could take over the
functions of law-enforcement, he resorted to
illegitimate methods including the encour-

agement and the protection of the violation
of the law by the employees of the govern-
(Copyright, 1954, New York Herald Tribune, Inc.)

And Political
(EDITOR'S NOTE: This is the fifth in a series of editorials and interpretive
articles on the investigating conittees. Today's contribution was written
by Alan Barth, member of the Washington Post staff in the. Bulletin of the

The Daily welcomes communications fromits readers on matters oa
general interest, and will publish all letters which are signed by the writer
and in good taste. Letters exceeding 300 words in length, defamatory or
libelous letters, and letters which for any reason are not in good taste will
be condensed, edited or withheld from publication at the discretion of the

Degeneration ...
To the Editor:


American Association of University Professors. I ]HE disclosures by Miss Price
By ALAN BARTH comes not as a surprise, but
rather a deep disappointment. It
The beginning of defense is the recognition of danger. reflects the extent to which in-
It seems to me that in the academic world today there is a wide- tellectual degeneration has crept
spread failure to face and to assess realistically the forces in American into the academic institutions-
life 'which are now mobilized to extinguish academia freedom. Speci- more especially among the young
fically, I think that many university professors and presidents are fail- university men and women in the
ing to recognize the real peril presented-to themselves and to the U.S.
society they serve-by the current congressional investigations of their Friends would recall that for
institutions. ;making a speech before a peace
There seems to be a widespread tendency to treat these Investi- group in Detroit in May, 1951, I
gations as minor irritations to be borne philosophically or as bridges epaiztend A dictaphon isin
to be crossed with a little caution and circumspection. Not very long stalled and I sat there for nearly
ago, for example, the Association of American Colleges adopted a reso- two hours. And on Convocation
lution in which it expressly declared that "the colleges should wel- day in 1952, I appeared before fel-
come any free and impartial inquiry" as a means of promoting popular low students on the Joint' Judi-
understanding of the accomplishments of higher education, ciary to answer whether or not

course, ncr, based on the fact
that I kept c"mpany wv4n "unpo-
pular opinions." They didn't mind
my rubbing shoulders with Repub-
licans, Democrats, drunks or cri-
Again, in May, 1953, a fellow
country-woman (a total stranger
to me) took exception to my views
on the Malan regime and wrote of
my existence to the South African
Minister of Interior. ,;he didn't
need any coaxing.
It is all the more detestable,
therefore that persons entrusted
with responsibilities as advisors or
counsellors should encourage stu-
dents to turn informers. Frankly,
my personal relationship with the
international Center was far from
cordial and this could be said for
a number of foreign students
whom I knew, who had differing
opinions on controversial topics
but were petrified to open their
The two students who are to
appear before the real Un-Ameri-
cans in Lansing are my good
friends in spite of the fact that
we do not see eye to eye on every
single issue. I have other friends
besides, with whom I perhaps do
not share as many common ideas
but most certainly share, with
them mutual trust and respect.
However, I want to add unhesi-
tatingly, that I not only admire
the courage of the subpoenaed stu-
dents, but also stick by their side
in defending academic freedoms.
The editors of The Daily would
do well, instead of haggling over


I am convinced that this attitude of "welcome" toward legis-
lative investigations of universities is an utterly disastrous folly. It
reflects-at least so it seems to me-a total misconception of the

I attended the McPhaul dinner.
The invitation to testify came on
grounds of "strong suspicions"
that I was present 'actually I
wasn't). These suspicions, o

A congressional hearing-at any rate & hearing conducted under-
the prevailing know-nothing auspices-is a disadvantageous ground on A
which to fight the battle for academic freedom. It provides, to begin!
with, an atmosphere entirely unfriendly and unfamiliar to men of
learning. It is an atmosphere in which the presentation of a con- OFFICIAL
sidered and reasoned argument is virtually impossible. The presenta-
tion is bound to be incessantly interrupted by the explosion of photo- , BULLETIN
graphic flash bulbs, by the movement of newspapermen and curious
spectators, by the gavel-pounding of a chairman determined to ex-
clude rationality from the hearing room, and impertinent questions (Continued from Page 2)
from the members of the committee.
It is perfectly clear that the discussion in such a hearing is not fulfillment of tne reeen





