PAGE FOUR THE MICHIGAN DAILY T UL SDAY ) MA; vCil 24, 1953 U __________________________________ I ____________________________________________________ I Korean War Approaches IT TOOK A "Britisher, Anthony Eden, to tell the American public that there is no immediate way out of the "partial war" in Korea. As it becomes more and morerapparent that Ike's abortive campaign promise to "bring the war to a quick and honorable close" was an empty pledge, it also be- comes more imperative to examine the several approaches to an eventual, long range solution to the Korean war. Briefly, there have been four approaches advanced. They are: an all-out offensive to the Yalu, aid to Chiang Kai-shek for peri- odic raids on the Chinese mainland, a China blockade, and a large-scale buildup of ROK troops for the eventual replacement of Am- erican troops in the front lines. The proposal for a drive to the Yalu, championed by Gen. Van Fleet, is at best a military risk. There is absolutely no as- surance that such a drive would be a mili- tary success. Eisenhower has made it clear that there will not be the extended draft or stricter rotation system which Van Fleet has asked for to carry out such an offensive. Moreover, even if the UN army were strengthened by these measures, there are at least one million Chinese firmly entrenched between UN lines, and the Yalu. It is highly doubtful that a big push now will drive the strong Communi- ist forces from Korea. With such a risk involved, it would be entirely unwarranted to sacrifice 40,000 lives -the estimated loss in such a drive. The "help the cause with Chiang" ap- proach is equally insufficient. For the past year and a half, the former Chinese dicta- tor has directed abortive air and commando attacks on the Chinese mainland, yet failing to divert Chinese forces from Korea. Beyond this, Chiang might embroil the United States in an all-out war with China. And one war is never stopped by spreading it. A blockade of China also portends risks. In international law, a blockade during] peacetime is tantamount to a declaration of war. If the United States did throw a naval blockade around China, Mao Tse- Tung would be legally justified in pioclaim- ing a state of war with the United States, and by terms of Red China's 1950 pact with Russia, in enlisting Russian aid to defend the mainland. In addition, a plan for successful block- ade is based on the assumption that Chi- na receives most of her vital goods frond the West. While this might have been the case a few years ago, the Western em- bargo on strategic materials to Red China now renders this assumption obsolete. At the present time, China receives a large percentage of her materials from Russia via the Sino-Russian railroad network. Obviously, a naval blockade would be useless in stopping this inland trade. Where China depends heavily on North- South coastal trade, nothing short of com- plete mobilization of the U.S. fleet could halt this flow of goods. Throwing out the above approaches, we are left with Eisenhower's original plan of letting "Asians fight Asians." Notwith- standing the distasteful tone of this bit of campaign oratory, the actual policy behind the slogan appears to be the most tenable both politically and militarily. Many expes hold the view that the Rus- sians and Chinese have offered no accept- able solution because the Korean War's continuation is of military advantage to them. This becomes higPly plausible when one realizes that the Russians themselves are not losing men while UN military strength is slowly being depleted. A gradual (withdrawal of American troops would not only mean an end to such a lopsided affair, but would enable the U.S. to maintain stronger land estab- lishments along the Pacific perimeter. In addition, the cold war, at this stage. is largely being conducted with propaganda jabs. The "defeat the Western imperial- ists" Chinese propaganda approach would be rendered, almost meaningless if there were no Westerners directly involved in the Korean war. Presumably, then, the Chinese would be more prone to call a truce in the future if the Korean -war ceases to serve its appar- ently dual purpose of propaganda and sap- ping American military strength. However, such an approach would, by necessity, entail a long-range program. It is estimated that it will take at least two years of concentrated American aid to train and equip ROK forces to the point where they will be able to carry on the war alone. Because this last long-range policy carries with it a minimum risk and a .maximum chance for peace, it appears to be the most plausible and positive approach to the Ko- rean war within political reality. -Alice Bogdonoff Student Art's Festival THIS WEEKEND the Student Art's Fes- tival celebrates the fifth anniversary of the Inter Arts Union. Only a few years have passed since a handful of energetic artists first assembled to try and remedy Ann Ar- bor's lack of student artistic outlet, but in this short time great strides have been tak- en in bringing the problem towards solution. At the time of the first Student Art's Festival, the young creative artist faced a barrier of administrative apathy in the University, a want of organization where- by creators in the various