r PAGE TWO THE MICHIGAN DAILY r.. On the Driving Ban MATTER OF FACT: BY A CONVINCING referendum vote of 5,542 to 1,782, students have affirmed their desire to have the present University driving regulations either modified or re- pealed outright, with 2,702 voters asking complete abolition of the controversial driv- ing ban. These results clearly indicate that student opinion wants a change in the sta- tus quo, and should give the administration the necessary student support to back up necessary revisions. In addition, the results confirm the arguments that present regulations are unenforceable and that removal would not create any greater traffic problem than already exists. The referendum showed that 575 students are driving illegally on campus, while 708 students disclosed that they possessed cars with University permits. These figures indi- cate that the enforcement of existing regu- lations has fallen down completely, since an extremely large group is succeeding in evading the law. In regard to the traffic and parking situ- ation, the vote revealed that there probably would be no substantial change in the num- ber of cars on campus if the ban were re- moved completely. Since it appears rela- tively easy to skirt existing rules, most of the students who want automobiles here seem to have them. Altogether more than 1,200 stu- dents said they had cars now, and approxi- mately 1,200 said they would have them without the ban. Thus it would seem that repeal of the measure would not add to the present traf- fic difficulties. Instead, removal of the ban would permit the University to save the money now being used for red-tape and police vigilance to curb violations. With this information to back them up, administrative officers should be able to present a convincing brief to the Regents asking for liberal changes in the existing rules. The handling of the referendum is an excellent demonstration of how effectively the University and the Student Legislature can work together on common projects. The referendum, mutually beneficial to both par- ties, will probably result in improvement of University regulations from the student standpoint as well. -Harry Lunn ON THE Washington Merry- Go-Round with DREW PEARSON WASHINGTON-General Eisenhower's re- cent conference with military chiefs at the Pentagon did not lead to much hope that he could end the Korean War on his forthcoming trip. The picture given him on the whole was gloomy. In fact, considerably more casualties may be necessary before there can be any conclusion in Korea. In general, the President-elect was told that the Communists had built up their strengthg to a peak of 1,200,000 men. They took advantage of the truce talks to put across this build-up, and it now develops that the Chinese were weak and crumbling when they asked for a truce-apparently for the purpose of stalling for time. From our point of view the truce talks were one of the crucial mistakes of the war. Eisenhower was also given the rather ominous news that signs of a Communist of- fensive have been reported. The forward placement of enemy artillery along the Ko- rean battle front looks like an approaching large-scale attack. Also there has been a build-up of light bombers just across the Yalu river, which is a bad sign. For light bombers are chiefly used for offense. There was no indication that an of- fensive was being timed for Eisenhower's visit to Korea-though that could be the. case. The President-elect was told that, if an offensive does come, UN troops were suf- ficient to hold the line, though the line might be dented in spots. Eisenhower asked each member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff the same question. Of Admiral Fechteler, chief of naval operations, he -asked: What kind of shape is the Navy in in Korea? Fine shape, Fechteler replied. Eisenhower got about the same answer from Gen. Joe Collins, Army Air Force. He did not discuss his trip to Korea with the Joint Chiefs of Staff, though he told Secretary of Defense Lovett that he would let him know about the trip in two or three days. FAME IS FLEETING GENERAL EISENHOWER and Freeman Gosden, partner in the team of Amos and Andy, were playing golf the other day and discussing the question of fame. General Eisenhower complained a bit that his new-found fame restricted his movements and his normal way of living. But Gosden assured him that fame is very fleeting. Gosden went on to explain that for a good many years he was supposed to be one of the biggest figures in the entertainment world, but since Amos and Andy had gone on television, three Negro actors had been hired to play the parts-Tim Moore as Kingfish, Alvin Childress as Amos, and Spencer Williams as Andy. "After the TV films are made," Gosden explained to Eisenhower, "They are taken to a theatre for a preview before a live audience, at which we dub in the audi- ence applause and reaction. "And after it's all over, the three actors who have only just taken over these TV parts nearly get mobbed, while Charlie Cor- rell and I who have been playing them for years, get shoved aside." CHANGING WASHINGTON MOVING-OUT DAY is approaching for the following: LESLIE BIFFLE, astute Secretary of the Senate. Biffle, famous for making Alben Barkley Vice-President, for giving away canned tomato juice at Christmas, and for dressing up as a chicken salesman to take election-campaign soundings, will not be- come minority senate secretary when the Democrats lose control. He is tired of poli- tics and will go into business. AMBASSADOR