" .., ,

At Lydia Mendelssohn.
lian Gish, presented by the University of
Michigan Drama Season.
THE STORY of the opening of the nine-
teenth drama season at Lydia Mendels-
sohn is much like that of the eighteenth
and seventeenth, and, I presume, many that
have gone before: a handsome production,
a couple really fine performances, but not
much of a play. "The Trip to Bountiful" is
primarily a vehicle for stars; any inventive-
ness it develops comes from the performers.
It does provide an approximately adequate
frame for virtuoso acting, and some of this
acting was quite brilliant.
Unfortunately, however, a few good ac-
tors or even a few well conceived charac-
ters do not make a dramatic situation of
necessary force. The story of an old lady
who wants to return to her country home
is the meat of "Bountiful." It is in the
main offered forth sentimentally (but not
slickly), salted by the opposition of her
selfish daughter-in-law and larded by the
earnest confusion of her entrapped son.
All three acts are well padded with char-
acter touchese, but, in general, each act
repeats the same ones and adds little that
is fresh to the dramatic situation.
The play could profitably be compared to
"Point of No Return," a work of similar
spirit and intention, but which does succeed,
in spite of its bifuration, in complicating
the drama somewhat after the first act. In

"Bountiful," for instance, the second act
could have been left out entirely without
the slightest sense of anything missing.
About all that can be said for the second
act is that Miss Gish is given her biggest
opportunity at the end of it, this opportunity
being the final hysterical plea to a sheriff
that she be allowed to go the last twelve
miles to her home. This, and all other fa-
cets of the character, she handles with ap-
peal and driven energy. It is, however, not
so much Miss Gish as it is Kim Stanley, in
the role of Jessie May Watts, the daughter-
in-law, who holds the play in Texas and in
the kind of fountain-coke, moving-picture
world that the playwright intended.
Miss Stanley's gestures, her voice, her
"nervousness" are perfectly controlled, and,-
she virtually runs off with the play at
times, furnishing a constant uneasy re-
minder that it should not be quite that
easy a thing to do.
In the final analysis, "The Trip To Bounti-
ful," in spite of a little heavy-footed poesy
near the end, is never a really bad play; it
has one good characterization and another
better than average :and its padding is only
occasionally uncomfortable. Still, it seems as
if the Drama Season might have considered
the tepid New York reaction toward it a
little more seriously. Good plays fail on
Broadway, but they usually stimulate some
good arguments in the process; at best
"Bountiful" might be advanced for the cause
of in-the-tradition, unexperimental theater
by its supporters, but hardly with much
--Bill Wiegand

going to be about academic freedom. It is not going to concern !itself
with the accomplishments of universities or with the problems of pro-
moting intellectual maturity among students. It will concern itself,
as the investigation comrittee chairmen have made quite clear, with
individuals. It will be a discussion not of principles but of personalities.
Thus these hearings will revolve around such questions as whether
Professor A is a Communist because Louis Budenz says that someone
told him that Profesor A was believed to be a Communist a quarter-
of a century ago .... whether Prof. B. is subversive because he belongs
or once belonged to organizations which have incurred the disapprov-
al of the Attorney General or the House Committee on Un-American
Activities . . . whether a particular college is communist-dominated
because it allowed on its campus a visiting lecturer who denounced the
Un-American Activities Committee.
Out of this kind of inquiry and discussion can come only di-
visive controversy and confusion. No doubt some of the academic
witnesses will respond to questions which seem to them impertinent
and offensive with dignity and coolness and clarity. But some oth-
ers, no doubt, will lose their tempers and talk foolishly. The com-
mittee, presumably, will be able to discover a number of teachers
who joined the Party years ago for respectable reasons, who got
out of it years ago for respectable reasons-to make witnessing a
career. Some of the professors in this category will seek the pro-
tection of the Fifth Amendment-mistakenly, in my judgment-I
in order to avoid possible prosecution or in order to avoid being re-
quired to give the names of persons who, like themselves, joined
the Party innocently and got out of it long ago. Some will refuse
to answer the questions of the committee on abstract grounds of
conscience, pleading the protection of the First Amendment, and
may find themselves cited for contempt of Congress.
This is a point at which should like to same something about the
use of the Fifth Amendment as a means of avoiding acknowledgmentI
of past membership in the Communist Party. I do not mean to at-
tempt here any exhaustive discussion of its scope and protection in
ordinary circumstances. I mean merely to consider its application to
teachers in the special context of the current inquiries into colleges
and universities.
When a committee of Congress hales a man before it and asks him
if he has ever been a Communist, it impales him in one or another of
the prongs of a trident. If the witness answers "yes" to this question,
the committee is all too likely to insist that he identify individuals who
were in the Party with him-a kind of degradation which any sensi-j

