PAGE FOUR THE MICHIGAN DAILY THURSDAY, OCTOBER 23, 19521 PAGE FOIJR THURSDAY, OCTOBER 23, 1952 U I Tidelands Oil States' Rights WITH TIDELANDS a fighting issue in Texas and at least a controversial one in Louisiana and California, the position of the major candidates with reference to it will have a very decided effect in the coming election. Strongly endorsing state ownership of the tidelands Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower has, in his statements, enlarged upon the Republican platform, which is opposed to the ever-increasing centralization of power by the Federal government. The Democratic platform is significantly si- lent on the issue of tidelands ownership. Eisenhower has emphasized that he fa- vors legislation by the Congress to vest con- trol in the states to three-mile or three- league limits as appropriate. He maintains that there is no conflict in the Constitutional responsibility of the Federal Government over national resources with the vesting of titles of tidelands in the states. In the case of Texas several factors have entered into the Republican decision to favor state ownership besides the alluring prospect of gaining Texas' 24 electoral votes. Texas as an independent nation in 1845 signed an annexation compact with the United States in which she was allowed to retain control of the tidelands extending. three-leagues (10.3 miles) from her shores. Although no significant oil reserves have been tapped in this under-sea strip of land, as in the case of California and Louisiana, royalties from the tidelands have been ear- marked by the state legislature for the schools. Under Federal 'control of tide- lands only part of the royalties would be returned to the state. The remainder would go to the Federal Government. By 1950 the tidelands oil question had gained sufficient momentum to warrant a Supreme Court decision. That decision while declaring that "the paramount interest in oil discovered beneath these submerged lands is vested in all the people of the United States," nonetheless clearly indicated that it was a question to be settled by the Con- gress. This was a fact apparently overlooked by President Truman when he twice ve- toed legislation passed by the Congress granting the states ownership of the tide- lands. Truman killed the Congressional action declaring that he opposed state ownership because of the "oil lobbies." He ignored the pertinent fact that who- ever owned the tidelands the oil companies would still have to pay -royalties. In a larger sense, Republican policy on the tidelands issue is a reaction to the rec- ord of the Democratic party which has for 20 years systematically tried to centralize the economy in the hands of a small number of bureaus in Washington. The so-called un- holy alliance of Northern Republican indus- trialists and Southern States-Righters has matured with the tidelands issue to a posi- tive policy of support for the Constitutional position of the states and opposition to he il- logical encroachment of Federal power in ev- ery sphere of the national life. -Eugene Hartwig Federal Rights HAVING FLIPPED the "tidelands oil" coin three times and -having received three adverse decisions from the Supreme Court, the "state-control" lobbyists are now call- ing for four out of seven. In the meantime, they have also suc- cessfully defeated the bi-partisan effort to implement the judicial decisions by legislative action. This effort, undertaken last spring, was the "tidelands oil" amendment, placed before the Senate by Senator Lister Hill of Ala- bama, for himself and 18 other Senators including Senator Blair Moody of Michigan. Its purpose was to obtain for all the states the revenues, amounting to over 50 billion dollars, derived from the oil and natural gas deposits in the submerged coastal lands be- yond the low tide mark. The amendment would "dedicate," ac- cording to Sen. Hill "these precious, ir- replacable national and gas resources to the common defense and to education in all states, at all levels." In addition to the advancements in these fields, giving these revenues to all of the states would greatly relieve the overburdened taxpayers. The Supreme Court has ruled three times -once in 1947 and twice in 1950-that these submerged coastal lands beyond the low- tide mark (and not the "tidelands"-the lands between the points of high and low tide) belong to the people of all of, forty- eight states, and are not the property of the adjoining states, California, Texas and Louisiana. In spite of these Supreme Court rulings, the Walters Bill was introduced into the House of Representatives which favored giv- ing the oil to the few states. This bill was passed in the House in July, 1951, and Presi- dent Truman, in line with the Supreme Court decisions, vetoed it. The Walters Bill is nothing but a gift to three individual states of a national re- source of major economic and strategic importance. It tried to accomplish by fed- eral legislation what could not be gained by adjudication. As the New York Times stated : "The Walters Bill is entitled the 'Submerged Lands Act.' It seems that it might be more appropriate as far as the American people are concerned, to call it the 'Submerged Rights