FELIX NIETO DEL RIO, popular Chilean envoy to the U.S.A. He is packing his bags not because a General won an election in this country, but be- cause, Carlos Ibanez, won an election in his country. ERNEST GRUENING, Governor of Alas- ka. Gruening has been Governor of Alaska -and a good one-for 13 years, longer than any other man in history. Probably he has been Governor longer than most governors of states. His term expires in April at which time he will resign. He is not removable at the pleasure of the President. MIKE STRAUS, Commissioner of Recla- mation. Straus, an old personal friend of Harold Ickes, is turning in his resignation to Eisenhower. But in the final Truman budget he is proposing a long list of dams and power projects which Republican sena- tors in the west very much want, but which Eisenhower budget-pruners will probably cut. CARLOS REYES-Press secretary of the Chilean embassy. He is moving out because he once refused to shake hands with the new Chilean ambassador to the U.S.A., Anibal Jara. Jara once edited a Chilean magazine in New York, looks like John L. Lewis, and wrote the anti-Am- erican speeches of President Ibanez which helped him win the recent election. MOVING-IN DAY is approaching for the following: COL. GORDON MOORE. brother-in-law of General Eisenhower. A retired Army offi- cer, married to Mamie's younger sister, Col- onel Moore is in the public-relations busi- ness. He will get some of the big accounts once given to Democrats. TOM STEPHENS, probable new ap- pointment secretary to Eisenhower. For- mer assistant to campaign manager Her- bert Brownell during the Dewey try for the White House, Stephens has been with Ike most of the time since he arrived from Paris, is efficient, hard-working, good team-worker. SEN. "WILD BILL" LANGER of North Dakota. For years Langer has been some- thing of a GOP stepchild. Republicans once tried to bar him from taking his Senate seat, since then he has voted frequently with the Democrats, especially on domestic issues. Now Langer moves into one of the most important spots in the entire Senate- chairman of the Judiciary Committee. Re- publicans have been doing their best to per- suade him to take another post, but their hands are tied. For all Langer has to do is vote with the Democrats and this one vote would permit the Democrats to organize the Senate. (Copyright, 1952, by the Bell Syndicate) The H-Bomb And Europe By JOSEPH ALSOP PARIS-A new Western strategy, depend- ing much more heavily on strategic air- power and such new weapons as the hydro- gen bomb, seems likely to emerge from the crisis that is now overtaking the Atlantic alliance. Initially, at least, President-elect Eis- enhower may well be reluctant to adopt this new strategy, since it involves dras- tic revision of his own plans for Western European defense. Yet he can hardly es- cape the central fact, already reported in this space. Our allies are no longer work- ing towards the defense force of ninety- eight ready and reserve divisions, as re- quired by Eisenhower's former planning staff at SHAPE. Under extreme budgetary pressure, our allies have lowered their targets. As a result, even continuing American aid plus recruit- ment of the Germans will not produce a force of much more than sixty-five divi- sions by 1954. Certain of our allies, most notably the British chiefs of staff, have therefore developed a new strategic concept, to rationalize, as it were, their own lower- ing of targets. This new Western defense concept comes in three parts. First, the primary deterrents of Soviet aggression are to be America's strategic air- power and America's stock of atomic wea- pons, prospectively reinforced by the hydro- gen bomb, the British atomic bomb and the small but growing strategic airpower of Bri- tain. Second, however, Western Europe, the great prize of Soviet aggressive ambition, the real key to the forward airbases which make our strategic airpower truly effective, is emphatically not to be left naked and undefended. There must be a tough, effec- tive, "covering force" to discourage any at- tack on Europe. Third, better plans must also be laid to help this covering force to "cut the ene- my down to size" by right uses of the new weapons. The ninety-eight division scheme for Western European defense was based on an intelligence estimate that the Kremlin could attack with 100 divi- sions across northern Europe, and send seventy-five more southwards against Italy, Yugoslavia and Greece. The new weapons should be used to prevent such large Soviet forces from being supplied, by severing their communications with the Russian homeland, as well as to destroy these attacking forces themselves. On the surface, this looks likea scheme that will allow our hard-pressed allies to stabilize their rearmament at approximately the present levels; will allow us at home to stabilize our aid to Europe also; and will afford what is essential-a secure defense of the free world. In the end, the new con- cept will do all these things. At first, how- ever, adoption of this new concept will force a temporary increase of American military investment, while simultaneously testing the Eisenhower Administration's political and diplomatic skill to the utmost. Budget-wise, what sticks out a mile is the vastly increased importance that the new defense concept will confer on Am- erica's offensive and defensive air power. As previously disclosed in this space, President-elect Eisenhower will find wait- ing for him at the .White House deeply alarming studies