Carillon Recital by Ferdinand Tim-
mermands, Guest Carillonneur,. from
Holland, at 7:15 Wednesday evening,
May 12, on the Charles Baird Carillonj
in Burton Memorial Tower. The pro-
gram will include compositions by Vi-
valdi, Bach, Mozart, Henk Badings;
Dutch Songs of the 17th Century, and
Four Peasant Dances written by Mr.
Events Today
Musie Education Students are re-
quested to attend the M.E.N.C. meet-
ing to be held tonight, at 7 p.m.,
Hussey Room League. Election of of-
Mathematics Club Meeting, 8 p.m.
today, West Conference Room, Rack-
ham Bldg. Mr. K. M. Siegel from
the Engineering Research Institute
will speak on "Present requirements for
mathematics research in the electro-
magnetic scattering field."
The Young Demorcats have invited
Prof. Henry Owens, Democratic Candi-
date for Congress, to be their guestl
speaker tonight at 7:30 p.m., Audi-
torium B, Angell Hall. He will talk
on "Outlook for Democrats in Novem-
Paul R. Leach, Jr., of the Extension
Division of DuPont will give a talk on
"The Future as DuPont Sees It," this
afternoon at 4 p.m., 140 Business Ad-
ministration School. Sponsored by Al-
K1,iP Orci_ Professional Business

the degree of Master of M cusic (vusi

Education). She is a pupil of Philip minor issues or weighing the "be-
Duey, and her program will be open to nefits" (if any) of Dulles' bank-
the general public rupt foreign policies or joining in
the moth infested anti-Red cru-
Student Recital. David Murray, Bar- sade, to lead the way to indepen-
tone, will present a program in partial sdt ed-h a oidpn
fulfillment of the requirements for the dent thought and honest intellec-
degree of Master of Music at 8:30 Wed., tual inquiry.
May 12, in the Rackbam Assembly Hall. -L. V. Naidoo, '53
It willsinclude works by Bach, Ravel,
Brahms. and Britten, and will be open
to the public. Mr. Murray is a pupil of Open Hearing
Harold Haugh.j"S


To the Editor:

T HE ACADEMIC Freedom sub-
commission of SL will sponsor
an open hearing for all students
and faculty members who have
testified before the Clardy Com-
mittee, on Thursday, May 14, at
The objects, of this meeting are,
to make it possible for those who
have testified to clarify their po-
sitions, to the campus and to give
the student body an opportunity
to hear the positions of these stu-
dents and faculty members first
In the weeks to come there will
undoubtedly be a great deal of dis-
cussion about how to handle indi-
viduals who have been called to
testify as well as about the place
of committees on the academic
(and national) scene. The ability
to evaluate the positions of vari-
ous individuals requires these po-
sitions be understood, not from
editorialized comments but as the
individuals state and develop
It is in line with giving the stu-
dents a chance to evaluate the ac-
tual reasons and positions that
the meeting on Thursday is being
-Etta Gluckstein
SL Academic Freedom Sub-

tive man might understandably desire to escape. If he answers 'no" Fratern
to the question, then the committee may hold over his head the threat
of a prosecution for perjury based upon testimony calling him a form- square and Folk Dancing. Special
preparation for the MSDLA State Festi-
er Communist by one or another of the committee's former-and pro- val. Everyone welcome. Lane Hal, to-
fessedly reformed-Communists. And if he refuses to answer the ques- night, 7:30-10,00.
tion at all, pleading the constitutional privilege against self-incrimi- Episcopal Student Foundation. Tea
nation, the committee hopes to have his university discipline him Uy: from 4 to 5:30 at Canterbury House, All
dismissal. students invited.
I submit to you that it is outright folly for any university to lend
. . Museum Movies, "Forest Ranger" and
itself to this stratagem. I submit to you that is an abdication of aca- "Modern Hawaii," free movies shown at
demic independence for any university to serve indiscriminately as! 3 p.m. daily including sat. and Sun.
the executor of punishments arbitrarily imposed by a congressional and at 12:30'Wed., 4th floor movie al-
cove, Museums Building, May 11-17.




Universities, and the individual members of the faculties, have,
of course, a duty of respectful cooperation with any duly consti-
tuted congressional body. But this duty does not require of them
blind obedience. They have a duty also to their own values which
obliges them to judge each case individually on its individual
Of course, I am not questioning the legal authority of Congress
to investigate institutions of higher learning. I do not, for that mat-
ter, question the authority of Congress to investigate the church or
the press, despite the constitutional limitations on legislation in these
spheres. Congress has plenary power-and must have such power-
to look into any area of American life. But to say that Congress has
power to investigate is not necessarily to say that this power ought to

Coming Events
Psychology Chib. At our next meet-
ing, Dr. M. Rosenberg, faculty adviser
to the club, wvill speak on "An Analytic
Theory of Mystical Illumination in Re-
ligious Experience." The meeting will
be held on Wed., May 12, at 7:30 in the
third floor Graduate Lounge in Mason#
Hall. Everyone is welcome.
Freshman Engineering Council will
hold its weekly meeting Wed., May 12,
7:30 p.m., at 1042 East Engineering Bldg.
Reports on College Night, Sophomore
Council, and Questionnaires are due.
The meeting is open to the public.


