:xTh J+iiCHIiiC-AN _ _ __ __ __ __ __I__ __ .. _ .r. _.?_... ,:z.t:% C a g C etIIC6ito i/i4e6,blor (Continued from Page 4) ' ossfire' To the Editor: WOULD like to answer Mr. Kircher's questions aboult the editorial written by Jean Vagan concerning "Crossfire , :1 poit, out the foll owin: 1. The accusations against the ,ffollywood screen writers, direc- tors, producers, and actors which were leveled by the Thomas-Ran- kin Committee were made on the basis-that the men were instilling the Communist Party line in their productions, and therefore in their positions in the movie indus- try, were dangerous menaces to the people of the United States. 2. The investigations held by the Un-American Committee have smacked of anti-semitism on more than one occasion. Because of this, it was to be expected that they would find objectionable a film which fights discrimination. 3. R.K.O. fired both Scott and Dmytryk because they had been ifdicted by the Un-American Committee. I am sure that it is evident to all who saw the film that it con- tains nothing un-American, but rather a philosoplfy and credo which is distinctly a part of de- mocracy. -Harriet Likovsky I Arab Partition 'To the Editor: ONE MORE deceived! Mr. El Gamal's letter puts him in the ranks of the poor Arabs who are now "educated" by the "respecta- ble" ex-Grand Mufti. Egypt, Iraq, Trans-Jordan, etc., re facing crises in the Middle East. People are getting idle, masses begin to shout, to strike. Democratic ideas take hold of the population oppressed by a feudal social order. The Pashas must face them. They come to Cairo from Bagdad, sRayad, Amman, Damascus. Yes, they unite to face this troubling situation; and aren't they lucky; he solution is here: War against, the Jews! To make them ready to fight the word "Holy" is added-otherwise the reaction may be weak. Now he masses won't shout against their leaders, asking for freedom; they will shout against the Jews. The Pashas' power will be safe for another few years, and so will be that of the Husseinis inPal- estine. We would also like to mention here that all the members of the Arab Higher Committee have been unanimously elected by one an- other; they, therefore, represent *,. one another. .o If the Jews were happy on the 29th of November, the hearts of Mufti and his cohorts leaped with joy. -Josef Jahr Alfred Rose $ To the Editor: THE LET'ER entitled "No Par- tition," dealing with the Pal- estine situation, and appearing in this column on December 13, con- tamed in its opening paragraph an analogy that was, at first glance, sufficiently striking in its implications to appear to sustain the rest of a typically partisan ar- ticle. Its author was a member of the Arab Club. The analogy to which I refer was to the effect that the varying reactions of, Jew and Arab to the United Nations plan to partition Palestine are similar to the reac- tions of the false and true moth- ers, respectively, in the old story of King Solomon's decision to di- vide a child between two women both claiming to be its mother. The Arab organizations concludes that the intent of the Bible Story is to portray the grief of the real mother and the joy of the false one. But, it must be remembered that the gist of that Bible story is that a true mother's love for her child is sufficiently great that she would rather give up the child than see the child put to unneces- sary pain and suffering. Would the Arab give up even dart of Palestine in order to see leace come to the troubled land, which is holy unto him as unto Christian and Jew? Is it not the Arab who is Avill- ing to see this land, "his child," bathed in blood, and ravished by a loly War, rather than see it safe in another'5 arms? Only the kidnapper wxould rath- er see the child dead than re- turned to those who love it, and to whom it is everything, more dear even than life itself- to those who have no other family. -Matt Margolis To the Editor: PERMIT ME to express my ap- proval of the rightfully indig- nant letter by Mr. El Gamal, which unveils so skillfully the ma- licious perfidy of the Zionists. The Jews, without even having a seat in the Assembly, brazenly solicited the help of a great power to plead their cause in the UN. This cyni- cal effrontry of the worst sort, which breaks every rule of inter- national relations, is looked upon with a mixture of consternation and abhorrence by all civilized na- tions. This is just one of the many in- justices committed by the UN against the Arabs whose only crime was to have opposed the al- lied cause during the last war. Yes, as Mr. El Gamal so