Act.'" This is one of the greatest single economy issues that has ever been presented to the American people. It is up to them to decide whether these 50 billion dollars are to be used to the benefit of the few or of the many. -Bob Jaffe Editorials printed in The Michigan Daily are written by members of The Daily staff and represent the views of the writer only. This must be noted in all reprints. NIGHT EDITOR: VIRGINIA VOSS MUSIC_ MR. MENUHIN is that delightful rarity, an unsentimental violinist. He plays cleanly and without the groaning and slid- ing which often mar violin performances. He is also a clever program maker: he placed the music before the intermission and the encore numbers afterwards. Such strategy gave those who came to listen to the music an opportunity to escape the extended vio- lin exercise which is the Paganini Concerto and the various arrangements which made up the remainder of the program. Beethoven's Sonata in C Minor, Op. 30, No. 2 and Bartok's Sonata No. 3 in G for solo violin were the two numbers played before the intermission. The juxtaposi- tion of these two works proved (if any proof is needed) that the best modern works not only can hold their own with the old masters but can even overshadow them. The Beethoven was beautifully played in a sensitive chamber music style, with a careful balance between the violin and piano. In places Mr. Balsam's piano drowned out the violin, especially in the second movement of the Beethoven. And throughout the concert Mr. Balsam's playing was harsh and metallic; there was little of that singing legato and finely molded phrasing which distinguished Mr. Menuhin's performance. More exciting than the Beethoven, and clearly the music upon which Mr. Menuhin lavished the most loving care was the Bartok sonata. Playing solo, Mr. Menuhin showed himself to complete advantage: there wasn't the distraction of Mr. Balsam's unsympa- thetic accompanying. The Bartok sonata is conceived in the style and spirit of Bach's solo violin sonatas and has the intellectual passion and craftsman- like structure of these transcendent works. This sonata is unusual for Bartok. There is none of the tension and driving force of his earlier works. Rather it is serene and relaxed: these are characteristics which we don't usually associate with Bartok's works. The texture of the violin writing is trans- parent, the harmonies predominantly con- sonant. And no modern work that I can re- call more fully exploits the splendid possibil- ities of the violin. Mr. Menuhin negotiated the prodigious difficulties of the Bartok sonata with astounding ease; one felt that in his hands there were no technical problems. The contrapuntal sections of the work came out clear and undistorted; the lyrical parts were simply and movingly played. I feel that no work Bartok has written has ,pleased me more. And my pleasure was in no small part due to Mr. Menuhin's intel- ligent and sensitive interpretation. After the intermission Mr. Menuhin played the Paganini Concerto and a group of ar- rangements. It was evident that Mr. Menuh- in didn't have his heart in this part of the concert. The Paganini was played with the obvious intention of getting through with it as fast as possible. This is of course under- standable: the work is as dated as the trom- ba marina and I can only wish it were as thoroughly obsolete. However, some people like this kind of nineteenth century archae- ologizing, and I am not the one to say that people shouldn't have what they want. Aft- er all, America is a democracy. -Harvey Gross DORIS FLEESON: Women Playing Power Politics KANSAS CITY-The makings of a new deal for women in the Republican Party are present in the Eisenhower campaign. For the first time women who are not afraid of the social and economic changes of the last 20 years have captured front- row seats hitherto reserved for various handsomely attired figureheads long known to the working press as the or- chid-bearers. The cameras are probably beginning to familiarize the public with the delicate fea- tures and permanent poise of Mrs. Charles Howard of Boston, national committeewo- man from Massachusetts. She is now a fixture of the Eisenhower train, not as a personal friend of anyone, including Mrs. Eisenhower, nor as a paid employee to do "public relations." She is there as a woman politician in her own right, quietly and cleverly cementing her influence by helping with the visiting firemen and state organizations. The campaign between convention and election is a great training ground for the patronage and policy problems that in- stantly beset a victorious presidential can- didate. Men of both parties have not been notoriously hospitable toward letting wo- men have the chance to educate them- selves in these practical aspects of power. It possibly occurred to some of the Re- publican women who have long been res- tive that Mrs. India Edwards became a real Democratic shotgun only after she decided to go whistle-stopping in 1948 with the "Who Needs Coal?" fAL - -. II ON THE MEfR Y-('O-OUND I T WITD DREW PEARSON WASHINGTON-An Eisenhower committee has just taken an in- S t teresting step to appease Gerald L. K. Smith. Smith is the organizer and chief spark plug