fields could meet and pool their arts, and, most important, a deficiency in audience reaction and public opinion, which provides a critical function necessary to the growth of every young artist. Now five years later the results of the group's hard work is everywhere about us. There exists an organization to facilitate student art. The creative vyriter, previously receiving criticism only in classes, today can see his work published in Generation. Through both the group's efforts and the composition department of the music school, the composer hears his music at a concert. The painter and sculptor exhibit their wares not just to classmates, but to the campus as a whole in the Alumni Hall. The initial nucleus of the Art's Theatre was recruited from the Inter Arts Union. and the anual Festivals have performed student dramatic efforts. A great deal of the recent revival by other campus organ- izations in producing student plays can be attributed to the group's prodding. The dancer also has been benefited, and only the overwhelming irresponsibility of the university towards this art has prevented its further exploitation. Not limiting itself to student art, the IAU's auspices have fayored local pros- ceniums with performances by the New Dance Group, Jose Limon, and with the production of many plays including T.S. Elliot's "Murder in the Cathedral" and Christopher Fry's "Phoenix too Frequent." During these early years the group was perpetuated by a doubleincentive, enthu- siasm from the artist and the audience. The enthusiasm of'the artist still remains. But we, the audience, can easily lapse into com- placency, the death blow to such an organi- zation. Five years ago we supported the group be- cause we too felt the need for contemporary artistic enterprise. Today the Art's The- atre, Generation, music school composer's forums, and the production of student plays by the speech department have partially satisfied this need. But there is much work yet to be done, as shown by this year's Fes tival which will see poets reading their ver- ses, the production of a student opera, per- formances by the dance clubs, and a student play. As in the past there is an art exhi- bition. , These things, however, cannot be taken for granted. If there is no one to watch a dance, hear an opera, see a play, there is no reason for the presentation in the first place. For the artist to reach maturity he demands an audience, and a critical one. No one knows his shortcomings better than the artist; he makes no claim to perfection. He has a claim, a right, to reaction. The responsibility of the community is far greater at the youthful level than at the established, museumized level of, say Hill Auditorium. History lives through art; it is dead on the dusty bookshelf. If we had to choose between the legacies of Napoleon and Beethoven, it is not diffi- cult to see that the choice would be the latter, though the necessity of any choice would be unfortunate. And if there is no audience for new creative art, the very conception of such a choice would be ne- gated. Those works to be presented at the Stu- dent Art's Festival are good. The creators are sincere; their works promise enjoyment not only on the artistic plane, but also the excitement that can only be generated by works just born. They merit attention. And a word to those attending the festival. The performers and creators would like nothing better than meeting you after the perform- ance and receiving your criticisms both fa- vorable and unfavorable. -Donald Harris "Care To Cheek On Some Other Gold Bricks?" ---1 - tette~~4 TO TEDIO ' lop z gti/dTO T HE E DITOR The Daily welcomes communications from its readers on matters of general interest, and will publish all letters which are signed by the writer and in good taste. Letters exceeding 300 words in length, defamatory or libelous letters, and letters which for any reason are not in good taste will be condensed, edited or withheld from publication at the discretion of the editors. MATTER OF FACT By JOSEPH and STEWART ALSOP WASHINGTON-Around the State Department, Charles E. Bohlen is currently called "Jenkins' Ear." It may seem an odd name for President Eisenhower's recently nominated Amnbassador to Moscow, but the historical allusion is apt all the same. Jenkins was the British sea captain whose pickled ear brought on a war between England and Spain. The international situation was pretty tense anyway when the Spanish government, having captured Jenkins and his ship, cropped his ear as punishment for alleged free-booting in Spanish waters. Jenkins saved the ear, salted it and brought it back to London where it was shown in the House of Commons as evidence of the evil deeds of Spain. Sir Robert Walpole, the first Prime Minister of England, did not give a snap of his fingers for Jenkins, and did not want a war. But the ear and the outcry it provoked were too strong for the peace- loving Walpole. War with Spain had to be declared rather shortly. Change the names around, giving Bohlen the role of the salted ear; and you have approximately the story of the relations between Sen. Joseph R. McCarthy and the Eisenhower administration. The nomination of Bohlen as Ambassador to Moscow has transformed what was