of the air picture by the most capable American scientists and ex- perts. These studies indicate that improved Rus- sian air defenses are beginning to neutralize our strategic air strength. If this is al- lowed to happen, our whole atomic stock- pile will, in effect, be sterilized. These stu- dies also indicate that the growth of Rus- sia's strategic airpower and atomic stocks, combined with the weakness of our own air. defenses, will open the United States to crippling surprise attack within about two years. These are fearful trends, which must be arrested at whatever cost. The cost of a "crash program" to avert these trends will certainly be large. Meanwhile, any slackening of our mili- tary contributions to Europe will deprive Europe of its essential covering force. The short-range political and diploma- tic problems are equally repellent. With- in the American armed forces, adoption of the new Western defense concept will surely touch off a major row-the first to protest probably being Generals Ridg- way and Gruenther. Among the allies, very definitely including the Germans, the reduction of Europe's defenses to a mere covering force will arouse still more bitter protests. These protests can hardly be stilled, and sensible Western defense plans cannot possibly be made, unless we somewhat relax our present-policy of total atomic secrecy. You cannot convince Europeans that a covering force will be good enough, you can- not make sound allied plans for strength- ening this covering force with the new weapons, if any mention of atomic bombs is strictly forbidden in inter-allied discussions. We must at least be ready to disclose to our allies, not how the bombs are made, but what the bombs will accomplish; not how many we have, but whether enough will be available for the European planners. There are many other problems that might be mentioned. --eter3 to i e dietor 900 Voices .,.. To the Editor: IN ITS LAST meeting the Stu-! dent Legislature passed a reso- lution constituting a Committee on Evaluation of Campus Organi- zations. The announced member- ship of this committee proved to be a shock to me, as it must have been to many other international students on this campus. As constituted by the said reso- lution, in addition to the appoint- ed members, the committee would include represtatives from the Union, the League, the Daily, Pan- hellenic Assembly, the Interhouse Council, and the Interfraternity Council. The pity is, that, there being nearly 900 foreign students on this campus, the so-called rep- resentative body of the students on this campus did not feel the ne- cessity of including a representa- tive from the International Stu- dents' Association on this com- mittee. One person in the SL. did present an amendment to the ef- fect that a representative from I.S.A. should be included on this committee, but (presumably) due to lack of support the particular member withdrew his amendment. I was present at this meeting as one of the many candidates and was pained to see the inter- est of the foreign students shatter once again. May I, through these columns, ask the legislature in gen- eral and the persons responsible for the constitution of this com- mittee in particular, why the need was not felt to have a representa- tive from the I.S.A.? Does the Stu- dent Legislature consider the I.S.A. less representative than the I.H.C. or I.F.C., or does it think that the international students on this campus do not deserve to be represented on such an important committee? It is a fact that a great majoi- ty of the foreign students do not come under either I.H.C. or I.F.C. The I.S.A. is the only organization which can represent their inter- ests. Moreover, because the pur- pose of the said committee is to evaluate the campus organiza- tions, and because there are a great number of national organi- zations on the campus, most ofI them being affiliated to the I.S.A., there is a definite need for taking a representative from the I.S.A. Is that too much for the 900 for- eign students to expect of the S.L.? I as an International student of the University of Michigan ear- nestly request the S.L. to re-con- sider their stand and I suggest that a representative of the IS.A. be included on the proposed commit- tee. It would not only be very use- ful for the efficiency of the com- mittee, but would also go to a great extent towards the improve- ment of the public relations of the S.L. -Rajesh Gupta Correction . * To the Editor: A LETTER dealing with Union Opera tickets appeared in The Daily several days ago bearing the name of Robert F. Shallow. Des- pite the fact that the name was misspelled it was close enough to my name to make it appear that I wrote the letter. I neither wrote the letter, support the ideas con- tained therein, nor have any in- terest in the matter with which it deals. If a student wishes to pre- sent charges of that nature, he should have the self-respect to use his own name and accept the criticisms arising from it. -Robert Scott Shellow (Editor's note: The Daily apolo- gizes to Mr. Shellow for the em- harassment caused him by the letter to which his name was forged.) Opera Tickets . . To the Editor: L AST SUNDAY a letter appeared in this column and was fol- lowed by an editorial on Thursday concerning Union Opera Tickets. Since Lambda Chi Alpha's name was mentioned in both, we want to explain briefly our position. The letter came as a complete shock and surprise to us. It was neither authorized nor approved by us. We were satisfied with our seats for the Union Opera and didn't feel that there had been any favoritism shown. -Bill Markstrom President of Lambda Chi Alpha * * * Why Is It?.. . To the Editor: WHY IS IT that the liberal ele- ments are not accurately repre- Imof G.