well, emphasizes, the Arabs are rising in righteous anger, and let no one be surprised at this. They know how to defend the ground their fathers have squatted on for gen- erations. If they should die for this noble cause, think only this oft them: Inch' Allah! There is some corner of the Middle East that is forever Arab. -Joseph Dresner Add Up? To the Editor: THIS IS MY first save-the- world-letter-to-the-editor. I have just seen "Crossfire." My condition can probably be excused by rememberingthat objectively, blessed objectivity, will return by morning, when this wears off. I am told the director of the picture is out of a job. Ducky. Perhaps the red match Mr. Sig- ler helped light will eventually blossom into a crossfire. Fascinat- ing. Communism, Kim, Crossfire and Christmas. Even a poet prob- ably couldn't make sense out of that. No doubt a Congressman could. Does it add up? I'm afraid it will by morning. -Bob Donaldson * *- * aame no matter w hih way le re- ult; \wei-e obained. The imph lon e aeene 1 t L I I I I ! t e ifl-'ic adverti sed ar,e eclaI~b t,. per ap r tiniem led by hlie Pait I then tuin to 'Pe Daily, rand and these sanm movies adertised :) the Art Cinema League, some- imes in conjunction with a Pdb- ral stident organiaidon. All this prompets me to ask the 'aekground, composition and pur- pose of the Art Cinema League- Even without. having seen one'. I can almost gues:; that there would have to be a good deal of very fine talent represent,-d in these pro- ductions. Only a true work of art would be worthwile using as the background for the emotlional conditioning metuod oi propagan- dizing, which the Soviet realizes is the best way to get liberal think- ers to think in ways they would re- ject if presented "cold." as in a calm discussion of political phil- osophy. I'm not saying they aren't art. I'm not even campaigning to have showings stopped. But if our lib- eral thinkers are to be shown Communist - approved films, I think they should be warned to prepare themselves to withstand a propaganda attack, for I'm sure they don't. go to movies to have their thoughts implanted. James E. Dras G~ar;Iii 11101 To the Editor: ENCLOSED find a few recent Gargoyle publicity clippings published in The Daily which I wish you would reprint for the benefit of those fortunate enough to have missed the Garg Monday. These and some of the printable "spiel" of the Gargoyle peddlers would make excellent copy for a "good" Garg. They're much fun- nier!-so why waste money print- ing the Garg--that is unless 14 full pages, out of a total 32, of ad- vertisements warrant the addi- tional expense. For inspiration I suggest that the Garg staff send for a sub- scription to the Michigan State "Spartan! -Ray Bloh To the Editor: FROM paragraph 6, 2nd column, page 6 of the December issue of Gargoyle, I quote the following: "He who laughs last has found something the censors missed. To paraphrase: "He who laughs at Gargoyle has found something the , editors missed." -Doug Swift IRA Poll To the Editor: ANY people who have been making a fuss about the fact that the student body is behind the IRA principle, but does not back up their action in the case of the barber shops. Act ion and prin- ciple are two friends often separ- ated. But can the separation of ac- tiontion and principle be justified? Can apathy promote anything ex- cept a negative policy? Are we in- terested in perpetuating the nega- tive policies of segregation here by neglect? This is a request for peo- ple to examine their principles and then to circulate them loudly and often. The poll was not, as some put it, a snide attempt of IRA's to use sophistry to prove that the stu- dent body was behind its picket- ing. It was but a further attempt to abolish discrimination by show- ing that the majority of student opinion was against it. This, as the editorial states, may seem like an obvious fact; but obvious facts are as useless if veiled from the people they could affect by an em- Ibarrassed silence. All the people who objected to IRA's picketing have a right to do this. Those who agree with IRA's I f.. principle9, and a great majority,7 Is the polls show. do, and disagree wih the action taken, have a ight a privilege :ud an ever-in, creasing obligation to come down and tell IRA what should be doe with their help. One lives a sort of betrayal day by lay knoiwing that there is dis- crimination and race prejudice and not doing anything about it. Help ycur principles along and help yourself toward a more com- plete life. Think it over during the holidays. Try to evaluate methods we can use to