Sixty-Fourth Year
Edited and managed by students of
the University of Michigan under the
authority of the Board in Control of
Student Publications.

t Hill Auditorium
Michigan Men's Glee Club, Philip Duey,
director, Joseph Savarino, accompanist,
Thomas Lester, tenor, Russell Christopher,
baritone, Robert McGrath, tenor, The No-
velaires, vocal quartet.
SATURDAY night's concert proved to be
an exceptionally enjoyable one. The
program was chosen in good taste and with
enough variety to preclude even a single
boring moment,
The evening - began with little ostenta-
tion. The first group was rather serious
in nature. But the ice started to break
with Haydn's "To the Women," a light-
hearted -piece extolling the virtues of the
fairer sex. Schubert's "The Omnipo-
tence" followed in sharp contrast, a reli-

topher's voice is a rich and mature baritone.
He uses it well. His tone is relaxed and ef-
fortless, and with full intensity. As well as
vocal technique, Mr. Christopher possesses
dramatic and interpretive talent. He appear-
ed completely at home in both grand opera
and lighter music.
Robert McGrath stepped in to sing the
exotic and mysterious "Far Above the Purple
Hills" with pianissimo choral accompani-
ment. His voice was light and well suited to
the piece. And with their extreme vocal con-
trol, the Glee Club outdid themselves.
The first half of the program concluded
with a number from Guys and Dolls but
the bravos of the audience made it neces-
sary for the group to render encores of
"Casey Jones," "Nola," and "It Ain't Ne-
cessarily So," with solos by Russell Chris-
topher. It was in this last group that the

some sentimental, and some folksey and hu-
morous with action and special sound ef-
The Glee Club sounded rich and velvety.
Occasionally one section dominated and
sometimes the tone sounded slightly for-
ced, but never did a single voice stand out.
Professor Duey deserves praise for his
choral arrangements. He very definitely
wrote bearing in mind his singers' limi-
tations. Accompanist Joseph Savarino did
a stunning job. He was never overpower-
ing, but he skillfully brought out his part
when called for.
At the closerthe audience rose to sing
"The Yellow and Blue." Even the most long-
haired had long since let down their locks.
The short hairs were well satisfied too. I
suspect there were some who shed a tear
that evening, while others felt like a good
pitcher of beer to round the evening off.


be exercised. In my own view, it ought resolutely to be eschewed in La Sociedad Hispanica will meet Wed.,
regard to universities-at least when the aim and tendency of the in- May 12, at 8 p.m. in the League. There
vestigation is coercive, will be a poetry contest and picnic
eplans will be made. Also scholarships
One function of institutions of higher learning in a free society to Mexico will be awarded. Officers for
is the propagation of unorthodoxy. Their business is to produce men next year will be elected. Refreshments.
and women who will question inherited values and challenge consti- All members are urged to attend this
tted authoristrd s himportant meeting.
The notion, that religion, the press, and the universities should American Society for Public Adminis-
serve the State is essentially a Communist notion. Government control tration Social Seminar will meet Wed.,
SMay 12, 7:30 p.m., West Conference
oom, Rackham Building. The speaker
tarian system. In a free society, these institutions must be wholly free will be Wallace Sayre, Chairman, De-
-which is to say that their function is to serve as checks upon the partment of Government, City College
of New York.
State, as devices for keeping governmental authority within appropri-
ate bounds. Phi Eta Sigma. Initiation banquet
A free society differs from a totalitarian society in that its gov- will be held Thurs., May 13, In the
Micign 'nin. ewinitiates will as-
ernment is one of limited powers-and limited jurisdiction. There have semble in Room 3-D at 5 o'clock.
always been important areas of American life which have been left to
private regulation-higher education among them. The administra- Beta Gamma Sigma spring 'meeting
_,1_ __a 3.,, - 1+-11t vo f will be held Thurs., May 13, 3 p.m.,

Editorial Staff
Harry Lunn..........Managing Editor
Eric Vetter...............City Editor
Virginia Voss.........Editorial Director
Mike Wolff........Associate City Editor
Alice B. Silver..Assoc. Editorial Director
Diane D. AuWerter....Associate Editor
Helene Simon..........Associate Editor
Ivan Kaye...............Sports Editor
Paul Greenberg... .Assoc. Sports Editor
Marilyn Campbell...Women's Editor
Kathy Zeisler.,..Assoc. Women's Editor
Chuck Kelsey ......Chief Photographer
Business Staff
j rhomas Treeger. Business Manager
William Kaufman Advertising Manager
Harlean Hankin. ...Assoc. Business Mgr:
William Selden ....... Finance Manager
Anita Sigesmund. Circulation Manager
Telephone NO 23-24-1





Back to Top

© 2021 Regents of the University of Michigan