% Oats "rMF v.!/lsaa/GYON POLvr C^ CA "Think This Is Too Soon To Hang 'Em Up?" / ~ 01, 71 in a democracy, but everyone should be treated equally. In reply to Mr. Sharpes letter appeared a 480 word letter by Mr. Zakariasen. I believe it to be only fair that Mr. Sharpe be allowed to answer in the same number of words. Yet Sharpe was accused of being a letter hog, of writing 600 words when he wrote around 500, and of bursting into The Daily office. I doubt very much if Sharpe did burst into the office (as was indi- cated) for he had requested an au- dience with Mr. Samra before go- ing to The Daily Office. Aside from this, I believe that anyone who knows Mr. Sharpe will agree that he is smart enough not to go burst- ing in to anything like a confer- ence as this is just the thing that would give The Daily reason to criticize his actions. But no matter what the liberals do they always end up on the wrong side of the fence. This is because they do not get fair cov- erage and no one is able to find out the good side of a person un- less he is on the side of reaction and conservatism. Even Sen. Morse gets criticized for the views which he holds, es- pecially since he left the Republi- can Party. -Valentine Birds * * * Rah Rah? . . . To the Editor: RE: FOLLOWING the Philoso- phers, by Cal Samra. It was with pleasure that I read your charming analysis of our cur- rent philosophical tendencies. Fortunately there are Editors on The Daily with a keen sense of the value of careful rational thinking, and of the necessity of keeping the student body posted on the marital habits of a great man. It is really a shame that your article "Following the Philoso- phers" did not come out under the auspices of the "This I Believe' series. The level of thinking in your excellent presentation reveals the same range as was exhibited in the more than imbecilic state- ments of a few of the "This I Be- lieve" credos. Please continue these scholarly "footsie-minded' articles, for sure- ly with enough of this type of editorializing we may achieve a new low in the Rah Rah approach to philosophic criticism. -Tom Linton Korea & Africa... To the Editor: IN RE MR. ED Shaffer's recent ravings (appearing Tues. Nov. 18 issue-title "South Africa") it would seem a few corrections are necessary to arrive at some re- mote resemblance to the truth; (1) The war in Korea is not "against the non-white peoples of Asia," as Mr. Shaffer states, but an attempt to stop Communist ag- gression-a war against those who believe in the Communist method of conquest and government by terror and concentration camp- the race of the aggressors having nothing to do with it. (2) The refusal of the U.S. to agree to Communist truce condi- tions has been based upon the ing the wishes of only the party bureaucrats.' (3) Korea was an action sanc- tioned by the United Nations- after an out and out act of ag- gression had been committeed by the North Korean (Communists) against the South Koreans. For the U.S. to interfere in the present "Malan crisis" in South Africa, as Mr. Shaffer seems to suggest we do, would certainly be interference in the internal af- fairs of another sovereign nation -without authority of UN sanc- tion. (4) The Communists in South Africa, as everywhere, have been behind much of the racial hatred; for the Communist philosophy on racial issues is' (a) Stir up racial hatred and anomosity, (b) capi- talize upon it for Communist purposes (c) but as far as making any sincere effort to help elimi- nate racial tensions thru educa- tion-the Communists have no in- terest, as continued racial ten- sion is a necessary tool for them in their world wide march to dic- tatorship. -Beecher F. Russell * * * Lane Hall Pamphlet . . To the Editor: M ANY WHO react more private- ly than we who write letters to the editor have indicated an interest in further contributions to the discussion engendered by the recent "This I Believe" series. Consequently we are announcing the forthcoming publication of a pamphlet containing the four lec- tures in the series, the state- ments published in The Daily, and some additional statements which we hope will augment and round out the collection now available. This is an open invitation, the same as that already sent to oth- er contributors: "This invites you to make a very great contribution; nothing less than a statement of your private beliefs, your personal rule of life, your independently-arrived- at sense .of values - all in 500 words. "Moreover, we'd like you to tell not only what your be'liefs are now, but how you reached them; and if they have changed, then what caused the change. We want this very personal. We'd like you to tell of things or events in your life, personally important to you, which resulted in changing or strengthening your beliefs. "There are some things we do not want. We do not want a ser- mon . . . or editorializing or sec- tarianism or 'uplift' or 'finger- pointing' or the riding of hobbies; we do not want your views on the American way of life or democracy or free enterprise. These are of vital importance - but another subject. Simply stated, we want you to tell us what you live by \ "Although this is designed to express moral and spiritual be- liefs, it is not concerned with any specific form of religion. This is your decision, for