forward our mutual principles. Bring them down to a post-vacation meeting. IRA will certainly be glad to have both you and your ideas. -Arthur Braverman *. * * Music Critic To the Editor: -OR THREE YEARS I have gone my way on this campus, attending concerts, reading The Daily's criticisms, and occasion- ally wondering if the critic and I heard the same music. It never entered my head to write a nasty letter about this state of affairs. Frankly, I don't think the criti- cism of a. concert, per se, has any function to fulfill. Either a person heard the concert, in which case lie has his own opinions, or he didn't in which case he has little interest in the article. Unlike plays or movies, concerts are by their very nature unrepeatable. It is impossible for a musician to re- peat a work twice exactly the same way. Thus, the reader can not use a music column as a guide to action. My point is that I think the re- cent squabble in the letter column is making a fortissimo out of a pianissimo. Let Miss Stern air her views as best she can, if she must. I myself think that Dr. Koussevitsky's addiction to retard mars almost every perfomance, but the performance, under ques- tion, was, on the whole, quite good. No one, Miss Stern, or any one else, can say will ruin my enjoy- ment of the concert. Anyhow, I would rather listen to music than talk about it. -David Segal Union, League To the Editor: WE GO TO school on a big cam- pus in a small town. Conse- quently, all our time is spent on or about this campus. After going to classes during the day, we re- turn to the campus at night for both extra -curricular and purely social activities, One of the more popular social activities on this campus is danc- ing, and on Friday and Saturday ni-'hts th ballrooms of the League and Union :aVO ft iedh\ uili people xxho want to t*-flO : t' eutluc 0f1 danciug' ln'ilit es are a dequnt I aid most ('Oipi' ax tl a guel tif at these affairs . Aniu& er reason that (lcing is so popular is that On Friday, Dee. . a good nany, students had dates to go (dancing, but x'ahen they tried to get into the 1teague or Union ballrooms they ound that boti t he t'ities werd beint used for rivate for al dances.danyh heestdet had been locking forward to this evening fr a long time. and there Was absolutely no place else in this town for these l"ople to dance. I'll admit that xhetheir one does or does not (lance Onl a certain evening does not seem very impor- tant in relation to present-day aworld problems, or even in rela- tion to many other campus issws' It's only a little matter, but it is something that can be very easily provided for, and these little mat- ters all add up to make campus life more pleasant. I don't condemn any of the or- ganizations inxtolved for making use of the League or Union ball- rooms for their orvn parties. They have a perfect right to (10 0. how- evem, I severely c'iticize both the League and Union for alloming their ballaooms to be taken over for private parties on the same night. There ought to be at least one place we can dance during an evening. I sincerely hope that this does not happen again. Again, I repeat, this is only a little matter, but its correction could make life more enoyable. -ihbert E. Elkins eply to A re b ciiib To the Editor: oN ANSWERING the letter of the Arab ClubTe ' I should like to state first of all that this group is i no tay epresentativ' of the Arab people generally. As a matter of fact, the Arab people have never had any repre- sentative form of government. They have been subjugated by a type of totalitarian feudal autoc-' racy that knows no dissent. In orrtoaRintitheler polies of successfully kept the eol i ignorance and illiteracy. In a country so impoverished and pimitive,rthereforenohne bu apelectafew nrhaffortepex- iense of an overseas education. It is from these few who have gained their wealth from the ex..- ploitation of thei' countrymen or from profitable trade with the Jews, that our Arab students here are gathered. They have come to latrn American t cechn ology, not I II at ii mw. en ibring progress to t hen' yountt' but only.vs> that ucy osn muou <-i tii-ni ,' epu'es t is ob .ous, then, th i I the Arab Cub has io interost in Pi o- Inoting the xvlfaire of their couin- try em' people generally. Their mo- tives in opposing partition are the meanest lpo)sile- and are based solely on the fear of the loss of profit 1 hiehi would result Iroin political and indlustm'rial de- velopmnent of the Middle East. S ortumat ely. 11 me wx orld. aware S[ isulved intends to see that .1justice is done. -Irwin R. Veiner-. l' isl