always a tense situation into a situation of open war. In certain pompous quarters, previous reports of possible trouble between the Eisenhower administration and Sen. Mc- Carthy have been ignorantly dismissed as mere trouble-making. But as these words are written, Secretary of State John Foster Dulles has accused Sen. McCarthy's particular friend and ally, Sen. Pat McCarran, of indulging in untruth. Sen. McCarthy has countered by calling Secretary Dulles a liar, almost in so many words. This is war, and no mistake about it. It is a war that Secretary Dulles and President Eisenhower went to great and perhaps unwise lengths to avoid. When Sen. McCarthy renewed his attack on the State Department immediately after the inauguration, he was not brusquely reminded, as he might have been, that his own party was now running the State Department. Instead, the department, urged on by the White House, made a series of considerable concessions to McCarthy. One of the most important of these concessions was the appoint- ment of R. W. Scott McLeod as State Department Security Officer. McLeod is an ex-FBI operative who has served more recently on the staff of another McCarthy ally, Sen. Styles Bridges. The appointment of McLeod was one item in a sort of concordat that Vice President Richard Nixon attempted to arrange between McCarthy and the ad- ministration. (Besides other quiet, useful work, the Vice President has been making a particular effort to keep the Congressional inquisi- tors in order. In this situation, Secretary Dulles decided to send Bohlen's name to the Senate. The decision was warmly approved by Presi- dent Eisenhower, who is an old friend and golf-partner of the State Department Russian expert. When told of this decision, Bohlen warned the Secretary that some Senators would undoubt- edly object to his role at the Yalta Conference. Bohlen added that he could not,'in honor, do anything but tell the truth about Yalta as he saw it. Thus Dulles had plain warning of the first hurdle-the sharp in- terrogation of Bohlen by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. The hurdle had already been got over, when McCarthy seized upon the Bohlen nomination as the opportunity for a final showdown with the State Department. 'Y i i w m a n u CONC RT '4 A SEMI-FORMAL atmosphere of check- ered tablecloths and beer pervaded the hallowed confines of Hill Auditorium last evening as Arthur Fiedler conducted the Boston Pops Tour Orchestra through as variegated a program as one could imagine by such a combination. Refinement and sub- tlety have never been their forte, but cer- tainly the maximum amount of noise ema- nated from a minimum number of musicians (75, to be exact). Of primary interest to me, who had never seen the Boston Pops Orchestra in person before, was the question of whether it actually sounded the same as it does on recordings and broadcasts, and if so, could this sound be conveyed by the "Tour" Or- chestra, which is obviously a trunjated version of the original. Naturally this problem is too large to solve at face value on first exposure, but I have a few ink- lings. The Boston Pops Tour Orchestra does, once in a while, achieve that char- acteristic sound peculiar to and identifiable with the Boston Pops Orchestra as heard on recordings and broadcasts. So far as I can determine, however, the reasons it does not sound the same all the time are two: (1) the Tour Orchestra is smaller, and (2) I suspect that the Boston Pops Orchestra, as well as others of its ilk, have become as dependent upon the mar- vels of electronic amplification for dynamic effect as have most of the modern crooners. The program was divided into three portions. The first consisted of Berlioz' Rakoczy March, the Overture to "Mignon," by Thom- as, some waltzes from "Der Rosenkavalier," and the. "Espana" Rhapsody by Chabrier. They all received the usual zesty treatment which has come to be expected of there play- ers. A few clues to the mystery of the Bos- ton Pops "sound" were contained in their arrangement of the set of waltzes usually ex- tracted from Richard Strauss' opera "Der Rosenkavalier." These clues consisted main- ly of doublings in the instruments of higher frequencies, such as triangle, bells, piccolo, etc., and emphasis of the lower bass parts. These effects are partly responsible for the brilliance and boom that result. One is led to wonder whether such doublings are not also arbitrarily added to the scores of works composed specifically for this medium. The middle portion of the program was comprised of three more lengthy works; Tchaikovsky's "Italian Caprice." Ravel's "Bolero,"' and the "Hungarian Fantasy" for Piano and Orchestra, which Liszt arranged from his "First Hungarian Rhapsody." Hilde comer gave the piano solo terrific pow- work requires. A slower tempo was often adopted to accomplish the more difficult passages, and some rather wild gesticulations of the arms resulted in erratic rhythmic pat- terns simply because the hands could not be returned to the keyboard fast enough. The orchestral playing of this entire part of the program seemed listless (no pun intended), as if the members bf the orchestra were tired of playing these pieces. The Tchaikovsky fared rather well in