it is your be lief." (We are concerned with what you believe, not what you do not believe.) Anyone who wishes to contribute may turn his statement in at Lane Hall before December 5. -C. Grey Austin The Compass... To the Editor: WHILE the "issue" of the N.Y Compass has perhaps already received undue attention, we fee SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 1952 f. . oblige us to entertain any illu- sions about the "liberalism" of the Compass, long lists of Good Works notwithstanding. This "liberalism" is what we are "against." The long history of the type of quasi-lib- eral, pseudo-left orientation fol- lowed by the Compass and simi- lar publications provides ample justification, we think, for our "cynicism." We submit, therefore, that in the battle for democracy and in- dividual freedom, it is better to fight alone, with our eyes open, than to seek the support of groups which while crying aloud in the name of freedom, at the same time not too subtly sanction its antithesis. -Henry Esner, Jr. John Leggett * * * Quad Formalities... To the Editor: UPON GOING down to dinner this evening, I was greeted by the checker with the statement that "the axe has fallen today," upon which he pointed to a no- tice posted' by the dining room door. The notice contained the dress regulations passed by the South Quad Council, a body which in the past contributed much to the improvement of Ann Arbor's finest housing units. I must state here, before I con- tinue, that I have enjoyed living in the South Quadrangle, that I hope to continue living here for five more years, and that I gen- erally hold nothing but respect for the South Quad Council and the regulations passed by the Coun- cil. However, I feel that in this instance the Quad Council has acted harshly, more in the manner of the WCTU than that of an honorable organ of student gov- ernment. The dress regulations, which I assume, attempt to create or maintain gentlemen within the Quardrangle, are in the very na- ture of their crude reminder, of- fensive to those of us who are gentlemen and unsuccessful in their attempt to create gentlemen of those of us who are not so by the time we reach college. I should suggest, as an aside, that the Quad Council consider tablecloths every bit as befitting gentlemen as dress shirts, ties, suit coats and dress pants. I should suggest also as an aside, that fatigue pants, which are specifically prohibited in the new regulations, since they are found acceptable in the classroom, at church, and at concerts, be also acceptable in the dining rooms of the Quadrangle. I am sure that the notice was intended as a reminder for those very few who come to Sunday din- ner in tee shirts and blue jeans but these few people can be given private reminders without insult- ing those of us who have under stood the regulations from the be- ginning and have come to dinner dressed respectably. Because a very few men cannot use discre- tion and tasteis poor reason for the South Quad Council to come to their level and thus mar the high respect most of us hold for sen- sible, mature student government. Louis R. Zako, '53 "THEY THAT dally nicely with words may quickly make them wanton." -Viola in "Twelfth Night" "THE MORE pity that fools may not speak wisely what wise men do foolishly." -Touchstone in "As You Like It" DORIS FLEESON: Taft Senate Leadership . .G c WASHINGTON-It is General Eisenhow- er's hope that the delicate question of the Senate Republican leadership can be worked out in private conferences, and his friends are quietly working toward that end. There is no disposition in the Eisen- hower camp to deny that Senator Taft's declaration of availability for the job is somewhat embarrasing. They do not wish to oppose him and will try to avoid any semblance of a showdown on the issue. They confess thy would prefer not to have ~hc~iau &iP tioned a long list of legislative problems he expected to suggest to the General for con- sideration. It was all done much in the manner of teacher laying out homework for the class. If it were left strictly to the senators, Taft could certainly win in the balloting. However, they have a new President; it is to their interest for him to succeed and he has much power and patronage at his disposal. .h .ica lga nal etr i at Sixty-Third Year Edited and managed by students of the University of Michigan under the authority of the Board in Control of Student Publications. Editorial Staff Crawford Young.......Managing Editor Barnes Connable............City Editor Cal Samra.......... Editorial Director Zander Hollander...... Feature Editor Sid Klaus ....... Associate City Editor Hariand Britz........Associate Editor Donna Hendleman ....Associate Editor Ed Whipple.............Sports Editor John Jenks......Associate Sports Editor Dick Sewell.....Associate Sports Editor Lorraine Butler........ Wowen's Editor Mary Jane Mills, Assoc. Women's Editor Business Stafl Al Green .......... Business Manager Milt Goetz........Advertising Manager Diane Johnston . . ..Assoc. Business Mgr. Judy Loehnberg ..... Finance Manager Tom Treeger.......Circulation Manager I sented in The Daily and in other belief that it is morally wrong to newspapers throughout the coun- force Chinese and North Korean try? Is it because the newspapers prisoners to return to the Com- and the elements that control munist terror which they dread. them are afraid of the actual truth A popular fallacy is that Com- in the matters the liberals repre- munism is a form of "Peoples sent? Democracy" - that those coun-