of the Christian Nationalist Party and has nominated General MacArthur for President with State Sen. Jack Tenny of California for vice-presi- den. His chief financial angel is Judge George W. Armstrong of Texas, whose donation to Jefferson College in Mississippi was re- buffed amid nationwide publicity. A few days ago, a committee speaking for General Eisenhower called on Smith and urged him to take the Christian Nationalist Par- ty out of the presidential race. Smith has built up quite a following in Southern California, also some following in Texas, and his party is on the ballot in Washington, Missouri and elsewhere. In states where the Democratic-Republican race may be close, the Christian Nationalists could hold the balance of power. There- fore, Smith was urged to withdraw the party's name from the ballot. As an inducement, Smith was told that if he would withdraw, General Eisenhower would take the initiative in calling personally on General MacArthur. The significance of this gesture is that no less than ex-President Herbert Hoover himself has been trying to get Eisenhower and Mac- Arthur together, but so far has been unable to persuade Ike to go to see Mac. Eisenhower is willing to get together with his former com- mander, but he isn't willing to go to the Waldorf Tower where Mac- Arthur lives. And MacArthur in turn won't go to see him. However, according to the Eisenhower committee that called en Smith, Ike will now go to see Mac-if Gerald L. K. will drop his political party. NOTE-Though MacArthur's name is not on the ballot in Calif- ornia, it's legal to write it in, and a lot of MacArthur admirers plan to do so. *, * . FRANK STEVE MITCHELL YOUNG STEVE MITCHELL, new chairman of the Democratic Na- tional Committee, took down his hair at an off-the-record meet- ing at the Hotel Statler here recently and told how he really thought the Stevenson campaign was going.e He admitted, among other things, that Stevenson's campaign trips had received lukewarm crowds until St. Louis, at which time the committee spent $12,000 to get things organized, sust as the Eisenhower people have been sdoing for some time. e He also admitted that his and Wilson Wyatt's statement of a bandwagon rush to Stevenson in part was wishful thinking. Instead, he said, the election was neither won nor lost.u Discussing political developments in different parts of the country, the refreshingly frank Mitchell said: e That Sen. Lyndon Johnson phoned him to complain that businessmen were threatening to get even with him when he ran in 1954 if he helped Stevenson in '52. That Governor Lausche of Ohio, the alleged Demo- crat, must realize that Stevenson's chances had picked up, because he now occasionally mentioned Stevenson's name. Before, Lausche's contribution to Stevenson had been minus nothing. That the Democrats hadn't emphasized the real issues on tidelands oil; they should have made northern and inland states realize that they would lose by the Eisenhower plan giving tidelands oil to three states only. The Democratic chairman was critical of Senators Smathers and Holland of Florida, who, he said, were carefully ducking. He said Stevenson faced a buzz-saw in the bigger cities of Texas. He told how he had Governor Stevenson telephone Jesse Jones, the ex-RFC director, following which Jesse had printed a fairly warm editorial in his Houston Chronicle. Most Democratic Congressmen in Texas are vacationing, Mitchell admitted, but he warned that this would be remembered when the time came to pass out the patronage. The worst problem he faced as Democratic chairman, Mitchell said, was that local Democratic organizations had disintegrated in the last 20 years, and had to be built up again. Two exceptions he noted were Massachusetts and Rhode Island. Regarding Senator Nixon, Mitchell made this comment: "I think by election day he will be the lowest man on any political totem pole you ever saw." "Eisenhower," he continued, "is now 62 years old. Only a few other men have been older when elected President, and don't forget that Harrison died one month after he took office." EDUCATION AND IKE THE STUDENT newspaper at Columbia University may have come out officially against their president-on-leave, but the faculty is mixed. Some are ardently for Eisenhower, some ardently opposed. A leader of the latter group is the dean of journalism, R. L. Ackerman, who administers the Pulitzer Prize Awards and has helped to train thousands of newsmen. Writing to Stevenson headquarters recently, Dean Ackerman enclosed a check. "Education," he wrote, "has a vital stake in this campaign. The election of General Eisenhower will set an example for ever itudent from the kinderearten tn the rranate level that Xettet4 TO THE EDITOR The Daily welcomes communications from its readers on matters of general interest, and will publish all letters which are signed by the writer and in good taste. Letters exceeding 300 words in length, defamatory or libelous letters, and letters which for any reason are not in good taste will be condensed, edited or withheld from publication at the discretion of the editors. Note to Smale . .. To the Editor: I DEEPLY appreciate the great interest shown in my career by Mr. Smale. One who