spite of this, and emerged as the most substantial music-mak- ing of the evening. After the second intermission the mood brightened up considerably, and an or- chestral ragout of popular songs arranged by Mason caused considerable audience response during its playing, especially with "Alexander's Ragtime Band." The inevitable "Fiddle Faddle" served as tran- sition to two 'martial equines' of the first water; the "Fast Track" Polka by Eduard Strauss and the Ride of the Valkyries from Wagner's "Die Walkure." Amazing- ly enough, they had saved some reserve power for this last, which was overwhelm- ing for sheer intensity of sound. As I left, the audience was applauding-a trombonist for his skill in announcing encores with flash cards. Needless to say, none of the performances could be desribed as definitive. I only regret that I haven't met this organization in its natural habitat, complete with aforemen- tioned atmospheric accoutrements. But even through last night's concert was not a deep musical experience, I must admit it was fun! -Tom Reed Al, Bill &Crl . To the Editor: AM CARL. The same Carl that J. Fred Lawton referred to in his contribution to last Sunday's editorial page. But you wouldn't know me now. I'll start from the beginning. Two days after Mr. Lawton's visit to my engineering office Al left my employ. It seemed that he had won a Nobel Prize and took up the offer of a research position at Princeton. Bill, whom you may also remember, left soon after- wards, having secured a govern- ment position as engineering con-: sultant to the AEC. Very soon afterward I was faced with a problem which required their aid. But they were no long- er there to come when I pushed the familiar buzzer. The problem remained unsolved, my business failed, and the bank from which I had just secured a $100,000 loan took it over. I am in Ann Arbor now, writing this from the kitchen of my old fraternity, which was kind enough to give me a job washing dishes. --Carl * * * The JCP .,. To the Editor: BECAUSE The Daily does not offer a review of the Junior Girl's Play, I feel it my duty to inform the public of its worth this year.has well as stating a few of my own sentiments about the nature of its acceptance . . . in relation to another musical, Un- ion Opera. First a quick review. Being a; bit more than mildly interested in musical comedy, I have taken it about my wallet to see as many Broadway musicals as I could af- ford in New York and sometimes Detroit, and may I most truth- fully say that some of the num- bers in J.G.P. were equally as good, if not better than many top Broadway shows. When one con- considers that the talent is drawn entirely from junior women who came to the University primarily for an education, it becomes an amazement that they can be as polished and professional looking as they were Thursday night at Senior Night. The music is the kind everyone walks out of the theater singing; the plot is no triter than most legitimate shows; and the dancing and solo singers were so good that I didn't have to make one caustic remark. I walked out of J.G.P., however, a little angry, and that was be- cause I began to realize that it doesn't get enough credit. I un- derstand that Union, Opera has a Broadway director come from New York or someplace such and throw the almost budgetless pro- duction together. Granted it is al- ways entertaining to see men dressed as women trying to look like men dressed like women, and granted women dressed as men aren't usually as funny, but might I add that the women aren't try-. DAILY OFFICIAL BULLETIN (Continued from Page 2) Roger Williams Guild. Yoke Fellow- ship meets at 7 am. Trhurs., morning in the Prayer Room of the First Bap- tist Church, followed 'by breakfast to- gether in the Guild House. We are ing to get the kind of laughs that Union Opera gets. I am not trying to belittle Union Opera because I enjoy seeing it; however, I am trying to raise the Junior Girls' Play to an equal footing with Un- ion Opera. Last night J.G.P. was as good as any of the five Union Opera's I've seen. Sue Shafter as the director de- serves the highest of praise as does Sue Nassett as dance direc- tor. In fact, everyone connected with this year's Junior Girls' Play merits about the highest of accla- mations. -Ann Lewis, '53 * -OG * .* G. B. Shaw. . To the Editor: W ELL, I never thought of label- ing myself as one of "Shaw's followers" (Shaw would writhe at such a phrase), but Mr. Huebler's letter of March 19 regarding a movie review, Christianity, and love, did it. Far from being unable to inter- pret Christianity validly because he was not a Christian (to inter- pret Mr. Huebler's lovers' anal- ogy), Shaw's views of this religion have augmented validity to many who value the scope of unfettered mind he has leveled on the sub- ject. As Shaw said, Mr. Huebler, "We used to be told that the people that walked in darkness have seen a great light. When our people see the heavens blazing with suns, they simply keep their eyes shut, and walk on in darkness until they have led us into the pit." -G. T. Shea Rent Hike . .. To the Editor: EXTRAaT FROM the minutes of a recent Kelsey House Council meeting:... "The Univer- sity officials refused to divulge information on the room rent