ei Re por't To the Editor: SHAME ON THE DAILY for vio- lating its precept of "printing every letter to the Editor received which is signed, 300 words or less in length, and in good tate . . i" Wednesday's threat in this column by Mr. Wagner to commit mayhem was obviously not in good itaste by any stand- ards. Perhaps Mr. Wagner is un- aware of what the consequences of a firearm fired at close range are. Let Ne assure him, as an ex 0.1., that they are unpleasant. I hope The Daily is not breaking a precept IJust because a letter hap- pens to be in support of the tempo of its editorial policy. As to Monday evening's out- burst, it is very gratifying to see that there are many students who believe that our system of gov- ernment is worth defending. This should be the lesson to Messrs. Shaffer, Ellis, and the rest of the Communist supporters-that, rev- olution to overthrow our govern- ment, which seems to be what they work for, will never come as long as the spirit displayed by Monday night's students is kept alive. -T. F. Cartaino. To the Editor: IN HARRIETT FRIEDMAN's story on the "mob" that turned out "to hear" Eisler, as given in The Daily December 16, in at least two instances she has used words in such a way as to give a false impression. In her first sentence she says that the crowd turned out "to welcome" Eisler. Knowing that many people never read beyond the first few lines of a story, she - - ------------ puts iin a phrase lke that early. .he Il mucli too shrewd. I am sure, seriously to suppose that. te ma- ,oiry of the crowd Lund the slight- ist intention of "welcoming" Eis- ler oi' anyone like him. Again, in the first and third paragraphs she contrives a build-up for produc- ing another false impression which she springs in one of the later paragraphs. Paragraph one reads in part: "students, half of them armed with snowballs"; paragraph three continues: "oth- ers, also armed with snowballs id sticks." So having used the wod - "armed" twice with the true addition of "with snowballs," Miss Friedman easily slides over much later in her report (?) to the phrase. "Eisler had . . . seen the armed mob waiting for him." Beiv,- from Chicago, Miss Friedman surely must be aware that such a use of the word "armed" implies, or at least has the connotation, that the mob carried weapons far more effect- ive than mere snowballs or sticks, giving the idea that Eisler was en- dangered by pistols or machine guns. One of the hallmarks of decent reporting is the giving of the truth. Reporting of the type illustrated in this story merely serves to underline again a truth of which most people are aware, but of which they need to remind themselves constantly, and that is that Commtmists and many of their fellow-travelers have no re- gard whatever for the truth. -Warren C. Sledd Iovie Crjdic To the Editor: TN RE REVIEW of Odd Man Out by Gloria Hunter: I imagine that Miss Hunter would not like Moby Dick because it's about whale fishing; and, whale fishing Isn't what it used to be. Honestly, how ridiculous can you get? -Emil Hurtik. Unforgetable Christmas Gift For the Home O R I ENTAL t R UGRS 4 25 to 30% discount { ~on all .pieces N. L. Mangouni 334 S. Fourth Ave.- Phone 6878 1 I .4 7$' ; I SERVING HOURS: 11 A.M.-1:30 P.M. 5-7 P.M. "Known for Good Food" The TAVERN CAFETERIA 336 Maynard Street I A ME HA cob,4n,~L.Art Cinemta To the Editor: w t w i s h I'M NEW HERE. All I know is what I read in the papers. One of "the papers" is the Daily Worker. I read the one in the li- everyone brary periodical room every now and then. The other paper is our own Daily. I read it six days a ER RY CH R IST M AS week. One thing I read is the movie ads. In the Daily Worker veryj a n d few movies are advertised. Almost no Hollywood productions. There must be some sort of selectivity P P Y H O L / D A Y 5 exercised, by the paper, the ad-I vertisers, or both. Having heard of the integration of the Communist Party, I thought to myself that the implications were probably the ok J4a lle 4 2 Y' 16A III_ ! *. Aj 0 I <'1 [JI 71 4: '*1 The Trin is N-O-I... To amplify your wardrobe for the rest of the winter and for spring. New spring woolens are now here, ready for your selection. Place your order NOW for that suit, sports coat, topcoat or overcoat tailored to your measure . . . and be assured of most meticulous needling, most careful attention to details, greater perfection of fit. Your garments will -be ready for you when you want them. have fin! ;v Jj III .-. III S} C , It , A , ./ I lka e to-al d Have Fun! ate(t~ll t > -00011b P .we-. i V- I ae'i III III i