is two years removed from the scenes of his Michigan Daily activities is often forgotten. In fact, most of the sophomore and junior staffers on The Daily don't know how to spell. my last name and this is indeed a blow to the ego. Happily, Mr. Smale is not of that ilk. Mr. Smale failed to say a few things that would have been ap- propriate to the tone of his highly informative letter. He did not charge that the football concealed a time bomb, set to explode in the. midst of the rally, nor did he ac- cusd me of bringing a gang of ruffians down to break up the meeting. Such claims would be no farther from the truth than the inferences he did draw. One is thus inclined to believe either that he is unimaginative, which is doubtful, or that his ability to analyze the behavior of others has not yet been completely distorted. Mr. Smale's conception of "news" differs somewhat from mine and I am not the least in- clined to go along with him on the proposition that a peaceful Progressive Party rally does not "make such. a good news story." If an element of "news" is con- trast, a peaceful rally is a good story, compared with the more boisterous affairs with which we are all familiar. Thinking that this story might be captured in a picture, I asked five or six kids who were playing football 200 yards away to move within fifty yards of the meeting for a moment so that a photo of them with the meeting going on peacefully in the background would catch the tone of the ac- tivities. As the sun was in the wrong place and the picture did not look good, I was not inclined to argue strenuously when a young man, evidently Mr. Smale, leaped bravely into the midst of the youngsters, and then wildly wav- ed his arms, signaling three or four burly men who came imme- diately to his aid. These "gentle- men" must have shared some of Mr. Smale's interest in me since they stood immediately behind me for the rest of the meeting. Again, I wish to thank Mr. Smale for his interest, and I would like to offer my condolences. One who wants to go through life be- lieving without proof that all men (except Progressives, etc.) are at all times motivated by evil in- tentions may indeed find life very difficult. --Al Blumrosen, '53L * * Malan's Fascism . . To the Editor: ONE OF THE MOST crucial is- sues is being discussed in the United Nations. The champions of the so-called free world have con- sistently, since the issue was first brought to the attention of the General Assembly in 1946, refused to condemn South Africa's inhu- mane treatment of its non-white citizens who constitute a clear 75 per cent of the total population. The answers are many and ob- vious. The Imperialist powers have their investments in Africa. As- tralia and New Zealand have "com- mon ties" with the United King- dom and themselves practise dis- criminatory policies. Malan and the Southern Rhodesian Premier, Godfrey Huggins are crusaders for white supremacy and "Christian civilization" on the African con- tinent. The rich deposits of ura- ium, gold, diamond, and other strategic minerals make South Africa a pawn in world politics. Perceiving the advantages of the situation, the South African Pre- mier, in a shrewd move, is wooing the western democracies to help him realize his ambition of creat- ing a vast, slave empire in South- DAILY OFFICIAL BULLETIN (Continued from Page 2) planetarium, if the sky is cloudy. Chil- dren are welcomed, but must be ac- companied by adults. Newman Club is presenting a semi- formal dance entitled "Autumn Noc- turne" on Fri., Oct. 24, from 9 to 12, at St. Mary's Chapel. The very versa- tile Paul McDonough and his band will be featured. Hillel Friday night services at 7!45, sponsored by Pi Lambda Phi fraternity. Followed by a talk by Prof. Frank L. Huntley. ern Africa and upholding the su- periority of the "white race." To save his own skin and win the confidence of his allies, Ma- lan has hastily enacted a law (copied from the Mein Kampf), the Anti-Communist Suppression Act. The naked truth is that we have fascism in South Africa. Malan and his cronies have transplanted the Nazi doctrines there and with the Afrikaner (Boer) and the Eng- lish, given these perfidious theories a new lease on life. The economic, political and so- cial oppression against the non- whites have been going on for the last three centuries. The late Gen- eral Smuts who appears to be re- vered in the western countries is also guilty of undermining democ- racy in South Africa. The United Party (parliamen- tary opposition and the party of late Smuts) is erroneously cred- ited with being the' democratic party. The difference is: Malan is impatient to push the non- whites into ghettos; Strauss pre- fers to do the same thing with less impatience! The non-whites cannot tolerate the existing conditions any longer and they have taken the initiative with or without the aid of the "free-world." Under difficult cir- cumstances, they are defying the "unjust laws." The South African government has resorted to terror- tactics in order to break the pas- sive resistance movement. Mean- while, the "Commandos" who led the "torch parades" against Malan, have refused to support the non- whites. How much confidence the Asian, Arab and other