in- crease. It was their contention that this was administrative busi- ness and did not concern the stu- dents." Oh? -Neil Letts Alan Rice i * On M~JcCarthy .. * To the Editor: MUST point out, that in addi- tion to being "smeared" by Communists, Mr. McCarthy has been severly criticized by all the leading liberals of this country, those who believe in the basic American principle of the integ- rity of the individual. It is true that the Communists would love to lower the boom on the senator, it is obvious that their purposes are different from those who cringe at the flagrant misuse of power which disregards the traditional philosophy of democracy. I do not want Communists infiltrating the mechanism of our government and they must be rooted out, but I am just as much opposed to disgrace- ful accusations of those whose pol- icies differ from the Accuser as I am to the Communist menace it- self. Under the pretense of fighting Communist activities, Mr. McCar- thy has repeatedly undermined the principles of democracy that he professes to uphold. Mr. Don Con- verse, in his half hearted attempt to defend the Accuser, shows that he has learned very well the les- sons on how to identify every op- position with "Communists." We want a continuation and ex- tension of American principles where a m'an can oppose his gov- ernment without fear of being in- timidated, even if his views on a I 4 T i Y J a J tS 1f l r S J i McCarthy's pretext is that Boh- len's file contains material that caused the new State Department Security Officer, McLeod, to re- fuse clearance. McCarthy has im- plied that he has heard this story from McLeod himself. This seems to mean that McLeod, whose ap- pointment was supposed to be a peace-preserving act, has already been grossly disloyal to Secretary Dulles. The case also raises, in acute form, at least two major issues. It is understood on the highest authority that the most impor- tant evidence allegedly damag- ing to Bohlen takes the form of anonymous letters. One ques- tion, therefore, is whether the poison pen is to reign supreme among us, with Sen. McCarthy in the role of kingmaker. The other question, of course, is whether President Eisenhower is to be master in his own house, or must yield to the McCarthy- ite Republican wing. a "Target for tonight, John Fos- ter Dulles; target for tomorroww, Dwight D. Eisenhower," is the way one shrewd Capitol Hill observer has summed up the McCarthy op- erational plan. Dulles has been driven to fight back already. The signs are that the President is getting ready to fight back too. (Copyright, 1953, N.Y. Her. Trib., Inc.) The (Congressional) investiga- tions may "drive a few genuine Communists out of their jobs-- and, unless they are scrupulously careful, a few innocents as well. But they can hardly change -he pattern of American education, except to make it more cautious. -The Manchester Guardian Y &lir tP~t.Mn IL Sixty-Third Year Edited and managed by students of the University of Michigan under the authority of the Board in Control of Student Publications. Editorial Staff Crawford Young .....Managing Editor Barnes Cannabie.........City Editor Cal Samra........... Editorial Director Zander Hollander .....Feature Editor Sid Klaus.......Associate City Editor Harland Britz........Associate Editor Donna Hendleman.....Associate Editor Ed Whipple....... .....Sports Editor John Jenks.....Associate Sports Editor Dick Sewell.....Associate Sports Editor Lorraine Butler .. . Women's Editor Mary Jane Mills, Assoc. Women's Editor Don Campbell .... Chief Photographer Business Staff Al Green ..........Business Manager Milt Goetz....... Advertising Manager iane Johnston....Assoc. Business Mgr. Judy Loehnberg.......Finance Manager Harlean Hankin ...Circulation Manager Telephone 23-24-1 Member of The Associated Press The Associated Press is exclusively entitled to the use for republication of all news dispatches credited to it or otherwise credited to this newspaper. All rights of republication of all other matters hereinare also reserved. Entered at the Post Office at Ann Arbor, Michigan, as second-class mail matter. Subscription during regular school year: by carrier, $6.00: by mail $7.00. I~ ON THE Washington MerryGo-Round with DREW PEARSON WASHINGTON -- President Eisenhower solemnly promised Anthony Eden be- fore he departed that the U.S. would con- sult Britain In advance before ordering any atom-bomb attacks from British bases. One of Eden's main purposes in visiting the White House was to get this assurance. ... Prime Minister Churchill instructed Eden to dis- cuss this because he was afraid that, in event of a sudden Russian attack, American atomic bombers would take off for Moscow without informing him. . . . Eisenhower as- Mich., lost out in the bidding for an Air Force contract and went crying to their congressman, Clare Hoffman of Michigan. The congressman promptly ordered his House investigating committee to in- vestigate the air force for refusing to award the contract to his constituents. The Chief of Air Force procurement, Brig. Gen. Walter Bain, was hauled behind closed doors to explain. He pointed out that the contract was for $3,500,000, yet the Fon- tana brothers had made only $156 profit f ,'S wS /, { \ /4 aj i