non-white nations will have in the International Or- ganization now meeting at Lake Success, depends on the way the final votes are cast by the western bloc on this issue. - -L. V. Naidoo ' *+ * * SL Elections .. . To the Editor: THE EDITOR of the University of Oklahoma daily. recently went "corruption hunting" in the student body. After decrying the student elections as "rotten, stink- ing and filthy," she found the Stu- dent Senate "fiercely attempting to stifle her." Anyone who wishes to go cor- ruption hunting in the forthcom- ing Student Legislature elections is invited to sign up for ballot box duty on November 18 and/or 19. Sb is particularly looking for volun- teers for morning, noon, and aft- ernoon duty. There will be two others at the ballot box with you so that your corruption hunt won't be as lonely as it will be unprofit- able. Speaking of corruption (I think that's the word for Ned Simon's in- terpretation of campus speakers rulings), it should be pointed out that Peg Nimz' letter was not only amusing, it was more factual than Mr. Simon's. If I remember correctly, politi- cal speakers are supposed to ap- pear on a platform with, or near in time to a speaker of an opposing political party. The Lecture Com- mittee did not suggest that Taft's speech was educational. He was approved on the theory that the audience would present adequate competition for his views. -Leah Marks fffr~lgjt ig l .4 A SL's Open House SL's SPECIAL open house from 4 to 6 p.m. today at their new headquarters at 512 S. State offers the campus an excellent opportunity to meet the 50 legislators and get a picture of many of the important but unheralded activities they perform from day to day. One of the most difficult problems fac- ed by the Legislature is keeping in touch with its electorate. Special reports to house groups and other personnel con- tacts have always been difficult to foster on a consistent basis. Such activities as today's housewarming give students and legislators a chance to get together and talk over campus problems and activities. In addition, many faculty .members and University officials plan to be on hand to tour the new offices and talk with students and SL members. Any students interested in running for the Legislature should especially try to get to the open house. With the deadline for petitions approaching tomorrow, SL needs many more candidates for the Nov- ember elections. To date, more than 35 people have tak- en out petitions for the 23 open posts, but 50 candidates should be the minimum for a successful election. Though the deadline is tomorrow, it does- n't take much time to get the necessary number of signatures for petitions. SL needs 23 hard-working and enthusiastic people in these posts and the many qualified people on campus should seriously consider making the race. Student government is extremely important here and offers opportunities for interesting, vital work. --Harry Lunn CURRENT MOVIES At The State.. . THE WILD HEART, with Jennifer Jones. THIS PICTURE is a spirited but somewhat wandering treatment of an old theme: civilized people cannot assimilate or even tolerate genuine innocence. Jennifer Jones plays a Welsh country girl of the nineteenth century, whose dead moth- er was a gypsy and whose father is a crude rustic. The girl grows up taming small wild animals and studying the superstition-filled notebooks her mother left her. She marries a gentle but not very manly minister who wants only to protect her innocence. Then her passionate nature "POVERTY IN A democracy is as much to be preferred to what is called pros- perity under .despots as freedom is to slav- causes her to run off with the local decay- ing aristocrat, whose cruelty she fears and hates. Her struggle to choose one or the other is the basis of the action. Miss Jones' behavior is symbolically equated throughout the picture with that of the fox in a fox-hunt. The directors pursue this analogy a little too fervidly--in the final scene the heroine is in full flight before a pack of hounds, This tendency to oversimplify things is also present in the development of the char- acters. The minister is almost too good to be true, while the aristocrat is the devil in- carnate. The acting is for the most part good, but one wonders when Miss Jones will be pen- sioned out of the ranks of country-maiden portrayers. The youthfulness of her per- formance in this picture seems a bit forced. -Bob Holloway Sixty-Third Year Edited and managed by students of the University of Michigan under the authority of the Board in Control of Student Publications. Editorial Staff Crawford Young . .. .Managing Editor Cal Samra........... Editorial Director Zander Hollander..... Feature Editor Sid Klaus ......... Associate City Editor Harland Britz.......Associate Editor Donna Hendleman.....Associate Editor Ed Whipple ............Sports Editor John Jenks...Associate Sports Editor Dick Sewell....Associate Sports Editor Lorraine Butler........ Women's Editor Mary Jane Mills, Assoc. Women's Editor Business Staff Al Green........... Business Manager Milt Goetz........ Advertising Manager Diane Johnston...Assoc. Business Mgr. Judy Loehnberg..... Finance Manager Tom Treeger.......Circulation Manager